Russia is responsible for downing MH17 over Ukraine in 2014, global aviation agency's council finds
The International Court of Justice wasn't an option, because Russia doesn't recognize The Hague, Netherlands-based court's jurisdiction.
Advertisement
Council finds that Russia violated the Chicago Convention
The council found that Russia had violated the Convention on International Civil Aviation, known as the Chicago Convention, which requires that states 'refrain from resorting to the use of weapons against civil aircraft in flight.'
It's the first time that the council, which represents 193 member states, has decided a dispute between governments.
Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said that the council would consider the question of reparations within weeks.
'In that context, the Netherlands and Australia are requesting that the ICAO Council order the Russian Federation to enter into negotiations with the Netherlands and Australia, and that the Council facilitate this process,' Veldkamp said in a statement.
'The latter is important in order to ensure that the negotiations are conducted in good faith and according to specific timelines, and that they will yield actual results,' he added.
Advertisement
Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong urged the council to move swiftly to 'determine remedies.'
'We call on Russia to finally face up to its responsibility for its horrific act of violence and make reparations for its egregious conduct, as required under international law,' Wong said in a statement.
Russian Embassy doesn't respond
The Russian Embassy in Australia didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.
Australian National University international law expert Don Rothwell said that the council had yet to publish the reasons for its decisions.
'One of the consequences for this process will be that the council will probably make some recommendations that Russia pay what are called reparations, which is an international term for damages, as a result of its violation of international law,' Rothwell said.
'So we have to wait and see exactly what the council finds on that particular point,' Rothwell added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
20 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.
Ukraine's drone strikes deep into Russia delivered a humiliating blow to Moscow last weekend. Kyiv's defenders celebrated the attack as a triumph of modern warfare and a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin. But the extraordinary operation got a different response inside the White House: anger. Donald Trump has openly vented in recent weeks about Putin's unwillingness to end the war. But since Sunday's attack, which hit a series of Russian military airfields, the president has privately expressed frustration that the strike could escalate the conflict, according to three administration officials and an outside adviser to the White House. (They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.) These sources told me that the drone strike has reignited the president's long-held displeasure with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and prompted a new debate in the White House about whether the United States should abandon Ukraine. Throughout the war, Trump has deemed Zelensky a 'bad guy' and a 'hothead,' the outside adviser said—someone who could be pushing the globe toward World War III. Trump privately echoed a right-wing talking point this week by criticizing Zelensky for supposedly showboating after the drone attacks; according to the adviser, Trump was impressed with the audacity of the strikes but believes that Zelensky's focus should have been on Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul. Trump spoke with Putin yesterday, and, in a readout of the call on Truth Social, the U.S. president relayed the Kremlin's plans to strike back against Ukraine. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin against retaliating, and two of the administration officials told me that he has not decided on his next steps. Officials have presented him with options that include sanctioning Russia and reducing American aid to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump told aides this week that he does not believe a summit with him, Zelensky, and Putin—which he once hoped would be a way to bring the war to a close—will happen any time soon, one of the administration officials told me. Trump, who on the campaign trail last year vowed to end the war within his first 24 hours in office, made a renewed push for a peace deal last month. While Zelensky agreed to an immediate cease-fire, Putin rejected the offer and ratcheted up his bombing of Ukrainian cities. That led Trump to threaten to walk away from peace talks, and to flash some rare ire at Putin. The president had hoped that some progress would be made in this week's talks in Turkey, but the meeting was overshadowed by the drone strikes and went nowhere. The White House has said that the U.S. was not told in advance about the surprise attack, which was carried out by drones hidden across five of Russia's time zones that hit nuclear-capable bombers and inflicted billions of dollars in damage, according to a preliminary estimate from the White House. Steve Bannon and other influential MAGA voices have berated Ukraine for the attack and are attempting to push Washington further from Kyiv. On his podcast this week, Bannon blamed Ukraine for, in his view, sabotaging peace talks while potentially provoking a massive response from Russia. 