National Trust acquires major stretch of Dorset coastline
THE National Trust has bought a major stretch of the Dorset coastline 'to protect for the nation'.
Its latest acquisition is a 26-hectare strip of coastal grassland in Purbeck.
The site lies between two farms already looked after by the Trust near Swanage, and is the final piece of the jigsaw in a continuous five-mile stretch in the charity's care.
It will be grazed by livestock and provide room for wildlife, including rare wildflowers such as early spider orchids, and butterflies like the Lulworth skipper.
The Trust says it will also improve the area for walkers, including widening the South West Coast Path to make it safer and easier to navigate.
The latest acquisition means almost 900 miles of coastline in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are now protected to the generosity of the UK public, the National Trust has announced.
As a result of new detailed mapping, the charity can reveal that it looks after 896 miles of coast, over 10% of the total coastline of the three countries, on behalf of the nation.
The news comes on the 60th anniversary of the Trust's major coast campaign, Enterprise Neptune, which is one of the longest-running environmental campaigns in Europe, and regarded as among the most successful endeavours in the charity's 130-year history.
Since its inception in 1965 to address the rising threat of overdevelopment of the coast, the campaign has raised over £114m through donations, many of which have been left as gifts in people's wills. Three quarters of the 896 miles cared for by the Trust since its founding in 1895 have been acquired through Enterprise Neptune.
Hilary McGrady, Director-General of the National Trust, said: "This extraordinary coming together of public generosity over 60 years means the UK coast is one of the best protected in the world. To reach 900 miles - or almost! - is testament to everyone who has been part of this enduring campaign.
"Generations of people have left gifts in their wills, or given money in memory of a loved one, or simply wanted to protect a place they love. Every donation has a reason behind it, and together they tell an incredible story about the UK public's affinity with its coastline.
"It's because of this shared endeavour that we can all freely access and enjoy the White Cliffs of Dover, the inlets of Cornwall and the North Antrim coast, and our sandy Pembrokeshire beaches. In fact, it is hard to imagine what our coastline would look like without Neptune.'
Recent acquisitions made by the National Trust include a former coastal golf course in Lincolnshire (2020) and a picturesque stretch of cliffs at Tintagel in Cornwall (2023). Other landmark sites saved include fields atop the White Cliffs of Dover, which were bought after an appeal backed by Dame Vera Lynn in 2017 raised £1m in just a few weeks.
In recent years, the Neptune campaign has focussed on conservation, including responding to the challenges posed by climate change, such as sea level rise and extreme storms. Projects have included a major coastal adaptation scheme on Northey Island in Essex, where the creation of saltmarsh is protecting rare bird habitats from rising sea levels.
However, the Trust continues to acquire areas of coast where it can make a significant contribution to restoring nature and provide access and enjoyment for people.
Hilary continued: "As today's news shows, Neptune is still going strong. In fact, the current threats facing our coastline, such as rising sea levels and more extreme weather events, mean Neptune is needed as much as ever. So if people want to be involved in the next chapter of this historic campaign, we would love to talk to them.'
Enterprise Neptune began in May 1965 when geography professor Dr John Whittow and a group of 33 students and three fellow teachers from Reading University set out to survey the entire coastline of England, Wales and Northern Ireland[3].
With limited technology available, the students trekked around the coast, camping in tents and painstakingly colouring-in hundreds of Ordnance Survey maps. On analysing the data, Dr Whittow found that a third of the total coastline was in pristine condition but in need of protection from encroaching development and overtourism.
The National Trust launched the campaign that same year, acquiring Whiteford Burrows on the Gower Peninsula as its first purchase with Neptune funds. Back then, the site had been earmarked for landfill; today it is one of the best dune systems in Britain, supporting a range of rare and important species.
Eight years later, in 1973, the campaign had reached its original £2m target and had saved over 300 miles of coast.
Some stretches of coastline that were deemed 'beyond redemption' in the 1965 survey have since been bought by the Trust, with several having undergone a remarkable transformation. Stretches of the County Durham coastline (purchased 1988-90), once black with coal waste, are now home to wildflower meadows. The peninsula of Orford Ness in Suffolk (1993) was a military testing ground in the mid-20th century – today it's a thriving nature reserve filled with birds, and most recently, a colony of grey seals.
In 2014, the University of Leicester repeated the original survey – albeit digitally this time – to understand how land along the coast had changed since 1965. The data revealed that of the 3,442 miles of coastline deemed 'pristine' in the original survey, 94% was now protected either by the Trust or by statutory designations.
Sean Fletcher, TV presenter and National Trust Ambassador, said: 'I've visited coastal sites around the globe, and I'm always struck by how the UK's coastline stands shoulder to shoulder with the world's best. The Trust's Neptune campaign to protect our coastline has preserved some wonderful natural gems, which we can all enjoy.'
