Satellite Photos Over North Korea Reveal Kim's Partially Sunken New Warship
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
New satellite imagery offers a detailed look at the North Korean destroyer damaged in a failed launch that infuriated Kim Jong Un, who was present during the incident.
The 5,000-ton warship appears to be keeled over, stuck on a slideway in the northeast city of Chongjin, and may be partially submerged, analysts say.
An image captured on May 12, 2025, by U.S. commercial satellite company Planet shows North Korea's new navy destroyer prior to its attempted launch on May 21 at Hambuk Shipyard in the northern port city...
An image captured on May 12, 2025, by U.S. commercial satellite company Planet shows North Korea's new navy destroyer prior to its attempted launch on May 21 at Hambuk Shipyard in the northern port city of Chongjin. More
Planet Labs PBC
Why It Matters
The destroyer is the second to be constructed following the launch of the Cho Hyon, which North Korea unveiled with much acclaim in late April and which has since begun weapons systems testing.
The Kim regime has stepped up efforts to modernize its armed forces, including its United Nations-sanctioned nuclear weapons program and ballistic missile fleet, citing "provocations" by the U.S. and Washington's South Korean and Japanese allies.
Newsweek reached out to the North Korean embassy in Beijing by email with a request for comment.
Drag slider
compare photos
What To Know
During Thursday's launch, the bottom of the destroyer's hull was pierced after a transport cradle beneath the stern section slid off and became stuck, according to the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).
Images supplied to Newsweek by U.S. commercial satellite firm Planet confirmed the ship was resting in an awkward position at Chongjin's Hambuk Shipyard Thursday, partially covered by blue tarpaulins to mask the damage.
A higher-definition image captured by Germany-based Airbus Defence and Space shows the vessel listing heavily to starboard.
North Korea's latest naval destroyer has been significantly damaged prior to its launch. In a rare acknowledgment, North Korea's state news agency KCNA reported yesterday an incident occurred with a new destroyer in Chongjin, which was close to being launched. pic.twitter.com/0PfuqehYnF — Open Source Centre (@osc_london) May 22, 2025
"Vessel now covered, but angle consistent with reporting bow got stuck on slideway. It is likely the vessel may be on its side or at least partially submerged," Joseph Dempsey, research associate for defense and military analysis at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, wrote on X (formerly Twitter).
"North Korea's admission of failure is rare but would have likely been undeniable once satellite imagery revealed the extent of the 'serious accident,'" he added.
What People Are Saying
The Korean Central News Agency reported: "Respected Comrade Kim Jong Un made a stern assessment, saying that it was a serious accident and criminal act caused by sheer carelessness, irresponsibility and unscientific empiricism which should never occur and could not be tolerated."
Sidharth Kaushal, Senior Research Fellow at London-based Royal United Services Institute think tank, was quoted by X account Open Source Centre as saying: "The Choe Hyon class represents North Korea's most ambitious naval project to date and its construction was a departure from practice for a navy historically focused on its littorals."
What Happens Next
Kim called for the destroyer to be restored as soon as possible, setting a deadline for completion ahead of the key June meeting of the Workers' Party of Korea's Central Committee, according to KCNA. He stressed that the issue was not only a practical one but also a political matter tied to state prestige.
