logo
Gilbert: Tony Evers' exit makes for a rare, truly open governor's race

Gilbert: Tony Evers' exit makes for a rare, truly open governor's race

Yahoo25-07-2025
Democrat Tony Evers' decision not to seek a third term means Wisconsin voters will experience something unusual in this political era — a truly 'open' race for governor.
Nine of the past 10 gubernatorial contests in this state have involved a sitting governor.
Now we know that the 2026 election will not.
That makes the next campaign for governor more open-ended than it would have been, and harder to handicap.
It also means there's a possibility both parties will have costly and hotly contested primaries for the state's highest office.
Evers' decision not only alters the nature of the general election contest, but it also means the governor's race could serve as a platform for Democrats to debate their future in the aftermath of the party's momentous national defeat last year to Donald Trump and the GOP.
For Democrats, a defeat for governor in 2026 in the nation's closest state would be hugely demoralizing. It also would be a major political failure, given the political advantage typically enjoyed in a midterm election by the party that is out of power in Washington.
On the other hand, from a historical perspective, a Democratic victory would be groundbreaking.
Coming as it would after Evers' two terms in office, it would produce the Democratic Party's longest hold on the governor's office in Wisconsin's nearly 180-year existence.
Incredible as it sounds, Democrats have never occupied the office of governor for more than eight years in a row in Wisconsin.
That is a testimony to several things: the dominance of the GOP in the state's first 100 years; the fact that until the 1970s, elections for governor here occurred every two years, not four; and the state's penchant for political swings in the current era of partisan parity and polarization.
Let's look a little more closely at the history of governors' races here to put 2026 into some very broad perspective.
Democrats have only once won three gubernatorial elections in a row in Wisconsin. It happened in the late 1950s and early 1960s when governors served two-year terms: Gaylord Nelson won in 1958 and 1960 and John Reynolds won in 1962.
By contrast, Republicans have a history of longevity in power.
There have been eight three-term Republican governors in Wisconsin's history, though only Tommy Thompson has done it since the four-year term was instituted beginning with the 1970 election. Thompson is the state's longest-serving governor (just over 14 years, from 1987 to 2001) and the only one to win four elections in a row.
Only one other politician has tried to win three four-year terms, Republican Scott Walker, but he lost his bid for a third term to Evers in 2018.
That Walker defeat illustrates some of the challenges a party faces staying in power in the current era.
There is voter fatigue, which caught up with Walker after a drama-filled eight years, including a polarizing recall fight in 2014 and the failed bid he launched for the presidency in 2015.
There is the cyclical nature of modern politics. Wisconsin has a history in mid-terms of voting against the party of the president, which worked against Republicans in 2002, against Democrats in 2010, and against Republicans in 2018. (Evers broke this pattern in 2022). In other words, America's frequent presidential swings have also produced frequent mid-term swings at the state level here.
And finally, there is the state's extreme competitiveness. It was easier for a single party to stay in power when Wisconsin was dominated by one party.
Since Wisconsin became a state in 1848, the governor's office has been held by four different parties: Republican, Democratic, Whig, and Progressive. But Republicans have been dominant for most of that history, at one point (between 1857 and 1930) winning 34 out of 37 contests for governor.
Republicans have never been shut out of the governor's office for more than eight years in a row (a streak now in jeopardy). And there have been five different periods when Republicans held the office of governor for longer than eight years:
∎ 1987-2001, the Tommy Thompson era. It only ended when Thompson left office halfway through his fourth term to be health secretary under President George W. Bush. His lieutenant governor, Scott McCallum, filled the remainder of that term before losing the 2002 election to Democrat Jim Doyle.
∎ 1943-1959, when four different GOP governors served and Republicans won seven elections in a row for governor (again, these were two-year terms).
∎ 1895-1933. This was the longest period of Republican governance. Ten different Republican governors served, including both Fighting Bob La Follette and his son Philip. The GOP won 19 consecutive elections for governor.
∎ 1876-1891.
∎ 1856-1874.
That history of lopsided control is long gone in Wisconsin, replaced not only by frequent partisan swings but also by routinely close elections. The past two races for governor have been the two closest of the past 60 years.
The fact that this is now an open-seat race, without a sitting governor on the ballot, adds to the suspense.
The last time this happened was 2010, when Walker was first elected.
But the last time before that was more than 40 years ago in 1982.
Evers would have been a formidable candidate for re-election as the most popular politician in the state, according to polling by the Marquette Law School. At the same time, his age (73) and the challenges of winning a third term were potential election wild cards.
Without Evers on the ballot, this race will still be hugely influenced by the national political climate next year and by public opinion toward Trump. Democrats will still go into this race with the historic advantage of running against the party of the president.
But historical patterns don't dictate the outcomes of elections; they just put them in context.
Candidate quality matters. And in 2026, that is now a big unknown for both sides.
Craig Gilbert provides Wisconsin political analysis as a fellow with Marquette University Law School's Lubar Center for Public Policy Research and Civic Education. Prior to the fellowship, Gilbert reported on politics for 35 years at the Journal Sentinel, the last 25 in its Washington Bureau. His column continues that independent reporting tradition and goes through the established Journal Sentinel editing process.Follow him on Twitter: @Wisvoter.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Gilbert: Tony Evers' exit makes for a rare, truly open governor's race
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live updates: Abbott threatens to force out Dems who left Texas amid redistricting fight
Live updates: Abbott threatens to force out Dems who left Texas amid redistricting fight

