Coca-Cola will launch version with U.S. cane sugar after Trump push
The announcement comes days after President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he had "been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so."
Initially, Coca-Cola did not confirm the news. The company told NBC News last week that it appreciated Trump's "enthusiasm for our iconic Coca-Cola brand" but that "details...will be shared soon."
The company said in its earnings release Tuesday morning that a version of the drink with cane sugar was indeed coming later this year.
"As part of its ongoing innovation agenda, this fall in the United States, the company plans to launch an offering made with U.S. cane sugar to expand its Trademark Coca-Cola product range," its news release said.
Coca-Cola produced for the U.S. market is typically sweetened with corn syrup, while the company uses cane sugar in some other countries, including Mexico and various European countries. In the United States, Coca-Cola made with cane sugar is colloquially known as "Mexican Coke."
The Coke made with U.S. cane sugar will complement the company's existing product line, the company added.
Last wee,k Trump said "this will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!"
The Trump administration's Make America Healthy Again initiative, named for the social movement aligned with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has pushed food companies to alter their formulations to remove ingredients like artificial dyes.
While taste preferences may differ, the health impact of cane sugar and high fructose corn syrup is essentially the same.
Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, a cardiologist and director of the Food is Medicine Institute at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, said that 'both high-fructose corn syrup and cane sugar are about 50% fructose, 50% glucose, and have identical metabolic effects."
That is, both can equally raise the risk for obesity, diabetes, and high triglycerides and blood pressure. Both provide the same number of calories, but the body processes them differently.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
How Trump's executive order could criminalize homelessness: ‘Terrifying'
Donald Trump's executive order that pushes local governments to remove unhoused people from the streets will exacerbate the issues already facing people who have unstable housing, mental health conditions and substance use disorders – and the vague wording could be used for wider action, experts say. 'It's one of the most harmful things to happen to folks who live outside in decades. It is not going to help anybody,' said Jesse Rabinowitz, campaign and communications director at the National Homelessness Law Center. 'It sets the stage for rounding up folks who are homeless, folks with mental health issues, folks who are disabled – and instead of helping them, forcing them into detention camps and institutions. So it's terrifying.' The order instructs states and municipalities to crack down on public substance use; camping, loitering, or squatting in urban spaces; mental health issues; and sex offender registration. It calls for 'shifting' people without stable housing into 'long-term institutional settings'. 'It is essentially creating a pathway to criminalize larger and larger numbers of people,' said Margaret Sullivan, a family nurse practitioner and director of programs for immigrant and unhoused communities at the FXB Center for Health and Human Rights at Harvard University. The order is 'vague and broad and potentially leaning toward creating more civil rights violations', she said. The conditions for detainment outlined in the order are poorly defined, which means it could be interpreted broadly to detain and involuntarily institutionalize people in public spaces. And it doesn't detail who may make determinations on institutionalization. 'It doesn't define 'mental health crisis'. It also doesn't define who's qualified to make an assessment,' said Rabinowitz. Individuals with mental illness are defined in the order as people who 'pose risks to themselves or the public', which could be broad enough to encompass many people, he said. And while the order sometimes refers to cracking down on 'illicit' substance use, at other times it speaks more generally to substance use disorder – a condition that can include legal substances such as alcohol and prescription medication. Many states already have laws on involuntary commitment for mental illness, Sullivan said. Typically, the process begins with clinical healthcare providers or mental health professionals and goes through the judicial system. 'There's a judicial system to ensure that the rights of the individual are not being violated. To strip away those checks and balances, and make it so that there's more essentially policing on the streets of mental illness … has never been proved to be effective in the long run,' Sullivan said. 'This goes a step further than what we've seen in some other states or cities,' she added. The order would also expand drug courts and mental health courts, and it would 'allow or require' anyone receiving federal funding for homelessness support to collect health information and share it with law enforcement. The Trump administration will also stop supporting housing-first policies, which provide housing and support services as quickly as possible to people experiencing homelessness, the order said. It comes amid significant proposed reductions for affordable housing. 'The Trump administration is going to make housing more expensive. They're going to force more people into homelessness. And then once people are homeless, they're going to take away actual solutions, and instead lock people up for being homeless,' Rabinowitz said. This approach has serious repercussions for health, he added. 