AI startup Perplexity makes bold $34.5 billion bid for Google's Chrome browser
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Perplexity AI said it has made a $34.5 billion unsolicited all-cash offer for Alphabet's Chrome browser, a low but bold bid that would need financing well above the startup's own valuation.Run by Aravind Srinivas, Perplexity is no stranger to headline-grabbing offers - it made a similar one for TikTok US in January, offering to merge with the popular short-video app to resolve U.S. concerns about TikTok's Chinese ownership.Buying Chrome would allow the startup to tap the browser's more than three billion users for an edge in the AI search race as regulatory pressure threatens Google's grip on the industry.Google did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The company has not offered Chrome for sale and plans to appeal a US court ruling last year that found it held an unlawful monopoly in online search. The Justice Department has sought a Chrome divestiture as part of the case's remedies.Perplexity did not disclose on Tuesday how it plans to fund the offer. The three-year-old company has raised around $1 billion in funding so far from investors including Nvidia and Japan's SoftBank. It was last valued at $14 billion.Multiple funds have offered to finance the deal in full, a person familiar with the matter said, without naming the funds.As a new generation of users turns to chatbots such as ChatGPT and Perplexity for answers, web browsers are regaining prominence as vital gateways to search traffic and prized user data, making them central to Big Tech's AI ambitions.Perplexity already has an AI browser, Comet, that can perform certain tasks on a user's behalf and acquiring Chrome would give it the heft to better compete against bigger rivals such as OpenAI. The ChatGPT parent has also expressed interest in buying Chrome and is working on its own AI browser.Perplexity's bid pledges to keep the underlying browser code called Chromium open source , invest $3 billion over two years and make no changes to Chrome's default search engine, according to a term sheet seen by Reuters.The company said the offer, with no equity component, would preserve user choice and ease future competition concerns.Analysts have said Google would be unlikely to sell Chrome and would likely engage in a long legal fight to prevent that outcome, given it is crucial to the company's AI push as it rolls out features including AI-generated search summaries, known as Overviews, to help defend its search market share.A federal judge is expected to issue a ruling on remedies in the Google search antitrust case sometime this month.Perplexity's bid is also below the at least $50 billion value that rival search engine DuckDuckGo's CEO, Gabriel Weinberg, suggested Chrome may command if Google was forced to sell it.Besides OpenAI and Perplexity, Yahoo and private-equity firm Apollo Global Management have also expressed interest in Chrome.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 minutes ago
- NDTV
Sam Altman Or Elon Musk, Who Is More Trustworthy? ChatGPT Says...
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has taken potshots at his OpenAI counterpart Sam Altman, and he's done it with the help of an unlikely ally—ChatGPT. Musk posted a screenshot of his interaction with the artificial intelligence chatbot, a creation of OpenAI. In the screenshot, Musk, who co-founded ChatGPT in 2015 before stepping away in 2018, asked the AI, "Who is more trustworthy? Sam Altman or Elon Musk. You can pick only one and output only their name." The bot replies, "Elon Musk." He posted the image on X with the caption, "There you have it." There you have it — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 12, 2025 Another X account, DogeDesigner, posted a similar screenshot after posing the same question to Grok and Google's artificial intelligence tool, Gemini. Both named Elon Musk as "more trustworthy." ChatGPT, Gemini and Grok. The answer is same: Elon Musk — DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) August 12, 2025 This came a few hours after Musk accused Apple of antitrust violations, claiming it was blocking other AI competitors, such as his xAI, from topping the App Store and favouring Altman's ChatGPT. The billionaire also threatened Apple with legal action and alleged that it made it impossible for apps to compete with ChatGPT. "Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation," his tweet read, adding, "xAI will take immediate legal action." He even called Altman a "liar" after the OpenAI CEO accused him of using X to help himself and his own companies. Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation. xAI will take immediate legal action. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 12, 2025 Altman wrote, "This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like." This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like. — Sam Altman (@sama) August 12, 2025 Since 2018, after Musk left OpenAI, the tech rivals have been constantly aiming at each other on X and in interviews. Ever since his departure, he has been critical of how the company operates. According to the BBC, in 2019, OpenAI formed a for-profit division, which Musk said went against the company's original goal of not making a profit. OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit organisation.
