logo
I don't want to die with a freezer full of seeds. It's time to rethink biodiversity and preservation

I don't want to die with a freezer full of seeds. It's time to rethink biodiversity and preservation

The Guardian02-04-2025
About a month after Hurricane Helene devastated western North Carolina last fall, Roger Wynn and I met in an Asheville, North Carolina, supermarket parking lot. He'd driven two hours from Little Mountain, South Carolina, where the passing storm had also left its destructive mark.
'When the power finally came back on,' Wynn said, 'two of my freezers didn't work.' Wynn was worried not about spoiled food inside, but his seed collection. On that autumn day, in an act of forced downsizing and seed philanthropy, Wynn handed over two boxes filled with seeds. He wanted me, as founder of the non-profit Utopian Seed Project, to share the seeds with farmers across the region. The boxes contained a trove of Appalachian varieties: speckled field peas, white mountain half-runner beans, purple-podded bush beans and lots of butterbeans.
Over many years of being active in the seed-saving community, Wynn has more than 100 varieties of carefully stewarded seeds. He recalled collecting sugar maple seeds in third grade when he 'planted them in Dixie cups and sold them door-to-door'. As a child, Wynn helped his grandmother shell dry butterbeans on their porch. He remembers how she admired the spectrum of lavender and pink seeds. But 'when she died, [family members] basically cleaned the freezers out and threw everything away, including all her seeds,' he said.
Unlike some of his butterbeans, it's not a rare story.
Seeds have a finite lifespan, but when cooled to below-freezing temperatures, seeds' metabolism slows and they can remain viable for decades or more. This makes freezers an important, albeit mundane, tool for long-term storage. Essentially, the freezer is an insurance policy against the loss of seed varieties.
That's also the principle behind facilities such as the Millennium Seed Bank in Sussex, England, which stores billions of seeds underground at -4F (-20C). This kind of institutional seed preservation is called ex-situ, which removes varieties from their natural environment. Wynn is growing and saving seeds within his community, practicing in situ conservation.
Freezing seeds is a double-edged sword. The ability to store large seed collections with a few hundred dollars worth of plug-in technology has created a preservation problem. Or perhaps the problem is preservation itself.
In Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass, the Red Queen said: 'Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.' The 'Red Queen's hypothesis' in evolutionary biology argues that species must be constantly evolving and adapting just to maintain their place in the ecosystem. A world without freezers would force seeds to be grown and saved regularly. But preservation can be a trap, both for the seeds frozen in time and the seed keepers who preserve them.
Hurricane Helene reinforced another hard truth: a freezer full of seeds is the literal version of putting all your eggs in one basket. Dr Jim Veteto, living in Celo, North Carolina, manages the Southern Seed Legacy Project and recorded oral histories of people like Roger Wynn. His barn collapsed during Helene, burying his entire seed collection of hundreds of rare seed varieties collected from Appalachian and Cherokee seed keepers. In the days after the storm, he tried to dig the freezer out of the debris and muck. Later, local seed-savers showed up to help, and they pulled the freezer from the wreckage. Amazingly, the seeds appear to have survived.
Large-scale, government-funded seed banks also have their problems. They collect and store seeds from peasant, Indigenous and rural communities across the world. Bonnetta Adeeb, founder of Ujamaa Cooperative Farming Alliance, refers to them as 'seed jail'. I visited the US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) S-9 Seed Storage at the University of Georgia's Griffin campus. A large room cooled to a constant 18F was filled with hundreds of shelves, thousands of containers and millions upon millions of seeds.
