Jerando Case: Anti-Morocco Jargon Backed, Used by Algeria's ‘Electronic Flies' & Beyond
Rabat – We are all familiar with the social media memes featuring people claiming they don't like drama, but when it happens, they will be the first ones to jump in and enjoy it.
In many situations, individuals, groups, organizations, and even governments may intervene to lecture on human rights but often turn a blind eye to more urgent issues that deserve attention, such as the pleas of irregular migrants pleas, the genocide in Gaza, and other critical violations recorded here and there around the world.
Instead, these actors would rather focus on cases of ordinary citizens who create a YouTube channel or a TikTok account to share unverified claims and disseminate allegations targeting a specific person or a whole country, with its institutions, organizations, and internal affairs.
This is exactly the case with the Algerian regime and the claims of Hicham Jerando, a Moroccan YouTuber who lives in Canada. Jerando, who reportedly owns a men's clothing store, has made a name for himself not as a vendor but rather among those who enjoy conspiracy theories, especially about Morocco, its monarchy and security services.
Upon the launch of his channel approximately four years ago, he presented himself as a consultant, covering different topics related to entrepreneurship, finance, among many.
In the past few years, however, Jerando changed his narrative to focus on conspiracy theories and defamation campaigns targeting not only people, but also high-ranking officials in the security sector and the government.
Social media as a refuge to success
His videos on YouTube, with over 727,000 subscribers, rack up hundreds of thousands of views, and why wouldn't they? It is not surprising as many social media influencers turned to similar approaches to collect fame, exhibiting erratic behavior if one of their audiences sends a virtual gift like the 'TikTok Lion,' among others.
A week ago, Jerando shared a video that generated over 126,000 views and hundreds of comments, the majority of which condemned his anti-Moroccan claims and defended the monarchy as the source of Morocco's stability.
In the video, he claimed that he 'uncovered grave matters' — presumably expressing concerns about the 'dangerous' situation in Morocco – alleging that King Mohammed VI is 'being targeted by a silent coup' and that Crown Prince Moulay El Hassan is 'in danger.'
Jerando further claimed that the monarch 'wanted to make radical changes,' but he 'was attacked and he is unable to act,' calling on people who care about the monarch 'to act immediately.'
Many took to social media and on his YouTube channel comments section to denounce his claims, which have been largely perceived as a provocation that sought to incite violence and destabilization.
Exploiting the emotions of his audience, Jerando's content creates an atmosphere of tension and division, promoting violent and rebellious ideas.
His claims further intensified when some of his family members were arrested for their alleged involvement in extortion and embezzlement.
Jerando's family lands in legal trouble
Last week, the public prosecutor at the Casablanca court arrested four individuals who were taken in custody.
The prosecutor identified two of the suspects as Jerando's sister and her husband, who face charges of 'complicity in contempt of a constitutional body and an organized group, dissemination and publication of false claims and facts to harm the privacy of individuals and defame them, as well as for the offense and threats.'
One of the individuals is a minor, who was referred to a juvenile judge and ordered to stay at the Abdeslam Bennani Child Protection Center.
International media, however, have spread fake news alleging that she has been put in a prison.
The public prosecutor responded to the claims, reiterating that she is in fact in the child protection center, in line with legal procedures for minors.
According to the prosecutor, the 13-year-old minor is involved in the case, in which she acquired and provided SIM cards used in acts of cyber extortion, blackmail and defamation by the primary suspect.
While the court did not specifically mention his name, reports said the court referred the primary suspect to be Jerando, who is currently on the run abroad.
The Regional Human Rights Committee in the Casablanca Settat Region is currently monitoring the case.
In response to rumors and claims, the council called for refraining from sharing the child's identity, name, and image as this could violate her privacy and lead to potential psychological harm.
The suspects were arrested following a complaint from a woman who said she received a call from an unknown phone number in which she was subjected to defamation, insults, and threats.
Morocco's media perspective
Moroccan news outlet Le360 said on March 4 that the charges contradict Jerando's channel, as he has been ironically promoting content that seeks to fight against corruption and embezzlement.
