logo
Fresh hope for thousands of households suffering with extreme service charges planned by government law change

Fresh hope for thousands of households suffering with extreme service charges planned by government law change

The Sun04-07-2025
THOUSANDS of households will be able to challenge extortionate leasehold service charges more easily, the government has said.
Households who live in leasehold properties pay fees to the person who owns the building or their managing agents for services including building insurance and maintenance.
These service charges can include repairs and maintenance for things such as the roof, windows, drains and gutters.
The payments are usually due twice a year and the exact amount can vary depending on the costs the landlord incurs.
This can mean that they can be hit with surprise bills that can often run into thousands of pounds.
Almost five million homeowners pay service fees, which have risen by 11% in the last year to an average of £2,300 a month, according to Hamptons.
Leaseholders have been promised that the system will change by several governments and Labour when it was in opposition.
The government is hoping to tackle this problem by forcing companies to be transparent about the fees they are charging, Sky News reports.
The reforms will be introduced after a consultation, the government said.
Leaseholders will receive standardised service charge documentation that will explain clearly and in detail how the fees are calculated and where their money is being spent.
Other reforms will stop leaseholders from automatically having to pay for a landlord's legal costs even if they have won their case.
The changes will allow homeowners to challenge unreasonable service charges more easily, housing minister Matthew Pennycook said.
He added that the changes will put pressure on managing agents to reduce the fees.
It will also introduce a strict new qualification system for managing agents to try and improve standards in the sector.
Mr Pennycook told Sky News: "The system has some inherent inequities in it that do allow leaseholders to be gouged and particularly when it comes to managing agents there are unscrupulous people out there.
"They are abusing leaseholders and there's poor practice.
How do service charges work?
Service charges are fees paid by a leaseholder or resident and are set by the landlord.
The amount varies every year depending on costs to the landlord.
The details are usually set out in your lease.
Landlords usually calculate the fee based on what they think they will spend.
At the end of the year they should provide a statement.
Some leases allow landlords to ask for contributions towards a "sinking fund" which is a reserve that can be built up for larger scale works.
These could include repairing the roof of the building or fixing issues with the foundations.
"The reforms we are announcing today and reforms that are to come are going to bear down managing agents and ensure the sector as a whole is properly regulated."
Unfair charges
Some leaseholders have said that they have been charged unfair fees.
Judges have made some landlords pay back up to £100,000 after the leaseholders took them to tribunal.
In one example, the leaseholders were charged £135 to change two lightbulbs.
In February 2023, it was revealed that landlords and insurance brokers were taking up to 60% of the £1.6billion leaseholders paid for building insurance as hidden commissions.
New rules now stop insurance companies from choosing policies just to earn the highest commission.
But brokers and managing agents are still allowed to take commissions.
The government has previously promised to ban excessive building insurance commissions through the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024.
Instead, landlords will only be able to charge a straightforward and fair "permitted insurance fee" for the work they actually do, making costs clearer and protecting leaseholders from hidden charges.
However, these proposed laws still need further legislation to come into effect, and the government hasn't yet provided a timetable for this.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing previously sold The Sun that "far too many leaseholders" are being hit with "unreasonable and extortionate charges".
New rules planned by the government also plan to introduce commonhold agreements to replace leasehold ones.
Commonhold allows flat owners to jointly own and manage their buildings, which cuts out landlords and property management companies.
But the proposed rules only apply to new homes.
How to challenge fees
Leaseholders have the right to request extra information from their landlord within six months of receiving a summary of costs.
You can challenge a cost if you think it's unreasonable, the standard of work is poor or you don't think you should have to pay it.
For example, you could question why you need to pay for lift maintenance if you live in a ground-floor flat and it's not included in your lease.
Or you can challenge for communal services, such as a garden that is always closed or a concierge that never has any staff.
To challenge these services you need to apply to a tribunal which has the power to rule on whether the service charge is reasonable or payable.
In England this is the first-tier tribunal (property chamber).
In Wales it's the leasehold valuation tribunal.
Applying to the tribunal usually costs a fixed fee of £114, but you may be able to waive it if you have certain benefits.
If your case is transferred from court to the tribunal, you'll only pay the difference between the court fees and the tribunal fee - or nothing if you've already paid more than £114 in court fees.
If a hearing is scheduled, you'll need to pay an additional £227 hearing fee.
Speak to the Leasehold Advisory Service online at lease-advice.org or call them on 020 7832 2500 to find out more and get free advice on service charge issues.
You could also apply to the Housing Ombudsman if you want to complain about how your service charge fees have been managed.
The Ombudsman said cases have jumped by 25 per cent in the last four years.
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes
Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes

Leader Live

time21 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes

The Tories claim scrapping the £500 dividend allowance will drag an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying investment levies. The party is seeking to pile pressure on ministers after a memo sent by Angela Rayner to Ms Reeves, in which the Deputy Prime Minister suggested a series of tax hikes, was leaked to the press. In the document, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to raise around £325 million a year in revenue, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, the Telegraph reported. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm. 'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.' The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes. The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'. This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends. Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request. The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so. A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country. 'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could. 'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'

Newcastle launch improved bid for RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko
Newcastle launch improved bid for RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko

Telegraph

time22 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Newcastle launch improved bid for RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko

Newcastle have raised their bid for RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko. Manchester United had still to submit a formal offer for the Slovenia international as of Monday afternoon. Newcastle's first bid was worth an initial €75m (£65.5m) with a further €5m (£4.3m) in add​-ons but the Tyneside club are now guaranteeing the Bundesliga club at least €80m. United opted to prioritise a move for Sesko over Aston Villa's Ollie Watkins but the 22-year-old's price tag is creeping up now Newcastle have increased their initial offer. Newcastle co-owner Jamie Reuben is said to have held positive talks with Leipzig on Monday. Sesko is thought to be waiting to see what United do before making a final decision on his future. However, Leipzig are reported to be unwilling to sell Sesko below their stated expectations on a fee. On Sunday, Omar Berrada, the United chief executive, said the club's director of football Jason Wilcox and his recruitment team were working 'around the clock' to make further additions to the squad. United wanted to sign Liam Delap at the start of the season but the striker turned them down in order to join Chelsea from Ipswich for £30m. 'We have a team back home led by Jason – the recruitment team – that is working around the clock to ensure that we continue to find opportunities to strengthen our squad. There are lots of late calls and early morning meetings to make sure that we stay on top of it.' Newcastle's move for Sesko comes amid continuing uncertainty over the future of Alexander Isak. The Sweden striker has signalled his desire to leave St James' Park. Liverpool had a £110m bid for Isak rejected last Friday.

Uh-oh, he's back in the news — it's Prince Andrew, the duke of hazard
Uh-oh, he's back in the news — it's Prince Andrew, the duke of hazard

Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Times

Uh-oh, he's back in the news — it's Prince Andrew, the duke of hazard

For a man who hardly goes anywhere or sees anyone, the Duke of York has a very unfortunate habit of finding himself in the spotlight. He is the subject of a new book full of extraordinary allegations, which, as so often with the older of the King's brothers, can be divided into two broad categories: claims that are concerning and serious, and those that are slightly less concerning but further burnish his hard-earned and unimpeachable reputation for oafishness. • Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew's secrets, new book claims In his book the historian Andrew Lownie writes that Prince Andrew's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, which was the source of so many of his problems, may have been even more perilous than previously expected. The 'rattlesnake' Epstein sold Andrew's 'most intimate secrets' to foreign intelligence agencies, it is claimed. And Epstein is alleged by sources to have been an 'agent of influence' for President Putin. Lownie wrote: 'The Prince was a useful idiot who gave him respectability, access to political leaders and business opportunities. He found him easy to exploit.' Epstein died in his prison cell in New York in 2019 while awaiting trial for child sex trafficking offences, but the prospect that he had links to intelligence agencies who may not have the best interests of Andrew or the royal family at heart is not entirely reassuring. Rather less surprising are claims in the book, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, that Andrew can be rude to staff. One painful vignette features a head of the household at Hillsborough Castle in Northern Ireland reporting damage to a tree planted by Andrew's grandmother. He referred to her as the Queen Mother, rather than her full title, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother. This ignited the fury of Andrew, who allegedly called him a 'f***ing imbecile' and ordered him out. • Prince Andrew, the King and the 'siege of Royal Lodge' Andrew turned 65 in February. If his parents' genes are anything to go by, he could be living the strange life of a semi-detached royal for decades to come. Last year The Times reported that, shorn of an official role, he spends long days at Royal Lodge watching television in a darkened room and venturing out on horseback into the Windsor estate's 40 hectares three times a week. Meanwhile, anxious courtiers wait for the duke's past to trigger its next unwelcome detonation. The day Andrew cannot escape is one back in 2001 when a camera captured him at the Belgravia home of Ghislaine Maxwell with his arm round the waist of young Virginia Giuffre. The photograph has been disputed and he claimed that he could not recall meeting her. But Giuffre, who said she was recruited as a masseuse for Epstein by Maxwell, claimed she was forced to have sex with the duke when she was a teenager. In 2022 he reportedly settled a lawsuit brought by her for £12 million without admitting liability. He had been forced to retreat from public long before that. His boneheaded refusal to express regret for his friendship with Epstein in his notorious 2019 interview with Emily Maitlis on Newsnight, and his failure to convincingly answer questions put to him about Giuffre, caused a public outcry and ended his royal career. His alibis included that he had been at Pizza Express in Woking on the night that it was claimed he danced with her at Tramp nightclub, and that he could not have sweated on the dancefloor, as was vividly claimed, because a peculiar medical condition meant he did not perspire. Within days it was announced that he was stepping back from public duties. When he attempted a comeback in 2021, Prince Charles headed him off, with a source saying 'a way back for the duke is demonstrably not possible' and that it was an unsolvable problem because 'the spectre of this [accusation] raises its head with hideous regularity'. Not one but two streaming service dramas about the Newsnight interview kept the Epstein mess firmly in the public eye in the UK and around the world. Then in April this year Giuffre's sad story ended in tragedy as she took her own life in Australia. • Prince Andrew 'called staff member an imbecile over Queen Mother' With Epstein and the conspiracy theories around him entangling President Trump, this is a miserable mire in which Andrew is stuck. Just last week his one-time friend Maxwell, for whom he once threw a birthday party at Sandringham with Epstein in attendance, was moved to a minimum-security prison in Texas. She is serving 20 years for her role in Epstein's sex trafficking network but recently spoke to a top US Justice Department official about what she knows. One of her lawyers said they had not talked to the president about a pardon 'just yet'. Another big embarrassment for the royal family emerged last year when the prince was named as an associate of an alleged Chinese spy. A court named him as a confidant of Yang Tengbo, an alleged agent. During the case it emerged that a senior aide to Andrew had written to Yang, a Chinese businessman, telling him he was 'at the very top of a tree' of the duke's contacts. This prompted Stella Rimington, the former director of MI5, to wonder: 'Maybe he's just the weakest link.' The news led to him abandoning plans to join the King at the traditional family Christmas at Sandringham. The previous year he was invited to Sandringham with Sarah, the Duchess of York, his former wife, in a sign that they might be being gradually rehabilitated. His close family have stood by him, especially his former wife. In an intriguing arrangement they have continued to live under the same roof, despite divorcing in 1996. She has called him 'a great man' and in an interview with The Sunday Times about her experience of mental health problems with men she talked about caring for her late father. 'I was left to look after a sad man, which is sort of what I'm doing now,' she said, possibly referring to her relationship with Andrew. In an interview in The Times at the start of this year she talked about going to some 'dark places' after she had two forms of cancer diagnosed within months of each other. 'My family have been an immense support to me through this period. I've used meditation and mindfulness to help stay positive and balanced,' she said. • Sarah Ferguson: I will not let Andrew down Ferguson is said to have been regarded by the King as a helpful conduit to his brother during a period when relations between them have been strained, culminating in the 'siege of Royal Lodge'. The King had said he would cut his scandal-hit sibling off financially if he continued to stay in the 30-room home in Windsor Great Park, instead of moving to the more modest accommodation at Frogmore Cottage, the former home of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Andrew has a lease on Royal Lodge, which the Queen Mother turned into a comfortable family home, until 2078, but Charles was no longer prepared to pay for his security. The home is outside the main Windsor security cordon. In a surprise development last year Andrew raised the funds to stay from legitimate sources. The duke's finances have long been a matter of speculation, including when it emerged that Ferguson once had a debt paid off by Epstein. It is known that he sold his former marital home, Sunninghill Park, a wedding present from Queen Elizabeth, for £15 million, £3 million above the asking price. He also sold a ski chalet in Switzerland in 2022. Andrew and 'Fergie' now have the welcome distraction of four grandchildren: Princess Beatrice's daughters Sienna, aged three, and Athena Mapelli Mozzi, six months, and Princess Eugenie's sons August, four, and Ernest Brooksbank, two. And at Easter he made a surprise appearance at the royal family's Easter service in St George's Chapel, Windsor. Sources have made it clear that he will still be welcome at such 'family events'. But minor indignities continue to be visited upon the prince. A school named after him on the island of St Helena was reported to be looking for a more 'neutral' name (will the title 'Duke of York' be retired once he relinquishes it?). Among the old anecdotes that continue to be thrown up, one that seemed especially absurd involved an employee being moved to other duties because the prince objected to him wearing a nylon tie. What then to do with a problem like Prince Andrew? The writer AN Wilson wondered in The Times last year if Andrew could not be sent to govern the Falkland Islands, where the one heroic episode of his life is recorded: piloting helicopters during the war against General Galtieri's invading forces. He quickly, regretfully answered his own question: 'It would be a neat solution but, given his extreme stupidity and his ability to attract dodgy friends, it would not be politically feasible to entrust him with such a role.' The King may dream of his brother being somewhere trouble can't find him, but at least when he's in Windsor he can keep a close eye on him and perhaps get an early warning when this never-ending saga next explodes back into life.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store