In theory, everyday people can request seeds from the USDA's extensive collections. But, in practice, the USDA seed banks are primarily accessed by academic and corporate plant breeders, who rely on crop diversity to develop elite breeding lines. The preservation can become predatory, leading to claims of biopiracy and the 'gene rush', equivalent to gold rushes where outsiders rushed in to extract precious metals and profit from them. Seeds over people, even when those people and their relationships to the land are the reason the seeds exist and endure. Often, 'improved' seeds are sold back to the original communities, further undermining their stewardship of biodiversity.
Roger Wynn told me that the hurricane prompted an ongoing shift in his own thinking. 'This disaster made me start thinking about my seeds. For the most part, it's been fun. It's given me purpose.' Wynn highlighted the friends and community he had made along the way, all the times he had swapped and shared seeds. The Southern Seed Legacy Project's Veteto, who feared for his own life at the peak of the storm, said almost everyone he received seeds from had already died. 'It's just me out here with a freezer full of seeds,' he said. 'I've become the type of person that I started out documenting. But that's OK because these seeds give my life meaning.'
Veteto was a student of Dr Virginia Nazarea, co-founder of the Southern Seed Legacy and author of Heirloom Seeds and Their Keepers. Nazarea once wrote: 'Seedsaver contribution to the conservation of biodiversity needs to be understood as conservation in vivo, or conservation as a way of life.'
This speaks to something greater than preservation, which often treats seeds like artifacts, not living things. Seed-saving should not be the goal, but merely a skill that is used in an ongoing relationship with the plant. People, seeds and relationships change over time. Life is messy, and that's OK.
In 2019, I accompanied culinary historian David Shields on a visit to the 'Dark Corner' of South Carolina, near Greenville. As part of his work with the Carolina Gold Rice Foundation, he researched and sometimes rediscovered old seed varieties that dropped out of commercial circulation or had never achieved it.
We traveled there to follow a lead from Craigslist, which mentioned someone growing what was believed to be an extinct corn. In the late 1800s, Cocke's Prolific was a nationally renowned corn, but became less available by the turn of the 20th century and was considered a lost variety until six years ago. That day, we visited 96-year-old Manning Farmer, who proudly showed us 18in corn cobs. They were perhaps the only ones in the entire world.
He'd grown and saved Cocke's Prolific for nearly seven decades. Like any good seed-saver, he kept backup seeds in his freezer. His motivations were utilitarian, not preservation. It was his way of life. Farmer died shortly after his 99th birthday, in November 2021.
Our desire to preserve is strongly linked to a narrative of loss, both for biodiversity writ large and for rare heirloom seeds. But we recognize the need for biodiversity and destroy it in the same breath. What if we protected the Amazon instead of just the genetics within it? What if we supported small-scale diversified agriculture instead of industrialized monoculture?
Seed preservation has a place, but it's not the thing that will save us. Heirloom seed keepers attempt to preserve the past, while plant breeders control genetic resources to commodify the seed. Neither camp is particularly focused on how to expand biodiversity into the future, as if biodiversity and seed varieties are fixed and finite things.
Compounding this problem is the climate crisis, which is dramatically affecting our ability to grow food. Diversity is a core component of resilience, so we need rapid, ongoing and diverse adaptation of our regional food systems – everywhere, all the time. If we've been preserving all these seeds for some imagined future need, then the need is now. Arguably, it's already too late.
For me, events like Hurricane Helene represent the limits of adaptation. You can't adapt to a 30,000-year flood, which wiped entire farms and towns from the landscape. You can only roll the dice and cross your fingers. Enormous climate mitigation is our only hope. In the meantime, we need to heed the Red Queen's advice to 'keep running', to adapt while we still can. For me, this means emptying the freezers into the fields, a radical reverse flow from preservation back to the people. Because what's the point in dying with a freezer full of seeds?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Refracted sunlight sparks blaze across two homes in Basingstoke
Refracted sunlight sparks blaze across two homes in Basingstoke

