Trump seeks to use Canada's recognition of Palestinian state as leverage in trade talks
By MICHELLE L. PRICE
Canada's announcement it will recognize a Palestinian state 'will make it very hard' for the United States to reach a trade agreement with its northern neighbor, President Donald Trump said.
Trump's threat, posted early Thursday on his social media platform, is the latest way he has sought to use his trade war to coerce countries on unrelated issues. And when other allies had raised the matter of Palestinian statehood, the Republican president had been ambivalent.
He said this week that he did not mind that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was taking the position that the United Kingdom would recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agreed to a ceasefire in Gaza, allowed the United Nations to bring in aid and took other steps toward long-term peace.
'We have no view on that,' he told reporters later on Air Force One.
Last week, the Republican president said French President Emmanuel Macron's similar move was "not going to change anything.'
But Trump, who has heckled Canada for months and suggested it should become its 51st U.S. state, is now indicating that Prime Minister Mark Carney's similar recognition would become leverage before a looming deadline that the American leader set in U.S.-Canada trade talks.
'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' Trump said in his Truth Social post. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!'
Trump has threatened to impose a 35% tariff on Canada if no deal is reached by Friday, when he's said he will levy tariffs against goods from dozens of countries if they don't reach agreements with the U.S.
A spokesperson for Carney declined comment.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said later that Trump "expressed his displeasure and his disagreement with the leaders of France, the United Kingdom and Canada. He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages."
Some imports from Canada are still protected by the 2020 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which is up for renegotiation next year.
Carney's announcement Wednesday comes amid a broader global shift against Israel's policies in Gaza.
Though Trump this week said he was 'not going to take a position' on recognizing a Palestinian state, he later said that such a move would be rewarding Hamas, whose surprise Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel prompted a declaration of war and a massive military retaliation from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Trump's new cudgel against Canada comes after he sought this week to impose steep tariffs on Brazil because it indicted former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally who like the U.S. president has faced criminal charges for attempting to overturn the results of his election loss.
Citing a personal grievance in trade talks with Brazil and now Canada's symbolic announcement on a Palestinian state adds to the jumble of reasons Trump has pointed to for his trade war, such as stopping human trafficking, stopping the flow of fentanyl, balancing the budget and protecting U.S. manufacturing.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
19 minutes ago
- Japan Today
How Russia reins in the internet by blocking websites and isolating it from the rest of the world
An activist holds a sign reading, "For Russia without censorship. Orwell wrote a dystopia, not an instruction manual,' referring to author George Orwell during a protest in front of the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, July 22, 2025, prior to lawmakers approving a measure that punishes online searches for information that is deemed 'extremist.' (AP Photo) By DASHA LITVINOVA YouTube videos that won't load. A visit to a popular independent media website that produces only a blank page. Cell phone internet connections that are down for hours or days. Going online in Russia can be frustrating, complicated and even dangerous. It's not a network glitch but a deliberate, multipronged and long-term effort by authorities to bring the internet under the Kremlin's full control. Authorities adopted restrictive laws and banned websites and platforms that won't comply. Technology has been perfected to monitor and manipulate online traffic. While it's still possible to circumvent restrictions by using virtual private network apps, those are routinely blocked, too. Authorities further restricted internet access this summer with widespread shutdowns of cell phone internet connections and adopting a law punishing users for searching for content they deem illicit. They also are threatening to go after the popular WhatsApp platform while rolling out a new 'national' messenger that's widely expected to be heavily monitored. President Vladimir Putin urged the government to 'stifle' foreign internet services and ordered officials to assemble a list of platforms from 'unfriendly' states that should be restricted. Experts and rights advocates told The Associated Press that the scale and effectiveness of the restrictions are alarming. Authorities seem more adept at it now, compared with previous, largely futile efforts to restrict online activities, and they're edging closer to isolating the internet in Russia. Human Rights Watch researcher Anastasiia Kruope describes Moscow's approach to reining in the internet as 'death by a thousand cuts." "Bit by bit, you're trying to come to a point where everything is controlled.' Kremlin efforts to control what Russians do, read or say online dates to 2011-12, when the internet was used to challenge authority. Independent media outlets bloomed, and anti-government demonstrations that were coordinated online erupted after disputed parliamentary elections and Putin's decision to run again for president. Russia began adopting regulations tightening internet controls. Some blocked websites; others required providers to store call records and messages, sharing it with security services if needed, and install equipment allowing authorities to control and cut off traffic. Companies like Google or Facebook were pressured to store user data on Russian servers, to no avail, and plans were announced for a 'sovereign internet' that could be cut off from the rest of the world. Russia's popular Facebook-like social media platform VK, founded by Pavel Durov long before he launched the Telegram messenger, came under the