'Housing is the best form of healthcare, period. The health impacts of housing are tremendous, and the health consequences of homelessness are devastating.' Higher rates of involuntary institutionalization would add greater strain to the healthcare system, Sullivan said. 'We know that involuntary commitment leads to more people being in the emergency room and emergency rooms being more overwhelmed than they currently are.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Cuts to Medicaid will also make it harder for people with mental illness and substance use disorder to access healthcare, Sullivan said. And the new federal budget cuts funding for supportive services like mental health care and substance use treatment. The administration also plans to review grants for existing substance use programs, with explicit instructions not to fund projects on harm reduction – which often includes overdose response and naloxone distribution, needle and syringe exchanges, and education on safer drug use, among other initiatives – and safe consumption. And the order instructed Trump administration officials to pursue possible lawsuits against such programs. States and cities receiving federal funding could see that money restricted or frozen if they don't enforce the new rules, the executive order said. In the wake of last year's supreme court decision on Grant's Pass, upholding the Oregon city's ordinance that effectively criminalizes homelessness, several states and municipalities introduced stricter laws to target people living outside. 'Especially when federal funding is really disappearing, this hamstrings cities and municipalities into compliance in order just to fund vital services,' Sullivan said. Focusing on programs addressing these issues in innovative ways 'makes it seem like this is another mechanism for going after places like LA or Portland or Chicago or any place that is trying to do something different with addressing homelessness and substance use', Sullivan said. 'That is, to me, what it seems like – this is a way to go after not just individuals and people, but to go after areas,' she said. But it will have sweeping effects on homeless people and others to whom the order is applied. 'I think that they are motivated by this incorrect belief that homelessness is a choice, that we have to punish people in order for them to make a better choice,' Rabinowitz said. Even if that were true, he said, 'there are no carrots right now, there's no housing that anybody can afford, but there are a whole ton of sticks, and we know that people don't need a stick. People want housing; there's just no housing that they can afford. But the executive order does nothing to address the actual causes of homelessness.' Sullivan agreed. 'It does nothing to address underlying poverty. It does nothing to address the persistently unaffordable housing crisis,' she said. 'It does nothing to expand access to Medicaid for impoverished people. Meanwhile, the numbers in the US of people who are experiencing chronic homelessness and disability are increasing.'
The Guardian
9 hours ago
- The Guardian
How Trump's executive order could criminalize homelessness: ‘Terrifying'
Donald Trump's executive order that pushes local governments to remove unhoused people from the streets will exacerbate the issues already facing people who have unstable housing, mental health conditions and substance use disorders – and the vague wording could be used for wider action, experts say. 'It's one of the most harmful things to happen to folks who live outside in decades. It is not going to help anybody,' said Jesse Rabinowitz, campaign and communications director at the National Homelessness Law Center. 'It sets the stage for rounding up folks who are homeless, folks with mental health issues, folks who are disabled – and instead of helping them, forcing them into detention camps and institutions. So it's terrifying.' The order instructs states and municipalities to crack down on public substance use; camping, loitering, or squatting in urban spaces; mental health issues; and sex offender registration. It calls for 'shifting' people without stable housing into 'long-term institutional settings'. 'It is essentially creating a pathway to criminalize larger and larger numbers of people,' said Margaret Sullivan, a family nurse practitioner and director of programs for immigrant and unhoused communities at the FXB Center for Health and Human Rights at Harvard University. The order is 'vague and broad and potentially leaning toward creating more civil rights violations', she said. The conditions for detainment outlined in the order are poorly defined, which means it could be interpreted broadly to detain and involuntarily institutionalize people in public spaces. And it doesn't detail who may make determinations on institutionalization. 'It doesn't define 'mental health crisis'. It also doesn't define who's qualified to make an assessment,' said Rabinowitz. Individuals with mental illness are defined in the order as people who 'pose risks to themselves or the public', which could be broad enough to encompass many people, he said. And while the order sometimes refers to cracking down on 'illicit' substance use, at other times it speaks more generally to substance use disorder – a condition that can include legal substances such as alcohol and prescription medication. Many states already have laws on involuntary commitment for mental illness, Sullivan said. Typically, the process begins with clinical healthcare providers or mental health professionals and goes through the judicial system. 'There's a judicial system to ensure that the rights of the individual are not being violated. To strip away those checks and balances, and make it so that there's more essentially policing on the streets of mental illness … has never been proved to be effective in the long run,' Sullivan said. 