Here's how much more buying rather than renting costs in Salt Lake City
Buying a home in Salt Lake City is more than two times as expensive as renting, a new analysis shows.
That's based on Salt Lake's median monthly mortgage payment of $3,463 compared to the median rent of $1,627, a so-called 'buying premium' of 112.8%, according to the research company Construction Coverage.
Nationwide, the extra paid for ownership is just 21%, based on a U.S. median monthly mortgage payment of $2,382 and a median monthly rent of $1,968. The median home price is much lower for the U.S. compared to Salt Lake City, $355,328 versus $549,528.
Salt Lake City ranked 13th on a list of the most expensive midsize cities in the analysis, behind cities in California, Washington state, Texas, North Carolina and Arizona, where Scottsdale took the No. 10 spot with a buying premium of 125.6%.
Sunnyvale, in California's Silicon Valley, had the highest buying premium of any midsize city, at 298.1%. The technology hub also had the most expensive cities in the other categories analyzed, with San Jose topping the list of large cities at 205.5% and Santa Clara, small cities at 235.6%.
The analysis looked at 343 U.S. cities, identifying only 32 where buying is more affordable than renting, mostly in southern states like Alabama, Georgia and Texas or in the nation's Rust Belt, including Ohio and Michigan.
Detroit had the biggest 'buying discount,' at just over minus 60%. Among midsized cities, Alabama's Birmingham and Montgomery ranked No. 1 and No. 2 on the list of places where it's cheaper to buy than rent, at just over minus 36% and 31%, respectively.
No places in the West made the Top 15 cheapest lists for large, midsize or small cities.
Among the 343 cities in the analysis, Salt Lake City ranked the 306th cheapest in 2025. Last year, the Utah capital was 303rd, with a buying premium calculated at 116.3%.
'Buying a home used to be the financially savvy move but that's no longer the case for many would-be buyers in America,' the analysis concluded, adding, 'renting has become the more affordable choice in most markets.'
The shift occurred, the Construction Coverage analysis stated, as demand during the COVID-19 pandemic started driving up home prices and mortgage rates, at record lows in January 2021, have since more than doubled.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Providence teachers to vote on new contract
It is expected to carry the union through the 2026-2027 school year. The state is widely expected to turn control of the district back over to Mayor The bigger picture: One of Education Commissioner Angélica Infante-Green's top goals when she led the state takeover was to Advertisement That never happened. Between the COVID-19 pandemic and the gubernatorial transition from Gina Raimondo to Dan McKee, priorities (and strategies) changed. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up The state lost its desire to have a prolonged battle with the union, and the union (even through its own leadership changes) held firm. The contract saw minor tweaks during the takeover, but nothing close to what Infante-Green promised (or threatened) back in 2019 and 2020. The negotiations for the deal that will be voted on next week moved slowly in part because both sides knew there wouldn't be very much extra money since pandemic-era federal funding has dried up. What's next: The teachers' union vote is scheduled for June 9. Getting a deal done now is beneficial to Infante-Green and McKee, who won't have to worry about a contentious contract battle as he seeks reelection next year. Advertisement Mayor Brett Smiley and the City Council have not been involved in the negotiations, but if the school system returns to their control next year, they'll have a major say over the next contract. This story first appeared in Rhode Map, our free newsletter about Rhode Island that also contains information about local events, links to interesting stories, and more. If you'd like to receive it via email Monday through Friday, . Dan McGowan can be reached at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
4 Major Questions Are Lingering About Tariff-Related Inflation
Tariffs' effects haven't shown up in official inflation measures yet, but retailers have said they are raising their prices in response to the increased import taxes. There are lingering questions about how those price increases will work their way through the economy. How much of the tariffs companies will cover, which items will see price increases, the extent to which price increases persist, and whether workers think they need a pay raise will be crucial in determining the path of tough to forecast the economy these days, but one thing is sure: prices on some goods are going up. Tariffs haven't yet pushed up official measures of inflation, but economists say that's certain to change soon as Walmart, Macy's, and smaller businesses raise prices on imported goods. Even so, airfares, hotels, and gasoline prices are dropping, and there are signs that rents are peaking after years of hikes. Wall Street analysts and D.C. policymakers are debating how noticeable the tariff-related sticker shock will be and what items will be most affected. With tariff headlines changing by the day, the inflation outlook is 'unusually uncertain,' Barclays economist Marc Giannoni wrote in a recent note to clients. The answer to how high inflation is headed may vary on any given day. But below are four questions that are driving the debate. President Donald Trump has said companies should 'eat' the tariffs, taking a hit on their profits rather than passing costs onto customers and driving up inflation. But if a megaretailer like Walmart felt forced to raise prices, smaller ones with thinner margins and less negotiating leverage may feel more pressure, said Richard Moody, chief economist at the Alabama-based bank Regions Financial. It may take time for that to happen, since retailers are still selling their existing inventories—and some bulked up ahead of tariff uncertainty. But economists expect consumers to feel a bigger hit nonetheless. 