BBC News

time13-07-2025

  • BBC News

Refracted sunlight sparks blaze across two homes in Basingstoke

Sunlight refracted through glass has sparked a fire which spread to two started on a wooden fence before moving to the terraced houses in Dorset Crescent in Basingstoke at about 16:00 BST on Saturday, said the fire was an "important reminder to ensure that glass ornaments and mirrors are kept out of sunlight, particularly in hot weather", Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Service returned to their station at about 18:00, after conducting other home fire safety visits. You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

EPA head promises 'total transparency' on geoengineering and contrails as weather conspiracy theories swirl
EPA head promises 'total transparency' on geoengineering and contrails as weather conspiracy theories swirl

NBC News

time10-07-2025

  • NBC News

EPA head promises 'total transparency' on geoengineering and contrails as weather conspiracy theories swirl

Greene added that Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., is a co-sponsor. Burchett has spread similarly bizarre claims about extreme weather. In a statement, a spokesperson for Greene said the congresswoman "has long discussed this issue" and that the bill was not related to the Texas flooding. Burchett's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Following Milton and Helene, the NOAA released a fact sheet in October 2024 to try to debunk 'weather modification claims' that swelled after those two storms decimated communities in Florida and North Carolina. In it, the agency said that it 'does not fund or participate in cloud seeding or other weather modification projects.' Zeldin's nod toward more fringe explanations for extreme weather comes as the Trump administration has cut funding for climate change research and removed the website that hosted the government's climate assessments. President Donald Trump has called climate change a hoax, even as scientists have increasingly found strong evidence connecting the growing severity and frequency of extreme weather to global warming. Decades of research into weather modification have at times become fodder for conspiracy theorists. Between 1962 and 1982, NOAA was involved in a project called STORMFURY that sought to determine whether hurricane intensity could be modified. The research was unsuccessful at altering hurricane intensity and was discontinued. NOAA hasn't attempted similar research since, according to the fact sheet. Cloud seeding is a weather modification technology currently in use. The practice has been around since the 1950s and typically involves spraying silver iodide into clouds to draw water out of the atmosphere and produce extra snow or rain. Currently, cloud seeding programs are primarily used in Western states to boost water supplies, and companies are required to file notices before implementing them. 'Cloud seeding doesn't make water; it helps clouds in marginal environments to release 5-15% more moisture. But in Texas, there was already 100% humidity, extreme moisture and storms. The clouds didn't need any help,' Cappucci said. The spread of these claims has coincided with an uptick in threats directed at meteorologists. While geoengineering is a legitimate scientific endeavor, claims about its ability to control major weather patterns or create severe weather are not grounded in reality. Most geoengineering options are theoretical and untested. Federal researchers have taken only a few small steps toward studying their feasibility, and atmospheric scientists say there is no evidence of any large-scale programs. Last year in Alameda, California, a small-scale testing project of a form of geoengineering called marine cloud brightening by academic scientists was shut down after community outcry, despite researchers demonstrating that the actions were harmless. Psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert explained that conspiratorial thinking usually spikes during moments of collective fear and uncertainty, especially during weather events in which people feel powerless. 'Conspiracy theories offer an emotionally satisfying narrative: they restore a sense of control by framing events as intentional acts by powerful agents rather than random, chaotic phenomena,' Alpert told NBC. 'In this sense, 'someone is doing this to us' feels more tolerable than 'no one is in control.'' However, while some view the EPA's move as an act of transparency, others believe it's merely the latest political maneuver to avoid critical environmental issues. 'Some people have 'questions' about whether birds are real — will that be your next project?' Rep. Don Beyer D-Va., said in response to Zeldin's Thursday morning

The U.S. faces more frequent extreme weather events, but attitudes and actions aren't keeping up
The U.S. faces more frequent extreme weather events, but attitudes and actions aren't keeping up

NBC News

time09-07-2025

  • NBC News

The U.S. faces more frequent extreme weather events, but attitudes and actions aren't keeping up

