Explosion at U.S. Steel plant in Pennsylvania leaves dozens hurt and people trapped under rubble
There are no confirmed fatalities at the Clairton Coke Works, said Abigail Gardner, director of communications for Allegheny County. The explosion sent black smoke spiralling into the midday sky in the Monongahela Valley, a region synonymous with the state for more than a century.
The Allegheny County Emergency Services said a fire at the plant started around 10:51 a.m. and that it has transported five people. The agency did not provide any more details on those people transported and would only say it was an 'active scene.'
The plant, a massive industrial facility along the Monongahela River south of Pittsburgh, is considered the largest coking operation in North America and is one of four major U.S. Steel plants in Pennsylvania that employ several thousand workers.
Democratic Sen. John Fetterman, who formerly served as the mayor of nearby Braddock, called the explosion 'absolutely tragic' and vowed to support steelworkers in the aftermath.
'I grieve for these families,' Fetterman said. 'I stand with the steelworkers.'
In June, U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel announced they had finalized a 'historic partnership,' a deal that gives the U.S. government a say in some matters and comes a year and a half after the Japanese company first proposed its nearly $15 billion buyout of the iconic American steelmaker.
The pursuit by Nippon Steel for the Pittsburgh-based company was buffeted by national security concerns and presidential politics in a premier battleground state, dragging out the transaction for more than a year after U.S. Steel shareholders approved it.
In February, a problem with a battery at the plant led to a 'buildup of combustible material' that ignited, causing an audible 'boom,' the Allegheny County Health Department said. Two workers who got material in their eyes received first aid treatment at a local hospital but were not seriously injured.
In recent years, the Clairton plant has been dogged by concerns about pollution. In 2019, it agreed to settle a 2017 lawsuit for $8.5 million. Under the settlement, the company agreed to spend $6.5 million to reduce soot emissions and noxious odors from the Clairton coke-making facility.
The company also faced other lawsuits over pollution from the Clairton facility, including ones accusing the company of violating clean air laws after a 2018 fire damaged the facility's sulfur pollution controls.
Clairton Mayor Richard Lattanzi said his heart goes out to the victims of the explosion.
'The mill is such a big part of Clairton,' he said. 'It's just a sad day for Clairton.'
Levy, Casey and Whittle write for the Associated Press. Levy reported from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Casey reported from Boston and Whittle reported from Portland, Maine. AP reporters Holly Ramer in Concord, N.H., and Beatrice Dupuy in New York City contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
6 minutes ago
- CBS News
Colorado congressional members accuse ICE of trying to prevent oversight of detention facilities
Democratic Rep. Jason Crow says he was first denied access to the immigration detention facility in Aurora, and now, Crow says he's being denied basic information about who is being held there. Crow and Colorado's three other Democratic U.S. House members -- Reps. Diana DeGette, Joe Neguse, and Brittany Pettersen -- visited the ICE facility Monday after giving seven days' notice under a federal policy they are suing to overturn. Crow says he was unable to get an exact head count at the facility, let alone information on who's being detained and whether they have criminal records. He was also unable to truly assess the conditions at the facility, he says, because the whole place was on lockdown for the entire visit. Crow says he's visited the Aurora facility 10 times in six years, but he says this visit was unlike any other. "This has been the most difficult visit in terms of getting information, getting answers out of the facility and employees," he said. He says ICE is now requiring members of Congress to submit any questions they have through the agency's headquarters in D.C., and anyone wanting to talk to a detainee must have a signed privacy release in advance. "So, if I want to visit my constituents in this facility, then somehow, I have to get a privacy release to them through the mail or other means," said DeGette. She says she was able to see immigration rights activist Jeanette Vizguerra, but the rest of the delegation was allowed to visit only one other detainee. The representatives say they have a duty to conduct oversight of federal operations, and ICE is making their job increasingly difficult. Last month, they were told they needed to give seven days' notice before any visit, so they sued. "If you have to give seven days' notice, they clean up pretty good," said DeGette. Still, Pettersen says, what they did see was concerning, including a lack of access to legal resources: "There is a phone, but you have to pay 15 cents a minute in order to make the calls that you need. That is a huge barrier for people." In addition to Democrats, Republican Rep. Gabe Evans has also asked ICE for more information on those being detained. Government data from June showed that about half of all detainees nationwide had been convicted or charged with crimes, while 70% of those in the Aurora detention facility had. Evans and his Democratic colleagues want to know the nature of the crimes. Neguse says they will continue to push for more access and information. "Above all else, transparency matters, oversight matters, accountability matters," he said. "You certainly can expect the Democratic members of Colorado's House delegation to continue to lean in on all fronts." As of Monday evening, a spokesperson for ICE had not yet responded to a request for comment from CBS News Colorado sent Monday morning.