control of Kremlin-friendly companies. Russia tried to block Telegram between 2018-20 but failed. Prosecutions for social media posts and comments became common, showing that authorities were closely watching the online space. Still, experts had dismissed Kremlin efforts to rein in the internet as futile, arguing Russia was far from building something akin to China's 'Great Firewall,' which Beijing uses to block foreign websites. After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the government blocked major social media like Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, as well as Signal and a few other messaging apps. VPNs also were targeted, making it harder to reach restricted websites. YouTube access was disrupted last summer in what experts called deliberate throttling by authorities. The Kremlin blamed YouTube owner Google for not maintaining its hardware in Russia. The platform has been wildly popular in Russia, both for entertainment and for voices critical of the Kremlin, like the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Cloudflare, an internet infrastructure provider, said in June that websites using its services were being throttled in Russia. Independent news site Mediazona reported that several other popular Western hosting providers also are being inhibited. Cyber lawyer Sarkis Darbinyan, founder of Russian internet freedom group Roskomsvoboda, said authorities have been trying to push businesses to migrate to Russian hosting providers that can be controlled. He estimates about half of all Russian websites are powered by foreign hosting and infrastructure providers, many offering better quality and price than domestic equivalents. A 'huge number' of global websites and platforms use those providers, he said, so cutting them off means those websites 'automatically become inaccessible' in Russia too. Another concerning trend is the consolidation of Russia's internet providers and companies that manage IP addresses, according to a July 30 Human Rights Watch report. Last year, authorities raised the cost of obtaining an internet provider license from 7,500 rubles (about $90) to 1 million rubles (over $12,300), and state data shows that more than half of all IP addresses in Russia are managed by seven large companies, with Rostelecom, Russia's state telephone and internet giant, accounting for 25%. The Kremlin is striving 'to control the internet space in Russia, and to censor things, to manipulate the traffic,' said HRW's Kruope. A new Russian law criminalized online searches for broadly defined 'extremist' materials. That could include LGBTQ+ content, opposition groups, some songs by performers critical of the Kremlin — and Navalny's memoir, which was designated as extremist last week. Right advocates say it's a step toward punishing consumers — not just providers — like in Belarus, where people are routinely fined or jailed for reading or following certain independent media outlets. Stanislav Seleznev, cyber security expert and lawyer with the Net Freedom rights group, doesn't expect ubiquitous prosecutions, since tracking individual online searches in a country of 146 million remains a tall order. But even a limited number of cases could scare many from restricted content, he said. Another major step could be blocking WhatsApp, which monitoring service Mediascope said had over 97 million monthly users in April. WhatsApp 'should prepare to leave the Russian market,' said lawmaker Anton Gorelkin, and a new 'national' messenger, MAX, developed by social media company VK, would take its place. Telegram, another popular messenger, probably won't be restricted, he said. MAX, promoted as a one-stop shop for messaging, online government services, making payments and more, was rolled out for beta tests but has yet to attract a wide following. Over 2 million people registered by July, the Tass news agency reported. Its terms and conditions say it will share user data with authorities upon request, and a new law stipulates its preinstallation in all smartphones sold in Russia. State institutions, officials and businesses are actively encouraged to move communications and blogs to MAX. Anastasia Zhyrmont of the Access Now internet freedom group said both Telegram and WhatsApp were disrupted in Russia in July in what could be a test of how potential blockages would affect internet infrastructure. It wouldn't be uncommon. In recent years, authorities regularly tested cutting off the internet from the rest of the world, sometimes resulting in outages in some regions. Darbinyan believes the only way to make people use MAX is to 'shut down, stifle' every Western alternative. 'But again, habits ... do not change in a year or two. And these habits acquired over decades, when the internet was fast and free,' he said. Government media and internet regulator Roskomnadzor uses more sophisticated methods, analyzing all web traffic and identifying what it can block or choke off, Darbinyan said. It's been helped by 'years of perfecting the technology, years of taking over and understanding the architecture of the internet and the players,' as well as Western sanctions and companies leaving the Russian market since 2022, said Kruope of Human Rights Watch. Russia is 'not there yet' in isolating its internet from the rest of the world, Darbinyan said, but Kremlin efforts are 'bringing it closer.' © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
Russia to stop abiding by defunct INF treaty, scrap self-imposed missile limits
Russia's foreign ministry says the country will no longer abide by a now-defunct treaty with the United States prohibiting the deployment of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles. The Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, known as INF Treaty, was one of the key nuclear arms control pacts between the US and Russia. The INF treaty expired in 2019 due to heightened tensions between the two nations. Nevertheless, Russia had maintained that it would refrain from producing or deploying INF systems as long as the US did not deploy similar missiles. The Russian foreign ministry issued a statement on Monday saying that "the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of American-made ground-based intermediate-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region." It noted that "the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared." The ministry added that Russia "no longer consider itself bound by the relevant self-imposed restrictions." Last year, Russian President Vladimir Putin noted the need to resume the production of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, and to deploy them. On Friday, he revealed that mass production of a new intermediate-range ballistic missile called Oreshnik had begun, and that it is slated for deployment. US President Donald Trump is urging Russia to agree to a ceasefire in its conflict with Ukraine by Friday. He has warned that if Moscow fails to meet the deadline, it will face severe tariffs.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Netanyahu Fires Attorney General as Domestic Pressure over Gaza Heats up
