
How fat-shaming show Biggest Loser ruined lives
It began, says Biggest Loser's co-creator David Broome, when he went to the gym one day. Broome has the expressionless face of a man who cannot be emotionally touched. Paddy Chayefsky, who wrote the film Network (1976) which foretold reality TV ('Suicide of the Week, Execution of the Week, The Death Hour!') would know Broome as an authentic television villain. The sign at the gym, Broome says, read 'Help needed. Please help save my life. Obese person seeking trainer'. He then remembered that America is filled with the unhappy and obese, and that they rarely see themselves on TV. He invited them to apply to be The Biggest Loser.
Broome did help: he helped himself. He co-invented a show that made hundreds of millions for NBC, made him rich, and arguably damaged the metabolism and mental health of those unlucky enough to appear on it.
The contestants were chosen, isolated from their families at a 'ranch', and placed on a punishing regime: hours of gym each day; humiliating stunts involving food and 'fitness'; and suggested calorie intakes (1,500 for men; 1,200 for women. Most ate far less than that when they realised it would help them win. One man ate 800 calories a day and burnt 6,000 calories in the gym).
Contestants have reported that their periods stopped; their hair fell out; they had problems with movement afterwards; they often couldn't sleep. (Others, though, still maintain that the show helped them.) Each week they were weighed in front of a live audience, who whooped and howled; the failures – those who had lost the least weight – were sent home. It couldn't happen today, now Ozempic is available and, watching it now, the show is a tableau of every piece of bullying I saw in the schoolyard, and worse.
Fit for TV uses gruesome archive footage. Contestants are screamed at in gyms and placed on obstacle courses which appear to have been designed to make them look ridiculous. There are exculpatory interviews with Bob Harper, the show's co-trainer; Robert Huizenga, its doctor, who offers well-dressed contrition; and multiple contestants who, almost without exception, act like they have been in a war.
Huizenga now says he didn't approve all the challenges the contestants faced. Harper says they knew it was diet that mattered for weight loss, 'but that becomes boring television. You know what's not boring television? To see us in a gym, yelling, screaming'. Even the contestants seem to understand that obesity is mostly a psychological problem that cannot be fixed by going on television. 'When you have something traumatic in your life,' says one, 'it doesn't go away.'
Danny Cahill, the gentle, still-bewildered winner of season eight (he lost 239lb, or 17½st), says of his eating disorder, 'I lived it every day. I was missing life.' Like most of the contestants, he is larger than ever, because obesity is a psychological problem triggered by trauma and self-hatred, which The Biggest Loser compounded, not solved. As the series wound on, medical professionals questioned whether the 'regime' damaged the contestants' metabolic systems.
The only things Cahill really lost were his privacy and his pride. The producers wanted exhibitionists of a particular type. It wasn't fat they needed – or not fat by itself – it was pain and ability to express it. Once successful – if we can call it that – they were not allowed to show the contracts they had to sign to a lawyer; or, rather, they were, but it was strongly hinted they would lose their place on the show if they did. Thus disarmed, they were fed into television. It is apt.
It was not enough, as respectable doctors advise, to lose 2lb a week with moderate diet and exercise – not to win The Biggest Loser, which at its peak occupied the same studio as the talent show American Idol. The weighing scales, the producers admit, were the real protagonist of the show. Contestants might lose a stone or more in a week, and this was revealed to the screams of the crowd.
This was achieved by over-exercise – 'I'm going to take your legs and beat you with them,' one trainer screamed – and, the contestants now say, by self-starvation and depriving themselves of water before the weighing in. One contestant – Ryan Benson, the winner of season one – said he lived on lemon juice for the last 10 days of the show and was so dehydrated he was urinating blood as he appeared on the valedictory talk shows.
There is a long segment about Tracey Yukich, also of season eight, collapsing during her first trial, which was to run a mile along a beach. She was evacuated by helicopter. 'No one could have expected that anything like that was going to happen,' a producer says, in mitigation. Really? A disclaimer was aired on screen at the end of every show: 'Consult with your own doctor before embarking on any diet or exercise programme.' All contestants were required to sign a waiver. Yukich now says she thinks she died that day.
