
Three Ways Managers Can Make Teams More Productive
Work today is full of interruptions. The constant influx of emails, notifications, and questions from co-workers can slow individual progress and create a sense of frustration. After all, most people want to feel productive and work toward crossing off important goals from their to-do list.
But productivity is more than a one-person show: it's a team effort. Recognizing this can help managers to make their teams more productive.
1. Signal Team Member Availability
One solution is to let team members know when they should avoid interrupting people, so that focus time is protected. To accomplish this, a team of researchers at the University of Zurich developed the 'FlowLight,' a tool that detects when a worker is focused and signals availability for interactions to others. First, the tool measures whether workers are in a state of 'flow,' detecting this through computer activity like keyboard and mouse usage. Then, the tool signals via a lightbulb mounted nearby whether now is a good time for interruptions. Like a traffic light, red signals that a person should not be interrupted as they're in the midst of deep work, while green means go ahead.
Testing out the FlowLight in a field study of 449 workers across 12 different countries, the researchers found that FlowLight reduced interruptions at work by 46%, allowing workers to focus their energy on individual goals at opportune moments. Given that recovery from a single interruption takes on average 23 minutes and 15 seconds, this amounts to a lot of time saved each workday.
Likewise, making it clear in schedules when people are available for interacting with others versus in focus time can help. The same researchers also developed a tool that encourages team members to designate time in these categories in their workday, and then displays this information to co-workers in a digital schedule. Testing this tool with 48 participants over 6 weeks, the tool helped workers to align their schedules so that teams could plan around rhythms of focus time and interaction time. This led workers to experience fewer interruptions during focused work, with 88% agreeing at the end of the study that they could focus well on their work when needed. Coordinating schedules made work less stressful and improved teamwork because workers no longer feared being interrupted at critical moments and were still able to answer co-workers in a timely manner.
Taken together, both of these research projects show that signaling to your team members when you're being individually productive and when you're available for helping others can be one way to get the team on board so that by working together, you minimize the cost of interruptions.
2. Change Mindsets About Being Productive
Of course, it's not possible to avoid all interruptions, even when team members have the best of intentions. What can be done to help people cope with frustration when interruptions do interfere with work?
Research led by Professor Thomas Fritz and co-authored with me, Alexander Lill, and Dr. André Meyer from the University of Zurich and Professor Gail Murphy from the University of British Columbia suggests reflecting on one question can make an impact: 'How can your team help you to be more productive?'
Answering this question can boost employees' feelings of productivity at work.
After all, the team members we work with are far more than a cause of interruptions that stall our productivity at work. Team members also support us in being productive and progressing toward our own goals, whether by giving feedback on a new idea, talking through a roadblock we've hit, or providing a mood boost by engaging in small talk near the coffee machine.
But as we go about our work each day, we might underrecognize the role that our team members play in supporting our own productivity. Becoming more aware of this could help people to reconsider their mindsets about how teamwork impacts productivity – and even boost productivity. This idea draws on research on mindsets, which suggests that calling attention to a sometimes overlooked truth - in this case, that team members can support us in being productive - can be constructive, changing how people respond to frustrations and challenges.
To test this idea, we conducted an experiment at a large multinational company where we asked 48 employees in different teams to report their feelings of productivity at the end of each workday over nine weeks. A few weeks into the study, team members received an additional reflection exercise which asked them to reflect on the question 'How did your team help you to be productive today?' This question encouraged workers to recognize that the team can help their productivity. Results showed that this reflection exercise increased workers' individual feelings of productivity, with team members reporting up to an 8.8% gain.
3. Build Productive Reflection into the Workday
Team members described how the reflection exercise created a 'higher awareness of what everybody is doing for the team' and made them more 'grateful for all the help and assistance that [they] have received for [their] tasks.' Additionally, individuals began to reevaluate their own contributions and behavior at work, saying that the daily reflections made them more aware that 'if I'm helping the team, then that is being productive, and I need to be a little less, maybe harsh on myself by not judging myself as being unproductive when I'm actually not.'
However, for teams with low initial levels of cohesion, the exercise backfired and undermined team cohesion as well as feelings of productivity. Team leaders should thus focus on establishing team cohesion and only then use reflection exercises to solidify and further improve productivity.
How can leaders act on these insights? They can take steps to create space for reflection during the workday. Dr. Meyer described the value of reflection in an interview with me: 'Our studies show that reflection helps shift focus from daily frustration to personal growth, empowering individuals to improve with each iteration.'
Reflection exercises can become part of the daily routine, such as being built into an 'emotional commute' when transitioning out of work as employees complete reflection exercises while logging off and setting their goals for the next day.
