‘Don't think about it': Housing dream slips away
Mitchell, a 26-year old renter working in the IT department told NewsWire the price of housing has skyrocketed in the last few years, pricing him out of the area where he grew up.
'There were a few times in my life I considered buying a house. One was in 20219 pre-pandemic when I was looking to go in with a mate to get a ground floor unit.
'Then I had a dream of being in the Sunshine Coast where I grew up and the plan was always to settle down and go back there.
'The plan was to turn 30, settle down and go back there. But you can't find anything for under $800,000-900,000.'
'Where it is now, I don't even think about it.'
He believes the current policy by the Coalition will just drive house prices higher while ruining younger Aussies' chance at retirement.
'Personally I think it's just kind of doing two bad things at the same time,' Mitchell said.
'The main problem I have with these policies is they help one person at one time but then make it worse for everyone else by driving up the price.
'If everyone at the auction has access to this $50 grand then the house goes up, but this policy also means first home buyers burn their retirement.
The Coalition flagship housing policy will give first home buyers the choice to access up to $50,000 from their super towards a deposit to buy their first home.
Under the scheme, the $50,000 can be initially withdrawn from super but would need to be returned when the house is sold.
Mitchell is not alone with survey results by Everybody's Home showing 76 per cent of respondents opposed allowing first home buyers to access $50,000 from their superannuation for a house deposit.
According to the results respondents believe the policy will just inflate house prices as well as see their superannuation savings diminish.
Everybody's Home spokesperson Maiy Azize said people across the country are seeing through the Coalition's super for housing proposal.
'Voters know Super for Housing could pour fuel to the flames of an already overheated housing market,' Ms Azize said.
'Using superannuation for housing deposits is unfair, and does nothing to build more affordable homes. Instead, it robs people of their retirement savings and drives up house prices for everyone else.'
She said Australians want greater structure reforms over policies that only help a select few.
'We need greater investment in social housing, better protections for renters, and an end to tax breaks for property investors.'
'A growing number of Australians are renting and more than 640,000 people are experiencing rental stress or housing insecurity. These aren't just numbers - they are real people who are almost entirely missing from the current election debate.
Academics, inducing the University of South Australia the super-for-housing policy would just drive prices up 7 to 10 per cent.
'It is an uncontroversial finding – if you add demand to an inelastic market, prices are going to rise, with the unintended consequence of making housing less affordable' study author Chris Leishman said.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said that concern would be addressed by the Coalition's major 'supply side' policy including 500,000 new homes by investing in essential infrastructure, setting a target of 400,000 new apprentices to build houses and reduce migration.
Mitchell called on both parties to commit to policies that will actually help the housing market.
'I would say, think of your kids, but they, you know, they probably got their own bank of mum and dad thing going on,' he said.
'But, think of future generations, you know, think of the country that you grew up in, and don't you want everyone else to have that chance as well.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
16 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Echoes of robo-debt: Lawyer warns Labor after hundreds illegally denied payments
A major law firm is warning the Albanese government it risks court action after a damning finding that hundreds of people were illegally denied income support and dozens more had payments cancelled even after the problem was noticed. The Commonwealth Ombudsman revealed last week that 964 people had their JobSeeker payments unlawfully terminated by an automated system, and even when the problem was noticed and seemingly rectified, a further 45 people had their payments cancelled. Gordon Legal partner Andrew Grech, who led a class action for victims of the robo-debt payment scandal – in which people had their earnings incorrectly calculated, leading to erroneous debt letters being sent – said there was an eerie familiarity between the two government payment problems. Warnings of court action over welfare payments will test Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on his first-term promise to protect vulnerable people and his criticism of the former Coalition government's handling of the robo-debt crisis. The investigation found cancellations were made through a digital system called the targeted compliance framework, designed to monitor if recipients were meeting the conditions of their welfare payments. This includes the requirement to search for work or report changes in income. This was contrary to law changes in 2022 after the robo-debt crisis, requiring consideration of a jobseeker's circumstances before deciding to cancel income support. 'The ombudsman report is deeply troubling and, like the much larger robo-debt scandal, it's another example of how government creep of deployment of automation influences the lives of our most vulnerable – it plays an inappropriate role,' Grech said. 'The government should move swiftly to address what's really mass-scale unlawful termination of payments.' Secretary of the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations Natalie James advised the ombudsman in December 2024 that decisions to cancel income support occurred automatically, affecting 964 jobseekers from April 2022 to July 2024.