'The most surprising aspect is the cover under which Hicham Jerando hides-his fight against corruption and embezzlement,' the news outlet said. According to their sources, Jerando has 'intervened to ask the Secretary General of the Ministry of Health to have one of his nieces admitted to medical school in Morocco.'
The news outlet further said that 'the one who spends his time selling his videos by fighting against embezzlement, corruption…was hoping to bypass an entrance exam to get his niece into medical school.'
Converging media further reported on the case in Morocco, noting how Jerando 'skillfully navigated social media codes' to strike accusations and conspiracy narratives to catch his audiences' attention.
'However, by continually pushing the limits of discourse, the foundation on which his credibility rested collapsed, dragging several associates into a legal process with multiple ramifications,' Telque l wrote .
Loved by Algeria's 'electronic flies'
Jerando's narratives have been well-seated among 'electronic flies' – or fake troll-like accounts – orchestrated by both regimes and media that endorse anti-Morocco sentiments and rhetoric.
Specifically, Jerando's content has also been hijacked and amplified by electronic flies originating from Algeria, which are using the situation to target Morocco's stability and undermine its reputation.
Various Algerian TikTok and Instagram accounts are widely exploiting the controversy surrounding Jerando's claims. These accounts are amplifying his conspiracy theories, especially about the alleged Moroccan coup as well as multiple narratives that paint Morocco and its monarchy in a critical light.
The arrest of Jerando was soon picked up by the Algerian regime's affiliated media, which used unverified claims and unsurprising defamations to take on Morocco and its internal affairs.
Algeria's official media claimed Morocco arrested the suspects in a 'fabricated case to take revenge on a relative of hers who exposed the crimes and revealed the involvement of high ranking officials in corruption… and other matters treating the security of the state.'
These claims have been widely circulated in Algerian media including Radio Algerie, as well as electronic flies, without any concrete evidence or supporting documents to substantiate the accusations.
Using hashtags, describing it as a 'scandal in Morocco,' one journalist in Algeria turned a blind eye on Morocco's prosecutor's clarification that the minor allegedly involved in the case was placed in a child center and not prison.
'The scandal surrounding the arrest of 13-year old…by the Moroccan authorities has sparked widespread anger among human rights activists and journalists, who labeled it as a 'dark day for human rights in Morocco',' he claimed, alleging this comes amid 'growing danger of systematic repression of freedom of speech.'
These maneuvers are not surprising as the regime has been lobbying and picking up on any chance – no matter if it's baseless – to portray Morocco unfavorably, especially when it comes to targeting the country's territorial integrity and sovereignty over its southern provinces in Western Sahara. Tags: algeria and human rightsHicham Jerando Case
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
18 hours ago
- Morocco World
Beneath the Wealth: How Algeria's South Threatens National and Regional Stability
Algeria's southern regions embody a striking governance paradox that is potentially impacting the local and regional security. Despite its vast reserves of petroleum, natural gas, and valuable minerals, the region continues to experience severe poverty and underdevelopment. This contradiction is not merely the result of economic mismanagement but reflects deeper issues related to governance, security, and broader regional dynamics. Numerous studies have emphasized that resource-rich economies, including Algeria, suffer from the so-called ' resource curse' —a phenomenon where wealth from natural resources fails to translate into widespread development. In particular, regions that host natural resource extraction sites remain impoverished and marginalized. Although resource extraction generates substantial national revenues, local populations receive minimal benefits. Employment opportunities are limited, and wealth distribution is starkly unequal. In Algeria, most profits are funneled to distant corporate headquarters or the central government, leaving little investment in the southern cities where the resources originate. This lack of economic diversification exposes the region to external shocks and environmental degradation, while centralized governance continues to exacerbate these inequalities is noticed that in Algeria, power over wealth distribution remains tightly concentrated in the northern regions, with minimal input from southern communities. Governance institutions in the south lack autonomy, resources, and meaningful political representation, leaving them ill-equipped to address the needs of their populations. This governance gap fosters widespread resentment and intensifies the legitimacy crisis facing the state. Crucially, the security implications are profound. As a matter of fact, socioeconomic divide and exclusion has created fertile ground for criminal networks, militant activity, and