'This goes a step further than what we've seen in some other states or cities,' she added. The order would also expand drug courts and mental health courts, and it would 'allow or require' anyone receiving federal funding for homelessness support to collect health information and share it with law enforcement. The Trump administration will also stop supporting housing-first policies, which provide housing and support services as quickly as possible to people experiencing homelessness, the order said. It comes amid significant proposed reductions for affordable housing. 'The Trump administration is going to make housing more expensive. They're going to force more people into homelessness. And then once people are homeless, they're going to take away actual solutions, and instead lock people up for being homeless,' Rabinowitz said. This approach has serious repercussions for health, he added. 'Housing is the best form of healthcare, period. The health impacts of housing are tremendous, and the health consequences of homelessness are devastating.' Higher rates of involuntary institutionalization would add greater strain to the healthcare system, Sullivan said. 'We know that involuntary commitment leads to more people being in the emergency room and emergency rooms being more overwhelmed than they currently are.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Cuts to Medicaid will also make it harder for people with mental illness and substance use disorder to access healthcare, Sullivan said. And the new federal budget cuts funding for supportive services like mental health care and substance use treatment. The administration also plans to review grants for existing substance use programs, with explicit instructions not to fund projects on harm reduction – which often includes overdose response and naloxone distribution, needle and syringe exchanges, and education on safer drug use, among other initiatives – and safe consumption. And the order instructed Trump administration officials to pursue possible lawsuits against such programs. States and cities receiving federal funding could see that money restricted or frozen if they don't enforce the new rules, the executive order said. In the wake of last year's supreme court decision on Grant's Pass, upholding the Oregon city's ordinance that effectively criminalizes homelessness, several states and municipalities introduced stricter laws to target people living outside. 'Especially when federal funding is really disappearing, this hamstrings cities and municipalities into compliance in order just to fund vital services,' Sullivan said. Focusing on programs addressing these issues in innovative ways 'makes it seem like this is another mechanism for going after places like LA or Portland or Chicago or any place that is trying to do something different with addressing homelessness and substance use', Sullivan said. 'That is, to me, what it seems like – this is a way to go after not just individuals and people, but to go after areas,' she said. But it will have sweeping effects on homeless people and others to whom the order is applied. 'I think that they are motivated by this incorrect belief that homelessness is a choice, that we have to punish people in order for them to make a better choice,' Rabinowitz said. Even if that were true, he said, 'there are no carrots right now, there's no housing that anybody can afford, but there are a whole ton of sticks, and we know that people don't need a stick. People want housing; there's just no housing that they can afford. But the executive order does nothing to address the actual causes of homelessness.' Sullivan agreed. 'It does nothing to address underlying poverty. It does nothing to address the persistently unaffordable housing crisis,' she said. 'It does nothing to expand access to Medicaid for impoverished people. Meanwhile, the numbers in the US of people who are experiencing chronic homelessness and disability are increasing.'
The Independent
12 hours ago
- The Independent
The uninhabited island being converted into a Gaza medical facility
Indonesia is set to convert a medical facility on its uninhabited Galang Island to treat about 2,000 wounded residents of Gaza, a presidential spokesperson announced on Thursday. The Muslim-majority nation has previously sent humanitarian aid to Gaza after Israel started an offensive in October 2023 that Gaza health officials say has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, whether fighters or non-combatants. "Indonesia will give medical help for about 2,000 Gaza residents who became victims of war, those who are wounded, buried under debris," spokesperson Hasan Nasbi told reporters, adding that the exercise was not an evacuation. Indonesia plans to allocate the facility on Galang island, off its island of Sumatra and south of Singapore, to treat wounded Gaza residents and temporarily shelter their families, he said, adding that nobody lives around it now. The patients would be taken back to Gaza after they had healed, he said. Hasan did not give a timeframe or further details, referring questions to Indonesia's foreign and defence ministries, which did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. The plan comes months after President Prabowo Subianto's offer to shelter wounded Palestinians drew criticism from Indonesia's top clerics for seeming too close to U.S. President Donald Trump 's suggestion of permanently moving Palestinians out of Gaza. In response to Trump's suggestion, the foreign ministry of Indonesia, which backs a two-state solution to resolve the Middle East crisis, said at the time it "strongly rejects any attempt to forcibly displace Palestinians". A hospital to treat victims of the COVID-19 pandemic opened in 2020 on Galang, which had been, until 1996, a sprawling refugee camp run by the United Nations, housing 250,000 of those who fled the Vietnam War.