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Live updates: Abbott threatens to force out Dems who left Texas amid redistricting fight

Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to remove from office the Texas House Democrats who fled the state if they don't show up for work. Many Texas Democrats left on Sunday to keep the state House from recording a quorum in its Monday legislative session, preventing the chamber from doing business. The Democrats fanned out across blue states, including Illinois and New York, where those states' governors have vowed to stand with them in their effort to prevent new congressional maps from being approved. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul will meet with the Texas Democrats in here state at 10 a.m. Monday. President Trump on Sunday said he would appoint a 'new statistician' this week after firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics chief Friday following dramatic revisions in recent jobs reports. 'We had no confidence. I mean, the numbers were ridiculous, what she announced, but that was just one negative number. All of the numbers seemed to be great,' he told reporters Sunday night. Trump on Monday will have lunch with Vice President Vance and has no other public events scheduled. Catch up here:

Trump Says Weak Jobs Data 'Rigged'
Trump Says Weak Jobs Data 'Rigged'

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Says Weak Jobs Data 'Rigged'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump on Monday said July's jobs report was "rigged" to favor Democrats in a post on Truth Social. "Last weeks Job's Report was RIGGED, just like the numbers prior to the Presidential Election were Rigged," he wrote."That's why, in both cases, there was massive, record setting revisions, in favor of the Radical Left Democrats." This is a breaking story. More to follow.

Donald Trump Gets Even More Bad News on US Economy
Donald Trump Gets Even More Bad News on US Economy

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Gets Even More Bad News on US Economy

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Analysts expect U.S. jobs figures to face further revisions this year, after downward adjustments to recent data angered President Donald Trump and led him to the fire the country's top employment statistician. According to a note released by Goldman Sachs over the weekend, preliminary revision estimates set to be published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) in September will reveal a 550,000-950,000 downward revision for the 12-month period through March 2025. Why It Matters Although the period subject to such change overlaps with more of Joe Biden's presidency than Trump's second term, these substantial revisions will be viewed against the backdrop of the White House's recent criticism of the agency. Following a weak jobs reading on Friday, and substantial revisions to earlier data, the president accused the BLS commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, of rigging data to reflect poorly on his administration and fired her from her post. This move has been roundly criticized by officials and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, who believe it will undermine the credibility and independence of the BLS, but the White House has pointed to other significant revisions as evidence of persistent inaccurate data-gathering by the agency. What To Know On Friday, the BLS released its report on non-farm payroll employment for July, revealing that only 73,000 jobs were added in the month compared to consensus forecasts of 110,000. In addition, the agency downwardly revised figures from May and June by a total of 258,000 jobs. Hours after the announcement, Trump said he would be firing McEntarfer "immediately" and replacing her with "someone much more competent and qualified." Without evidence, the president said July's figures were "RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad," and accused McEntarfer of manipulating the data "for political purposes." U.S. President Donald Trump outside the White House on August 1, 2025, in Washington, D.C. U.S. President Donald Trump outside the White House on August 1, 2025, in Washington, pointed to sizable revisions by the BLS under McEntarfer's leadership, in particular its last preliminary annual benchmark revision last August, when the agency found that the economy had created 818,000 fewer jobs than initially reported in the 12-month period through March 2024. This was later updated to reflect a 598,000 overestimation in previous data. Trump incorrectly claimed that this was a "record" revision—the final revision in 2009 came to 902,000—and listed other examples he said were used to "try and boost" the Democrats' chances of victory in the 2024 election. However, should the higher-end estimate of 950,000 provided by Goldman Sachs be correct, and not amended in subsequent estimates, this would amount to the largest downward revision since tracking began in 1979. What People Are Saying Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius told CNBC on Friday that the revisions to June and May's data make it "very, very likely" the Federal Reserve will cut rates at its next meeting in September. "This is a meaningful data release. But it's one data release. And we'll want to see what the picture looks like over the next couple of months," Hatzius said. "But if we get confirmation that things have slowed as much in the labor market then I would say yeah, we should get back to neutral pretty quickly." The White House, in a press release on Friday, said: "A lengthy history of inaccuracies and incompetence by Erika McEntarfer, the former Biden-appointed commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, has completely eroded public trust in the government agency charged with disseminating key data used by policymakers and businesses to make consequential decisions." Pollster Nate Silver, in a Sunday newsletter, wrote: "Firing the BLS commissioner won't prevent the effects of tariffs. But it will reduce American economic leadership and increase uncertainty for businesses, workers and investors." "I'm not sure exactly where firing the BLS commissioner ranks on the list of Trump-related outrages," he added. "Even if Congress does its job and McEntarfer is replaced with another competent successor, this could have a chilling effect on BLS and other government agencies to operate independently." What Happens Next? Trump said on Sunday that he would announce a replacement for McEntarfer "sometime over the next three, four days." Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer said that Deputy Commissioner William Wiatrowski will take over as acting commissioner during the interim.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store