'Zelensky didn't give the president of the United States a heads-up to say he's going to do a deep strike into strategic forces of Russia, which is going up the escalatory ladder as quickly as you can, on the day before your meeting in Turkey?' Bannon said. 'On the eve of peace talks or cease-fire talks, he takes the Japanese role in Pearl Harbor—the sneak attack.' Bannon has conveyed similar messages to senior West Wing advisers, a fourth administration official told me. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine envoy, warned on Fox News that 'the risk levels are going way up' because the drones struck part of Russia's 'national survival system'—its nuclear program—potentially pushing Moscow to retaliate in significant ways. Trump has not increased aid to Ukraine since taking office again in January, and he has yet to endorse a bipartisan Senate push, led by his ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, to impose harsh economic penalties against Russia and countries that do business with it. There have been other recent signs that the White House is distancing itself from Ukraine, too. Yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not attend a meeting of 50 defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels. In the past, the meeting has been an important venue for coordinating military aid for Ukraine. Hegseth was the first U.S. defense secretary to skip the event in three years. The Pentagon cited scheduling issues for his absence. When I asked a White House spokesperson for comment about the drone strikes, she pointed me to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's briefing-room remarks on Tuesday, when Leavitt said that Trump 'wants this war to end at the negotiating table, and he has made that clear to both leaders, both publicly and privately.' In public remarks about the strikes, Putin downplayed the chances of a cease-fire, asking, 'Who has negotiations with terrorists?' But Zelensky told reporters that the operation over the weekend, code-named Spider's Web, would not have been carried out if Putin had agreed to a U.S.-proposed truce. 'If there had been a cease-fire, would the operation have taken place?' Zelensky asked. 'No.' Exasperated with the conflict, Trump continues to muse about walking away from any sort of diplomatic solution. In his Truth Social post about his call with Putin, the president seemed eager to change the subject to focus on ending a different international crisis. 'We also discussed Iran,' Trump wrote about ongoing talks regarding Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.'
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Watch live: Trump, German chancellor hold bilateral meeting
President Trump and newly minted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will meet Thursday at the White House with the conversation likely to center on foreign and trade policy. The visit between Trump and Merz comes as the European Union is in talks with U.S. officials on a potential trade deal — and after the president's 50 percent tariff on steel and aluminum imports went into effect. Merz has also been a strong defender of Ukraine amid its war with Russia. Trump too has aired frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks as ceasefire talks have been unfruitful. The president also issued a new travel ban on Wednesday that will affect 19 countries starting next week, including 12 countries with full bans and seven with restrictions. The event is scheduled to begin at 11:45 a.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.
CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
Palantir CEO Karp says AI is dangerous and 'either we win or China will win'
Palantir CEO Alex Karp said the artificial intelligence arms race between the U.S. and China will culminate in one country coming out on top. "My general bias on AI is it is dangerous," Karp told CNBC's "Squawk on the Street" on Thursday. "There are positive and negative consequences, and either we win or China will win." Karp has been a vocal advocate for U.S AI dominance. He told CNBC in January that the country needs to "run harder, run faster" in an "all-country effort" to develop more advanced AI models. In a recent letter to shareholders, he also touted Palantir's commitment to equipping and enhancing U.S. defense interests. The billionaire tech CEO said Thursday that the U.S. currently has a leg up in the AI race and Palantir is leading the way in making companies more secure and efficient with its tools. "There is no economy in the world with this kind of corporate leadership which is willing to pivot, which understands technologies, which is willing to look at new things, but also has deep domain expertise," he said. "Our allies in the West, in Europe, are going to have to learn from us." Shares of the Denver-based data analytics and AI software firm outperformed in 2024 and have continued their ascent in 2025 as investors bet on their software and work with key government contractors and agencies. The stock is up 74% this year, but investors have to shell out on a higher earnings multiple than its tech peers. "You don't like the price, exit," Karp said on Thursday in response. Karp also asserted that the company is "not surveilling Americans" in response to recent New York Times report that Palantir is helping the Trump administration gather data on Americans.
