Top Senate Democrat presses Pentagon over Microsoft use of China-based engineers
Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, raised questions in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about the Pentagon's implementation of a 2018 provision requiring defense contractors to disclose when a country considered a cyber threat has asked them to share their source code.
The provision passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act in 2018. However, the Defense Department did not propose rulemaking until last November.
'[I]t unfortunately took the Department six years to take this initial step,' Shaheen wrote. 'Meanwhile, PRC engineers were engaged in providing support to the DOD that could have exposed the Department to serious vulnerabilities.'
In mid-July, ProPublica reported that Microsoft was relying on China-based engineers, overseen by U.S. citizens with security clearances known as 'digital escorts,' to maintain Defense Department systems.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) raised concerns about the practice to Hegseth. He noted in a letter that even though the practice technically met security requirements, the digital escorts 'often do not have the technical training or expertise needed to catch malicious code or suspicious behavior.'
Shortly after, Microsoft announced it was making changes to ensure no China-based engineering teams were providing technical assistance for Defense Department cloud services.
Hegseth also announced a two-week review to 'make sure that what we uncovered isn't happening anywhere else' across the Defense Department.
'While I am encouraged that Microsoft has announced that it will end this arrangement, this incident raises serious questions about whether the DOD is fully implementing U.S. laws that require guardrails around the procurement of information technology (IT) systems,' Shaheen added in Monday's letter.
The New Hampshire Democrat requested information about the timeline for implementation of the 2018 provision and why it took so long to propose rulemaking. She also pressed the Pentagon for details about its Microsoft contract, how it aims to mitigate similar risks going forward and the scope of its two-week review.
'As cybersecurity risks stemming from the PRC compound, the United States government should not be proactively opening the door to its critically sensitive IT systems due to a lack of U.S. government oversight,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
28 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Fed up with Beacon Hill, those seeking to change the Legislature turn to 2026 voters for reforms
Kaufman is now leading the charge on two petitions that target stipends lawmakers earn for holding leadership positions. One would eliminate stipends altogether; the other would limit stipends to a certain percentage of a legislative leader's base salary, among other restrictions. The effort emerged after a Such issues 'should have been dealt with in a deliberative process in the Legislature,' said Kaufman, who filed bills to address the stipends only to have legislators ignore them. 'We feel like we have to take democracy back. The Legislature failed us and continues to fail us.' Advertisement Another petition submitted Wednesday would overhaul the election system by allowing open primaries that candidates from all different parties would compete in, an effort to increase competition to incumbents who are often unchallenged. Yet another would extend the state's public records law to the Legislature and governor, which would put Massachusetts in line with most other states. Both petitions are pushed by the Advertisement The petitions, if they make it to the 2026 ballot, build off momentum from the The success of that audit campaign, combined with a changing public perception of Beacon Hill, has fueled new efforts 'to try and pry open information from the Legislature,' said Horowitz, who studies the impact of ballot questions. 'People are recognizing that there is a real opportunity in the ballot question,' he said. Legislator pay has been a recurring topic on ballots nationwide. Peverill Squire, a professor at the University of Missouri who's studied Conversely, among the most common — and unpopular — measures that lawmakers themselves have put before voters are ones to increase their own pay. Squire said there have been nearly 250 such measures over the past 100 years, but the median 'yes' vote sits around 43 percent. Advertisement 'It's a problem that lawmakers are always hoping to tackle,' Squire said during a panel Wednesday at the National Conference of State Legislatures Legislative Summit in Boston. In Massachusetts, lawmakers' pay is automatically adjusted every two years through a complicated process involving two separate mechanisms: one guaranteed by the state Constitution, the other baked into a The constitutionally mandated adjustment is determined by the governor, who every two years must decide whether to raise the annual base salary for legislators. In December, Governor Maura Healey said lawmakers would get an The extra pay lawmakers can earn on top of their salaries also jumped by Some legislative leaders defended the extra pay. House Speaker Ron Mariano said stipends reward those who take on more work and responsibility and helps to 'keep people thinking about this job as a potential career.' He also said legislative leaders are best positioned to determine who receives them. 'Who better to know who shows leadership and puts in effort than the leaders who are trying to move the agenda?' Advertisement The Quincy Democrat did not say whether he'd support subjecting lawmakers to the public records law, arguing it depends on the details of 'what you're opening up' to the public. 'There are some things that are better left to negotiate in private,' he said, 'and I would prefer it that way.' There is a relatively low bar for starting the petition process: submitting just 10 signatures from registered voters and the full text of the law or amendment they wish to have enacted. That signed petition must be filed with Campbell's office, accompanied by certificates of voter registration for each signatory. After that, Campbell's office will review the language and, if deemed acceptable, will certify it and create a summary of the proposed law or amendment that will be printed on the petition forms. Once Campbell announces which petitions are certified for the ballot, typically in early September, campaigns can begin gathering the tens of thousands of signatures necessary to get it on the ballot. Initiative petitions for laws require two separate rounds of signature gathering and submission, and the number of signatures required for each round depends on the number of votes cast for governor at the most recent gubernatorial election. For the 2026 election, campaigns will have to collect a total of at least 87,003 signatures over the two rounds, and no more than one-quarter of the signatures can come from any one county. Other petitions filed Wednesday would allow Committee for Public Counsel Services employees to unionize, reduce the state's personal income tax to 4 percent from 5 percent, overhaul a Advertisement Another initiative that was certified last year and will be on the 2026 ballot would Mariano has been vocal about lawmakers' frustration with the ballot initiative process, saying citizen-written laws can create unintended consequences. Massachusetts lawmakers have also regularly rewritten voter-approved laws, such as slowing the implementation of a reduction in The House just this spring passed a He said he doesn't see the proposals as a rebuke of the Legislature, but rather a demonstration of the 'ease' of getting a measure before voters. 