How proposed federal SNAP cuts would harm New Hampshire
Right now, the federal government pays for 100 percent of the state's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, formerly known as 'food stamps' – $154 million in fiscal year 2024, according to the
Get N.H. Morning Report
A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox.
Enter Email
Sign Up
People with low income who are eligible get a benefits card, and they can use money loaded onto the card toward the cost of groceries each month.
The bill would require states to pay 5 percent to 25 percent of those benefits, and states that made more errors, such as overpayments or underpayments, would have to pay a higher percentage.
Advertisement
In 2023, New Hampshire's error rate was 12.53, according to the
But Laura Milliken, executive director at New Hampshire Hunger Solutions, said it's very unlikely New Hampshire would be able to come up with that kind of money.
'There's no question that there would be cuts,' she said.
Milliken's organization estimates that tens of thousands of Granite Staters would lose access to SNAP if the federal proposal is approved.
The federal spending bill would also require states to pay 75 percent of the administrative costs of SNAP, up from 50 percent. In 2023, the overall cost of administering SNAP in New Hampshire was $22 million, according to the
'It's just so disturbing at a time when the cost of living is squeezing us all,' Milliken said of the proposed federal cuts. 'SNAP has been our country's first line of defense against hunger for 60 years. We should be strengthening those programs, not taking them away.'
This article first appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, our free newsletter focused on the news you need to know about New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles from other places. If you'd like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday,
Amanda Gokee can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Ayotte's approval dips; majorities opposed to budget cuts to universities, DHHS
Gov. Kelly Ayotte at a ceremony celebrating the signature of housing-related bills in Manchester, Aug. 21, 2025. (Photo by Ethan DeWitt/New Hampshire Bulletin) Gov. Kelly Ayotte's approval rating has dipped in recent months, according to a new survey from the University of New Hampshire, with almost equal percentages of Granite Staters approving and disapproving of her performance. That same survey found that majorities of respondents disapproved of some actions by the Republican-led Legislature this term — such as cuts to the University System of New Hampshire and the Department of Health and Human Services — though the moves are popular among Republicans. According to the survey, conducted between Aug. 14 and Aug. 18, 47% of respondents approved of Ayotte's performance in office and 46% disapproved. The results suggest that Granite Staters' longstanding tradition of giving bipartisan support to its governors may be fading, with Ayotte's approval ratings hewing much closer to party breakdowns. Of those who approve, 15% said it was because of Ayotte's handling of education — the highest percentage for any category, followed by 14% who said it was because her handling of immigration, 12% who pointed to her handling of LGBTQ+ issues, and 11% who said it was because of her handling of the state budget and state finances. Of those that disapproved, a plurality, 29%, did so because of her handling of education, 16% cited her handling of LBGTQ+ issues, and 11% said it was because of her support for President Donald Trump. The survey did not ask respondents about specific actions taken by Ayotte in any of those areas. But Ayotte has signed bills removing 'sanctuary cities' and requiring law enforcement cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, establishing a 'parental bill of rights' in public schools, banning gender-affirming medication and surgeries for minors, and making education freedom accounts available to students of all income levels. The results show a drop in the governor's overall approval rating, which was 53% in June, and an increase in her disapproval rating, up from 34% in February. Those changes have happened as more Granite Staters appear to have made up their minds about the governor: The percentage of respondents who did not know whether they support or oppose Ayotte has dropped from 15% to 7%. Ayotte's razor-thin approval ratings are a contrast to the last Republican governor, Chris Sununu, who maintained approval ratings between 50% and70% throughout his four terms. Former Gov. Maggie Hassan had an approval rating of 55 percent in February 2015, her last term in office. The UNH survey also found that several of Republican lawmakers' accomplishments this year do not have a majority of support in the state. The Legislature's move to cut $51 million from the Department of Health and Human Services in the budget — one opposed by Ayotte — was supported by 26% of respondents, with 62% of respondents opposed. The two-year, $29 million funding cut to the University System of New Hampshire in New Hampshire, is also not popular, with 53% of respondents opposing it, 34% supporting it, and 12% neutral. Respondents narrowly opposed a bill that allows landlords to end leases at the end of the lease period and initiate eviction proceedings against those who don't leave, without needing to point to a specific reason. In the survey, 42% of respondents supported that law and 48% opposed it. And the elimination of state motor vehicle inspections in the bill is nearly evenly split among respondents: 44% support it while 45% oppose it. In each of those issues, Democratic respondents were strongly opposed while Republican respondents were in support. Some of the legislation that passed this year was more popular. Overall, 49% approved a new law allowing cities and towns to create 'social districts' where adults 21 and older can purchase alcohol from licensed establishments and consume in public, with 30% opposed and 19% neutral. And one of Ayotte's biggest priorities, requiring public schools to create a 'bell-to-bell' ban on cell phones in schools, has high support, with 71% supportive, 18% opposed, and 11% neutral. Even on that issue, there were differences between parties. Among Democrats, 56% approved of that law, while 89% of Republicans did. Solve the daily Crossword
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
SNAP Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Snap Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Snap Inc. ('Snap' or 'the Company') (NYSE: SNAP) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors who purchased the Company's securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), are encouraged to contact the firm before October 20, 2025. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Snap concealed the true state of its advertising growth rate from investors. The Company's growth rate fell between quarters from 9% to just 1% due to its execution failure. The Company blamed its advertising slowdown on 'an issue related to our ad platform, the timing of Ramadan and the effects of the de minimis changes. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Snap, investors suffered damages. Join the case to recover your losses The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.
Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Visually impaired voters sue New Hampshire over changes to absentee ballot access
Under the new rules imposed by SB 287, voters will be required to either bring a photo ID to their local election officials to request an absentee ballot in person, or submit a copy of their ID or a notarized signature along with their application. Advertisement While proponents said the legislation will better protect election integrity, critics said the changes will add barriers that disproportionately impact seniors, voters with disabilities, and those living in rural parts of the state. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Under the existing law, a voter who is already registered can fill out an absentee ballot The plaintiffs, who are already registered to vote, contend that people with disabilities are especially likely to rely on absentee voting, and the newly added logistical hurdles in the absentee process will effectively deter those who are blind or have severe vision impairment from participating in the democratic process at all, even after they have successfully registered. Advertisement 'Voters cannot simply provide this information once — they must do so repeatedly for each local, primary, and general election in which they wish to vote absentee,' the lawsuit states. The plaintiffs are represented by attorneys from the McLane Middleton law firm, based in Manchester, N.H., and the Elias Law Group, based in Washington, D.C., which The potential for a lawsuit on this topic from the Elias Law Group sparked a political uproar last week, when Republicans mounted a pressure campaign and In email messages to several individuals earlier this month, Liot Hill wrote that SB 287 'will make it harder for people to vote,' and she asked individuals if they would be willing to speak with an Elias Law Group attorney, who was copied on the messages. It was not immediately clear whether any of the three plaintiffs are participating in this case as a result of Liot Hill's introductions. McLane Middleton attorney Steven J. Dutton declined to comment, and the Elias Law Group attorneys did not respond to a request for comment. Even before this new law, New Hampshire already had stricter absentee ballot rules than its neighbors. Massachusetts, Maine, and Rhode Island allow Advertisement Despite the existing restrictions, nearly 100,000 voters cast absentee ballots in New Hampshire's 2024 general election, according to data Nationwide, roughly The legislative change in New Hampshire, where Republicans currently hold a trifecta in state government, comes as President Trump pushes to The lawsuit in New Hampshire alleges the state's constitution guarantees voting rights and tolerates restrictions only when the state offers a specific and sufficient justification. 'There is no state interest that is 'sufficiently weighty' to justify the substantial burdens that SB 287 places on the right to vote,' the lawsuit states. Assistant Attorney General Christopher G. Bond, a spokesperson for the New Hampshire Department of Justice, said the DOJ will review the lawsuit and respond as appropriate in court. Advertisement The changes adopted as part of SB 287 are separate from those in Senate Bill 218, which will require that absentee voters submit proof of their citizenship, age, domicile, and identity in order to qualify to vote. (Republican Governor Kelly A. Ayotte signed both pieces of legislation into law These changes come after the state adopted tighter voter ID rules last year, including a strict Representative Ross Berry, a Republican from Weare who chairs the New Hampshire House Election Law Committee, has said the rules governing access to absentee ballots should be as close as possible to the rules governing access to the voting booth, and he praised SB 218 as ' Steven Porter can be reached at