The Age
16 minutes ago
- The Age
Echoes of robo-debt: Lawyer warns Labor after hundreds illegally denied payments
A major law firm is warning the Albanese government it risks court action after a damning finding that hundreds of people were illegally denied income support and dozens more had payments cancelled even after the problem was noticed. The Commonwealth Ombudsman revealed last week that 964 people had their JobSeeker payments unlawfully terminated by an automated system, and even when the problem was noticed and seemingly rectified, a further 45 people had their payments cancelled. Gordon Legal partner Andrew Grech, who led a class action for victims of the robo-debt payment scandal – in which people had their earnings incorrectly calculated, leading to erroneous debt letters being sent – said there was an eerie familiarity between the two government payment problems. Warnings of court action over welfare payments will test Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on his first-term promise to protect vulnerable people and his criticism of the former Coalition government's handling of the robo-debt crisis. The investigation found cancellations were made through a digital system called the targeted compliance framework, designed to monitor if recipients were meeting the conditions of their welfare payments. This includes the requirement to search for work or report changes in income. This was contrary to law changes in 2022 after the robo-debt crisis, requiring consideration of a jobseeker's circumstances before deciding to cancel income support. 'The ombudsman report is deeply troubling and, like the much larger robo-debt scandal, it's another example of how government creep of deployment of automation influences the lives of our most vulnerable – it plays an inappropriate role,' Grech said. 'The government should move swiftly to address what's really mass-scale unlawful termination of payments.' Secretary of the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations Natalie James advised the ombudsman in December 2024 that decisions to cancel income support occurred automatically, affecting 964 jobseekers from April 2022 to July 2024.

News.com.au
41 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Secret Deloitte review into automated JobSeeker system warns of 'instability,' 'unintended impacts'
A $439,000 report kept under wraps by the government has issued urgent warnings over the system responsible for managing vulnerable Australians on JobSeeker, with fears the program punishes those struggling and is prone to error. The damning report comes after the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) and Services Australia were found to have illegally cancelled the JobSeeker payments of 964 recipients between April 2022 and July 2024. A review completed by Deloitte, which was received by DEWR on June 18 and remained unpublished until inquiries from NewsWire on Thursday, said repeated modifications and updates of the system had created at 'excessively convoluted' code base which 'lacks architectural integrity' had become 'difficult to manage. Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson said he feared it would have likely resulted in 'profound if not catastrophic' effects on Australians struggling financially. The mistaken terminations, which have been likened to robodebt 2.0, occurred after the controversial automated Targeted Compliance Framework (TCF) responsible for ensuring JobSeeker recipients met their mutual obligations repeatedly malfunctioned. A lack of a 'comprehensive design register' also meant any changes require 'extensive manual intervention across multiple databases and workflows,' resulting in a high 'likelihood of system instability and unintended impacts on participant case outcomes'. Additionally the Statement of Assurance said the TCF has 'not evolved or matured' since it was introduced under the Coalition government in 2018, and 'lacks the risk-based proportionality and participant centred design' found in similar programs used by the ATO, Australian Border Force and the NDIS. In another scathing finding, Deloitte, who were paid $439,142 to undertake the review, said other large government IT systems which weren't used by vulnerable Australians placed 'greater emphasis on human case management to respond to complex participant needs'. Criticisms were also made of the TCF's technical makeup. The report said the volatility of the program had been 'exacerbated by the widespread use of unconventional technical practices', like hard-coded fixes. However, the two out of three of the glitches which resulted in the nearly 1000 JobSeeker payment terminations were 'embedded during the original 2018 system'. Despite amendments passed in 2022, which called for greater discretion to be used before the cancelling of payments, Deloitte said there was 'no evidence' that the 'capacity for discretionary decision-making functionality was embedded in the system' ever. The review called on DEWR to limit or suspend further modifications to the system to 'constrain the risk of further disruptions,' and limit the introduction of new defects. If necessary, changes to comply with legislative updates should be 'thoroughly assessed by policy, legal and technical authorities to ensure legislative and policy compliance and anticipated outcomes are maintained'. DEWR must also urgently strengthen its current internal review processes to ensure negative case determinations are 'supported by appropriate evidence' and lawful under current legislation. Welfare advocates, like the Anti-Poverty Centre, the Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS), and Economic Justice Australia have repeatedly criticised the use of the TCF, calling for the punitive measure to be removed. Mr Anderson, the Commonwealth Ombudsman also singled out DEWR secretary Natalie James had been so slow to act, taking 10 months April 2022 to September 2023 to pause the automated cancellations after it was raised by external legal advisers. As of March 21 this year, reductions and cancellations in income support payments have been paused pending ongoing legal and IT reviews, however suspensions have remained. The department has also yet to implement the Digital Protections Framework, despite legislative requirements passed in 2022, with Mr Anderson writing: 'We do not consider a delay of over three years, coupled with an indefinite commitment to future action, is reasonable'.