logo
Senior citizens are rattled by news that telehealth coverage could expire next month

Senior citizens are rattled by news that telehealth coverage could expire next month

NBC News27-02-2025
If Congress doesn't act, on April 1, the prior rules will largely be restored, which means that most telehealth appointments will only be covered if they're provided in person at rural medical facilities.
There will be exceptions for certain services, such as mental health care and some visits for home dialysis treatments.
A lapse could have ramifications for millions of Medicare beneficiaries. Roughly 13% of the nearly 22 million people with traditional coverage received a telehealth service between October and December 2023.
Dr. Cecil Bennett, a family medicine physician in Newnan, Georgia, outside Atlanta, estimates that half of his clinic's patients are on Medicare. Some already have telehealth appointments scheduled months out. He often uses telehealth to deliver simple information, like lab results, and fears that some patients may miss necessary appointments if they require an in-person visit, allowing conditions to worsen.
'There's no doubt in my mind that seniors are going to suffer if this waiver goes away,' he said.
In Mississippi, Dr. Saurabh Chandra, chief telehealth officer at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, said the flexibilities can mean the difference between older adults having a virtual appointment at 2 a.m. during a busy flu season or traveling long distances to an emergency room.
'This state was made for telehealth,' he said.
As Congress clashes over a GOP-led House proposal to slash Medicaid spending, advocates are hopeful that telehealth services offered via Medicare will remain a bipartisan cause.
'Federal government does things last minute,' said Kyle Zebley, senior vice president for public policy at the American Telemedicine Association.
'We have a wonderful place in being bipartisan that we find ourselves in a very divided, very polarized time,' he said. 'We'll continue to work to do all we can to maintain that.'
Telehealth, though, hasn't been immune from political crossfire.
What initially started as a two-year extension for the program shrank to three months during the scramble last December to avoid a government shutdown after President-elect Donald Trump and Elon Musk pushed to kill a broader spending bill.
Some members of Congress hope to allay older adults' concerns and make the flexibilities permanent.
In a statement to NBC News, Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester, D-Del., who co-introduced a bipartisan bill to solidify the provisions when she served in the House, described the flexibilities as 'vital' — 'especially for those in underserved and rural communities and those with accessibility or transportation barriers' — and said she was still fighting for permanent protections.
Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., whose viral social media posts brought attention to the looming deadline, said he plans to introduce similar legislation.
'What is the rationale for this other than making life more difficult for many seniors?' Khanna said in a post on X.
With the fate of telehealth still uncertain, Bennett is waiting to see whether the appointments he's booked can proceed.
'I really hope that Congress acts quickly,' Bennett said. 'I know that they kick the can down the road — I'm fine with that as long as they keep kicking the can.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants to put Washington DC under full federal control. Here's why he probably can't
Trump wants to put Washington DC under full federal control. Here's why he probably can't

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Trump wants to put Washington DC under full federal control. Here's why he probably can't

President Donald Trump has repeatedly voiced intentions to place Washington D.C. under complete federal control, citing a need to curb crime. This stance comes despite city officials saying that crime rates are already on the decline. While the president holds some sway over the capital's police force and National Guard, a comprehensive federal takeover would almost certainly face legal challenges and likely be blocked in court. The U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1787, established a federal capital district to serve as the permanent seat of government. It explicitly grants Congress complete legislative authority over the district. However, Congress has historically delegated a degree of day-to-day municipal governance to other bodies. How is DC governed? A federal law passed by Congress in 1973, known as the Home Rule Act, allowed city residents to elect a mayor and council, who have some autonomy to pass their own laws. Congress still has budgetary oversight over D.C., however, and can overturn local legislation. Congress did that most recently in 2023, voting to overturn changes to Washington's laws that lowered penalties for some crimes. Who controls DC law enforcement? The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has authority over the city's Metropolitan Police Department. However, the Home Rule Act allows the president to take control of the MPD for federal purposes during emergencies if 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' A presidential takeover is limited to 30 days, unless Congress votes to extend it through a joint resolution. Trump invoked this part of the Home Rule Act on Monday, saying in an executive order that there is a "crime emergency" in the city that necessitates federal management of the police department. Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims of unchecked violence, saying the city is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime, including murders, spiked in 2023, turning Washington into one of the nation's deadliest cities, according to city police data. However, violent crime dropped 35 per cent in 2024, according to federal data, and it has fallen an additional 26 per cent in the first seven months of 2025. Trump also has broad control over the D.C. National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen. They report directly to the president, unlike counterparts in other states and territories. Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington. Can Trump 'federalize' DC? It is highly unlikely. To exert full federal control of D.C., Trump would need Congress to repeal the Home Rule Act. Such a repeal would require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, where Trump's Republican Party has a 53-47 advantage. Democrats have been supportive of home rule for DC and are not expected to cross party lines to endorse Trump's vision. But there are ways Trump can exert more influence over the district without fully taking it over. Trump in recent months has directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. Trump has broad authority to reallocate FBI personnel, and in recent months, FBI agents around the country have been given temporary assignments to help with immigration enforcement. Trump also signed an executive order in March to make D.C. "safe and beautiful," establishing a task force to increase police presence in public areas, maximize immigration enforcement, and expedite concealed carry licenses. Can Trump evict DC's homeless population? Trump has said homeless people must move out of Washington, without offering specifics of a plan to accomplish this. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." The federal government owns much of Washington's parkland, so the Trump administration has legal authority to clear homeless encampments in those areas, like President Joe Biden did while in office. But the federal government cannot force people to move out of the city because they lack shelter, legal experts said.

