From tikanga to ‘protocol': Luxon's war on the Māorification of Aotearoa
Our government is halting the Māorification of Aotearoa. This isn't an opinion, but rather a proud declaration made by Christopher Luxon in his usual Monday morning interview with Newstalk ZB broadcaster Mike Hosking earlier this week.
'How do senior bureaucrats not understand that they're working for a government that have spoken very clearly on the Māorification of this county?' asked Hosking. 'Where we see it, we call it out,' Luxon gloated in response.
The duo were talking about a job advertised in March by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Mfat), searching for a tikanga lead. At around the same time, the minister of foreign affairs and trade (Winston Peters) was trumpeting his party's bill to remove diversity, equity, and inclusion targets from the public sector – with the backing of Luxon. The tikanga lead role quickly became the example, sort of.
The fix for Peters' concerns was seemingly simple – replace any mention of 'tikanga' with 'protocol'. 'The minister's opposition to the politically loaded and inaccurate use of the term 'tikanga' is well known. However, protocol has always been important,' a New Zealand First party spokesperson said following the change in terminology.
Following the furore, several requests were made under the Official Information Act in an attempt to unveil what was happening within the ministry during the kerfuffle. Evidently, it appeared top officials within Mfat were caught off guard by Peters' criticism of the role. Understandably, the likes of Hosking were dumbfounded as to how the country's top bureaucrats could have missed the agenda clearly set out by this government.
Nevertheless, Luxon is quick to point out that his government is laser-focused on stopping the 'Māorification' of the country. His most recent example? The removal of traffic control stop-go signs in te reo Māori in Te Matau a Māui. 'We need the stop-go signs to be very unambiguous,' Luxon said. Hosking went on to say that the production of Māori road signs is 'taking the piss', drawing a chuckle from Luxon as he reiterated his coalition government's intent on 'running things differently'.
'We want everybody in the public service focused on delivery, focused on results, and not lots of resources tied up in things that isn't core business,' Luxon said. 'Where it comes out and they get it wrong, we're very quick to clamp down on it.'
This is strong, authoritative language from Luxon. It shows a switch in his political demeanour from a centrist to a more explicitly right wing politician, at least on this issue. The shift towards 'a tough guy approach', as Willie Jackson called it during the Labour caucus run on Tuesday morning, appears to be an attempt to pull voters from its more right wing coalition partners, draining them of their overall influence on the make up of government. It's the dog trying to take back control of its tail – but this approach also has its risks.
The thing with the authoritative approach from Luxon is that you must walk your talk if you want to appear authentic in your belief – lest those you are trying to win over see through the charade. With the case of the Mfat job, it appears that all that was changed was the use of the word 'tikanga' in the job title. Everything else stayed the same and presumably, someone was still hired for the role and is currently employed at the ministry, providing expert advice and support to ensure Māori cultural 'protocols' are understood, upheld, and appropriately applied across the ministry's work and foreign policy priorities. So what was really achieved and is it enough to convince the voters you are trying to win over?
Similarly, te reo Māori road signs aren't really an important issue to everyday New Zealanders. Most people would understand that green means go and red means stop. 'This isn't about rules – it's about racism,' said Ngāti Kahungungu chair Bayden Barber. The language being used on a road sign is likely not something that shifts a swing voter. But seeing your prime minister getting giddy about Fonterra's ambient cream being sold in Korea, yet livid about the inclusion of te reo Māori in roadworks signage? That might be a deterrent for someone sitting in the middle.
The more you take the hard line approach, the more you risk alienating the always-important centre bloc voters who may feel uncomfortable with such an attitude on diversity, equity, inclusion and race relations. Luxon risks sending National further to the right and competing for a share of the same culture war voter base that New Zealand First and Act already tussle over while leaving voters abandoned in the middle.
I won't venture into how te reo Māori is an official language of this country, or how the likes of Wales and Ireland have effortlessly adopted dual-language signage across their roading networks, aiding the revitalisation of their indigenous languages. However, what's clear from all of this is that if it isn't a part of the government's 'core business' of turning a profit, then it's not a priority.
The issue around the use of te reo Māori is like the latest haka debacle – Māori culture is great, but only on certain terms and when it suits the wider agenda. We love to parade the culture overseas as being our point of difference, our unique selling-point. Why? Because it helps turn a profit. That is the government's core business. But when it comes to the normalisation of te ao Māori in its rightful home, we are quick to condemn. Not right. Not core business. Not helping us make money.
