Hopelessly distracted by you: Can we break our love affair with tech?
'In the age of digital distraction, information overload, doomscrolling and decreasing attention spans are the new normal,' says gallery director Dr Ryan Jefferies. The exhibition is a response to that and asks: 'How do we stay focused, filter out or switch off in an ever-growing global attention economy?'
Works big and small both mimic and critique the tropes of big tech, including computer games, 'sock puppets', tweets … even a wall of cat videos.
Curator Bern Hall developed the show with the input of a panel of young 'sci-curious' advisers aged 15 to 25, some of whom did their final years of high school or first years of university in tech-dependent COVID isolation.
'They talked about how they had this feeling of being constantly plugged in, but feeling less connected than ever before, and wanting to find a way to steal that time and attention back,' she says.
Hall is not immune to the lure of digital distraction. Instead of working on her comic book art, the 30-year-old often succumbs to deep dives on Reddit.
There is, she believes, 'a malicious kind of design going on' in digital media. 'All the social apps, all the web interfaces we engage with, are intentionally designed through neuroscience to grab our attention and be addictive.' Her aim in the exhibition was to explore 'the ways we can resist that'.
There are, she believes, both good and bad distractions.
'When we've been scrolling social media too long, it doesn't feel good,' she says. And we instinctively know that's a bad distraction.
But sometimes, instead of focusing on the task at hand, our minds might wander in pursuit of 'whimsical thoughts that just arrive, these creative impulses – and if we follow them through with a bit more intention, they could be leading us to somewhere better'.
In the world of internet distractions, cat videos hold a special place. And for artist Jen Valender, the question was: what do the cats themselves think of them?
Valender has previously worked with pythons, macaques, newborn calves and house flies. 'I really am interested in how animals see the world,' she says. 'I thought, 'Someone's got to do a cat video work, and that better be me.''
In April, she flew to Japan to film semi-feral cats on Aoshima (aka Cat Island). 'I had to find a gang of cats that hadn't had exposure to screens before,' she explains.
She then showed the cats the footage, and filmed them as they watched it, mostly with haughty feline disdain, but occasionally with mild interest.
Her work features a grid of 81 cat videos. Squint and you can make out Valender in some of them, but not many.
'I'm allergic to cats,' she says. 'I get itchy, can't breathe, runny nose, the works. So this was also an endurance performance for me.'
For American Laura Allcorn, our digital saturation demands a response.
'It's time we steal our attention back – I think it's a worthy cause,' says the creator of Pledge Drive for Attention, an installation that mimics the set of a telethon. 'It's been taken from us by apps and algorithms designed and curated to feed into whatever we're interested in, and we know they're profiting from this.'
Allcorn's work invites visitors to take a pledge to substitute time currently spent scrolling for something more productive. A counter on the wall keeps track of the hours pledged, and a bell rings every time someone signs up.
Loading
She's not anti-tech, just anti the way it has come to dominate our lives. 'It's a grey area, which is why we find so much tension around it,' she says. 'Things can serve us and things can go too far.'
Like many of the contributors to the exhibition, Allcorn is convinced our relationship with digital media is altering the way our brains function.
'There's evidence that our attention spans are shrinking in certain ways, we're not engaging in the same ways we used to,' she says. 'There's something in how we live now that means we can't sit with ourselves and boredom. And I think that is definitely rewiring our brains. It's this need to be activated all the time.'
Digital media is all about ease – of access, of use, of immediacy. And in this 'slick, frictionless world' we inhabit, being bored produces a sense of 'friction that feels incredibly scratchy and horrible' to many of us.
