Bitcoin achieves $120k milestone on Trump policy support
Bitcoin has surged past the $120,000 (£89,000) level for the first time, with its new record value being attributed to progress in cryptocurrency regulation under Donald Trump.
It was trading at $121,207 early on Monday morning - having doubled in value over the past year on the back of support for digital assets from the president during his second term.
While new products on Wall Street have made it easier to invest, a lack of global regulation has held back ownership and continued to leave the industry at the mercy of high volatility.
The US House of Representatives is to debate a series of bills this week to provide an American regulatory framework for a market worth almost $3.8trn, according to figures from CoinMarketCap.
Members are set to vote on the Genius Act, which would create federal rules for stablecoins, and two other pieces of legislation.
Mr Trump, who has called himself the "crypto president", has urged Congress to back the shake-up as part of his efforts for the US to take a lead on digital currencies.
He himself is involved in several crypto ventures, including World Liberty Financial, a platform that his sons Eric and Don Jr. run.
Bitcoin's surge of recent weeks has tracked a broader financial market recovery since mid-April that has seen US stock markets hit record levels.
The rally, market analysts have said, can be attributed to the so-called TACO (Trump always chickens out) trade that followed his decision to delay the implementation of the "liberation day" trade tariffs against trading partners back in early April.
He has since warned dozens of countries, including Canada, Japan, South Korea and the European Union, that higher rates will kick in from 1 August without a deal being agreed.
Stock market and crypto values would be likely to face fresh pressure should he follow through on that threat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bryson DeChambeau tips Trump's Turnberry as ‘worthy' host of The Open
Bryson DeChambeau has tipped President Donald Trump 's Turnberry golf course to host The Open in the future and end its inactive role on the R&A's 10-venue British Open rotation. The Scottish golf course has not hosted the prestigious event for 16 years, with its last iteration back in 2009. And DeChambeau, who shot a stunning six-under-par round of 65 at Royal Portrush to make the cut and sit +1 for the major overall at the half-way stage, has backed Trump's course to prove a worthy host once more. 'I look at it as a golf course,' said DeChambeau, whose round of golf with the president has amassed more than 15 million views on YouTube. 'It's one of the best golf courses in the world, and I'd love for it to be a part of the rotation. 'Albeit I haven't played it, I've heard so many great things about it, and anytime you get to play a special historical golf course like that, I think it's worthy of it, for sure.' The Ayrshire course last saw 59-year-old Tom Watson make a bogey on the 72nd hole with Stewart Cink prevailing in a playoff. Speaking ahead of the Open being played this week at Royal Portrush, R&A chief executive Mark Darbon said transportation and other issues had to be addressed before Turnberry got its hands on the oldest major championship again. Darbon said the R&A met with Eric Trump and other leaders of Trump Golf a few months ago regarding the 'big logistical challenges' facing Turnberry, and that the talks had been constructive. DeChambeau believes Trump would make Turnberry a special Open venue. 'He'd still probably respect the R&A and what they're trying to accomplish,' DeChambeau said. 'I can't speak on his behalf, but what I can say is knowing him, he'll do his best of a job as he possibly can.' DeChambeau's relationship with Trump is such that he joined him on stage at an election party in Florida in November before Trump was declared president again. DeChambeau also had a round of golf with Trump and some short-game practice on the South Lawn of the White House a few months ago. So what of his audience with Trump around this time last year, when they attempted to break 50 off the forward tees at the president's Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey using the scramble format? It went on YouTube and was a huge success. 'Got like 15 million views or something,' DeChambeau said. 'It was fun.' DeChambeau was speaking after shooting 6-under 65 in the second round of the Open at Royal Portrush in a bid to make the cut, having opened with a 78. AP contributed to this report
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Planned Parenthood seeks to keep Medicaid funds flowing during legal fight
