The White House launches TikTok account
"America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?" read a caption on the account's first post on the popular video sharing app, a 27-second clip.
The new account, @whitehouse, went live yesterday evening with an initial video showing footage of Mr Trump as he declares: "I am your voice."
The account had about 4,500 followers an hour after posting the video.
Mr Trump's personal account on TikTok meanwhile has 110.1 million followers, though his last post was on 5 November, 2024 which was Election Day.
TikTok is owned by China-based internet company ByteDance.
A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Mr Trump's inauguration on 20 January.
But the Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media and who has said he is fond of TikTok, put the ban on pause.
In mid-June Mr Trump extended a deadline for the popular video-sharing app by another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the US.
That extension is due to expire on 17 September.
While Mr Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, he reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform - which boasts almost two billion global users - after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election.
Mr Trump's official account on X, formerly Twitter, has 108.5 million followers - though his favored social media outlet is Truth Social, which he owns, where he has 10.6 million followers.
The official White House accounts on X and Instagram have 2.4 million and 9.3 million followers, respectively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Why do wind farms attract so much misinformation and conspiracy?
Analysis: Conspiracy thinking is a stronger predictor of opposition to wind farms than age, gender, education or political leaning When Donald Trump recently claimed, during what was supposed to be a press conference about an EU trade deal, that wind turbines were a "con job" that "drive whales loco", kill birds and even people, he wasn't just repeating old myths. He was tapping into a global pattern of conspiracy theories around renewable energy – particularly wind farms. (Trump calls them "windmills" – a climate denier trope.) Like 19th century fears that telephones would spread diseases, wind farm conspiracy theories reflect deeper anxieties about change. They combine distrust of government, nostalgia for the fossil fuel era, and a resistance to confronting the complexities of the modern world. And research shows that, once these fears are embedded in someone's worldview, no amount of fact checking is likely to shift them. A short history of resistance to renewables Although we've known about climate change from carbon dioxide as probable and relatively imminent since at least the 1950s, early arguments for renewables tended to be seen more as a way of breaking the stranglehold of large fossil-fuel companies. The idea that fossil companies would delay access to renewable energy was nicely illustrated in a classic epidode of The Simpsons when Mr Burns builds a tower to blot out the sun over Springfield, forcing people to buy his nuclear power. Back in the real world, similar dynamics were at play. In 2004, Australian prime minister John Howard gathered fossil fuel CEOs help him slow the growth of renewables, under the auspices of a Low Emissions Technology Advisory Group. Meanwhile, advocates of renewables – especially wind – often found it difficult to build public support wind, in part because the existing power providers (mines, oil fields, nuclear) tend to be out of sight and out of mind. Public opposition has also been fed by health scares, such as "wind turbine syndrome". Labelled a "non-disease" and non-existent by medical experts, it continued to circulate for years. The recent resistance Academic work on the question of anti-wind farm activism is revealing a pattern: conspiracy thinking is a stronger predictor of opposition than age, gender, education or political leaning. In Germany, the academic Kevin Winter and colleagues found that belief in conspiracies had many times more influence on wind opposition than any demographic factor. Worryingly, presenting opponents with facts was not particularly successful. From RTÉ Brainstorm, What can you do with used wind turbine blades? In a more recent article, based on surveys in the US, UK and Australia which looked at people's propensity to give credence to conspiracy theories, Winter and colleagues argued that opposition is "rooted in people's worldviews". If you think climate change is a hoax or a beat-up by hysterical eco-doomers, you're going to be easily persuaded that wind turbines are poisoning groundwater, causing blackouts or, in Trump's words, " driving the whales loco". Wind farms are fertile ground for such theories. They are highly visible symbols of climate policy, and complex enough to be mysterious to non-specialists. A row of wind turbines can become a target for fears about modernity, energy security or government control. This, say Winter and colleagues, "poses a challenge for communicators and institutions committed to accelerating the energy transition". It's harder to take on an entire worldview than to correct a few made-up talking points. What is it all about? Beneath the misinformation, often driven by money or political power, there's a deeper issue. Some people – perhaps Trump among them – don't want to deal with the fact that fossil technologies which brought prosperity and a sense of control are also causing environmental crises. And these are problems which aren't solved with the addition of more technology. It offends their sense of invulnerability, of dominance. This " anti-reflexivity", as some academics call it, is a refusal to reflect on the costs of past successes. It is also bound up with identity. In some corners of the online "manosphere", concerns over climate change are being painted as effeminate. Many boomers, especially white heterosexual men like Trump, have felt disorientated as their world has shifted and changed around them. The clean energy transition symbolises part of this change. Perhaps this is a good way to understand why Trump is lashing out at "windmills".