JD Roth, an executive producer, says the show existed to help people. But this was spin – as the 'temptation challenge' laid bare. The contestants were taken to a room filled with the kind of food – or non-food – they would ordinarily binge on, and invited to eat it. If they ate enough of it, they might win a prize: getting to see their children, for instance. It was coercive bingeing for people who were already ill. When Roth tells us, 'I can't say that 100 per cent of the temptations we got right, but I can say that life is full of temptations,' I want to punch him.
The contestants were vulnerable people, but were made to pass doughnuts from mouth to mouth – it's kissing with baked goods – or sing songs about obesity, or were screamed at for vomiting on the treadmill. A woman was weighed on TV. She was 476lb, or 34st. She wept, because she needed a support group, not primetime, which is the opposite. Suzanne Mendonca of season two, a police officer, said the show gave her an eating disorder, and made her a mockery among her colleagues. 'I stopped eating,' she said, of her time after the show, and regained the weight just the same.
The nadir was in 2014, when season 15 winner Rachel Frederickson, a former competitive swimmer, walked out to her $250,000 prize money looking dangerously thin: she began at 260lb (18½st) and ended at 105lb (7½st). Even the trainers looked appalled at her appearance. The show went on, and the contestants got larger – how else do you entice the public to watch? It was a miracle that, as parodied in the drama series Unreal, backstage at a version of The Bachelor, no one died.
Frederickson was the beginning of the end. In 2016, The New York Times reported that, 'A study of season eight's contestants has yielded surprising new discoveries about the physiology of obesity that help explain why so many people struggle unsuccessfully to keep off the weight they lose… As the years went by and the numbers on the scale climbed, the contestants' metabolisms did not recover… It was as if their bodies were intensifying their effort to pull the contestants back to their original weight.'
Now, only when it is too late, we have contrition. Harper looks awkward before the camera now; Huizenga looks ashamed. Jillian Michaels, the co-trainer who wasn't interviewed for Fit For TV, was rebuked for recommending her contestants take caffeine pills, which is the least of the show's evils. The concept itself was dangerous, but reality TV is ever in search of a villain. Its cynicism was boundless.
The cynicism goes on. Netflix is still happily airing The Ultimatum: Queer Love (couples on the verge of marriage commit or split) and Love is Blind (get engaged to someone on TV before you actually meet them). The Biggest Loser ended in 2016. The producers of Fit For TV have done to the producers of The Biggest Loser what they did to the contestants, and this is satisfying, but nothing more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
13 hours ago
- Times
Obese to get soups and shakes diet instead of weight-loss jabs
Low-calorie soups and shakes are to be prescribed to thousands of overweight people in Scotland in an attempt to reduce their dependence on expensive weight-loss drugs and provide longer-lasting health benefits. From January, 3,000 patients who have been newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes will be recruited for a clinical trial. About 300,000 Scots live with type 2 diabetes, a condition commonly linked to obesity, in which badly regulated blood sugar levels can increase the risk of heart disease, kidney disease, strokes or nerve conditions. About 10,000 of them are being treated with weight-loss drugs such as Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro, with injections costing the NHS £3,000 a year. The estimated annual bill of £30 million is expected to rise as manufacturers raise prices. NHS chiefs believe that not only will the soups and shakes plan be less expensive, it will also bring longer-term health benefits. In the Total Diet Replacement (TDR) plan, to be rolled out over three years, patients who have recently been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and are deemed eligible will be given low-calorie substitutes for their breakfast, lunch and dinner. The replacement meals, containing a maximum of 900 calories a day, will be delivered to patients for between three and five months. • What to do now Mounjaro's hiking its prices, by an obesity expert After this initial period, normal food will be reintroduced, but with guidance given on healthy meals through online consultations and an app. The ambition is for patients to lose up to 10 per cent of their body weight over a year. Doctors are also optimistic that up to 40 per cent of the trial participants will achieve remission from type 2 diabetes within a year. There are fears that the weight lost through injections — which work by suppressing the appetite — may last only as long as the patient is taking the drug. By contrast, the effects of diet changes should prove more long-lasting and cost effective, NHS officials believe. The TDR scheme is set to cost £5.6 million for 3,000 patients, a one-off cost of about £1,866 per person. Doctors hope the plan will help patients to fundamentally alter their diet and lifestyle. A spokesman for the Scottish government said: 'We anticipate that around 35 to 40 per cent will achieve remission from type 2 diabetes at the end of their first year on the programme, with a majority of patients benefiting from a clinically significant average weight loss of 10 per cent.' This would lead to reductions in blood pressure and contribute to a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. He added: 'We will measure impact by the number of patients recruited into this programme, the number who achieve remission and the number with clinically significant weight loss.'