Through steps like reflection, leaders can help employees reconsider being productive as not a solo act, but a multiplayer game.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These are the foods getting more expensive - and why experts are so 'concerned'
Beef, coffee, chocolate and butter prices are on the rise - here's what it means for you. Food prices have skyrocketed in the last month, with the price of beef and veal going up by nearly a quarter, inflation figures released on Wednesday show. Juice, coffee and chocolate are among the basics that have dramatically risen in price, with experts warning that rising food costs "are particularly concerning". Overall inflation has risen by 3.8% in July, edging up from 3.6% in June, according to the Consumer Prices Index (CPI), the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said. Inflation rose by more than expected as demand for summer travel pushed up air fares and food prices continued to climb, according to official figures. Here's what we know about the food price rises, why it is concerning, and what it means for the wider cost of living in the UK at the moment. What food prices are increasing the most? According to the index, these are the foodstuffs that went up in price the most. Beef and veal: 24% Butter: 18% Coffee: 18% Chocolate: 17% Milk: 11% Juice: 8% Bakery goods: 7% Overall food and non-alcoholic beverages inflation: 4.9% (up from 4.5% in June) Why are food prices going up? Climate change is said to be a big factor in the increase, with widespread droughts in the UK this summer leading to smaller crop yields. "As the UK experiences one of our worst droughts in living memory, the impact of climate change on these figures is clear to see," Tom Lancaster, land, food and farming analyst at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, said. "The Bank of England stated in a report this month that extreme weather is now one of the main drivers of food price inflation, and that climate change-related impacts may prevent it from coming down as expected towards the end of this year. "We can already see the impacts of this year's drought starting to come through in some vegetable prices, and inflation for coffee, chocolate and tea are all back up, all crops that have been hit by extreme weather linked to climate change in recent months and years." Added to this, the Ukraine war has significantly disrupted global supply chains, particularly affecting energy and commodity prices, which in turn pushed up food prices globally and in the UK. To a lesser extent, the Israel Gaza war has also taken a toll, affecting global markets and shipping routes, causing further cost pressures on food imports. Why is it a problem? When food prices rise, the average customer faces some significant knock-on effects with how far they can stretch their budget. "Households are once again seeing the cost of their weekly shop climb, with food inflation now up by 1.9% in just four months," Kris Hamer, director of insight for trade body the British Retail Consortium, said. "This surge has been a key driver behind headline inflation, alongside a rise in transport costs, piling fresh pressure on families already being forced to cut back." At the sharper end, more struggling families have to turn to foodbanks for support to deal with rising food costs. "The rising cost of food is particularly concerning for families as it comes on in the wake of a period of steep increases in the cost of essentials and rising food bank use," James Smith, Research Director at the Resolution Foundation, said. It looks like inflation is only set to continue, indicating that food prices might be higher for longer. The Bank of England is expecting CPI inflation to continue rising to a peak of 4% in September, before price rises start to ease. It's not great for the central bank, which is tasked with keeping inflation at 2%. "UK inflation looks increasingly like an international outlier as CPI stepped up again in July to reach 3.8 per cent, a nineteen-month high, with a worrying increase in the inflation rate of essentials," Smith added. However, Harmer added that there was some "limited relief" for consumers with clothing and footwear inflation easing and some everyday food items like olive oil, butter and cheese falling month-on-month. What other prices have risen? With inflation rising across the board, food is not the only good affected. Air fares soared by 30.2% between June and July, the biggest jump since the collection of monthly data began in 2001. The average price of petrol rose by 2p per litre between June and July, and the average diesel price by 2.9p per litre over the period, the data showed. Prices across UK restaurants and hotels also increased last month, largely driven by a jump in overnight hotel stays booked the night before. Added to this, because inflation is still fairly high at 3.8%, the Bank of England is less likely to lower interest rates anytime soon. Homeowners celebrated a small victory when the average two-year mortgage deal dropped below 5% on 13 August, the first time since Liz Truss's mini-budget sent them skyrocketing in 2022. However, they are sadly likely to stagnate again until inflation drops. When it comes to the average person's spending power, even with current inflation levels, they are still said to be in a better position than they were last year. According to the Consumer Prices Index, annual wage growth in real terms was 1.5% for regular pay and 1.1% for total pay. Even though prices are rising, this suggests wages are rising enough for workers to have slightly more spending power than a year ago when adjusted for inflation. Responding to the increase, Rachel Reeves acknowledged that there was 'more to do to ease the cost of living' following the figures. The chancellor said: "We have taken the decisions needed to stabilise the public finances, and we're a long way from the double-digit inflation we saw under the previous government, but there's more to do to ease the cost of living. "That's why we've raised the minimum wage, extended the £3 bus fare cap, expanded free school meals to over half a million more children and are rolling out free breakfast clubs for every child in the country."