The charity is encouraging people to donate to its 60-year coastal campaign by going to the webpage www.nationaltrust.org.uk/donate and selecting 'coast'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lammy seeks to ‘deepen' UK-India ties on New Delhi visit
David Lammy will seek to deepen UK-India economic ties as he visits New Delhi this weekend, saying Britain's recently agreed trade deal with the country is 'just the start of our ambitions'. Trade and migration will be at the top of the agenda for the Foreign Secretary's trip, during which he will meet Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and external affairs minister S Jaishankar. The Foreign Office said Mr Lammy would also raise 'the recent escalation in tensions following the Pahalgam terrorist attack, and how the welcomed sustained period of peace can be best supported in the interests of stability in the region'. Pakistan and India agreed to a US-brokered ceasefire last month after rising hostilities between the two nuclear-armed rivals followed a deadly attack on tourists in Pahalgam, Kashmir. Ahead of the visit, Mr Lammy said: 'Signing a free trade agreement is just the start of our ambitions – we're building a modern partnership with India for a new global era. 'We want to go even further to foster an even closer relationship and co-operate when it comes to delivering growth, fostering innovative technology, tackling the climate crisis and delivering our migration priorities, and providing greater security for our people.' The Foreign Office said talks in New Delhi would aim to 'deepen and diversify the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between the two countries'. 'The Foreign Secretary will also welcome progress in our migration partnership, including ongoing work on safeguarding citizens and securing borders in both countries,' it said.


New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
England's High Court Warns Lawyers to Stop Citing Fake A.I.-Generated Cases
The High Court of England and Wales warned lawyers on Friday that they could face criminal prosecution for presenting to judges false material generated by artificial intelligence, after a series of cases cited made-up quotes and rulings that did not exist. In a rare intervention, one of the country's most senior judges said that existing guidance to lawyers had proved 'insufficient to address the misuse of artificial intelligence' and that further steps were urgently needed. The ruling by Victoria Sharp, president of the King's Bench Division of the High Court, and a second judge, Jeremy Johnson, detailed two recent cases in which fake material was used in written legal arguments that were presented in court. In one case, a claimant and his lawyer admitted that A.I. tools had generated 'inaccurate and fictitious' material in a lawsuit against two banks that was dismissed last month. In the other case, which ended in April, a lawyer for a man suing his local council said she could not explain where a series of nonexistent cases in the arguments had come from. Judge Sharp drew the two examples together using rarely exercised powers that were designed to enable the 'court to regulate its own procedures and to enforce duties that lawyers owe.' 'There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused,' she wrote, warning that lawyers could be convicted of a criminal offense or barred from practicing for using false A.I.-generated material. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers
Who owns the news? Much of the Left has been obsessed with the issue for over a century. They have long railed against press barons and their supposed bias. So it is perhaps surprising that this Labour Government is taking such a lackadaisical approach to foreign states having substantial holdings in British newspapers. The last Conservative government back in December 2023 intervened to put on hold and scrutinise the proposed sale of The Telegraph to a company backed by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. Columnists, including Charles Moore, The Telegraph's former editor, rightly argued that even if there was no actual interference in the newspaper's editorial line, there would be the perception that the paper would no longer be independent. This would fatally undermine the newspaper's standing by throwing away its reputation for fearless reporting, whatever the reality of the situation. The then government listened and last year, in the Digital, Media and Competitions Act, introduced a new regulatory regime to restrict foreign state ownership of newspapers and news magazines. But this Act only set out the broad principle, not the details of how it would be implemented. A total ban would come with its own problems. There would be little risk of editorial interference if, say, the sovereign wealth fund of Norway was a passive investor owning 3pc or 4pc in a UK-listed media company. During the consultations, it was proposed that a 5pc limit may be appropriate to allow for such holdings. Last month the new Government announced that the threshold would not be 5pc, but actually 15pc. I and many of my colleagues in the House of Lords have serious misgivings about this much higher limit, but it is one we can live with. However, there is another aspect of the draft regulations which is unacceptable. The 15pc threshold is not cumulative, it applies to each individual holding. This means that there would be nothing to stop multiple states each owning 15pc of a newspaper. It has been reported that after The Telegraph's proposed takeover by RedBird Capital, Sheikh Mansour intends to retain up to a 15pc stake in the newspaper. With the current proposals there would be nothing to stop, say, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain from each taking 15pc holdings. A cumulative 60pc of a British newspaper owned by foreign states is a very different proposition. The guarantees against foreign control would have evaporated. Has this potential scenario arisen as a result of an oversight by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary? Alongside 50 of my fellow peers, I have written to Ms Nandy asking for clarification. Signatories include former chancellor Lord Lamont, former trade secretary Lord Lilley, long-time chairman of the 1922 committee Lord Brady, ex-director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald and the current chairman of Ipso, the independent press regulator, Lord Faulks. Our fears could be easily assuaged by simply amending the proposed regulations to ensure that 15pc is a cap on total foreign ownership. If the move is deliberate, it raises serious questions about this Government's commitment to a free press. The statutory instrument implementing the Government's regulations has now been laid and will shortly come before both Houses of Parliament. If the proposals reach the Lords in their current form, I and many of my colleagues will not be able to support the measure. The Telegraph's ownership has been left in limbo for two years so far. It is time for the new regulatory framework to be put in place that will allow its smooth transfer to new owners. But this must be done in a way that entrenches the traditional freedoms of our press. The issues are much wider than the future of just one newspaper. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.