'But I think we can reverse that, that we can return to the level of attention we once had,' Allcorn says. 'Maybe I'm a hopeful, hopeless optimist around that, but I know I've restored my own attention.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why Sydney Sweeney's ‘good jeans' campaign is being compared to Nazism
'So American eagle admits they are naz****s [sic],' another said beside an 15-second clip of Sweeney cuddling a German shepherd dog. The comment received more than 4500 likes. 'Blong (sic) hair, blue eyes, HOLDING A GERMAN SHEPHERD!!! What were you all thinking? Did you know what you were implying? This is not ok,' another commenter said. Another clip featuring Sweeney wearing a low-cut singlet while working on a car attracted the observation: 'Leaning into eugenics is a WILD take. No thanks,' collecting more than 6000 likes in the process. An Instagram clip of Sweeney apparently crossing out the word 'genes' on a street billboard and replacing it with the word 'jeans' was also slammed. 'It's giving 'Subtle 1930's Germany', one comment read. Conservatives claim Sweeney However, the campaign has also had its defenders. 'Woke advertising is dead. Sydney Sweeney killed it,' said right-wing commentator Kyle Becker on X. ' There is no 'racist undertone', unless you choose to put it there. They're about the end of cancel culture, which demonises beauty, excellence, and virtue itself,' X user Kaizen D. Asiedu said. But the current digital fracas is not the first time US conservatives have tried to enlist Sweeney into the culture war. Last year Sweeney appeared on a Saturday Night Live sketch as a Hooters waitperson wearing a low-cut T-shirt, prompting widespread conservative commentary that her revealing outfit on the show signalled the end of woke culture. And Sweeney's interest in country music and trucks has also prompted some discussion about her leanings – as has her family. In 2023, Sweeny threw a 'surprise hoedown' for her mother's 60th birthday, with some family members photographed in 'blue lives matter' T-shirts, and others seen in red MAGA caps. Sweeney responded on X a few weeks later: 'You guys this is wild. An innocent celebration for my moms milestone 60th birthday has turned into an absurd political statement, which was not the intention. Please stop making assumptions,' she tweeted. Sweeny has remained tight-lipped about her political views but has said she is pro-choice and has also expressed support for LGBTQI+ rights on X. So what went wrong? Senior lecturer in marketing at the University of Adelaide's Adelaide Business School, Dr Amelie Burgess, says it is unlikely the American Eagle campaign was deliberately provoking the controversy. 'I think that backlash is always a risk even without being deliberately provocative,' she says. 'It's rare that a company like AE with a diverse young audience would lean into something so polarising.' Loading As she notes, the ad's messaging 'is intersecting uncomfortably with eugenics ideologies' but 'that group of people are not dominant in our society'. 'It's not a smart business move or a good societal move either.' Burgess believes it is more likely the misstep came from a lack of diversity among the American Eagle marketing team and Sweeney's own advisers. 'It's probably poor creative development and execution,' she says. 'You have that provocative wordplay and it's obviously not been properly assessed for cultural implication … and you have someone not very diverse leading that campaign. Loading 'Theres a benefit in having diversity across all business functions, but especially in marketing.' Burgess' research has shown that a lack of diversity can affect marketing imagery and messaging and make the company tone-deaf and slow to respond when issues do blow up. As for any longer-term damage, Burgess observes that we expect brands to be accountable these days, and there are consequences for such missteps. And although Sweeney's fan base can provide a buffer for a period, it won't necessarily last. 'That sustained controversy does erode that over time, and we have seen that … It depends on how the brand responds and how Sydney Sweeney responds.'

The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Why Sydney Sweeney's ‘good jeans' campaign is being compared to Nazism
'So American eagle admits they are naz****s [sic],' another said beside an 15-second clip of Sweeney cuddling a German shepherd dog. The comment received more than 4500 likes. 'Blong (sic) hair, blue eyes, HOLDING A GERMAN SHEPHERD!!! What were you all thinking? Did you know what you were implying? This is not ok,' another commenter said. Another clip featuring Sweeney wearing a low-cut singlet while working on a car attracted the observation: 'Leaning into eugenics is a WILD take. No thanks,' collecting more than 6000 likes in the process. An Instagram clip of Sweeney apparently crossing out the word 'genes' on a street billboard and replacing it with the word 'jeans' was also slammed. 'It's giving 'Subtle 1930's Germany', one comment read. Conservatives claim Sweeney However, the campaign has also had its defenders. 