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pfizer battles another Paxlovid lawsuit from Enanta
If you don't succeed at first, try again – in separate regions. That's the motto Enanta Pharmaceuticals is following, at least, after disclosing it has sued Pfizer in Europe over a patent infringement relating to Covid-19 treatment pill Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir). In June 2022, Enanta filed a lawsuit against Pfizer in a US district court in Massachusetts, claiming that the big pharma company infringed on a patent describing protease inhibitors invented by its scientists. Enanta has now followed that up with another filing in Europe, making the same accusation. Since being emergency authorised in 2021, anti-viral Paxlovid has generated Pfizer more than $26bn in global revenue. This includes a staggering $18.9bn in 2022 when Covid-19 cases were still prevalent. Despite waning demand for Covid-19 treatments, the pill still brought in $1.2bn in 2024, buoyed by government orders. However, Enanta – known for co-developing hepatitis C virus treatment glecaprevir/pibrentasvir with AbbVie – believes Pfizer designed Paxlovid via unlawful means. The US biotech stated it is 'seeking a determination of liability for use and infringement of European Patent No. EP 4 051 265 (the '265 Patent) in the manufacture, use and sale of Pfizer's Covid-19 antiviral, Paxlovid'. In an emailed statement to Pharmaceutical Technology, a Pfizer spokesperson said: 'We are confident in our intellectual property (IP) surrounding Paxlovid and will respond in due course in court.' The lawsuit, filed in the European Union's (EU) Unified Patent Court (UPC), targets Pfizer's commercial activity in the 18 countries of the EU. The company confirmed the '265 patent in question is the European counterpart of US patent number 11,358,953 (the '953 Patent) that is the centre of the US lawsuit. Although it is technically ongoing, Enanta's US lawsuit hit a major roadblock. In December 2024, a federal judge in Massachusetts sided with Pfizer, granting that the '953 patent is invalid. Enanta confirmed at the time it would appeal the decision, adding it 'believes strongly in the merits of our case'. Pfizer reported strong Q2 2025 results this month, bucking a tepid earnings window that gripped the wider pharma industry. Sales for the Paxlovid grew 71% while the Covid-19 vaccine Comirnaty revenue surged 95%. However, the legal challenge posed by Enanta marks the second issue Pfizer has had to firefight this week. The big pharma company reported a Phase III trial failure for a sickle cell disease candidate purchased as part of a $5.4bn takeover of Global Blood Therapeutics in 2022. "Pfizer battles another Paxlovid lawsuit from Enanta" was originally created and published by Pharmaceutical Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to RRE 6 Loan Management DAC (Reset)
LONDON, August 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA UK (KBRA) assigns preliminary ratings to five classes of refinancing notes issued by RRE 6 Loan Management DAC, a cash flow collateralised loan obligation (CLO) backed primarily by a diversified portfolio of Euro-denominated corporate loans. RRE 6 Loan Management DAC is managed by Redding Ridge Asset Management (UK) LLP ("RRAM UK" or the"collateral manager"). The CLO originally closed in March 2021. This transaction will reset the terms of the CLO, including the stated maturity, non-call period, reinvestment period, note interest rates and notional balances. Proceeds from the issuance of the new CLO notes will be used to redeem the outstanding notes in full and to purchase new assets. The CLO will have a 4.5-year reinvestment period and a 13-year legal final. The ratings reflect initial credit enhancement levels, coverage tests including par value and interest coverage tests, excess spread, and a reinvestment overcollateralisation test. The collateral in RRE 6 Loan Management DAC will mainly consist of broadly syndicated leveraged loans and bonds issued by corporate obligors diversified across sectors. The target portfolio par amount is €400.0 million with exposures to 162 obligors. The obligors in the portfolio have a K-WARF of 2451, which represents a weighted average portfolio assessment of approximately B. RRAM UK is a UK-based subsidiary of Redding Ridge Asset Management LLC, an independent asset management company established and seeded by Apollo Global Credit Management, LLC (Apollo) in 2016 to manage CLOs. The RRAM UK management arm currently manages more than €8.6 billion in assets across nineteen European CLOs. The rating on the Class A-2-R Note considers the timely payment of interest and ultimate payment of principal by the applicable stated maturity date, while the ratings on the Class B-R, C-1-R, C-2-R and D-R Notes consider the ultimate payment of interest and principal by the applicable stated maturity date. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Click here to view the report. Methodologies Structured Credit: Structured Credit Global Rating Methodology Structured Finance: Global Structured Finance Counterparty Methodology ESG Global Rating Methodology Disclosures Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above. A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. This credit rating is endorsed by Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited for use in the European Union. Information on a credit rating's endorsement status is available on its rating page at Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at There are certain issuers, entities or transactions rated by KBRA Europe or KBRA UK that may be or have relationships with Shareholders and/or Shareholder-Related Companies, as that term is defined in KBRA's Shareholder and Shareholder Related Companies for KBRA Europe and KBRA UK Policy and Procedure. Relevant disclosure information may be found here. About KBRA UK Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK is located at 1 Connaught Place, 2nd Floor London, England. Doc ID: 1010921 View source version on Contacts Analytical Contacts Gabriele Gramazio, Senior Director (Lead Analyst)+44 20 8148 HyunKyeong Kim, Associate Director+1 Jerry Jurcisin, Director+1 Eric Hudson, Senior Managing Director, Co-Head of Global Structured Credit (Rating Committee Chair)+1 Business Development Contacts Miten Amin, Managing Director+44 20 8148 Mauricio Noé, Co-Head of Europe+44 20 8148 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data