
Europe's Net-Zero Ambitions Need a CO₂ Transport Plan
Carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) is no longer theoretical. Projects across the continent, such as Porthos in the Netherlands and Greensand in Denmark, have moved from promise to practice. These frontrunners have made final investment decisions and begun operations. But for Europe to scale up from isolated projects to a coherent, cross-border network, it must urgently develop a regulatory framework that provides clarity, incentives, and investment certainty for CO2 transport infrastructure.
Without this, Europe cannot connect the dots between industrial emissions and safe, permanent storage.
The Missing Link in Industrial Decarbonisation
According to the European Commission's Industrial Carbon Management Strategy, CO2 transport is the "key enabler common to all pathways." Whether CO2 is destined for underground storage or industrial reuse, it must first be moved. And often it will have to be moved across national borders. The Joint Research Centre estimates that Europe will need a CO2 pipeline network spanning up to 19,000 km by 2050, requiring between €9.3 to €23.1 billion in investment.
But the market alone won't deliver this infrastructure at the scale and pace required. We need a European regulatory package to coordinate planning, harmonise technical standards, and unlock public and private funding.
Give Investors a Clear Signal
The lack of a predictable regulatory framework makes long-term investment risky. Building pipelines, terminals, and storage hubs is capital intensive, and future demand is uncertain. Without certainties, network operators can't justify oversizing infrastructure to capture economies of scale, hence making Europe less resilient.
The forthcoming EU regulation must provide such certainties. It should define infrastructure components, establish clear rules on third-party access, and allow for cost-recovery mechanisms like tariff regulation or contracts-for-difference schemes. Most importantly, it must not penalise the first movers. Early investments should be protected through grandfathering provisions or exemptions to ensure regulatory certainty and fairness.
Public Funding Is Essential but Not Sufficient
The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Innovation Fund have taken important steps. In 2024, the Commission awarded €452 million to five CCUS projects. Earlier this year, it committed €1.25 billion for energy infrastructure, including €250 million for CO2 transport and storage. Yet these figures are shadowed by what is needed to meet the EU's 2030 target of 50 million tonnes of annual CO2 injection capacity.
Funding must go beyond first-of-its-kind projects. Strategic support should enable network build-out, support smaller emitters, and de-risk private capital. That means significantly increasing budgets in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (2028–2034), launching an Important Project of Common European Interest (IPCEI) for CCUS, and deploying EIB-backed guarantees to absorb early project risk.
Connect Europe. Literally.
One of the biggest barriers to overcome is fragmentation. Existing national or even regional rules, such as those in Denmark and in Flanders, are important steps forward, but they risk creating a patchwork that hinders cross-border integration. The EU regulatory package must ensure consistency while respecting Member State autonomy, especially for storage infrastructure.
This includes resolving legal barriers to access CO2 stores in the UK and Norway. A bilateral EU-UK agreement recognising each other's carbon market and storage rules would unlock cost-effective storage options, potentially saving EU emitters €2.6 billion per year by 2040. Europe's climate goals shouldn't stop at its borders.
Not Just Pipelines
While pipelines will be the backbone of the CO2 network, they won't serve everyone. Many emitters, particularly in Southern and Eastern Europe, are far from industrial clusters or storage hubs. For them, non-pipeline transport, for example via ship, barge, rail, and truck, is the only viable solution. The regulatory package must recognise this and avoid subsidy schemes that unfairly favour one mode over another.
While regulated tariffs may not be appropriate for ships, access to funding, standardisation of quality and safety requirements, and liability frameworks should apply across all transport modes. The EU must ensure unity by allowing all emitters to participate in CCUS, regardless of geography.
Planning for the Future, Starting Now
Permitting delays are already affecting projects like Porthos in the Netherlands. Europe cannot afford to let bureaucracy slow down climate action. That's why CO2 transport infrastructure should be designated as "net-zero strategic projects" under the Net-Zero Industry Act, with streamlined permitting, single contact points, and faster environmental assessments.
Planning must also be integrated with electricity, hydrogen, and gas networks. Repurposing gas corridors for CO2 transport could cut costs and accelerate deployment. An EU-wide aggregation platform, as envisioned by the Commission, could help match CO2 emitters with storage providers, enable better forecasting, and facilitate investment decisions.
A Strategic Asset for Europe
This is not just a climate issue. It's an industrial strategy issue. CCUS can safeguard jobs, attract investment, and help decarbonise sectors like cement, steel, and chemicals, where emissions are hardest to abate. By developing a robust CO2 transport network, the EU can lead globally in low-carbon industry while maintaining its economic sovereignty.
Getting the regulatory framework right is not just a box-ticking exercise but rather a strategic necessity. Without clear rules, stable funding, and coordinated infrastructure, CCUS cannot scale. If Europe wants to remain industrially competitive while delivering on climate goals, it must treat CO2 transport as the enabler it is.
