Gaza mourns those killed in Israeli strike on seafront cafe
Blood stains dotted the debris-strewn floor in the aftermath of the strike on Monday, AFP footage showed. Upturned plastic chairs lay alongside wooden planks blown apart in the blast, as tattered fabric gently blew in the sea breeze.
The strike triggered a fresh outpouring of grief in the Palestinian territory already devastated by more than 20 months of war, with social media flooded with posts paying tribute to the dead.
"Gaza lost a rare talent. The world lost beauty and hope," wrote two friends of the artist Amina al-Salmi, nicknamed Frans, in an Instagram post after the young woman's death in the cafe.
"The occupation killed her, but it will never erase her voice," they added. One of the friends, journalist Noor Harazeen, drew parallels between one of Salmi's last drawings and a photo of the attack showing her face covered in blood.
Tributes have also poured in for Ismail Abu Hatab, described by friends as a journalist and videographer.
During the final prayer before his body was laid to rest, his press vest was placed on his chest, as Gazans have often done for the numerous Palestinian journalists killed during the war triggered by Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.
Salmi and Abu Hatab were among 24 people killed in the strike, according to Gaza's civil defence agency.
Images of the bombed cafe showing several lifeless bodies flooded social media.
Journalist and rights activist Bayan Abusultan was also seen in photos posted online, half covered in blood in the aftermath of the blast.
"We survived to curse the occupation for one more day," she wrote on Facebook.
- 'Sea the only refuge' -
The Israeli military told AFP it had "struck several Hamas terrorists" and that "steps were taken to mitigate the risk of harming civilians", adding that the incident was under review.
The cafe was known before the war for welcoming young professionals and the few foreigners who were able to visit the Gaza Strip under Israeli blockade.
Built in several sections, part of which was on stilts above the water, al-Baqa was damaged and then repaired several times in recent months, particularly during the two-month truce that ended in March.
A few weeks ago, the cafe was once again able to offer an internet connection, attracting its pre-war clientele back.
With food only trickling into Gaza, the kitchens were closed, but customers could still get a cup of tea to drink against a backdrop of destruction.
Maher al-Baqa, who co-owns the establishment, told AFP that it is "one of the most well-known cafes on the Gaza coast, frequented by educated youth, journalists, artists, doctors, engineers and hardworking people".
"Young people are fleeing the tragedies and difficult conditions in Gaza. They come here for work meetings or just to relax a little."
Israel "has betrayed these people and bombed the place without any justification", he added.
Journalist Shrouq Aila, who shared photos of the cafe on Instagram, said: "The sea has become our only refuge".
Another journalist, Wassim Saleh, wrote on Facebook that "the sea continues to wash up pieces of bodies, which we bury."
Still in shock but moved by the messages of support, cafe owner Baqa said he lost four employees and three family members in the strike.
"I felt, through the great solidarity of the people with this place, that they were defending what remained of their dreams in Gaza."