'I see a lot more of these well-financed special interest groups taking advantage of a procedure that I think is way too easy to get a question on the ballot,' he said. 'No one's talking to the voters. They're just getting signatures. It becomes an organizational chore more than anything. And when you see ballot initiatives become law, you see the holes in them.' Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
Business Wire
28 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Kirby McInerney LLP Reminds Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) Investors of Class Action Filing and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP reminds investors who purchased Sable Offshore Corp. ('Sable' or the 'Company') (NYSE:SOC) securities to contact Thomas W. Elrod of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at investigations@ or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to the securities fraud class action lawsuit against the Company. [ LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION ] On May 19, 2025, Sable announced that it had resumed oil production from one of three offshore platforms related to its Las Flores pipeline (the 'Onshore Pipeline') in California as of May 15, 2025. On May 21, 2025, Sable announced the pricing of its previously announced underwritten public offering of 8,695,654 shares of its common stock, by the Company at a price to the public of $29.50 per share (the 'Public Offering'). The Company subsequently announced the closing of the Public Offering on May 23, 2025, with gross proceeds of approximately $295 million. On May 23, 2025, the California State Land Commission sent Sable a letter warning the Company that, 'The [May 19] press release appears to mischaracterize the nature of recent activities, causing significant public confusion and raising questions regarding Sable's intentions.' According to the letter, Sable had conflated offshore well testing activities required by a federal regulatory agency with the restart of operations. Then, on May 28, 2025, the Santa Barbara County Superior Court approved a preliminary injunction requested by the California Coastal Commission regarding Sable's maintenance and repair work in the coastal zone related to its Onshore Pipeline. On this news, the price of Sable declined by $5.04 per share, or approximately 15%, from $32.93 per share on May 27, 2025, to close at $27.89 on May 28, 2025. The lawsuit alleges that Sable made false or misleading statements that the Company had restarted oil production off the coast of California when it had not. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Sable securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Thomas W. Elrod of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at investigations@ or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters without any cost to you. Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs' law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm's efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP's website. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
NBC News
29 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump threatens to take over D.C. police and says he might deploy the National Guard
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he's considering a federal takeover of the local police force in Washington, D.C., and that he might bring in the National Guard to help handle crime in the city. The president's remarks went further than his threat Tuesday to take federal control of the nation's capital after a well-known Department of Government Efficiency staffer was assaulted over the weekend. Asked by a reporter at a White House event Wednesday if taking over the Metropolitan Police Department is an 'an option on the table,' Trump said it was. 'We're considering it. Yeah, because the crime is — is ridiculous,' Trump said before referencing the DOGE employee, Edward Coristine, without naming him. 'We have a capital that's very unsafe, you know, we just almost lost a young man, beautiful, handsome guy that got the hell knocked out of him the night before last," Trump said. Trump then threatened to bring in the National Guard. 'What a shame, rate of crime, the rate of muggings, killings and everything else, we're not going to let it, and that includes bringing in the National Guard, maybe very quickly too,' he said. A spokesperson for D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, declined to comment on Trump's remarks. It wouldn't be the first time a Trump administration has deployed the National Guard in Washington. Following protests in the wake of George Floyd's murder in 2020, some of which turned violent, National Guard troops were brought in, despite opposition from Bowser. Two months ago, Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles in a legally contested move amid protests related to the administration's immigration enforcement. Violent crime in Washington is down 26% year to date, according to preliminary data from the Metropolitan Police Department. Trump has long expressed a desire to assume control of the D.C. government. Washington has a limited ability to self-govern in which its laws and budget are subject to congressional oversight. Taking over parts of the district involves a mix of congressional and unilateral actions. For example, Trump could unilaterally assume control of the police, but experts told NBC Washington earlier this year that it would require some 'justifying emergency' and would likely be challenged in court. A full federal takeover of the district would require an act of Congress, in which both the House and Senate would need to vote to repeal the 1973 Home Rule Act that grants D.C. residents the right to elect their own city government. Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for D.C., said in an interview with Fox News Wednesday night that she "totally" supports Trump if he decides to seek a federal takeover of the district. "It's up to the president," Pirro said. "If that's what we need to do to get it done, that's what he should do. And I support the president."
