Biden-era tax dollars funded anti-Netanyahu, judicial reform protest groups, US gov't report finds
United States tax dollars may have been used to fund protests against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's judicial reform plan during the Biden-Harris administration, an investigation published by the US House of Representatives on Thursday revealed.
In March, The Jerusalem Post reported that six US and Israeli NGOs were being investigated by the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs committees to ascertain whether funding they allegedly received from the Biden administration was utilized for the judicial reform protests in 2023.
The Committee's oversight also revealed that the Biden-Harris Administration provided grant funds to groups that 'contributed directly and indirectly to the judicial reform protests that sought to undermine the Israeli government,' the investigation stated.
Among the groups that received the largest amount of funding were Blue and White Future and the Movement for the Quality of Government in Israel.
'Under Israeli law, BWF's direct involvement in the protests and plots against Prime Minister Netanyahu's government 'may constitute a violation of the law and the conditions of the Registrar of Associations in Israel by 'operating outside of its stated goals' as a nonprofit organization, the investigation stated.
Funding groups with ties to terror groups
Additionally, the investigation suggested that the Biden-Harris administration 'potentially funded groups with ties to US-designated terrorist organizations.'
Notably, the Gaza-based NGO Bayader Association for Environment and Development has received nearly one million dollars in US funding since 2016, despite 'openly collaborat[ing] with Hamas officials, including holding joint events with Hamas leaders.'
The most recent grant issued by USAID to Bayader was on October 1, 2023, a week before the October 7 massacre.
'These ties are not new,' the investigation stated. 'For instance, in 2021, Bayader's annual report notes 'coordination' and 'meetings' with Hamas's Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Works, Ministry of Social Affairs, and Ministry of Agriculture.'
In 2023, a Bayader staff member was seen embracing senior Hamas officials, including the son of former Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.
The investigation is still ongoing, and will be expanded to include additional American and Israeli NGOs that may be involved in 'funneling US government funds with the purpose of undermining the Israeli government or for the support or fiscal sponsorship of terrorist groups.'
Netanyahu, Likud call efforts an 'attempt to undermine rule of democratically elected' right-wing government
Netanyahu shared the Likud Party's statement in a post to X/Twitter on Friday, calling the efforts an attempt to "undermine the rule of a democratically elected, stable right-wing government."
"As part of the attempt to overthrow the government, external pressures were applied, leading to a deep social rift, encouragement of disobedience, and dangerous divisions within Israeli society."
"Worse still, the document reveals that the same hand funding left-wing political NGOs in Israel also funded, through intermediary organizations, groups associated with Hamas and international campaigns against the State of Israel."
"What we have been saying for years is now being revealed before everyone's eyes. This is not a theory, it is not a conspiracy – it is a proven fact backed by official documents," Netanyahu and the Likud's statement read.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ireland 'assessing next steps' after Israel draw
Basketball Ireland says it is "assessing next steps" after being drawn with Israel in a European qualifier. Ireland are set to face Israel, along with Luxembourg and Bosnia-Herzegovina, in 2027 EuroBasket qualifying in November. Basketball Ireland says it has spoken to Fiba Europe, European basketball's governing body, and is "extremely alarmed by the ongoing humanitarian situation in Gaza" and is awaiting "clarifications on a number of matters". It also says it will liaise with players, staff, the Irish government and other stakeholders. In a statement released on Wednesday, Basketball Ireland says it would be fined 80,000 euros if it does not fulfil the fixture on 18 November, and would face an additional 100,000 euro fine if it did not participate in the return fixture. It says Ireland would also be removed from qualifying and be banned from the 2029 EuroBasket qualifiers. A 30,000 euro fine would be imposed if Ireland elected to withdraw from qualifying before it starts, but Fiba Europe might impose additional sanctions and has the power to exclude teams from future competitions. Qualifying is set to take place over two windows in November 2025 and March 2026. It is not the first time Ireland have been drawn to face Israel since the ongoing conflict in Gaza started in October 2023. Ireland refused to shake hands with Israel and stood at the side of the court for the national anthems in a 2025 EuroBasket qualifier in February 2024. When Irish players raised concerns before that qualifier, Israel player Dor Saar said the Ireland team was "quite antisemitic". Israel coach Sharon Drucker also said Ireland "did not respect" what the game symbolises, while Basketball Ireland said Saar's comments were "inflammatory and wholly inaccurate", and reported the remarks to European basketball's governing body Fiba Europe. Ireland were warned by Fiba for their protest, and players stood for the anthems on court and shook hands with Israel's players in a second EuroBasket qualifier between the sides in Riga in November. Fiba have been contacted about Basketball Ireland's statement. BBC News coverage of the Israel-Gaza war
CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
3 key looming Trump decisions will shape the future of the economy