The Independent
16 hours ago
- The Independent
Pricing people out of using Mounjaro would be bad news for the NHS
There were scenes of shock in pharmacies across the country when a notice from pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly hit inboxes out of nowhere last week. The wholesale price of their popular weight-loss drug Mounjaro, administered via jabs, was going to more than double from the start of September. While Eli Lilly has struck an, as yet secret, deal with the NHS, this massive increase will hit the vast majority of patients who are prescribed Mounjaro privately. More than a million Britons are estimated to already be taking Mounjaro, and scores more are interested in using it to start their weight-loss journey. So, when the news of this massive price hike went public, it wasn't only pharmacists who were worried and disappointed. The first message to concerned patients is don't panic and don't stop taking your medication; your local pharmacy is ready and willing to talk you through the options going forward. There are alternatives to Mounjaro that, for now at least, remain cheaper. They may be right for you, but it is essential that you get professional advice before you do anything, and your neighbourhood pharmacist is best placed and most on hand to give that advice. The consequences of this unprecedented price hike won't just hit patients; they will also hit the pharmacies on Britain's high streets. The finances of the whole pharmacy sector are already in a state of crisis after years of underfunding. The price hike for Mounjaro will put it under more financial strain. Unless the government steps in and offers the sector a fairer funding settlement for our NHS work, then, inevitably, we are going to see more pharmacies close and more communities robbed of the vital service on their street corner. If the government really wants pharmacies to be the 'front door' of their Neighbourhood Health Service, then it needs to act now. We call on the other weight-loss manufacturers to hold their nerve and hold their prices. The British market for weight-loss jabs was only set to grow, but it will only achieve that growth if treatment remains affordable to the average patient. There is a real danger that patients priced out of Mounjaro, but anxious to maintain treatment, turn to sourcing replacements online. If other manufacturers follow suit and up their prices, that danger will only grow. In their desperation, patients could well end up sourcing counterfeit jabs online, which are completely unregulated and potentially extremely harmful. At the click of a mouse, patients can find themselves buying jabs that they have no idea what they contain, or if they were manufactured in safe conditions, no matter what picture the unscrupulous sites use to tempt them in. We are urging patients to be extremely cautious and vigilant when looking to buy weight loss medication online. If it looks too good to be true, it almost certainly is. Again, talk to your trained and regulated community pharmacy, which is there to help. There is a real risk it won't end here. Although the companies would deny it, tariffs and the noise from the White House would seem to be hitting this side of the Atlantic. British patients must not become pawns in a wider dispute about the costs of medicines arising from President Trump's recent letter to the US drug manufacturers. For now, it seems that weight-loss jabs prescribed privately are the easy win for the pharma giants, but we are concerned that more companies may increase the prices of more medicines as a result of tariffs. Any increases in wholesale prices, even for those drugs prescribed by the NHS, will impact the sustainability of the sector. The Mounjaro price hike came out of the blue. It could prove just the start. Exploding prices for pharmaceuticals risks a genuine and rapid crisis. Ministers need to urgently develop contingency plans; otherwise, we risk the system that keeps vital medicines flowing to patients entering an unprecedented era of uncertainty.


Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mum who lost 4st in five months on Mounjaro issues urgent warning after her eyes turned yellow and she needed an organ removed
A mother who used weight loss jabs to get a post-break-up glow-up ended up with her eyes 'turning yellow' and needing her gallbladder removed. Jane Fennah from Blackpool, Lancashire, went on Mounjaro in February of this year, after seeing a myriad of success stories online. The family of drugs known as GLP-1 RAs, originally developed to treat diabetes, are now often being used by people hoping to become slimmer as they were found to suppress a patient's appetite. Wanting to shed some pounds after coming out of a relationship, the 39-year-old ordered the £170 injections from an online pharmacy and at first just had the 'normal' side effects, including feeling sick. Before long, she lost a whopping four stone within five months, dropping from 21 stone down to 17 stone, and continued to up her dose. However, Jane has now revealed how one terrifying incident while using the jabs - which had her thinking she was going to die. After the horrific health scare - and being hospitalised for nine days - she is now awaiting surgery to remove her gallbladder, but has been told she is also suffering from liver blockage and blood clots. 'I was 21 stone and I was losing weight quite quickly,' she explained. 'I did what people said, drank plenty of water, and took my vitamins. 'Six weeks in I started to feel hungry again so I upped my dose to 5mg. I started getting really bad diarrhoea. 'I looked into forums and people said that can happen so I carried on. I gave it a couple of months and went up to 7.5mg. However, that's when things got worse for Jane. 'My urine was brown, the tissue was brown. I thought I had to drink water and that I was dehydrated,' she explained. 'I thought I might have a bug because I have kids in school. That went on for about two weeks and I started to get bad indigestion in the middle of my chest. 'It started hurting my back and I had to walk bent over, I couldn't stand straight, I couldn't sit down. Three weeks ago, Jane woke up feeling something 'is not right'. The mother-of-two started getting an extreme 'stabbing' pain in the middle of her chest and - fearing she was having a heart attack - rushed to the hospital. 'Even halfway through the breath the pain was horrendous and like stabbing,' she continued. 'The pain was stopping me from breathing. 'They did a CT on me and my heart was okay and they did bloods, they said I have high blood levels in my liver. 'I said I don't know if this has anything to do with it but I'm on the skinny jab. He said there are three other people in A&E who are taking it.' Jane revealed that she had 'lots of gallstones' and 'blockage to the liver'. 'They put me straight on blood thinners, they said I had blood clots but my gallbladder was so inflamed they couldn't see it,' she explained. 'The doctor said to stop taking the jab because it's not worth it. I'm waiting for surgery to have my gallbladder out.' Mounjaro's information leaflet warns that gallstones are a 'common' side effect of the medication and may affect 'up to one in 10 people'. The manufacturer of the jab said patient safety is a 'top priority' and they 'encourage patients to consult their doctor about any possible side effects they may be experiencing'. 'I thought I was going to die because I wanted to lose weight. It was horrific,' she admitted. Jane also said the jab had caused hair loss and made her 'extremely' tired - but she had put it down to being a mother. 'Everybody is on the jabs and I've struggled with my weight,' she said. 'So when I split up with my partner last year I thought I need to sort myself out and it will help me because everyone is on it and I've seen so many success stories. 'It's not worth it. I started documenting my journey, I was happy to work on myself and my body. I felt amazing. 'I won't touch any weight loss thing again, I'm going to start the gym again and eat healthy, have my protein shakes and eat more veg and greens.' Jane also think that there need to be more safeguards in place for the jabs/ 'There needs to be more tests before people get them, it shouldn't be so easily accessible,' she remarked. 'People don't understand that not everyone is going to suffer these complications but there's a lot of people who are. It's scary, it's not worth it.' A spokesperson for Lilly, who manufacture Mounjaro, said: 'Patient safety is Lilly's top priority. 'We take reports about patient safety seriously and investigate and report safety events in accordance with regulatory requirements. 'We encourage patients to consult their doctor or other healthcare professional about any possible side effects they may be experiencing. 'Mounjaro (tirzepatide) must be prescribed by a licensed healthcare professional and prescriptions should be fulfilled and supplied only by registered pharmacies and providers.'