In a speech delivered in late April, the leader announced plans to begin construction of additional warships in 2026, including a cruiser and various escort vessels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
22 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Australia will recognize a Palestinian state, Prime Minister Albanese says
WELLINGTON, New Zealand — Australia will recognize a Palestinian state, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Monday, joining the leaders of France, Britain and Canada in signaling they would do so. His remarks followed weeks of urging from within his Cabinet and from many in Australia to recognize a Palestinian state and amid growing criticism from officials in his government over suffering in Gaza, which Albanese on Monday referred to as a 'humanitarian catastrophe.' Australia's government has also criticized plans announced in recent days by Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu for a sweeping new military offensive in Gaza. Albanese told reporters after a Cabinet meeting Monday that Australia's decision to recognize a Palestinian state will be formalized at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The acknowledgement was 'predicated on commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority,' Albanese said. Those commitments included no role for Hamas in a Palestinian government, demilitarization of Gaza and the holding of elections, he said. 'A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza,' Albanese said. 'The situation in Gaza has gone beyond the world's worst fears,' he said. 'The Israeli government continues to defy international law and deny sufficient aid, food and water to desperate people, including children.' Ahead of Albanese's announcement, Netanyahu on Sunday criticized Australia and other European countries that have moved to recognize a Palestinian state. 'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole ... this canard, is disappointing and I think it's actually shameful,' the Israeli leader said. Australia has designated Hamas a terrorist entity and Albanese repeated Monday his government's calls for the group to return Israeli hostages held since Oct. 7, 2023. The Australian leader last week spoke to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, whose authority administers parts of the occupied West Bank, supports a two-state solution and cooperates with Israel on security matters. Abbas has agreed to conditions with Western leaders, including Albanese, as they prepared to recognize a Palestinian state. 'This is an opportunity to deliver self-determination for the people of Palestine in a way that isolates Hamas, disarms it and drives it out of the region once and for all,' Albanese said. He added that Hamas did not support a two-state solution. Nearly 150 of the 193 members of the United Nations have already recognized Palestinian statehood, most of them decades ago. The United States and other Western powers have held off, saying Palestinian statehood should be part of a final agreement resolving the decades-old Middle East conflict. Recognition announcements are largely symbolic and are rejected by Israel, and by the United States — the only country with any real leverage over Netanyahu. Israel's leader said this month that he would not accept Palestinian Authority involvement in a government for Palestine. A two-state solution would see a state of Palestine created alongside Israel in most or all of the occupied West Bank, the war-ravaged Gaza Strip and annexed east Jerusalem, territories Israel seized in the 1967 Mideast war that the Palestinians want for their state. Albanese dismissed suggestions Monday that the move was solely symbolic. 'This is a practical contribution towards building momentum,' he said. 'This is not Australia acting alone.' Albanese had discussed Australia's decision with the leaders of Britain, France, New Zealand and Japan, he said. He also had a 'long discussion' with Netanyahu this month, he added. In neighboring New Zealand, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said Monday his government 'will carefully weigh up its position' on recognizing a Palestinian state before making a formal decision in September. 'New Zealand has been clear for some time that our recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of when, not if,' Peters said in a statement. After Albanese's announcement Monday, Israel's envoy to Australia said the move undermined Israel's security. 'By recognising a Palestinian state now, Australia elevates the position of Hamas, a group it acknowledges as a terrorist organisation,' Amir Maimon posted to X. 'This commitment removes any incentive or diplomatic pressure for the Palestinians to do the things that have always stood in the way of ending the conflict,' spokesperson for the Executive Council of the Australian Jewry Alex Ryvchin said in a statement. Meanwhile, President of the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network Nasser Mashni decried Albanese's recognition as too late and 'completely meaningless' while the country continues to trade with Israel. He told reporters in Melbourne on Monday that the move would do nothing to end the 'ongoing genocide in Gaza which has been live streamed for the entire world for two years.' Graham-McLay writes for the Associated Press.
Los Angeles Times
22 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Explosion at U.S. Steel plant in Pennsylvania leaves dozens hurt and people trapped under rubble
CLAIRTON, Pa. — An explosion Monday at a U.S. Steel plant near Pittsburgh has left dozens injured or trapped under the rubble, with emergency workers on site trying to rescue them, officials said. There are no confirmed fatalities at the Clairton Coke Works, said Abigail Gardner, director of communications for Allegheny County. The explosion sent black smoke spiralling into the midday sky in the Monongahela Valley, a region synonymous with the state for more than a century. The Allegheny County Emergency Services said a fire at the plant started around 10:51 a.m. and that it has transported five people. The agency did not provide any more details on those people transported and would only say it was an 'active scene.' The plant, a massive industrial facility along the Monongahela River south of Pittsburgh, is considered the largest coking operation in North America and is one of four major U.S. Steel plants in Pennsylvania that employ several thousand workers. Democratic Sen. John Fetterman, who formerly served as the mayor of nearby Braddock, called the explosion 'absolutely tragic' and vowed to support steelworkers in the aftermath. 'I grieve for these families,' Fetterman said. 'I stand with the steelworkers.' In June, U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel announced they had finalized a 'historic partnership,' a deal that gives the U.S. government a say in some matters and comes a year and a half after the Japanese company first proposed its nearly $15 billion buyout of the iconic American steelmaker. The pursuit by Nippon Steel for the Pittsburgh-based company was buffeted by national security concerns and presidential politics in a premier battleground state, dragging out the transaction for more than a year after U.S. Steel shareholders approved it. In February, a problem with a battery at the plant led to a 'buildup of combustible material' that ignited, causing an audible 'boom,' the Allegheny County Health Department said. Two workers who got material in their eyes received first aid treatment at a local hospital but were not seriously injured. In recent years, the Clairton plant has been dogged by concerns about pollution. In 2019, it agreed to settle a 2017 lawsuit for $8.5 million. Under the settlement, the company agreed to spend $6.5 million to reduce soot emissions and noxious odors from the Clairton coke-making facility. The company also faced other lawsuits over pollution from the Clairton facility, including ones accusing the company of violating clean air laws after a 2018 fire damaged the facility's sulfur pollution controls. Clairton Mayor Richard Lattanzi said his heart goes out to the victims of the explosion. 'The mill is such a big part of Clairton,' he said. 'It's just a sad day for Clairton.' Levy, Casey and Whittle write for the Associated Press. Levy reported from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Casey reported from Boston and Whittle reported from Portland, Maine. AP reporters Holly Ramer in Concord, N.H., and Beatrice Dupuy in New York City contributed to this report.
Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Chip Revenue Deal Comes Under Scrutiny
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. American chipmakers Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices have agreed to give 15 percent of revenue from certain artificial intelligence chip sales in China to the U.S. government as a condition of obtaining export licenses. The arrangement ties government permission to a revenue-sharing requirement, prompting questions about constitutionality and the purpose of export controls amid a high-stakes rivalry with China for AI computing capacity. Newsweek contacted the White House for more information on the deal via email. Why it Matters The deal alters a long-standing norm that U.S. export controls serve national security ends rather than revenue generation, potentially setting a precedent for monetizing access to foreign markets and complicating the legal framework governing exports. Critics have flagged legal issues, citing the Constitution's prohibition on export taxes and arguing that the arrangement blurs the line over national security controls. What To Know Nvidia and AMD had sought licenses to resume sales of high-performance AI chips to Chinese customers after previous restrictions had limited exports, with the chips named as Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308. However, the White House gave Nvidia the all-clear in July to resume sales with China. Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang said on July 14 the U.S. government had assured him it would restore the licenses to sell H20s in China. "General purpose, open-source research and foundation models are the backbone of AI innovation," said Huang. "We believe that every civil model should run best on the U.S. technology stack, encouraging nations worldwide to choose America." President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office on August 07, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office on August 07, 2025 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Now though, the all clear has been revealed to be conditional on the U.S. receiving 15 percent of the revenue from sales of artificial intelligence chips in China, according to reports from the Washington Post. Legal experts and former officials said the deal was highly unusual and could invite judicial challenges or congressional oversight. Peter Harrell, the White House's senior director for international economics under the Biden administration, said on social media: "In addition to the policy problems with just charging Nvidia and AMD a 15 percent share of revenues to sell advanced chips in China, the US Constitution flatly forbids export taxes. "In addition to the Constitution, 50 USC 4815(c) expressly prohibits fees for export control licenses. 'Fees-No fee may be charged in connection with the submission, processing, or consideration of any application for a license...' This is from the 2018 Export Control Reform Act." What People Are Saying Stephen Olson, former U.S. trade negotiator, told Bloomberg: "What we are seeing is in effect the monetization of US trade policy in which US companies must pay the US government for permission to export. If that's the case, we've entered into a new and dangerous world." A spokesperson for Nvidia, quoted in The Washington Post on Aug. 10, 2025, said: "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets. While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide." Alexandra Mousavizadeh, CEO of Evident and creator of the Global AI Index, previously told Newsweek that there were two different approaches to China's AI development: "You can continue to try and contain access to chips and close the walls off. While you're doing that, you're doubling down on investment into data infrastructure, supporting the development of AI in the U.S. and being first in that race, "Or you open up completely and you say, 'Look, it's to the benefit of all that everyone has access to everything, because the collaboration between Europe, the U.S. and China in the past has been what has led to the ability to get to where we are today.' What Happens Next The arrangement could prompt legal action from those arguing the revenue-sharing arrangement functions as an impermissible export tax, while Congress could open hearings to examine the administration's role and the terms of the licenses.