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Assault on D.C. Is a Grave Threat to the District and Democracy
President Donald Trump is federalizing control of the local police and deploying the National Guard in Washington, D.C., to further his authoritarian and anti-democratic agenda. As autocrats commonly do, Trump is seeking control over the national capital in order to intimidate and squelch dissent. Like despots around the world and throughout history, Trump is also relying on the pretextual deployment of military force to intimidate and project power, to suppress protest and undercut democracy. Across the nation, Americans should protest this move and what it means for our democracy. They should worry that Trump will misuse claims of national emergency to block peaceful protest and that he will deploy troops to deter demonstrators, or worse. President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters after signing an executive order in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on Aug. 5, 2025, in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters after signing an executive order in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on Aug. 5, 2025, in Washington, is a move of dubious legality and no necessity. The Home Rule Act governing the District of Columbia gives the president authority to take control of the metropolitan police force when there are "special conditions of an emergency nature." There are no special conditions and there is no emergency. Like everyone, Washingtonians want to be secure in their person, but everyday street crime does not constitute an emergency—especially when the Justice Department's own statistics show the violent crime rate in the District is at its lowest point in decades. There is a major crime problem in Washington, D.C., but it's not the one Trump is talking about—and it's one the administration is making that far worse. Corporate crime and wrongdoing—pollution, dangerous products, financial fraud and scams, unsafe workplaces, and more—inflicts far more damage on people than street crime, whether measured by dollars, injuries, or lives. But Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi are epically weak on corporate crime enforcement—probably the weakest in American history. They are ending investigations and prosecutions into corporations, announcing no-prosecute policies against whole areas of corporate wrongdoing, and redirecting law enforcement resources away from corporate crime and toward its mass deportation agenda. Trump is also complaining about homelessness in D.C. There is, in fact, a significant housing problem in Washington, D.C., like there is throughout the nation. But on this score, Trump is doing nothing to help—and actively making things worse. Telling people without housing that they have to "move out" of the District, as Trump has done, does nothing to actually address that problem. Investing more in housing would help, but there were no such investments in Trump's tax and budget reconciliation bill—he was too busy conferring giant tax breaks on the super rich and corporations and stripping health care coverage from everyday Americans. Those health care cuts will significantly worsen homelessness—both because health care is key to help people without housing and because Medicaid is often used for supportive housing. Providing support to people with addiction issues would also help address the homelessness challenge; instead, the administration is considering withholding already appropriated funding for responding to fentanyl overdoses. Trump's actions have nothing to do with anything happening in Washington, D.C. Trump is motivated instead to advance his authoritarian agenda and to distract from his political weakness. This aligns perfectly with his other despotic tendencies, for example his enemies lists, his mantra of "loyalists only"—particularly those who support his election denialism—to key appointments, and Pam Biondi's recent move to deputize Ed Martin to investigate perceived opponents like Adam Schiff and Tish James. Washington, D.C. does not need National Guard members—who signed up to address genuine national security threats and actual emergencies, not to be political pawns—on our streets. Instead, what we in D.C. need is representation in Congress and more federal funding to mitigate the restrictions on the District's power of taxation. But this is an issue of import that goes far beyond the interests of the people of Washington, D.C.—and not just because D.C. is our nation's capital. Trump is now broadcasting that he hopes to militarize law enforcement in cities across the country. Whether the nation tolerates—or rises up to oppose—Trump's actions in Washington will very meaningfully impact whether the country goes down a democratic or authoritarian path. Robert Weissman and Lisa Gilbert are Public Citizen co-presidents. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
Budget-conscious Americans are thrifting in 2025: Here are the hottest spots for second hand finds
