
Colombia ex-president Uribe guilty of abuse of process, bribery of a public official
Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia read her decision aloud to the court. She found Uribe not guilty of a third charge, bribery.
The ruling, which Uribe is expected to appeal, is the latest decision in a hugely politicized case that has run for some 13 years.
Uribe, 73, and his supporters say the process is a persecution and that he is innocent. His detractors have celebrated it as the deserved downfall for a man who has been repeatedly accused of close relationships with violent right-wing paramilitaries, but never convicted of any crime.
Each charge carries a jail sentence of between six and 12 years. Heredia is expected to sentence Uribe in a later hearing.
"Justice does not kneel before power," Heredia told the court on Monday morning, before spending about nine hours reading her decision. "It is at the service of the Colombian people."
"We want to say to Colombia that justice has arrived," she said, adding that her full decision is some 1,000 pages long.
Uribe and one of his lawyers, Jaime Granados, joined the hearing via video link, while another lawyer, Jaime Lombana, appeared in person.
Granados said the presumption of Uribe's innocence should be maintained and asked for him to remain free during the remainder of the process, a decision Heredia said she will take on Friday.
Both detractors and supporters of the former president gathered outside the court, with some Uribe backers sporting masks of his face.
Even if the conviction is eventually upheld, Uribe may be allowed to serve his sentence on house arrest because of his age.
Uribe, who was president from 2002 to 2010 and oversaw a military offensive against leftist guerrilla groups, was investigated along with several allies over allegations of witness tampering carried out in an attempt to discredit accusations he had ties to paramilitaries.
Judges have twice rejected requests by prosecutors to shelve the case, which stems from Uribe's allegation in 2012 that leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda had orchestrated a plot to tie him to paramilitaries.
The Supreme Court said in 2018 that Cepeda had collected information from former fighters as part of his work and had not paid or pressured former paramilitaries. Instead, the court said it was Uribe and his allies who pressured witnesses.
Cepeda attended the hearing in person with his counsel.
Uribe's trial triggered sharp criticism from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio ahead of the judge's decision. Uribe had a close relationship with the U.S. during his two terms as president.
"Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland. The weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisomeprecedent," Rubio said on X.
"A decision against the ex-president could generate some kind of reprisal by the government of the United States," Banco de Bogota said in a note on Monday, referring to a proposal by U.S. Republican lawmaker Mario Diaz-Balart to cut non-military aid to Colombia next year, partly on concerns of due process violations in the Uribe case.
Uribe, who was placed under house arrest for two months in 2020, is head of the powerful Democratic Center party and was a senator for years both before and after his presidency.
He has repeatedly emphasized that he extradited paramilitary leaders to the United States.
Colombia's truth commission says paramilitary groups, which demobilized under deals with Uribe's government, killed more than 205,000 people, nearly half of the 450,000 deaths recorded during the ongoing civil conflict.
Paramilitaries, along with guerrilla groups and members of the armed forces, also committed forced disappearances, sexual violence, displacement and other crimes.
Uribe joins a list of Latin American leaders who have been convicted and sometimes jailed, including Peru's Alberto Fujimori, Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Ecuador's Rafael Correa, Argentina's Cristina Fernandez and Panama's RicardoMartinelli.
(Reporting by Luis Jaime Acosta, Carlos Vargas, Nelson Bocanegra and Julia Symmes Cobb; Editing by Leslie Adler)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Zelenskiy, Trump speak by phone
U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 28, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
M23 rebels killed 319 civilians in east Congo in July, UN rights chief says
Members of the M23 rebel group mount their vehicles in Goma, North Kivu province in the East of the Democratic Republic of Congo, April 7, 2025. REUTERS/Arlette Bashizi/File Photo KINSHASA (Reuters) -Rwanda-backed M23 rebels killed at least 319 civilians, including 48 women and 19 children, last month in eastern Congo, Volker Turk, U.N. high commissioner for human rights, said on Wednesday, citing "first-hand accounts". (Reporting by Congo newsroomWriting by Robbie Corey-Boulet)


The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Ukrainians' trust in Zelenskiy dips after wartime protests, pollster finds
FILE PHOTO: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy speaks during a meeting with Italian President Sergio Mattarella at Quirinale Palace, in Rome, Italy, July 9, 2025. Italian Presidency Press Office/Paolo Giandotti/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo KYIV (Reuters) -Public trust in Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy fell to its lowest level in around six months following rare wartime protests against a move to curb the power of anti-corruption watchdogs, a leading Kyiv pollster said on Wednesday. The survey, by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, is the first by a major Ukrainian pollster to measure public sentiment since Zelenskiy sparked anger with a move to subordinate the agencies to a hand-picked prosecutor-general. Thousands of Ukrainians had rallied in Kyiv and other cities late last month against the fast-tracked measures, prompting Zelenskiy and his ruling party to quickly reverse course. The KIIS poll, which began a day after the controversial vote on July 22, found that 58% of Ukrainians currently trust Zelenskiy, down from an 18-month high of 74% in May and 67% in February-March. The move against anti-corruption authorities last month had fuelled discontent in particular because of what critics described as the speed and lack of transparency with which the measures were passed. Fighting corruption and improving governance are key requirements for loan-dependent Ukraine to join the European Union, a step many consider critical to fending off future Russian pressure. While much smaller, the demonstrations had prompted comparisons to Ukraine's 2014 Maidan revolution, when protesters toppled a leader accused of graft and heavy-handed rule in favour of closer ties with the West. KIIS found that those who distrust Zelenskiy cited corruption and his handling of the war as the top two reasons, at 21% and 20%, respectively. Trust had already been decreasing before the protests, it added, but the demonstrations "undoubtedly had an impact" on the continuing slide. Zelenskiy's lowest wartime trust rating was 52% in December 2024, according to KIIS. The latest survey involved more than 1,000 respondents across government-controlled Ukraine. 'WORRYING SIGNAL' In a research note, executive director Anton Grushetskyi said Zelenskiy still enjoyed "a fairly high level of trust" but said the gradual decrease should serve as a warning. "The persistent downward trend is a worrying signal that requires attention and thoughtful decisions from the authorities," he wrote. Zelenskiy, after bowing to pressure and submitting new legislation reversing the controversial measures last month, said he "respects the position of all Ukrainians". However, some protesters interviewed by Reuters said the scandal had at least somewhat altered their perception of Zelenskiy, whose office has also faced allegations of using wartime to centralise power. It has denied those charges. "On the first day of the protests, I thought #12414 simply as a reminder," said 22-year-old IT worker Artem Astaf'yev, referring to the controversial law's designation. A first-time protester, Astaf'yev added that he would probably not vote for Zelenskiy's ruling Servant of the People party in future polls. Elections are currently suspended under martial law. Others like Yuriy Fylypenko, a 50-year-old veteran, said the public outcry had proven that Ukraine's traditionally vibrant civil society could be stoked even in wartime. "We have been convinced that Ukraine is not sleeping, that Ukraine is full of potential to defend democratic principles." (Reporting by Dan Peleschuk)