'Woke advertising is dead. Sydney Sweeney killed it,' said right-wing commentator Kyle Becker on X. ' There is no 'racist undertone', unless you choose to put it there. They're about the end of cancel culture, which demonises beauty, excellence, and virtue itself,' X user Kaizen D. Asiedu said. But the current digital fracas is not the first time US conservatives have tried to enlist Sweeney into the culture war. Last year Sweeney appeared on a Saturday Night Live sketch as a Hooters waitperson wearing a low-cut T-shirt, prompting widespread conservative commentary that her revealing outfit on the show signalled the end of woke culture. And Sweeney's interest in country music and trucks has also prompted some discussion about her leanings – as has her family. In 2023, Sweeny threw a 'surprise hoedown' for her mother's 60th birthday, with some family members photographed in 'blue lives matter' T-shirts, and others seen in red MAGA caps. Sweeney responded on X a few weeks later: 'You guys this is wild. An innocent celebration for my moms milestone 60th birthday has turned into an absurd political statement, which was not the intention. Please stop making assumptions,' she tweeted. Sweeny has remained tight-lipped about her political views but has said she is pro-choice and has also expressed support for LGBTQI+ rights on X. So what went wrong? Senior lecturer in marketing at the University of Adelaide's Adelaide Business School, Dr Amelie Burgess, says it is unlikely the American Eagle campaign was deliberately provoking the controversy. 'I think that backlash is always a risk even without being deliberately provocative,' she says. 'It's rare that a company like AE with a diverse young audience would lean into something so polarising.' Loading As she notes, the ad's messaging 'is intersecting uncomfortably with eugenics ideologies' but 'that group of people are not dominant in our society'. 'It's not a smart business move or a good societal move either.' Burgess believes it is more likely the misstep came from a lack of diversity among the American Eagle marketing team and Sweeney's own advisers. 'It's probably poor creative development and execution,' she says. 'You have that provocative wordplay and it's obviously not been properly assessed for cultural implication … and you have someone not very diverse leading that campaign. Loading 'Theres a benefit in having diversity across all business functions, but especially in marketing.' Burgess' research has shown that a lack of diversity can affect marketing imagery and messaging and make the company tone-deaf and slow to respond when issues do blow up. As for any longer-term damage, Burgess observes that we expect brands to be accountable these days, and there are consequences for such missteps. And although Sweeney's fan base can provide a buffer for a period, it won't necessarily last. 'That sustained controversy does erode that over time, and we have seen that … It depends on how the brand responds and how Sydney Sweeney responds.'

Courier-Mail
a day ago
- Courier-Mail
'That's insane?!' Aussies divided over StarTrack delivery effort
Don't miss out on the headlines from Lifestyle. Followed categories will be added to My News. Receiving an online delivery can sometimes be a bit of a journey. But, no matter how frustrating it is, it's all worth it if your items come in one piece - right? For one Aussie, even this may not have been possible. Want to join the family? Sign up to our Kidspot newsletter for more stories like this. Image: Reddit. RELATED: Amazon under fire over suspected scam 'At least he actually delivered it?' An Aussie package recipient has taken to Reddit to expose a concerning act by a delivery driver. The poster shared a video of the driver, who he said was from StarTrack, lobbing their package over the fence - thankfully it wasn't fragile. 'From a couple weeks ago…' the poster said. 'I mean at least he actually delivered it and didn't leave a card.' 'This is the best AusPost delivery I've seen' Some commenters agreed with the poster, saying that while the situation wasn't ideal, at least the package arrived dry and in one piece. 'Kept it out of the rain too. Bang up service,' one person said. 'Trust me, your parcel has been through a lot worst through the sorting facility, this is nothing,' another pointed out. 'Wow, a parcel not delivered to the post office but [to your] actual home? This is the best AusPost delivery I've seen,' a third added sarcastically. 'Honestly I wish they would do this with my deliveries instead of another failed delivery. Hope your stuff was ok though,' another agreed. RELATED: Aussie's shock after receiving little-known delivery fee 'That's insane?!' But, for others, it wasn't enough. 'The companies have a lot to answer for, we're paying for our shit to be delivered, not for you to squeeze every last micro efficiency out of the process. Anybody caught yeeting a package across the floor should be kicked out, not given an award for efficiency. No respect,' one person said. 'That's insane?! Imagine if it had been glass or something,' said another. 'Other than the throwing and not attempting to open the gate, the issues I have are, one, its technically exposed to weather even though it landed in non wet area from rain, and [two,] it's visible through the gate which if isn't locked, is visible to footpath/road which isn't right,' a third pointed out. In a statement to Kidspot, Australia Post encouraged the customer to reach out. "We are keen to look into this matter further and encourage the customer to get in touch with us directly via our website or calling 13 POST (13 7678)," the spokesperson said. Originally published as 'That's insane?!' Aussies divided over StarTrack delivery effort