Francesco D'Apolito is EU Senior Communications and Events Officer at CCSA. Thierry Grauwels is the EU Director at CCSA.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
Russia calls European diplomacy over Ukraine ‘insignificant'
Russia branded European diplomatic consultations with Ukraine on Wednesday as "insignificant" ahead of a planned summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska later this week. "We consider the consultations sought by the Europeans to be politically and practically insignificant," Russian foreign ministry deputy spokesman Alexey Fadeev said in a briefing. "The Europeans verbally support the diplomatic efforts of Washington and Moscow to resolve the crisis around Ukraine, but in fact the European Union is sabotaging them," he said. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders were to hold urgent talks with Trump on Wednesday, hoping to convince him to respect Kyiv's interests in his looming summit with Putin on Friday. The summit is so far planned to go ahead without Zelenskyy, which has fuelled fears that Kyiv could be forced into painful concessions, notably over land. Zelenskyy has called for a full ceasefire – a proposal which Russia has rejected. Ahead of the conference call, Zelenskyy, who has spoken with more than 30 international leaders in the last few days, said "pressure must be exerted on Russia for the sake of a fair peace". EU leaders stressed on Tuesday "the inherent right of Ukraine to choose its own destiny" and that "international borders must not be changed by force". But Fadeev on Wednesday said the EU rhetoric "about supposed support for finding peaceful solutions is just another attempt to stall the settlement process". "We will monitor the actions of European countries in connection with the upcoming summit and hope that no steps will be taken that would prevent it from taking place and reaching constructive agreements," he said.


Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
Commission targets reform of its food chain rules in 2026
Some farmer organisations have called on Brussels to tighten up the rules and ban sales below production cost Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maria Simon Arboleas Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 13:52 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The European Commission is preparing an overhaul of legislation on unfair trading practices (UTPs) to prevent farmers from selling below production cost. The EU executive announced this week that it will launch a consultation on the revision this autumn with the aim of presenting a proposal a year later. In his blueprint for the agri-food sector, EU farm chief Christophe Hansen promised that the Commission would overhaul the UTPs directive to address one of farmers' key concerns: not covering production costs. Not everyone welcomed the announcement, with EU supermarket lobby Eurocommerce saying that the Commission should not have pre-empted the outcome of the ongoing evaluation of the rules, due to be completed in November. The directive currently distinguishes between 'black' and 'grey' unfair market practices – the former being unconditionally prohibited, such as payment delays of one month, and the latter permitted if agreed between parties, such as the return of unsold products. Some farmer organisations have long called on Brussels to tighten up the rules by including the purchase of agricultural products below production cost in one of the two categories. Countries including Belgium, Croatia, France and Spain have similar measures in place. But in a debate at the Special Committee on Agriculture (SCA) in June, member states could not agree on what to do with the colour scheme. In parallel, EU lawmakers are currently working on a 'quick fix' to the UTPs directive that the Commission proposed last December. The goal is to ensure cross-border enforcement and tackle international purchasing alliances. The Council reached an agreement on the proposal in April and the Parliament's AGRI committee adopted its position last month. MEPs wants to kick-start institutional talks as soon as the plenary gives its green light in September. (jp) CORRECTION: This story's headline has been changed to reflect the fact that the legislation is due to land in late 2026.


Euractiv
4 hours ago
- Euractiv
Estonia expels Russian diplomat over ‘interference'
Estonia's foreign ministry said on Wednesday it was expelling a Russian diplomat over 'ongoing interference' in the NATO and EU member's affairs. "The diplomat in question has been directly and actively involved in undermining the constitutional order and legal system of Estonia," Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said in a statement. "The Russian embassy's ongoing interference in the internal affairs of the Republic of Estonia must end and by expelling the diplomat, we are demonstrating that Estonia will not allow any actions orchestrated and organised by a foreign state on its territory," he added. Tsahkna said the diplomat was "contributing to... crimes against the state, including several offences related to sanctions violations". An Estonian citizen "has been convicted for carrying out these crimes", he added. Russian foreign ministry deputy press and information director Alexey Fadeev responded to the incident. "This is not the first such hostile action on the part of Estonia. I must say that we have already become accustomed to this," Fadeev was quoted as saying by the TASS news agency. "We will provide a timely comment on what measures we will take in relation to Estonian diplomats," he added. Tensions have escalated between the two countries since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Estonia has been a staunch ally of Kyiv since the war began. Last month, the Estonian foreign ministry summoned the Russian charge d'affaires, as it said that a Russian border guard vessel breached its maritime border. Last year, Estonia expelled another Russian diplomat on similar charges. "The Russian embassy has interfered in the internal matters of Estonia in an unacceptable way," Tsahkna said at the time. Russia has not had an ambassador in Tallinn since February 2023, when Estonia ordered Moscow's envoy to leave in a tit-for-tat move.