separatist sentiments to take root in Algeria's southern territories. These groups often exploit public grievances, further undermining stability. In this report, we argue that Algeria's unstable southern regions present not only a domestic challenge but also a broader regional threat. The instability, due to the equitable share of wealth, has the potential to destabilize the entire Sahel, as ethnic spillovers, refugee flows, arms smuggling, and extremist infiltration complicate ongoing peace efforts. South Regions By the Algerian south, we refer specifically to the regions of Hassi Messaoud, In-Salah, and Ouargla—territories that suffer from a glaring disparity in the distribution of oil and gas revenues extracted exclusively from their land. Despite being the primary source of the nation's wealth—thanks to its extensive hydrocarbon reserves, including the giant Hassi Messaoud oil field discovered in 1956, the region paradoxically remains among the poorest in the country, mired in poverty and deprivation. This condition reflects a deeply unequal development model in which hydrocarbon revenues are disproportionately channeled to the northern regions, to the detriment of the southern community. The ruling elites maintain a rentier and corrupt posture that sustains this structural imbalance. Social movements and protests emerging from these southern regions highlight a profound sense of injustice and exclusion. It has been voiced by the local population that they receive neither the economic benefits of oil and gas production nor the promised infrastructure improvements, even as their lands are heavily exploited for natural resources. In In-Salah, for instance, residents have voiced strong opposition to shale gas extraction, fearing further environmental and social harm—particularly since they have seen no tangible benefits from conventional gas revenues. Their concerns also extend to future generations in the south, who risk inheriting a region stripped of its natural resources and burdened with the severe environmental consequences of shale gas operations, especially the potential degradation of the local water table. This unrest reflects broader resistance to an extractivist development model that exacerbates underdevelopment while enabling capital accumulation without equitable redistribution. Despite repeated government announcements of large-scale development budgets, the southern regions remain marginalized, with minimal access to employment in the hydrocarbon sector and enduring socio-economic hardship. The paradox of immense natural wealth existing alongside persistent local poverty underscores Algeria's deep internal divide: oil revenues continue to finance development in the north while leaving the south vulnerable, overlooked, and impoverished. The Resource-Governance Paradox The Algerian South is endowed with significant natural resource reserves—including oil, gas, iron ore, phosphates, and uranium—that are central to the country's economy. However, this region faces persistent challenges similar to those encountered by countries afflicted by rent dependency and the so-called ' oil curse .' As Ross observes, nations like Algeria, despite their substantial oil revenues, often experience diminished levels of democracy, economic volatility, and recurrent civil unrest. These issues, fundamentally rooted in governance failures, are symptomatic of the 'resource curse,' whereby a rentier state's overreliance on oil revenues hampers both economic diversification and democratic development. In Algeria, key production sites are located in the southern regions of Hassi Messaoud, In-Salah, and Ouargla. While these areas generate the bulk of the country's export earnings, the resulting wealth is disproportionately directed to northern elites and central government accounts, leaving the local communities marginalized. This economic disparity is deeply entrenched in centralized governance structures that consistently sideline southern interests. Local institutions in the south remain under-resourced, lack autonomy, and are largely excluded from meaningful decision-making processes. As highlighted by Humphreys, Sachs, Stiglitz and Luong, and Weinthal, corruption and a lack of transparency in revenue management further erode public trust. Southern populations thus face a pronounced democratic deficit, with limited opportunities to influence policies that directly affect their livelihoods. Socio-Economic Marginalization and Its Consequences Southern Algeria faces systemic socio-economic exclusion that manifests across vital public sectors, contributing significantly to regional instability. Public services in the south are alarmingly inadequate: health infrastructure is sparse, forcing residents to travel long distances for basic medical care; educational institutions are underfunded, lacking both qualified personnel and adequate facilities; and transport, telecommunications, and utilities remain severely underdeveloped. Despite decades of intensive resource extraction, local populations continue to be underserved. High unemployment remains a pressing concern, as noted by Boubekeur (2019) and Zoubir (2020), with job opportunities often monopolized by northern elites and foreign contractors. These entrenched inequalities have