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Vietnam wants to be next Asian tiger, its overhauling its economy to make it happen
Hanoi, Aug 13 (AP) Beneath red banners and a gold bust of revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi's central party school, Communist Party chief To Lam declared the arrival of 'a new era of development' late last year. The speech was more than symbolic— it signalled the launch of what could be Vietnam's most ambitious economic overhaul in decades. Vietnam aims to get rich by 2045 and become Asia's next 'tiger economy' — a term used to describe the earlier ascent of countries like South Korea and Taiwan. The challenge ahead is steep: Reconciling growth with overdue reforms, an aging population, climate risks and creaking institutions. There's added pressure from President Donald Trump over Vietnam's trade surplus with the US, a reflection of its astounding economic trajectory. In 1990, the average Vietnamese could afford about USD 1,200 worth of goods and services a year, adjusted for local prices. Today, that figure has risen by more than 13 times to USD 16,385. Vietnam's transformation into a global manufacturing hub with shiny new highways, high-rise skylines and a booming middle class has lifted millions of its people from poverty, similar to China. But its low-cost, export-led boom is slowing, while the proposed reforms — expanding private industries, strengthening social protections, and investing in tech, green energy. It faces a growing obstacle in climate change. 'It's all hands on can't waste time anymore," said Mimi Vu of the consultancy Raise Partners. The export boom can't carry Vietnam forever Investment has soared, driven partly by US-China trade tensions, and the US is now Vietnam's biggest export market. Once-quiet suburbs have been replaced with industrial parks where trucks rumble through sprawling logistics hubs that serve global brands. Vietnam ran a USD 123.5 billion trade surplus with the US trade in 2024, angering Trump, who threatened a 46 per cent US import tax on Vietnamese goods. The two sides appear to have settled on a 20 per cent levy, and twice that for goods suspected of being transshipped, or routed through Vietnam to avoid US trade restrictions. During negotiations with the Trump administration, Vietnam's focus was on its tariffs compared to those of its neighbours and competitors, said Daniel Kritenbrink, a former US ambassador to Vietnam. 'As long as they're in the same zone, in the same ballpark, I think Vietnam can live with that outcome," he said. But he added questions remain over how much Chinese content in those exports might be too much and how such goods will be taxed. Vietnam was preparing to shift its economic policies even before Trump's tariffs threatened its model of churning out low-cost exports for the world, aware of what economists call the 'middle-income trap,' when economies tend to plateau without major reforms. To move beyond that, South Korea bet on electronics, Taiwan on semiconductors, and Singapore on finance, said Richard McClellan, founder of the consultancy RMAC Advisory. But Vietnam's economy today is more diverse and complex than those countries were at the time and it can't rely on just one winning sector to drive long-term growth and stay competitive as wages rise and cheap labour is no longer its main advantage. It needs to make 'multiple big bets,' McClellan said. Vietnam's game plan is hedging its bets Following China's lead, Vietnam is counting on high-tech sectors like computer chips, artificial intelligence and renewable energy, providing strategic tax breaks and research support in cities like Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Danang. It's also investing heavily in infrastructure, including civilian nuclear plants and a USD 67 billion North–South high-speed railway, that will cut travel time from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City to eight hours. Vietnam also aspires to become a global financial centre. The government plans two special financial centres, in bustling Ho Chi Minh City and in the seaside resort city of Danang, with simplified rules to attract foreign investors, tax breaks, support for financial tech startups, and easier ways to settle business disputes. Underpinning all of this is institutional reform. Ministries are being merged, low-level bureaucracies have been eliminated and Vietnam's 63 provinces will be consolidated into 34 to build regional centres with deeper talent pools. Private business to take the lead Vietnam is counting on private businesses to lead its new economic push — a seismic shift from the past. In May, the Communist Party passed Resolution 68. It calls private businesses the 'most important force' in the economy, pledging to break away from domination by state-owned and foreign companies. So far, large multinationals have powered Vietnam's exports, using imported materials and parts and low cost local labour. Local companies are stuck at the low-end of supply chains, struggling to access loans and markets that favoured the 700-odd state-owned giants, from colonial-era beer factories with arched windows to unfashionable state-run shops that few customers bother to enter. 'The private sector remains heavily constrained," said Nguyen Khac Giang of Singapore's ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. Again emulating China, Vietnam wants 'national champions' to drive innovation and compete globally, not by picking winners, but by letting markets decide. The policy includes easier loans for companies investing in new technology, priority in government contracts for those meeting innovation goals, and help for firms looking to expand overseas. Even mega-projects like the North-South High-Speed Rail, once reserved for state-run giants, are now open to private bidding. By 2030, Vietnam hopes to elevate at least 20 private firms to a global scale. But Giang warned that there will be pushback from conservatives in the Communist Party and from those who benefit from state-owned firms. (AP) GRS GRS
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
China's lead in open-source AI jolts Washington and Silicon Valley