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump administration better-placed than courts to release Epstein files, says judge
A New York judge has said the Trump administration is in a better position than federal courts to release materials that would satisfy public curiosity about the sex trafficking case of the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In rejecting the justice department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted Epstein in 2019, Manhattan-based US district judge Richard Berman wrote that the 70-odd pages of materials the grand jury saw paled in comparison to the 100,000 pages the government has from its Epstein investigation, but is not releasing. The judge said the bid to persuade him to unseal the records was an apparent distraction from the justice department's decision in July not to release its files and directly cited another judge's decision earlier this month not to release similar materials from the grand jury that indicted Epstein's long-time girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell . 'The instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession,' Judge Berman wrote. The justice department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Judge Berman's decision came as president Donald Trump has faced criticism from his conservative base of supporters and congressional Democrats over the justice department's decision not to release the files from its Epstein investigation. [ Epstein scandal: Letters from famous figures published Opens in new window ] Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with wealthy and powerful individuals sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes, and that he had been murdered. Mr Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the justice department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Mr Trump's supporters. To try to quell the discontent, Mr Trump in July instructed attorney general Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Justice department investigations typically collect more material than prosecutors ultimately present to grand juries. Some of that evidence is at times eventually disclosed to the public during criminal trials. The justice department does not routinely disclose its evidence in cases where a defendant pleads guilty or, like Epstein, never faces trial, but it would not require judicial approval to release such materials. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and saw a PowerPoint presentation and call logs, Judge Berman wrote. On August 11th, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied the justice department's request to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from Maxwell's case, writing that the material was duplicative of public testimony at her 2021 trial. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein. 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion - aimed not at full disclosure, but at the illusion of such,' Judge Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she asked the US Supreme Court to review her case. – Reuters
The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Any talks on Ukraine's security without Russia would be 'a road to nowhere', Kremlin says
RUSSIA HAS SAID it has to be part of any discussion on security guarantees for Ukraine and played down the likelihood of an imminent summit with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, tempering hopes for a quick deal to end the war. It comes after a meeting between Zelenskyy, US President Donald Trump and a host of European leaders at the White House on Monday, three days after the Republican's landmark encounter with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Trump called Putin during the talks in Washington, later claiming that the Russian leader had agreed to meet Zelenskyy and accepted that there will be Western security guarantees for Ukraine as part of any agreement to end the war. But Russia has not confirmed this. Speaking today, Moscow's long-serving foreign minister Sergei Lavrov downplayed the meeting in Washington, describing it as a 'clumsy' attempt to change the US president's position on Ukraine. Lavrov cast doubt on an imminent meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, saying that any summit between them 'must be prepared in the most meticulous way' so it does not lead to a 'deterioration' of the situation surrounding the conflict. He also warned that 'seriously discussing security guarantees without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere'. Trump, who has fiercely criticised the billions in support that this predecessor Joe Biden sent to Ukraine, earlier said European nations were 'willing to put people on the ground' to secure any settlement. Advertisement He ruled out sending US troops but suggested the country might provide air support. Russia has long said it will never tolerate the presence of any Western troops in Ukraine. Meanwhile, NATO military chiefs meanwhile held a virtual summit on security guarantees for Ukraine, the latest in a flurry of global diplomacy aimed at brokering an end to the nearly three-and-a-half year conflict. 'On Ukraine, we confirmed our support. Priority continues to be a just, credible and durable peace,' the chair of the alliance's military committee, Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, wrote on X after the meeting. Moscow signed the Budapest Memorandum in 1994, which was aimed at ensuring security for Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan in exchange for them giving up numerous nuclear weapons left from the Soviet era. But Russia violated that first by taking Crimea in 2014, and then by starting a full-scale offensive in 2022, which has killed tens of thousands of people and forced millions to flee their homes. On Tuesday, top US officer Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held talks with European military chiefs on the 'best options for a potential Ukraine peace deal'. Fresh Russian strikes In eastern Ukraine, far from the diplomatic deliberations, Russian forces claimed fresh advances on the ground and Ukrainian officials reported more deaths from Russian attacks. Russia's defence ministry said on Telegram that its troops had captured the villages of Sukhetske and Pankivka in the embattled Donetsk region. They are near a section of the front where the Russian army broke through Ukrainian defences last week, between the logistics hub of Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka. Related Reads Putin and Zelenskyy agree to meet directly in a 'neutral country' in the coming weeks What parts of Ukraine could Vladimir Putin ask for in exchange for an end to the war? Trump tells Zelenskyy and European leaders that Putin 'accepts' security guarantees for Ukraine 'Our units are engaged in heavy defensive battles against superior Russian forces,' said Ukraine's commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky. Last night, a drone strike on Okhtyrka in the Sumy region injured 14 people. A family with wounded children – 5 months, 4 years, and 6 years old – sought assistance after the attack. In Kostiantynivka, Donetsk region, a glide bomb strike damaged five apartment buildings, and at… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 20, 2025 Six civilians were killed by Russian attacks across eastern and southern Ukraine today, local authorities said. One person died in Russia's western Bryansk region as a result of a Ukrainian drone strike, the local governor said. Russia's aerial attacks on the northeastern town of Okhtyrka in the Sumy region wounded at least 14 people, including three children, according to regional governor Oleg Grygorov. Zelenskyy said these latest strikes showed 'the need to put pressure on Moscow', including through sanctions, 'until diplomacy is fully effective'. 'Together with the United States, Europe, and all those who seek peace, we are working every day to guarantee security. We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly reliable and lasting,' he said. With reporting from © AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