fueled widespread resentment, as the glaring contrast between visible resource wealth and daily deprivation intensifies anger toward both the state and private sector actors. On the ground, youth disenfranchisement is particularly acute, creating fertile ground for radicalization. In this context, Tanchum (2020) underscores how ethnic and tribal grievances—especially among the Tuareg—deepen feelings of alienation, while internal migration toward the north places additional strain on already overstretched urban infrastructure, compounding broader national challenges. Moreover, resource extraction carries a significant ecological toll. Traditional livelihoods such as herding and agriculture are becoming increasingly unsustainable due to widespread environmental degradation. Water scarcity—exacerbated by industrial usage and the effects of climate change—intensifies competition and stokes intercommunal tensions. In addition, recurrent droughts and accelerating desertification are pushing more people into precarious living conditions, further destabilizing the region. Security Implications and Regional Spillover Effects Southern Algeria's security challenges stem from weak governance and deep-rooted socio-economic marginalization, which together create a permissive environment for criminal and militant activities. In the absence of effective state control, illicit networks involved in drug and arms trafficking, human smuggling, and unauthorized mining operations have flourished . Armed groups, including Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), capitalize on local grievances to undermine state authority and national cohesion. These domestic challenges do not remain confined within Algeria's borders. The porous frontiers of the Sahel facilitate the cross-border movement of militants and the spread of instability. As highlighted by Chatham House and the Carnegie Endowment (2020), Algeria's internal stability is increasingly intertwined with broader regional peace and security. The situation of Mali, Libya, Niger and Chad reverberate through Algeria's southern regions, compounding internal vulnerabilities. The threat of separatism in southern Algeria, though often overlooked, cannot be entirely dismissed. Historical case studies such as South Sudan and Katanga illustrate how a lack of democratic governance, worsening socio-economic conditions, and a sense of ethnic exclusion—especially when amplified by external influence—can lead to territorial fragmentation. In this context, emerging demands for autonomy in southern Algeria reflect similar dynamics, raising serious concerns about future destabilization if deep-rooted structural grievances continue to go unaddressed. Conclusion Algeria's southern regions stand at a pivotal crossroads. Despite being richly endowed with natural resources, they continue to suffer from systemic exclusion, underdevelopment, and rising insecurity. This paradox can be best understood through two intersecting frameworks: the resource curse and grievance-based conflict theory . On one hand, natural wealth has not translated into inclusive growth; instead, it has produced economic distortions, entrenched rentier practices, and weakened democratic accountability.. On the other hand, deep socio-economic disparities and enduring perceptions of marginalization—particularly in contrast to northern Algeria—have fueled discontent and eroded state legitimacy, creating fertile ground for resistance and instability. The consequences are stark. From widespread unemployment and inadequate public services to environmental degradation and youth disenfranchisement, the south remains excluded from the benefits of its own wealth. These conditions have not only empowered criminal and militant networks but have also raised the specter of separatist demands, echoing patterns seen in other fragmented regions like South Sudan and Katanga. As Algeria's internal stability becomes increasingly intertwined with that of the broader Sahel, the costs of inaction grow heavier. Tags: separatism allianceSeparatism'
Morocco World
2 days ago
- Morocco World
Analysis: For Algeria, Polisario is an Ally, MAK is a Threat
Doha – Algeria's military regime is waging a calculated geopolitical charade in North Africa, fueling instability abroad while silencing resistance at home. Under President Abdelmadjid Tebboune and military chief Saïd Chengriha, the Algerian state has morphed into a launchpad for armed separatist agendas, even as it violently represses peaceful calls for autonomy within its own borders. This glaring contradiction lays bare a regime built not on principles of self-determination, but on selective oppression, weaponized hypocrisy, and a desperate bid to maintain regional influence at any cost. According to an analysis by Sahel Intelligence, 'this paradox is flagrant. Algeria, which qualifies the MAK as a 'terrorist group' without providing concrete evidence of violent acts, simultaneously offers official support to a movement like the Polisario, regularly associated with activities threatening the stability of the region.' The report exposes how Algeria's military leadership has weaponized the concept of self-determination, deploying it selectively to advance regional destabilization while denying the same rights to its own citizens. Algeria's handling of the two movements exposes a glaring double standard—sharp, deliberate, and impossible to miss. The Kabyle independence movement, represented by the Government of Kabylia in exile (GPK) in France, has consistently advocated for peaceful means to achieve self-determination. 