China's ambition to turn its open-source artificial-intelligence models into a global standard has jolted American companies and policymakers, who fear U.S. models could be eclipsed and are mobilizing their responses to the threat. Chinese advances in AI have come one after another this year, starting with the widely heralded DeepSeek and its R1 reasoning model in January. This was followed by Alibaba's Qwen and a flurry of others since July, with names such as Moonshot, and MiniMax. The models all have versions that are free for users to download and modify. This approach, commonly referred to as open source or open weight, is driving global adoption of Chinese AI technology. American companies that have kept their models proprietary are feeling the pressure. In early August, ChatGPT maker OpenAI released its first open-source model, called gpt-oss. The history of technology offers many examples where a welter of competitors in an industry's infancy eventually evolved into a monopoly or oligopoly of a few players. Microsoft's Windows operating system for desktops, Google's search engine, and the iOS and Android operating systems for smartphones are just a few of the examples. History also teaches that the battle to become an industry standard isn't necessarily won by the most technologically advanced player. Easy availability and flexibility play a role, which is why China's advances in open-source AI worry many in Washington and Silicon Valley. In an AI action plan released in July, the Trump administration said open-source models 'could become global standards in some areas of business and in academic research." The report called on the U.S. to build 'leading open models founded on American values." President Trump displayed a signed executive order related to his Artificial Intelligence Action Plan last month. For now, the rewards to the winners in open-source AI are slim, since they spend hundreds of millions of dollars developing models and get paid nothing directly in return. But those who lock in users may be able to sell other services piggybacking on the free part, just as Google offers search, YouTube and other revenue-generating products bundled with its Android operating system. Android is itself open source and built on Linux, an open-source operating system still widely used in the industry. Researchers have long embraced open source as a way of accelerating the development of emerging technology, since it allows every user to see the code and suggest improvements. Chinese officials have encouraged open-source research and development not only in AI but also in operating systems, semiconductor architecture and engineering software. 'Fearing being cut off from American technologies, China is fostering open-source projects as a strategic fallback and emergency resource," said Lian Jye Su, an analyst at research firm Omdia focusing on AI. This year's U.S.-China trade war has shown how each side can leverage its industrial advantages—such as Nvidia chips for the U.S. and rare-earth minerals for China—to extract concessions from the other side. U.S. officials worry that if Chinese AI models dominate the globe, Beijing will figure out a way to exploit it for geopolitical advantage. Away from politics, open-source AI models are vying for adoption by businesses. Many customers like open-source AI because they can freely adapt it and put it on their computer systems, keeping sensitive information in-house. Singapore-based Oversea-Chinese Banking, one of Southeast Asia's biggest banks, has developed around 30 internal tools using open-source models, including Google's Gemma to summarize documents, Qwen to help write computer code and DeepSeek to analyze market trends. The bank said it avoided being locked into any one model. It monitors new releases and can switch if it likes a new model. It also prefers models that many developers are familiar with, so it can get technical support. 'At any point in time, we probably have a stable of about 10 open-source models that we're using," said Donald MacDonald, an executive at OCBC. The overall performance of China's best open-weight model has surpassed the American open-source champion since November, according to research firm Artificial Analysis. The firm, which rates the ability of models in math, coding and other areas, found a version of Alibaba's Qwen3 beat OpenAI's gpt-oss. However, the Chinese model is almost twice as big as OpenAI's, suggesting that for simpler tasks, Qwen might consume more computing power to do the same job. OpenAI said its open-source model outperformed rivals of similar size on reasoning tasks and delivered strong performance at low cost. Major U.S. cloud-service providers have started offering gpt-oss to their users. Amazon Web Services said the OpenAI model was more cost-effective than DeepSeek's R1 running on its infrastructure. Engineers, especially those in Asia, said they found Chinese models were often more sophisticated in understanding their local languages and catching cultural nuances. Models from China are trained with more data in Chinese, which shares similarities with some other Asian languages. Shinichi Usami, an engineer in Yokohama, Japan, recently developed a customer-service chatbot for a retail client. He chose Alibaba's Qwen. With a leading U.S. model, he said, 'we've observed instances where the chatbot struggles to grasp the implicit intent from users' words and the responses can occasionally be not polite enough," said Usami. 'Qwen appears to handle these nuances better." Companies in China's hypercompetitive AI industry at first focused on undercutting each other's prices for closed-source models. That competition has extended in recent months to open-source models as everyone fights for adoption and public recognition. 'Chinese companies often prioritize user stickiness over immediate revenue," said Charlie Chai, a Shanghai-based tech analyst at 86Research. While startups have a window to attract users, it won't last long, analysts said, and larger tech companies are often best-positioned to cash in on a big user base by offering related services such as specialized apps or cloud services. 'This Darwinian life-or-death struggle will lead to the demise of many of the existing players, but the intense competition breeds strong companies," wrote Andrew Ng, head of Silicon Valley startup in a recent blog. Write to Raffaele Huang at