The window dressing and pandering to casual racists will only get National so far. With a turn right coming at a time of already fragile race relations in Aotearoa, the coalition government appears to be throwing caution to the wind. Luxon will be keeping an eye on how his latest gamble plays out with voters. If it goes well, we may be in for a fight for the right in 2026, with Labour left alone in the centre.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Local elections 2025: Rotorua rural ward councillor Karen Barker re-elected unopposed
'I'm very grateful I get the chance to serve again, because it's been a particularly enjoyable experience,' said Barker. 'I will take the opportunity to do the best I can, not just for rural people, but everybody and I am very much looking forward to it.' Barker said she was expecting to see more names trickle in before last Friday's nominations deadline. After nothing changed by Monday, she tentatively accepted her re-election. She hoped the lack of challengers was a show of 'confidence' from the rural community about her work. 'It can be a reflection of the kind of job you have done and how comfortable people are with what the council's been doing. So it's not all disengagement, sometimes there's potentially a level of comfort.' She also pointed to the six candidates running for four seats on Rotorua's Rural Community Board as a sign rural constituents were not apathetic about local politics. 'That is particularly encouraging,' she said. 'It shows that the rural people are engaged, and they want to have their say and they want to try and support me in my role.' Karen Barker was first elected in 2022. Photo / NZME Rotorua's rural ward was established after a drawn-out representation review concluded in April 2022. The Local Government Commission also instituted three Māori ward and six general ward seats. The rural ward covers an area with around 8000 residents including parts of the Ngongotahā Valley and Hamurana, Rerewhakaaitu, the Kaingaroa Forest, Lakes Rotomā and Rotoiti, Waiotapu, Reporoa, Mamaku and others within the Waikato portion of the Rotorua district. Barker highlighted rates affordability, community halls and rural subdivision rules as key issues in the ward for the next three years, as well as wider Rotorua projects such as water, sewerage, infrastructure investment and the museum. She said she was committed to still attending pre-election events to remain 'as engaged as possible'. There was a 'great choice' of candidates available across the other council wards, she said. Barker was congratulated by fellow councillors at Wednesday's Infrastructure and Environment Committee meeting, which she chairs. Don Paterson and Conan O'Brien both passed on their well wishes, while Robert Lee said she had 'conducted herself admirably' in her role. Mathew Nash is a Local Democracy Reporting journalist based at the Rotorua Daily Post. He has previously written for SunLive, been a regular contributor to RNZ and was a football reporter in the UK for eight years. – LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
The Spinoff
3 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The government may be turning away from te Tiriti – but the people aren't
Two authors of books about te Tiriti o Waitangi discuss the modern relevance of the nation's most important document and shifting attitudes towards it, despite pushback from the government. We recently shared the stage for a public kōrero on te Tiriti o Waitangi. The event, held during Matariki as part of the Tāmaki Untold series, filled the Whare Wānanga. People stayed after to talk. They asked thoughtful, sometimes difficult questions as they connected over cups of tea. We're seeing this kind of energy across the country. People are showing up not to argue or feel guilty – but to learn. What makes that so striking is how few New Zealanders were ever taught the basics about te Tiriti. That's not an individual failing, it's a systemic one. Some of the people in government who speak most confidently about te Tiriti may know less than the average person in the audience. That's why we sometimes need to start from the beginning. One of the questions Roimata was asked at our talk was: 'Which is the authoritative document – te Tiriti or the Treaty?' It's a common and important question. She laid it out like this: Māori discovered Aotearoa. Moriori discovered Rēkohu. They held tino rangatiratanga – complete authority – over their lands and lives. That's not ancient history; that's most of our history. By 1840, Queen Victoria's representatives wanted the exclusive right to buy land and a way to control British settlers. They promised protection and partnership. These were the terms discussed and recorded in te Tiriti o Waitangi, in te reo Māori. It reaffirmed Māori authority, echoing He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni, the 1835 Declaration of Independence. But a different version – the Treaty of Waitangi – was written in English, asserting that the Queen would have 'sovereignty' – the power to make laws over everyone, including Māori. That was never discussed or agreed. It's important to set this all out when giving the short answer: only te Tiriti was agreed to, so only te Tiriti can be authoritative. Still, since 1840, the Crown has acted on the English version, using it to justify a flood of laws that have harmed Māori and enabled the loss of more than 60 million acres – nearly 97% of Māori land. When people hear this for the first time, they're often stunned. Sometimes there are tears. But when people are met with compassion rather than shame, they lean in. They keep learning. They tell their friends. And they begin to expect better from our institutions. We've both seen this shift up close. Avril met a