bur-az/crb/acc/rlp/dcp
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Let's restore safety, sanity and sanctity to our nation's capital
In January, a 14-year-old was shot and killed by a group of his peers in Southwest Washington, D.C. Just weeks later, an elderly man was chased through traffic by a knife-wielding attacker in broad daylight. In May, two Israeli embassy staffers were brutally executed in what authorities have described as an antisemitic hate crime and potential act of terror. Last month, a congressional intern was killed in a tragic and still-unsolved drive-by shooting. And less than two weeks ago, a Trump administration staffer was viciously beaten by a violent mob, according to police. These disturbing attacks are only a few examples from a very lengthy list of egregious crimes that have happened in D.C. this year. And they are not isolated incidents — they reflect a broader, deepening crisis in Washington, D.C. Once a vibrant city, the nation's capital is now one of the deadliest places in America. In 2023, the homicide rate reached a 20-year high, with violent crime surging 40 percent, driven largely by armed robberies and carjackings. In July, a D.C. police commander was suspended amid allegations that the Metropolitan Police Department had manipulated data to falsely show a significant drop in violent crime compared to last year. But residents know the truth. Perhaps most alarming is the sharp rise in juvenile crime. Youth offenders accounted for more than half of all robbery arrests last year and nearly 60 percent of carjackings this year. Between January 2021 and June 2024, the percentage of homicides and non-fatal shootings committed by individuals age 15 to 20 nearly doubled. In neighborhoods like Navy Yard, just blocks from the U.S. Capitol, teens have turned the streets into battlegrounds. Restaurants and businesses have been forced to shut down while law-abiding residents live in fear. On March 27, President Trump took decisive action, establishing a task force to coordinate federal and local law enforcement efforts in the district. Last week, he went further and declared a crime emergency in Washington, directing the Department of Defense to deploy the National Guard to help restore order. For far too long, D.C.'s justice system has failed to hold criminals accountable. Young offenders committing violent crimes are often released immediately, emboldened by a system that delivers them no real consequences. In May, Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested nearly 200 illegal immigrants in D.C., many of whom had criminal records and known gang affiliations. At the time, local authorities had repeatedly refused to honor federal detainers, releasing these individuals back onto the streets. That ends now. The era of turning a blind eye to the violence, disorder and lawlessness is over. To support Trump's bold action and ensure repeat offenders face real consequences before deportation, the House must take up Rep. Knott's Punishing Illegal Immigrant Felons Act of 2025. Trump has made it clear: The time for excuses is over. Residents of our nation's capital are demanding real action. House Republicans, led by Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.), are stepping up their scrutiny of D.C.'s local government. Following the president's unprecedented move to take control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deploy the National Guard, Comer plans to hold a congressional hearing with key D.C. officials, pursuing legislation to prosecute juveniles as adults when warranted, mandate crime-tracking, block the city council from changing sentencing rules, eliminate sanctuary policies and hold accountable individuals in the country accountable. That is why the Senate must pass the Protecting Our Nation's Capital Emergency Act, which restores due process protections for Metropolitan Police Department officers in Washington, D.C. Passing this legislation would be a critical step in the right direction to tackle the public safety crisis brought by soft-on-crime policies. The days of rampant crime in the nation's capital must end immediately. Without meaningful reform, Washington, D.C., will continue to spiral into chaos, jeopardizing the safety of residents, members of Congress and visitors alike. We cannot allow the nation's capital to fall into lawlessness. Washington must be safe, clean and secure — not just for its residents, but as a model for the country and the world. It's time for the city's leaders to stop enabling criminals and start defending the law-abiding. Federal intervention is not only justified but also long overdue. August Pfluger represents the 11th District of Texas and is the chair of Republican Study Committee. Brad Knott represents the 13th District of North Carolina.
Fast Company
11 minutes ago
- Fast Company
In Uvalde massacre lawsuit, Meta lawyer argues Instagram isn't responsible for gunmaker's posts
A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued Tuesday. Nineteen children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. The families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. The families, who were present at last month's hearing, did not appear in court, with a lawyer citing the back-to-school season. Many plaintiffs attended the hearing virtually, he said. In one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: 'Let's normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?' The lawsuit alleges those posts are marketed toward minors. The Uvalde gunman opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, according to the lawsuit. He also owned various Instagram accounts and had an 'obsessive relationship' with the platform, at times opening the app more than 100 times a day, plaintiffs' lawyers found in an analysis of the shooter's phone. Plaintiffs say minors can access gun content on Instagram Meta attorney Kristin Linsley argued that the families provided no proof that minors, including the Uvalde gunman, even read the Daniel Defense posts on Instagram. She also said the posts didn't violate Meta's policies because they weren't direct advertisements and did not include links to purchase any products. Katie Mesner-Hage, representing the victims' families, said the defense's claim is 'fundamentally unfair,' as the plaintiffs don't have access to Meta data that would indicate whether the shooter encountered those posts. She added that if the content had landed on the shooter's feed, as the plaintiffs allege, then Meta 'not only knew about it, they designed the system so it would be delivered to him.' 