'Under Ferhat Mehenni, the Movement for Self-determination of Kabylia (MAK) has always claimed a peaceful, secular and democratic struggle, rejecting any recourse to violence or terrorism,' notes the Sahel Intelligence analysis. 'The MAK denounces a policy of systemic marginalization of Kabylia by the Algerian state, on linguistic, economic, religious and identity levels,' adds the analysis. Meanwhile, Algeria provides comprehensive support to the Polisario Front, which has become 'a hired regional gun that implements Iranian agendas in North Africa.' This goes in line with Algerian objectives in the Western Mediterranean and the Sahel. Algeria's behavior exacerbates tensions and fuels risks of a major regional war that would set back decades of efforts to preserve peace, security, and prosperity in southern Europe and along Africa's Atlantic front. 'Alger furnishes refuge, financing and military as well as diplomatic assistance. Algeria hosts the movement in the Tindouf camps, presents it as a liberation movement, and advocates on its behalf in international forums,' the report states. Polisario's terrorist ties are an open secret The Polisario's terrorist ties are no longer whispers in the dark—they've stepped into the spotlight. Last April, Republican politician John Wilson stressed Washington's 'determination to support the North African kingdom in confronting the threats posed by Polisario Front terrorists' during a meeting with Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. Multiple intelligence reports have documented the Polisario's connections with terrorist organizations. The Sahel Intelligence analysis points to 'connections with Hamas and Iran, via weapons and training networks, complicity with AQMI (Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb) and other jihadist groups operating in the Sahel, facilitating arms trafficking and kidnappings.' These elements have led several observers and states to characterize 'the instrumentalization of the Tindouf camps by the chief of staff General Saïd Chengriha, President Abdelmadjid Tebboune and his advisers, for opaque paramilitary activities, far from the standards of international conventions on refugees.' The situation in the Tindouf camps has deteriorated significantly. Recent protests erupted following what the Sahrawi Association for the Defence of Human Rights (ASADEDH) described as a 'horrific massacre' committed by the Algerian army in the Arkoub district of the Dakhla camp. The incident resulted in two deaths and nine injuries, with three victims in critical condition. NGOs strongly condemned the Algerian army's actions, pointing out that Polisario militias not only failed to denounce the attack but actively aided in suppressing protesters demanding justice for the victims. The growing discontent within the Tindouf camps has ignited an unprecedented wave of dissent, with frustrated Sahrawis openly demanding an end to decades of exploitation and false promises. According to local sources, chants once unthinkable in Polisario-controlled zones are now echoing through the camps. As they muster the courage to oppose the separatist group's illusive agenda, this emerging cohort of Sahrawi dissidents is calling not just for relief from their prolonged suffering, but for the immediate acceptance of Morocco's autonomy initiative as the only viable path forward. The total collapse of Polisario's Algeria-sponsored separatism is increasingly within reach The United Kingdom's recent alignment with Morocco on the Western Sahara marks a profound geopolitical shift. Not only does this shift consolidate the position of the world's major powers – including the US, France, and Spain – in favor of Morocco's territorial integrity, but also signals the collapse of the post-colonial ambivalence that long enabled Algerian-sponsored separatism to persist. That even former colonial actors now endorse Morocco's autonomy initiative reflects a recalibration of global realpolitik: sovereignty, territorial integrity, and strategic partnership now outweigh outdated fantasies of Balkanizing North Africa. If regional tensions continue to escalate and mounting intelligence confirms links between Polisario members and activities that undermine regional security, the path toward designating the group as a terrorist organization in the medium term will become significantly clearer—and more politically inevitable. While the Polisario has not completely disappeared, it is weakened politically, diplomatically and militarily. The balance of power clearly favors Morocco, which is advancing its autonomy initiative, regional development plans, and garnering increasing international support. If the current trend continues, particularly if the US administration designates the Polisario as a terrorist organization, Algeria may find itself forced to reconsider its support for the separatist group to avoid incurring the wrath of America and the Western world. Read also: Hilale Slams Algeria's Regime Over Regional Destabilization, Hypocrisy, and Separatism