woman after a talk who shared that her group was about to sign an MOU with their local hapū. She has been hosted by treaty education groups, who have been working in their communities, educating, leading protest actions and building networks for years These efforts are part of a growing nationwide movement. The commitment to te Tiriti is real – and it predates this government and will outlast it. Today, there are more tauiwi who outwardly support te Tiriti than ever before. And what's most heartening is that this movement is grounded in hope. At a time when public conversations are often dominated by fear, misinformation or division, we are generally seeing the opposite in our communities: courage, curiosity and kindness. In town halls, classrooms, marae and boardrooms, it's ordinary people – not politicians – who are stepping up. They're asking questions, challenging old assumptions, and imagining a future where Te Tiriti isn't a source of tension, but a foundation for justice, understanding and shared strength. It takes courage to admit you were never taught this history. It takes hope to believe things can be different. And it takes both to stay in the room, keep learning and take action. In workplaces too, change is continuing. Despite government reversals, many organisations are choosing to keep investing in Tiriti education, co-designing projects with Māori partners, and ensuring staff have a basic understanding of tikanga and pronunciation as part of respectful engagement. This matters. Non-Māori have a critical role to play – not just in backing Māori-led initiatives, but in educating our own communities, challenging our institutions and supporting the enactment of tino rangatiratanga in practice. Yes, people still get nervous. Some worry about being tokenistic. Others fear making mistakes or overstepping. But the reality is that mistakes are inevitable in any learning journey. The key is to treat them as part of the process, not a reason to pull back. Being useful looks different in different contexts. Sometimes it means stepping back and letting Māori leadership guide the kaupapa. Other times, especially where there are few Māori voices in a space, it means stepping up – but doing so under the direction of Māori colleagues and communities. In the end, it's about relationships. Te Tiriti was always meant to be a partnership – a mutually beneficial agreement between peoples. That vision still exists. Māori haven't withdrawn the invitation. The door is still open and we're seeing more and more people walk through it. That's what gives us hope. The future of this country will not be shaped solely by whoever is in power at any given moment. It's being shaped every day by teachers, parents, kaumātua, rangatahi, social workers, union delegates, health workers, and neighbours – people who are choosing honesty over defensiveness, and connection over fear. New Zealanders are ready to engage – if the facts are made accessible. We know that once people begin to understand, they often want to act. Hope grows fastest where knowledge replaces silence. The momentum is already here. And if it continues, the future of this country – grounded in te Tiriti – could be brighter than many dare imagine.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Children The Priority For The Social Investment Fund
Children of families with complex needs are the priority groups for the first round of the Social Investment Fund, Secretary for Social Investment Andrew Coster announced today. "To qualify for funding under this initiative, organisations that provide social services will need to be working with one (or more) of the following groups: children whose parent(s) are currently or have recently been in prison, children of parent(s) who experienced the care system, and children that were stood down or suspended from school when they were 12 or younger. "We know children who have had these experiences are more likely to experience poor outcomes and require significant social support throughout their lives. We want to work alongside organisations in the community to support these whānau and families to ensure the best outcomes for tamariki. "The Social Investment Fund is designed to work differently to ensure government, the social sector and other partners can work smarter to make a positive difference in the lives of New Zealanders. We've heard from the sector that they want to work differently with government, and we're committed to doing that through the Fund. "This funding opportunity is the first of four potential pathways providers can access through the Social Investment Fund, all aimed at unlocking opportunities to deliver better services, change the way government works with these partners and use data to improve the impact of government investment in social services," Mr Coster said. The Fund will open for applications on 25 August 2025. Information on the Social Investment Fund is on the Social Investment Agency's website: Note The Social Investment Fund (round one) will be open for applications on 25 August 2025 The first three initiatives that have already been announced by the Social Investment Fund as demonstration projects are: Autism New Zealand's early screening and intervention programme that provides services and support for family/whānau, caregivers and professionals. Ka Puta Ka Ora Emerge Aotearoa's evidence-based approach to tackling youth offending and truancy that will help at least 80 families each year to address youth offending and truancy; and The He Piringa Whare programme with Te Tihi o Ruahine, an alliance of nine hapū, iwi, Māori organisations and providers that will support 130 families at a time with a wraparound service that supports stable housing, education, training and employment, and other services.