'It's ultimately up to the president to decide.' That's more or less the go-to line for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and a host of other top Trump aides and White House officials when they share the administration's plans for tariffs and trade negotiations. With the August 1 deadline for higher tariffs rapidly approaching, President Donald Trump has a week to make a number of critical decisions about trade that could shape the future of the US and global economies. Trump in early April paused most of his so-called reciprocal tariffs. They're set to resume next Friday. But one of the few tariffs that Trump put in place on April 2 that has since stuck is the 10% universal tariff on virtually all goods coming into the United States. In recent weeks, Trump has suggested that he could raise that minimum tariff — perhaps even doubling it. 'We're just going to say all of the remaining countries are going to pay, whether it's 20% or 15%. We'll work that out now,' Trump told NBC News on July 10. He has since floated 15% a number of times. Trump has sent letters to the leaders of more than a dozen countries over the course of the past few weeks, setting new tariff rates that are scheduled to go into effect August 1. But Trump has a crucial decision to make about every other country: What tariff will they pay? Most market observers expect the new universal tariff to be set at 15%, because recent trade agreements with Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam were all at or above that level. The Financial Times on Wednesday reported that the European Union is nearing a trade agreement with the United States that sets tariffs on EU goods exported to the United States at 15%. 'After seeing the 15% tariff levied on all Japanese imported goods, let's assume that the new baseline tariff rate will be that, instead of 10%, on all imported goods,' said Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer of One Point BFG Wealth Partners, in a note to investors Wednesday morning. Trump's tariffs that are currently in effect have raised the effective US tariff rate — the average tax that US importers pay on foreign goods — from around 2% to 18%, the highest since 1934, economists at Yale's Budget Lab said in a recent report. That works out to $2,400 a year in added costs for the average American household. A higher universal tariff, if that's what Trump ultimately decides to implement, would add to that cost. With $3.3 trillion of annual imported goods, subtracting the $400 billion of tariff-exempted items from Canada and Mexico, that means roughly $2.9 trillion of goods each year will be taxed at 15% — $435 billion of taxes paid by US consumers and businesses, Boockvar noted. That's a lot of money: For comparison, that's only $90 billion less than what all corporations pay in US income taxes each year. Trump has repeatedly suggested that he would put major tariffs on pharmaceuticals that are manufactured outside the United States — the vast majority of US drugs — starting August 1. A crucial decision for Trump: What will that tariff be, how will it be rolled out, and which drugs will be covered under the new tax? Trump on July 8 said he would place 200% tariffs on pharmaceuticals 'very soon,' but he noted they may not take full effect for some time to allow drugmakers time to make plans to move to the US. Trump has paused industry-based tariffs before, including autos and auto parts, after company leaders complained that the immediate tariffs gave them insufficient time to shift production to the United States — a costly process that can take years. It's not clear what Trump's timeframe or plans may be. Trump has floated drug tariffs for months, but has yet to provide any concrete plans. Patient advocates and drug supply chain experts warn that tariffs would probably lead to higher drug prices and exacerbate drug shortages. The Trump administration launched an investigation into pharmaceutical imports in mid-April, setting the stage to impose tariffs on national security grounds. The White House and some proponents have argued that the United States needs more domestic drug manufacturing so it does not have to rely on other countries for its supply of medicines. But any increase in US domestic drug production would probably take years to implement. Although some drugmakers — most recently AstraZeneca — have announced expansions of their US-based manufacturing initiatives, some were in the works prior to Trump taking office in January, and those factories would not be able to entirely supplant foreign exports to the United States. A last crucial decision: Trump needs to decide whether he will ultimately allow the massive new tariffs on countries around the world to go into effect — or to delay them again. After April 2, when Trump put the reciprocal tariffs in place, markets tumbled. By April 9, markets had flirted multiple times with bear market territory, tumbling nearly 20% from the record high they had hit just several weeks earlier. The bond market had also begun to show signs that it might break — until Bessent guided Trump away from his harshest tariff levels. But since then, Trump has recorded several trade agreements with foreign countries — most importantly, China and Japan — giving investors a significant sense of relief and certainty. Wall Street also believes that, if necessary, it can put significant pressure on Trump to refrain from his most aggressive trade policies — a theory that has generated the moniker 'TACO,' or 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' With the stock market once again trading at record highs and bond yields stable, Trump may have less incentive to 'chicken out' this time around. However, the better-than-expected agreement with Japan announced Tuesday suggests the White House may be reluctant to push important trading partners too hard, recognizing that the economic pain from high tariffs and potential tit-for-tat retaliation could prove unacceptable to businesses, investors and the public, noted Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, global head of equities for UBS Global Wealth Management. So, some of Trump's most aggressive threats, including a 50% tariff on Brazil as punishment for charges against former President Jair Bolsonaro for alleged attempted election fraud, may ultimately be reduced or paused. CNN's Elisabeth Buchwald, Lex Harvey, Luciana Lopez, Tami Luhby and Meg Tirrell contributed to this report.