'The jury is still out if retailers and wholesalers will pick up much of the tab, but we remain comfortable for now with our working assumption that something like 80% to 90% of the tariff costs ultimately will be passed on to consumers,' Samuel Tombs, chief U.S. economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, wrote in a note to clients. While some imported goods may get pricier, consumers tend to spend more on services such as restaurants or travel. Services make up roughly two-thirds of consumer spending, noted Regions' Moody, who foresees more deceleration in service prices ahead. 'That's going to mitigate some of the impact from rising goods price inflation,' Moody said, though he noted that may be of little comfort to lower-income households that spend less on travel. Another possible mitigator is housing costs. Those make up a large chunk of inflation gauges, and while housing remains expensive following a post-COVID boom, rents have started to fall in some markets. Overall, service prices should 'remain relatively subdued,' Oliver Allen, an economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, wrote in a note to clients. But he doubted they'll prevent an overall increase in inflation. Inflation may lead to a one-time hit to Americans' pocketbooks, but the effects are more painful if higher prices feed off each other and become persistent. Goldman Sachs Economist David Mericle wrote he's skeptical about the latter scenario, expecting a one-time jump that pushes inflation gauges above 3.5% before coming back down. While the post-COVID bout of prolonged inflation is fresh in consumers' minds, this year's inflation rebound will be 'less threatening than the 2021-2022 episode,' he wrote. At the time, supply chain snarls led to a spike in prices, all while consumers had elevated spending power from stimulus assistance, he noted. But the economy looks different today, with GDP expected to grow at a measly pace of 1% this year and the unemployment rate potentially drifting higher. Economists say wages are critical to determining whether inflation will be one-time or prove stickier. When consumers expect inflation to rise, they tend to seek higher pay from their employers. Those companies then may pass on some of their higher labor costs to consumers, raising prices on the goods and services they buy. If that dynamic stays in check, inflation can rise without causing massive problems. However, one fear is a wage-price spiral, which the U.S. experienced in the 1970s. This spiral only ended after the Fed hiked rates aggressively and brought about a recession. 'A pickup in wage growth would be a crucial intermediate step for high inflation to become persistent, but so far as the trade war has gotten underway, anxiety about the outlook appears to be outweighing any boost from higher inflation expectations,' Goldman Sachs' Mericle wrote. Read the original article on Investopedia
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Most companies are already raising prices or plan to because of tariffs, data shows
Data from the New York Federal Reserve shows a majority of companies have passed along at least some of President Donald Trump's tariffs onto customers, the latest in a growing body of evidence indicating the policy change is likely to stretch consumers' wallets. In May, about 77% of service firms that saw increased costs due to higher U.S. tariffs tariffs passed through at least at least some of the rise to clients, according to a survey conducted by the New York Fed that was released Wednesday. Around 75% of manufacturers surveyed said the same. In fact, more than 30% of manufacturers and roughly 45% of service firms passed through all of the higher cost to their customers, according to the New York Fed's statics. Price hikes happened quickly after Trump slapped steep levies on trading partners, whether large or small. More than 35% of manufacturers and nearly 40% of service firms raised prices within a week of seeing tariff-related cost increases, according to the survey. Trump announced in early April that he would impose "reciprocal" tariffs on more than 180 countries and territories, sending the stock market into a tailspin. But Trump soon rolled back or paused those levies for three months, unleashing the equity market to claw back most of its initial losses. Companies and investors alike are now looking to a July 9 deadline for the return of those suspended tariffs, coping in the meantime with continued confusion regarding to trade policy. The U.S. has already announced one trade deal with the United Kingdom, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender said this week that the Trump administration is "close to the finish line" on some other agreements. The New York Fed's survey is the latest in a salvo of data releases and anecdotal reports that have shown companies' willingness to pass down cost increases despite pressure from Trump not to do so. Nearly nine out of 10 of the 300 CEOs surveyed in May said they have raised prices or planned to soon, according to data released last week by Chief Executive Group and AlixPartners. About seven out of 10 chief executives surveyed in May said they plan to hike prices by at least 2.5%. Corporate executives have been careful in how they speak about the impact of Trump's policies on their business, especially when it comes to trade, to avoid getting caught in the president's crosshairs. Last month, for example, Trump warned Walmart in a social media post that the retailer should "eat the tariffs" and that he would "be watching." Consequently, survey data and anonymous commentary offer insights into how American business leaders are discussing the tariffs behind closed doors. "The administration's tariffs alone have created supply chain disruptions rivaling that of Covid-19," one respondent said in the Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing survey published Monday. Another respondent said "chaos does not bode well for anyone, especially when it impacts pricing." While another pointed to the agreement between the U.S. and China to temporarily slash tariffs, they said the central question is what the landscape will look like in a few months. "We are doing extensive work to make contingency plans, which is hugely distracting from strategic work," this respondent said. "It is also very hard to know what plans we should actually implement." Responses to the ISM service sector survey released Wednesday revealed a similar focus on the uncertainty stemming from controversial tariffs. "Tariffs remain a challenge, as it is not clear what duties apply," one respondent wrote. "The best plan is still to delay decisions to purchase where possible."