'They knew more about him than anyone else on the planet,' she said. Linsley said content advertising firearms for sale on Instagram is allowed if posted by 'brick-and-motor and online retailers,' but visibility of those posts was restricted for minors under Meta's advertising policies from the end of 2021 to October 2022. 'This is not a playbook for how to violate the rules. This is actually what the rules are,' Linsley said. The plaintiff's team, however, showed a fake profile they created for a 17-year-old boy earlier this month, through which they were able to search Daniel Defense's Instagram account and see a post that included a picture of a gun, as well as a link to the gun manufacturer's website. When the link was clicked, the gun-maker's website opened, and the team was able to select a firearm and add it to their cart, all within Instagram's app — an experiment that refutes Meta's assertion that posts relating to firearms aren't visible to users under 21, Mesner-Hage said. Linsley said in her rebuttal that the experiment was done this year and not in 2021 to 2022, which is when the policy she described was in effect. The families have also sued Daniel Defense and video game company Activision, which produces 'Call of Duty.' Case hinges on social media's responsibility for content creation Linsley said the Communications Decency Act allows social media platforms to moderate content without being treated as publishers of that content. 'The only response a company can have is to not have these kinds of rules at all,' Linsley said. 'It just gets you down a rabbit hole very quickly.' Mesner-Hage argued Meta is not protected by the act because social media platforms don't just host speech, but help curate it through its algorithms. Daniel Defense, she said, didn't have to pay for ads to get free access to Meta's analytical data through its business account on Instagram. That data shows the company which age bracket and gender engaged most with a specific post. 'Daniel Defense is not on Instagram to make friends. … They're on there to promote their product,' Mesner-Hage said. 'It's not a paid advertisement, but I would struggle to describe this as anything other than an advertisement.' The lawsuit alleges that firearm companies tweaked their online marketing to comply with Meta's policies, including by avoiding the words 'buy' or 'sell' and not providing links to purchase, and that the social media company did not protect users against such strategies. Last month, lawyers for Activision also argued that legal proceedings against them should be thrown out, saying the families allegations are barred by the First Amendment. The families alleged that the war-themed video game Call of Duty trained and conditioned the Uvalde gunman to orchestrate his attack. Lawyers for the plaintiffs asked the judge to allow them to amend their lawsuit with the new information they presented Tuesday before ruling on the defense's motion. The defense claimed that was unnecessary, as the case would not have merit even with the amendments. The judge has yet to rule on Activision's motion and did not immediately rule on the Meta case.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration imposes fresh sanctions on four ICC officials
By Humeyra Pamuk WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday imposed sanctions on two judges and two prosecutors at the International Criminal Court, as Washington kept up its pressure on the war tribunal over its targeting of Israeli leaders. Washington designated Nicolas Yann Guillou of France, Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji, Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal, and Kimberly Prost of Canada, according to the U.S. Treasury and State Department. ICC judges issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli defense chief Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Ibrahim al-Masri last November for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. Guillou is an ICC judge who presided over a pre-trial panel that issued the arrest warrant for Netanyahu. Khan and Niang are the court's two deputy prosecutors. The move comes less than three months after the administration took the unprecedented step of slapping sanctions on four separate ICC judges, saying they have engaged in ICC's "illegitimate and baseless actions" targeting the U.S. and close ally Israel. ICC, which had slammed the move in June, describing it as an attempt to undermine the independence of the judicial institution, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ICC, which was established in 2002, has international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in member states or if a situation is referred by the U.N. Security Council. The United States, China, Russia, and Israel are not members. It has high-profile war crimes investigations under way into the Israel-Hamas conflict and Russia's war in Ukraine, as well as in Sudan, Myanmar, the Philippines, Venezuela, and Afghanistan. The sanctions freeze any U.S. assets the individuals may have and essentially cut them off from the U.S. financial system. Solve the daily Crossword
