Punjab govt changes allotment policy for GOR-I
According to official documents, Muhammad Faisal has been residing without formal allotment at House No. 9, Golf Road, GOR-I, and had submitted a formal request to the Punjab government and the Services & General Administration Department (S&GAD) for permanent allotment.
The S&GAD initially maintained that Muhammad Faisal was not eligible for government housing in GOR-I under the existing Punjab Residence Allotment Policy 2024.
The documents highlight that clause 3.1(c) of the policy restricts eligibility to officers within the S&GAD cadre strength, whereas Muhammad Faisal belongs to the Police Department. Therefore, he was considered ineligible not only under the regular policy but also could not be accommodated under the Chief Minister's 10 percent hardship quota.
However, when the Services & General Department formally opposed the allotment, stating that it would be a violation of the existing policy, it also noted that the only way to proceed would be to relax the policy itself. Additional Chief Secretary Punjab, Ahmad Raza Sarwar, reiterated that Muhammad Faisal was ineligible under the current rules.
Despite this, Chief Secretary Punjab Zahid Zaman wrote in the same set of documents that since Muhammad Faisal is ineligible under current policy, the Punjab Cabinet should approve a policy relaxation so that a house in GOR-I can be officially allotted to him.
Acting upon this, the Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister directed that House No. 12, Golf Lane, GOR-I be allotted to DIG Operations Muhammad Faisal. To make this possible, Grade-22 officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, Zaheer Hassan, who was already residing in that house, was instructed to vacate it and instead be shifted to the house where DIG Faisal was residing without allotment.
The Services Department was subsequently instructed to prepare a new summary for formal allotment. Additional Secretary (Welfare), Capt. (R) Samiullah Farooq, wrote in the file that as per telephonic instructions received from the Chief Minister's Office, the allotment summary was being resubmitted accordingly.
The final decision approved the allotment of House No. 12, Golf Lane, GOR-I to DIG Muhammad Faisal.
An interesting twist followed when it was revealed that House No. 12, which was now approved for DIG Faisal, was officially allotted to Grade-22 PAS officer Zaheer Hassan, who was asked to vacate the house. Furthermore, it was recommended in the same set of documents that House No. 5, Patiala House, be officially designated as the permanent residence of DIG Operations Lahore.
However, House No. 5 had already been approved earlier for DIG Operations but is currently occupied by former DIG Operations Dr. Haider Ashraf.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Punjab govt changes allotment policy for GOR-I
LAHORE: The Punjab Government has amended policy to allot official residence in GOR-I to DIG Operations Lahore. The Punjab government has made a special amendment to its official residence allotment policy to allocate a government house in GOR-I to DIG Operations Lahore, Muhammad Faisal (PSP). In an unusual move, two houses were allocated in Lahore instead of the standard one. According to official documents, Muhammad Faisal has been residing without formal allotment at House No. 9, Golf Road, GOR-I, and had submitted a formal request to the Punjab government and the Services & General Administration Department (S&GAD) for permanent allotment. The S&GAD initially maintained that Muhammad Faisal was not eligible for government housing in GOR-I under the existing Punjab Residence Allotment Policy 2024. The documents highlight that clause 3.1(c) of the policy restricts eligibility to officers within the S&GAD cadre strength, whereas Muhammad Faisal belongs to the Police Department. Therefore, he was considered ineligible not only under the regular policy but also could not be accommodated under the Chief Minister's 10 percent hardship quota. However, when the Services & General Department formally opposed the allotment, stating that it would be a violation of the existing policy, it also noted that the only way to proceed would be to relax the policy itself. Additional Chief Secretary Punjab, Ahmad Raza Sarwar, reiterated that Muhammad Faisal was ineligible under the current rules. Despite this, Chief Secretary Punjab Zahid Zaman wrote in the same set of documents that since Muhammad Faisal is ineligible under current policy, the Punjab Cabinet should approve a policy relaxation so that a house in GOR-I can be officially allotted to him. Acting upon this, the Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister directed that House No. 12, Golf Lane, GOR-I be allotted to DIG Operations Muhammad Faisal. To make this possible, Grade-22 officer of the Pakistan Administrative Service, Zaheer Hassan, who was already residing in that house, was instructed to vacate it and instead be shifted to the house where DIG Faisal was residing without allotment. The Services Department was subsequently instructed to prepare a new summary for formal allotment. Additional Secretary (Welfare), Capt. (R) Samiullah Farooq, wrote in the file that as per telephonic instructions received from the Chief Minister's Office, the allotment summary was being resubmitted accordingly. The final decision approved the allotment of House No. 12, Golf Lane, GOR-I to DIG Muhammad Faisal. An interesting twist followed when it was revealed that House No. 12, which was now approved for DIG Faisal, was officially allotted to Grade-22 PAS officer Zaheer Hassan, who was asked to vacate the house. Furthermore, it was recommended in the same set of documents that House No. 5, Patiala House, be officially designated as the permanent residence of DIG Operations Lahore. However, House No. 5 had already been approved earlier for DIG Operations but is currently occupied by former DIG Operations Dr. Haider Ashraf. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
20 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Expert rubbishes India's 'comical' plane downing claim