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
After Surge During Pandemic, Homicides Fall Significantly
Homicides in the United States have continued to fall sharply this year, according to a new analysis published Thursday by the Council on Criminal Justice, a nonprofit policy research organization, based on data from more than three dozen American cities. If the trend continues for the remainder of the year, the United States could post a third straight year of record declines in homicides. Homicides in major cities Total homicides over the previous 12 months, by month Chicago Philadelphia 800 600 400 501 homicides from July '24 to June '25 200 253 Jan. '19 June '25 Jan. '19 June '25 St. Louis Baltimore 400 200 176 119 Jan. '19 June '25 Jan. '19 June '25 Detroit San Antonio 400 200 206 115 Jan. '19 June '25 Jan. '19 June '25 Chicago Philadelphia Baltimore 800 600 400 501 homicides from July 2024 to June 2025 253 176 200 2019 2021 2023 2025 2019 2021 2023 2025 2019 2021 2023 2025 St. Louis Detroit San Antonio 800 600 400 206 200 119 115 2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023 2025 2019 2021 2023 2025 2025 Source: Council on Criminal Justice By The New York Times In fact, the new analysis suggests that the broad crime surge that took place during the pandemic has largely reversed itself. Of 13 categories of crimes that the council tracks, only one — car theft — remains higher than in 2019, the year before the pandemic. But the council's study is limited to a sampling of 42 American cities whose police departments release data on a timely basis, and for which it can make comparisons to crime levels just before the pandemic. The smallest city in the study is Cary, N.C., and the largest is New York City. The findings of the council's study through the first six months of this year largely align with other private sources of data that offer clues to national trends about crime. The F.B.I. has typically provided official nationwide crime data once a year. It last released nationwide statistics in September 2024. Murders in the United States Total murders over the previous 12 months, by month 12,000 10,000 8,000 7,551 murders from June '24 to May '25 6,000 4,000 2,000 2019 2021 2023 2025 12,000 10,000 8,000 7,551 murders from June 2024 to May 2025 6,000 4,000 2,000 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Note: Chart represents sample of 421 police agencies with available data. Source: Real-Time Crime Index By The New York Times Other crimes in the United States Total reported incidents over the previous 12 months, by month Robberies 100,000 109,253 robberies from June '24 to May '25 2019 2021 2023 2025 Aggravated assaults 400,000 300,000 343,137 assaults from June '24 to May '25 200,000 100,000 2019 2021 2023 2025 Motor vehicle theft 500,000 400,000 397,814 auto thefts from June '24 to May '25 300,000 200,000 100,000 2019 2021 2023 2025 Robberies Aggravated assaults Motor vehicle thefts 500,000 400,000 397,814 thefts 343,137 assaults 300,000 200,000 100,000 109,253 robberies from June 2024 to May 2025 2019 2021 2023 2019 2021 2023 2025 2025 2019 2021 2023 2025 Note: Chart on robberies show a sample of 417 police agencies, aggravated assaults show a sample of 414 agencies, and motor vehicle thefts show a sample of 417 agencies. Source: Real-Time Crime Index By The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