Attorneys for Planned Parenthood clinics nationwide argued in federal court Friday that cutting off Medicaid funding to its abortion providers would hurt vulnerable patients who already have limited health care options. Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliates in Massachusetts and Utah are fighting to block part of President Donald Trump 's tax bill they say is designed to target their clinics. The provision would end Medicaid payments to abortion providers like Planned Parenthood that primarily offer family planning services — things like contraception, abortion and pregnancy tests — and received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023. Although Planned Parenthood is not specifically named in the statute, which went into effect July 4, the organization's leaders say it was meant to affect their nearly 600 centers in 48 states. However, a major medical provider in Maine and likely others have also been hit. 'It's the affiliation provision that makes this rotten to the core,' said Planned Parenthood attorney Alan Schoenfeld during Friday's hearing in Boston. The plaintiffs have filed their federal lawsuit against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. So far, the provision has been on hold after U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston granted a temporary restraining order blocking the cuts for two weeks. That order expires July 21, when Talwani has said she will decide whether to grant a motion for a preliminary injunction against the funding cuts while the lawsuit plays out. On Friday, Talwani was particularly focused on getting a definition of what constituted an affiliation and what a Planned Parenthood health center would have to do to qualify for Medicaid funding, quizzing the federal government's attorneys if stopping abortions would be enough or if they would have to completely severe all ties. Emily Hall, an attorney representing HHS, said Friday that the federal government needs more information about Planned Parenthood's structure and time to finalize interpretations of the law. 'It depends on the nature of the corporate relationship, which I don't have,' Hall said. Fears of pending cuts to Planned Parenthood further escalated this week after a Planned Parenthood office in Ohio announced Tuesday that it was closing two health clinics — in Hamilton and Springfield, north of Cincinnati — due to state and federal cuts. 'Make no mistake: This is not a decision made by Planned Parenthood of Southwest Ohio Region,' President and CEO Nan Whaley, a one-time Democratic gubernatorial nominee, told reporters. 'We took every possible step to keep these centers open, but the devastating impact of state and federal political attacks has forced us into this very difficult position.' The centers provide preventive health care, including testing for sexually transmitted diseases, birth control and wellness exams. Medicaid is a government health care program that serves millions of low-income and disabled Americans. Nearly half of Planned Parenthood's patients rely on Medicaid.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's birthright citizenship order remains blocked as lawsuits march on after Supreme Court ruling
President Donald Trump 's plan to end birthright citizenship for the children of people who are in the U.S. illegally will remain blocked as an order from one judge went into effect Friday and another seemed inclined to follow suit. U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante in New Hampshire had paused his own decision to allow for the Trump administration to appeal, but with no appeal filed in the last week his order went into effect. 'The judge's order protects every single child whose citizenship was called into question by this illegal executive order," Cody Wofsy, the ACLU attorney representing children who would be affected by Trump's restrictions, said. 'The government has not appealed and has not sought emergency relief so this injunction is now in effect everywhere in the country.' The Trump administration could still appeal or even ask that LaPlante's order be narrowed but the effort to end birthright citizenship for children of parents who are in the U.S. illegally or temporarily can't take effect for now. The Justice Department didn't immediately return a message seeking comment. Meanwhile, a judge in Boston heard arguments from more than a dozen states who say Trump's birthright citizenship order is blatantly unconstitutional and threatens millions of dollars for essential services. The issue is expected to move quickly back to the nation's highest court. They asked U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin to consider either keeping in place the nationwide injunction he granted earlier or consider a request from the government either to narrow the scope of that order or stay it altogether. Sorokin, located in Boston, did not immediately rule but seemed inclined to side with the states. Lawyers for the government had argued Sorokin should narrow the reach of his earlier ruling granting a preliminary injunction, arguing it should be 'tailored to the States' purported financial injuries.' LaPlante issued the ruling last week p rohibiting Trump's executive order from taking effect nationwide in a new class-action lawsuit, and a Maryland-based judge said this week that she would do the same if an appeals court signed off. The justices ruled last month that lower courts generally can't issue nationwide injunctions, but it didn't rule out other court orders that could have nationwide effects, including in class-action lawsuits and those brought by states. The Supreme Court did not decide whether the underlying citizenship order is constitutional.