Rafale fighter jet taxis on the tarmac during its induction ceremony at an air force station in Ambala, India, September 10, REUTERS A senior research fellow at China's Charhar Institute, Prof Cheng Xizhong, has rubbished Indian Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh's claim that the Indian Air Force (IAF) had shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one large aircraft during Operation Sindoor in early May. In a statement issued on Sunday, the expert said everything should be based on evidence but India has never produced any evidence to prove that it had shot down Pakistani fighter jets even more than three months after conflict that started on May 7 and concluded on May 10. "The Indian side has not presented any evidence, such as photos of the wreckage of the fighter jets, radar monitoring data, etc, while the Pakistani side had previously presented a large amount of relevant evidence of shooting down the Indian fighter jets. "Therefore, the remarks by Indian Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh are comical, implausible and unconvincing. We may call it self-amusement," he said. In contrast, Prof Cheng said, the Pakistan side immediately provided a detailed technical report to international media after the clash ended. Moreover, there are also confirmations from world leaders, senior Indian politicians, and foreign intelligence assessments that India suffered heavy losses of multiple aircraft. "It is thus evident that no Pakistani fighter jet was hit or destroyed by the Indian side. On the contrary, the Pakistani side shot down six Indian fighter jets and destroyed S-400 air defense positions, among other achievements, which is an indisputable fact," he added. On Saturday, Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif also dismissed claims by the IAF chief, calling them "as implausible as they are ill-timed". In a statement posted on microblogging site "X", Asif said it was "ironic" that senior Indian military officers were being made to front "a monumental failure caused by the strategic shortsightedness of Indian politicians". He said for three months after the operation, no such assertions were made, whereas Pakistan had immediately provided "detailed technical briefings" to the international media - supported by independent observations acknowledging the loss of multiple Indian aircraft, including Rafale jets, as reported by world leaders, senior Indian politicians, and foreign intelligence assessments. Asif reiterated that Pakistan had destroyed six Indian jets, S-400 air defence batteries, and unmanned aircraft, while disabling several Indian airbases.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
No proof of Pakistani jet losses, says Chinese expert
Listen to article Prof Cheng Xizhong of China's Charhar Institute on Sunday debunked Indian Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh's claim that the Indian Air Force (IAF) had shot down five Pakistani jets and a large aircraft during Operation Sindoor, branding the assertion as baseless and unsupported by credible evidence. Prof Cheng described the statement as groundless and widely questioned by the international community, reported PTV World. Emphasising the need for verifiable proof, he noted that India has failed to provide photographs of wreckage, radar data, or any corroborating material. In contrast, Pakistan had promptly issued comprehensive technical reports following the engagement. He termed Singh's remarks 'comical, implausible, and unconvincing,' calling them an exercise in 'self-amusement.' Three months since the hostilities ended, India has yet to substantiate its claims, while Pakistan's evidence remains on record and publicly available. Prof Cheng also cited corroborations from global leaders, senior Indian politicians, and foreign intelligence agencies affirming that India had suffered significant aerial losses. Read More: Defence minister refutes IAF chief's claim of shooting down Pakistani jets He insisted that no Pakistani fighter jets were downed; rather, Pakistan's forces had effectively deployed air defences, shooting down six Indian fighter jets and neutralising S-400 air defence systems—facts he described as indisputable. The comments followed Air Chief Marshal Singh's statement on Saturday at an event in Bengaluru, where he claimed India had downed 'at least five fighters' and one larger aircraft—possibly a surveillance plane—using the S-400 surface-to-air missile system. He cited electronic tracking data as confirmation. 'We have at least five fighters confirmed killed, and one large aircraft,' Singh said, adding that the larger aircraft was shot down at a distance of approximately 300 km (186 miles). He did not specify the types of fighter jets downed but stated that Indian airstrikes also targeted another surveillance aircraft and 'a few F-16s' parked in hangars at two air bases in Pakistan. In contrast to Singh's statement, the Pakistan Air Force shot down six Indian aircraft during the May conflict, including three Rafale jets, in response to Indian missile attacks. A day later, a senior French intelligence official confirmed to CNN that one Indian Air Force Rafale had been downed by Pakistan—possibly marking the first known combat loss of the French-made aircraft. Also Read: Field Marshal Asim Munir meets US defence officials In response, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif dismissed Singh's remarks as 'implausible' and 'ill-timed,' accusing the Indian military leadership of engaging in politically motivated narrative building. He noted that while Pakistan had immediately shared detailed technical briefings with the international media, India had waited three months before issuing its claim. 'The belated assertions made by the Indian Air Force Chief regarding the alleged destruction of Pakistani aircraft during Operation Sindoor are as implausible as they are ill-timed,' he said in a statement. He further criticised Indian military leaders for being used as 'the faces of monumental failure caused by the strategic shortsightedness of Indian politicians.' Asif invited India to resolve the matter through transparency, suggesting an independent audit of both countries' aircraft inventories. 'If the truth is in question, let both sides open their aircraft inventories to independent verification—though we suspect such transparency would only expose the reality India seeks to obscure,' he added.