After deadly flooding in central Texas in 1987, some thought they'd proven they could handle Mother Nature's best punch. Then came this month's horrific flash floods, when unfathomable amounts of rain fell in only hours and more than 100 people died. Before 2021, the typically temperate Pacific Northwest and western Canada seemed highly unlikely to get a killer heat wave, but they did. Tropical Hawaii once felt an ocean away from drought-fueled wildfires, until it wasn't. And many in inland North Carolina figured hurricanes were a coastal problem until the remnants of Helene blew in last year. Climate change is making extreme weather events more frequent and intense, according to climate scientists and government data. But people and governments are generally living in the past and haven't embraced that extreme weather is now the norm, to say nothing about preparing for the nastier future that's in store, experts in meteorology, disasters and health told The Associated Press. 'What happens with climate change is that what used to be extreme becomes average, typical, and what used to never occur in a human lifetime or maybe even in a thousand years becomes the new extreme,' Princeton University climate scientist Michael Oppenheimer said. 'We start to experience things that just basically never happened before.' The 10-year summer average of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's climate extreme index, which tracks hurricanes, heavy rain, droughts and high and low temperatures, is 58% higher than it was in the 1980s. Despite the grim trajectory, society isn't acting with enough alarm, Oppenheimer said. 'There's plenty of evidence that we sit there and do absolutely nothing while these risks are coming right at us like a moving railroad train and we're standing in the tracks. And then all of a sudden, bam,' he said. Shifting public perspective Although the changing climate is the biggest problem, the way we react to or ignore the changes could make a bad situation worse, experts said. Marshall Shepherd, a University of Georgia meteorology professor who previously served as president of the American Meteorological Society, said people tend to base decisions on how they fared during past extreme weather events, including storms that didn't end up directly affecting them. This leaves them overly optimistic that they'll also fare well today, even though storms have grown more fierce. He points to the Texas flooding. 'That is flash flood alley. We know that floods happen in that region all the time. ... I've already seen normalcy bias statements by people in the regions saying, well, we get flooding all the time,' Shepherd said, pointing out that the amount of rain that fell in only a few hours last week was anything but normal. People need to shift how they think about disasters, even if they don't live in the most disaster-prone locations, said Kim Klockow McClain, an extreme weather social scientist at the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research who studies communicating disaster warnings and risk. 'The message needs to be, if you're used to some degree of nuisance flooding, every so often, look at what happened in Texas and realize that this is a shifting baseline,' she said. Ignoring the problem won't make it disappear Time and again after catastrophic storms and wildfires, people whose lives were upended say they didn't think it could happen to them. This mindset helps people cope, but with extreme weather happening more frequently and in more places, it can prevent them from adequately preparing. 'It's sort of a psychological mechanism to protect us that it can't happen to me,' said Susan Cutter, co-director of the Hazards Vulnerability & Resilience Institute at the University of South Carolina. Surviving past extreme events can leave people believing that it won't happen again or, if it does, that they'll be fine, said Lori Peek, director of the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado. She said this overconfidence can be dangerous: 'Just because I've lived through a fire or a flood or a hurricane or a tornado, that does not mean that the next time is going to look like the last time.' What's being done As the weather has grown more extreme, our ability to prepare for and react to it hasn't kept pace, the scientists said. 'Infrastructure is aging in our country and is more vulnerable given the fact that there are just simply, as a matter of fact, more people living in harm's way,' Peek said. 'As our population has continued to rise, it's not only that we have more people in the country, it's also that we have more people living in particularly hazardous areas like our coastal areas.' The Trump Administration's mass layoffs and planned cuts to agencies that study climate and help warn of and deal with disasters — the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the National Weather Service and research labs at the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. Geological Survey — could further worsen the situation, several experts said. Smart and experienced people have already left these agencies and it could take years to make up for their knowledge and abilities, they said. 'We're destroying the capability we have that we're going to need more and more in the future,' Oppenheimer said. As for future disasters, the country needs to figure out and plan for the worst-case scenario instead of looking to the past, Peek said. 'This is our future,' Peek said. 'It's obvious that we're living into a future where there are going to be more fires and floods and heat waves.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store