Death of the fun budget: Americans say their discretionary spending has dropped by 42% in the last year, according to a recent survey. The poll of 2,000 American adults found that many are looking for ways to save in the current economic environment, as over half of those surveyed (52%) revealed that they're worried about the state of their finances. Advertisement According to the findings, two-thirds (66%) of Americans are turning to thrifting on a regular basis to balance their budgets these days. In fact, nearly one in six (17%) are even thrifting as often as once per week, with Gen Z secondhand shopping more each week (28%) than other generations. 7 Americans say their discretionary spending has dropped by 42% in the last year, according to a recent survey. Seventyfour – And thrifting in 2025 isn't just a brick-and-mortar shopping experience, since the study found that almost one in four thrift shoppers (22%) like to do so online. Advertisement Conducted by Talker Research and commissioned by Mercari, an online marketplace, for National Thrifting Day on August 17th, the survey found that more than a quarter of thrifters (26%) have picked up secondhand shopping in the last year. Looking at the 'why' behind this uptick, nearly three-quarters (72%) said they shop secondhand to save money. 7 According to the survey, two-thirds (66%) of Americans are turning to thrifting on a regular basis to balance their budgets these days. Gabriel Cassan – However, many respondents have additional motivations for thrift shopping, with half of thrifters (51%) saying they hit the thrift stores because they enjoy the thrill of finding a good deal. Advertisement Forty-two percent relish searching for unique, one-of-a-kind things, and 28% are on the lookout for collectible items. And for 30%, they simply enjoy the vibe of thrift stores. 7 Thrifting in 2025 isn't just a brick-and-mortar shopping experience, since the study found that almost one in four thrift shoppers like to do so online. AntonioDiaz – Clothing (71%) is the most popular commodity people are thrifting this year, followed by home decor (45%), books (40%), home goods (39%), shoes (31%), collectibles (30%), and furniture (26%). Advertisement And respondents estimated that 34% of their belongings have been purchased secondhand, on average. 'As the data shows, thrifting is multidimensional,' said Jeff LeBeau, vice president of growth at Mercari. 'It's something people are doing to spend responsibility these days, but it's also a hobby for many. Not only is it an affordable option for shoppers due to financial constraints, but thrifters also just thrift for the fun of it, and to find unique deals. From clothes to video games to books to furniture, most everyone has something they enjoy browsing for when thrifting.' 7 Clothing is the most popular commodity people are thrifting this year, followed by home decor, books, home goods, shoes, collectibles, and furniture. AntonioDiaz – Thrift shopping is also something most secondhand shoppers (57%) consider to be self-care, and Gen Z (70%) is the most likely out of all generations to label thrifting as part of their self-care routine. Zooming in to investigate the quintessential thrifting excursion, many thrifters (37%) like to make it more of an experience than an errand by hitting up multiple stores in one day. Twenty-nine percent also like to meet up with a friend to thrift together, and a quarter (25%) said that treating themselves to a coffee or beverage to sip on while shopping is a must. 7 The survey found that more than a quarter of thrifters (26%) have picked up secondhand shopping in the last year. Gabriel Cassan – And from inexpensive but dearly cherished items, to once-in-a-lifetime designer deals, thrifters have really scored big in the past. Advertisement The survey asked respondents to share their best secondhand deals to date and uncovered that many have walked away with hidden gems, including vintage and designer clothing, retro video games, collectibles, antique furniture, and nearly-new tech. 'It's not unusual to walk away from thrifting with a killer deal,' said LeBeau. 'That's part of the joy of thrifting — searching for and finding something that's perfect for you, at a price you can afford. And with the rise of online thrifting, American consumers now have more opportunities than ever to discover incredible bargains.' 7 Many thrifters (37%) like to make it more of an experience than an errand by hitting up multiple stores in one day. okrasiuk – America's Best Thrift Wins: ● 'One of my favorite things I've thrifted is a vintage leather jacket that looks timeless and high-quality. I estimate it originally cost around $300 new, but I found it for just $40. It's become a staple piece I love wearing!' ● 'It was a copy of my favorite book that I then gave to a friend. [It] wasn't valuable, but I wanted her to have a copy.' ● 'Probably a video game that was rare. I gave $25 for it.' Advertisement 7 'One of my favorite things I've thrifted is a vintage leather jacket that looks timeless and high-quality. I estimate it originally cost around $300 new, but I found it for just $40. It's become a staple piece I love wearing,' one person said. Mazur Travel – ● 'My most recent favorite find was a 1974 Expo '74 decorative plate. It went well with my collection.' ● 'One thing I found was an old Schwinn bicycle that was the exact same as [the one] I rode when I was a kid, and I bought it for $10. Restored, it's worth a decent amount of money.' ● 'I bought a designer jacket for $34 that would have cost over $200 brand new. It was in perfect condition.' ● 'Sets of tools that I bought for $40 that would normally cost over $200 brand new.' Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans; the survey was commissioned by Mercari and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between July 24 and July 29, 2025.