TEL AVIV – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government voted unanimously Monday to dismiss his attorney general, Gali Baharav-Miara, the chief prosecutor in his ongoing corruption case, as he faces growing criticism inside Israel and U.S. impatience over his government's management of the war in Gaza. The vote to remove Baharav-Miara, a frequent critic of the government's policies, marks one of the more significant steps in Netanyahu's years-long effort to exert political influence over the country's legal system. It is also expected to lead to a confrontation between the elected government and the appointed justices on Israel's Supreme Court, who will review and rule on the legality of Baharav-Miara's removal. Immediately after the vote, opposition party Yesh Atid filed a petition to block the move, as did the Movement for Quality Government in Israel, a watchdog group that said the vote would politicize the office of the attorney general. In response, Supreme Court Deputy President Noam Sohlberg issued a temporary order freezing the decision. In a letter to her staff, Baharav-Miara wrote that the government's decision was unlawful. 'Political pressure will not deter us from continuing to perform our duties with statesmanship, professionalism, and integrity,' she wrote. According to a draft resolution released last week, cabinet ministers said the move was necessary because the government had 'no confidence whatsoever' in Baharav-Miara. Netanyahu's supporters say she routinely overstepped, including in March, when she blocked the prime minister's move to fire the head of Israel's internal security service, Ronen Bar. Baharav-Miara said the dismissal was improper because Netanyahu and some of his closest aides were facing several criminal investigations. The political turmoil Monday unfolded as Netanyahu faced renewed pressure to end the war. On Sunday, 19 former Israeli military, security and intelligence chiefs released a video criticizing the government for prolonging the conflict and failing to plan for the day after. Together, they warned Israel that the government was harming the country's security, and urged the prime minister to stop military operations in Gaza and secure a deal to release the remaining hostages. 'There are situations where a black flag must be raised, and we must say, this ends here,' said Moshe Yaalon, a former chief of staff for the Israeli military. 'Right now, we have a government that has been dragged by messianics into an irrational direction,' he added, referring to the far-right members of Netanyahu's coalition. Those members, including several cabinet ministers, oppose negotiating with Hamas and have called on the prime minister to reoccupy Gaza and allow them to rebuild Jewish settlements there. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff was also in Israel over the weekend to discuss efforts to pressure Hamas. On Saturday, he met with the families of hostages in Hostages Square – the central Tel Aviv plaza where tens of thousands have gathered for weekly protests – to relay a message that the United States was now pursuing a more inclusive hostage release agreement, one that would require Hamas to free all those still in captivity in exchange for a formal end to the conflict. In recent days, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a smaller militant group in Gaza, triggered mass street protests in Tel Aviv after they released videos showing two male hostages emaciated and begging to be saved. Israelis were horrified by the footage of the two hostages: 24-year-old Evyatar David – who was shown shirtless, his bones protruding as he was forced to dig what he said could be his own grave – and Rom Braslavski, 22, who was seen lying on a mattress and pleading for food. Monday's cabinet vote took place 'as our hostages are dying in the tunnels, as Israeli society is tearing itself apart,' Yair Golan, an Israeli opposition politician, said at a demonstration near the Knesset on Monday afternoon. Israel's government, Golan said, 'is not dealing with freeing the hostages, ending the war. … It is not bothered with Israel's safety.' During almost two years of war, military and security officials, as well as the families of hostages, have warned that Israel's ground invasion endangers those still held in Gaza – and that a negotiated agreement is the only way to bring the majority of the hostages home. An Israeli military investigation last year found that operations, 'although gradual and cautious, had a circumstantial influence' on the Hamas militants who killed six hostages in a tunnel where they were being held in Rafah in southern Gaza. But on Monday, Netanyahu projected an image of defiance, praising Israelis 'who fight together and win together' in a post on X. He vowed to 'continue until the enemy is defeated, all the hostages are released, and security is guaranteed for the residents of Israel.' Israeli news media reported late Monday that Netanyahu would convene his security cabinet this week to discuss plans for Gaza. A person familiar with decision-making in the prime minister's office, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak with the news media, said that Netanyahu had decided to 'occupy the Gaza Strip, meaning that military operations will also take place in areas where hostages are being held.' In pursuing moves against the attorney general, and leaning toward more military action in Gaza, Netanyahu 'is acting against the will of the Israeli majority, who want a comprehensive deal today to bring the hostages home and end the war,' said Gayil Talshir, a senior lecturer on political science at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. 'Today, the prime minister and his government see themselves as above the law.'