'Hyperbolic word salad': Row breaks out as Reform UK politician urges Scots council to rule out low emission zone
'Hyperbolic word salad': Row breaks out as Reform UK politician urges Scots council to rule out low emission zone

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

'Hyperbolic word salad': Row breaks out as Reform UK politician urges Scots council to rule out low emission zone

Councillor Jamie McGuire labelled the schemes in four Scottish cities as "little more than cash cows" in a blistering statement. A row has broken out after a Reform UK politician urged Renfrewshire Council to rule out ever introducing congestion charges or a low emission zone (LEZ). ‌ Councillor Jamie McGuire labelled the schemes as "little more than cash cows" and said the local authority "must have no part in this" in a blistering statement. ‌ But the elected member for Renfrew North and Braehead has been accused of "hyperbolic word salad" on an issue that was settled almost two years ago. ‌ In September 2023, the SNP administration confirmed it was not considering the introduction of an LEZ in Paisley or any other part of Renfrewshire at a full council meeting. Councillor McGuire, who defected from Labour to Nigel Farage's Reform in June, said: "Scotland's four main cities already have LEZs in place and their experience should be a warning. "These schemes have acted as little more than cash cows, generating income for councils while hitting those who can least afford it. ‌ "People on the lowest incomes, who are far more likely to drive older vehicles, have been penalised simply for trying to get to work, take their children to school or care for relatives. "Renfrewshire must have no part in this. A congestion charge or LEZ in our towns would be a hammer blow to local households and businesses. We are a working community that depends on accessible, affordable transport. "Many residents travel across Renfrewshire for work, education, and caring responsibilities, while small enterprises rely heavily on vans and cars to serve customers and move goods. ‌ "Imposing extra charges on them is not just unreasonable, it risks undermining our local economy and making it harder for people to live and work here." He added: "The SNP-led Renfrewshire Council must act now to rule out – clearly, unequivocally and permanently – ever introducing either a congestion charge or a low emission zone in our area. "Residents deserve certainty, not the constant threat of new charges hanging over them." ‌ Councillor Jim Paterson, SNP convener of the planning and climate change policy board, claimed Councillor McGuire was "trying to raise his profile" with the comments. The elected member for Renfrew South and Gallowhill said: "Another day, another fabricated outrage from Councillor McGuire. "The position of the SNP administration and indeed Councillor McGuire on this issue was settled in 2023 when the Conservative group called on the council to rule out establishing any form of LEZ in Paisley and wider Renfrewshire for the duration of this council term. "The SNP position along with a Labour amendment was agreed then by the vast majority of councillors which stated that the council would not consider the introduction of a low emission zone (LEZ/ULEZ) in Paisley or any other parts of Renfrewshire. That position remains unchanged. "Councillor McGuire, like his newfound political hero Nigel Farage, may like to trade in misinformation but to imply that there has been any change to the agreed position of 2023 is just nonsense and to suggest there is a 'constant fear' hanging over residents is just hyperbolic word salad from a councillor desperately trying to raise his profile to secure the top spot in his party's internal list for Holyrood 2026."

California GOP rep's town hall descends into chaos
California GOP rep's town hall descends into chaos

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

California GOP rep's town hall descends into chaos

A California Republican faced the music of an angry crowd of constituents screaming in opposition to President Donald Trump's agenda during a town hall event in his district. Representing northern California's northeastern corner, Doug LaMalfa, is the latest GOP lawmaker to get viciously booed back home this year. 'That's a lie!' one agitated attended yelled. Other's blurted out that the lawmaker was an '[expletive]' and another labeled him as 'shameless.' Several lawmakers have now been viciously jeered at while facing their constituents and trying to tout what the GOP sees as victories within Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' his sweeping tax cut and spending bill that was signed into law last month. The Republican was also grilled about Trump and whether Congress will force the administration to release files on [sexual] offender Jeffrey Epstein . 'The speaker of the House released you guys so you didn't have to deal with releasing the files,' one woman reportedly charged. 'You all left.' LaMalfa admitted it's a 'bad look' for the documents to continually be 'suppressed.' One constituent demanded that LaMalfa 'apologize to the farmers.' The lawmaker shot back that he had no intention of doing so. After the demand, the lawmaker immediately pivoted to speaking about 'due process for Ghislaine Maxwell, due process for the people on January 6...' before the crowd erupted in chaos. Many of those in the crowd were concerned about the cuts to social services contained within the Trump-backed bill, particularly to Medicaid and public broadcasters. '[Expletive]' one constituent screamed while the congressman was talking about the bill. Photos of the town hall show that the event hall in Chico, California, full with some attendees lining the walls. Many held red paper that they waved in disapproval. Since the president has come back into power and taken drastic action slashing federal jobs with DOGE and deporting over a hundred thousands migrants many who oppose the Republican, many Republican town halls have devolved into chaos. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., was also met by a combative crowd earlier this month when talking about the multi-trillion dollar package. The Nebraskan similarly faced a raucous crowd that labeled him a 'liar.' LaMalfa's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store