Morocco World
2 days ago
- Morocco World
LA Police Crack Down on Pro-Immigration Protests
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids carried out across Los Angeles, California, on Friday have ignited mass protests and heightened debate over the aggressive direction of US immigration policy under the Trump administration. The coordinated operation unfolded without warning, with convoys of unmarked, military-style vehicles and federal agents descending on multiple worksites in Los Angeles. According to local news reports, dozens of people were taken into custody during this sweep. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) initially refused to disclose the total number of arrests, citing operational safety. A spokesperson simply stated that anyone in violation of immigration law, regardless of nationality, could be arrested, detained, and deported. 'This is not justice' Estimates from immigrant rights groups suggested that between 45 and 80 individuals were detained. Among them was Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California President David Huerta, who was reportedly injured while in custody. ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) later reported the arrest of 44 individuals for immigration-related offences. 'This is about how we as a community stand together and resist the injustice that's happening,' said Huerta in a public statement. 'Hard working people are being treated like criminals.' 'We all collectively have to object to the madness because this is not justice. This is injustice. And we all have to stand on the right side of injustice,' he added. Activists say the operation lacked legal foundation. Caleb Soto of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network criticized ICE for failing to obtain judicial warrants, alleging that agents targeted known immigrant-heavy worksites, using people's fear and flight as a pretext for mass detentions. 'They use someone running as 'reasonable suspicion' of being undocumented and then arrest everyone nearby,' Soto said. 'That's not law enforcement—it's fear tactics.' The raids triggered swift mobilization from the community with hundreds of protesters marching toward the federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles, where some detainees were believed to be held. Demonstrators reportedly spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on a federal building before being confronted by Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers, who responded with tear gas and pepper spray, claiming that some protesters had thrown concrete debris. LAPD swiftly declared the protest an unlawful assembly, raising questions about the city's commitment to protecting the right to dissent in the face of aggressive immigration enforcement. Local officials issued immediate and vocal condemnations with all City Council members releasing a joint statement rejecting 'fear tactics to support extreme political agendas.' Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez directly challenged federal claims that ICE focuses on criminals, saying: 'It's never, ever, ever been the case. When they come for one of us, they come for all of us.' Arrest quotas The raids are part of a broader federal campaign aimed at drastically increasing immigration enforcement under president Trump. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem met last month with ICE leadership and demanded the agency increase arrests to 3,000 per day—reportedly threatening job loss for officials who didn't comply. The result was a dramatic escalation in enforcement nationwide, including the detention of over 2,200 individuals in a single day in early June. Many of those detained had reportedly been enrolled in ICE's Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program – a monitoring system meant to offer a more humane and cost-effective substitute for incarceration while individuals await immigration proceedings. Participants in the ATD program are typically subject to electronic ankle monitoring, biometric surveillance, or mandatory check-ins via phone or in person. Advocates argue that the decision to target individuals already complying with government oversight not only violates the spirit of the program but also undermines trust in any form of cooperation with immigration authorities. Legal experts and immigrant advocacy groups have expressed alarm over these developments, warning that constitutional rights are being eroded under the guise of policy. Access to legal counsel remains limited — only three attorneys were reportedly allowed to meet with detainees following the Los Angeles raids. Even prior to this escalation, immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area had already been intensifying. Between 2022 and 2024, ICE detentions surged by 155% to nearly 3,900 people, while removals rose by 180% to over 3,500. Among those without criminal records, the numbers were even more stark: detentions jumped by 432% and deportations by 547%. As federal officials inflate arrest quotas to protect their jobs, immigrant communities across the US are left to endure the relentless terror imposed by a system more invested in punishment than justice.
