Apple and Cook Are Back in Trump's Good Books: How Should You Play AAPL Stock Here?
In my previous article, I had noted that after woefully underperforming the market in 2025, Apple was due for a catch-up trade with the broader market as well as its Big Tech peers. The rally came faster than I had expected. In this article, we'll examine whether there's still heat left in Apple's rally or if it will fizzle away. Let's begin by analyzing the factors that spurred last week's rise.
More News from Barchart
'It Will Be the Biggest Product Ever': Elon Musk Says Tesla's Optimus Robots Will Be Bigger Than Even Robotaxi
Dear Archer Aviation Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for August 11
This Hidden-Gem AI Stock Has a Major Catalyst Coming on August 11
Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now!
Apple Is Back in Trump's Good Books, For Now
The relationsip between Apple and Trump has been quite complex this year. The president singled out Apple for manufacturing its products in India and called upon the iPhone maker to manufacture its products stateside, something experts believe is not possible as it would lead to a significant rise in production costs, pricing out many American consumers.
But Apple seems back in Trump's good books (at least for now) and during his visit to the White House, CEO Tim Cook announced plans to spend an additional $100 billion in the U.S. over the next four years. Apple had previously announced a $500 billion investment in the U.S. weeks after Trump's inauguration, and after the latest announcement, its commitment has increased to $600 billion.
Cook and Apple didn't leave the White House empty-handed, and Trump said that the company will be exempt from future tariffs on chip imports. iPhone imports from India are already exempt from the 50% tariff that Trump has imposed on the world's fourth-largest economy, and the exemption from the proposed chip tariffs takes away some further uncertainty.
Is Apple Stock Out of the Woods Yet?
Apple was due for a catch-up trade, and the White House optics were just the kicker it needed to decisively reclaim its $3 trillion market cap. Apple has also been able to address some of the other issues that have been putting pressure on its stock price.
The company's sales in China gained traction in May and June, and even though it was partially on account of its subsidy scheme, the company has done relatively well.
Apple has also stepped up its game in artificial intelligence (AI) and has released 20 Apple Intelligence features so far. During the fiscal Q3 2025 earnings call, Cook alluded to an 'exciting road map ahead' for new AI products and touted the possibility of a major acquisition to complement its AI capabilities.
While Apple still does not seem to be on the same footing in AI yet as some of its Big Tech peers, the company made its intention quite clear during the fiscal Q3 earnings call. Separately, at an all-hands meeting, Cook reportedly said that AI is an opportunity as big as the internet and emphasized, 'Apple must do this. Apple will do this. This is sort of ours to grab.'
Another headwind for Apple has been concerns over the Services business after District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Apple needs to loosen its stringent App Store rules and stop collecting fees on purchases made outside apps.
Apple implemented the changes only in the June quarter, and going by the company's guidance for the current quarter, where it expects Services revenues to rise in the same ballpark as the June quarter (13% year-over-year growth), so far, that business does not seem to be witnessing any noticeable impact.
That said, it is something Apple management has its eye on. Responding to a related question from an analyst during the Q3 earnings call, CFO Ketan Parikh said, 'we'll continue to monitor the effects on our business, but we'll continue to innovate and ensure that the App Store delivers the best experience for users and remains a great business opportunity for developers.'
Can Apple Stock Keep Going Up?
Overall, I would argue that Apple looks in a much better place now than where it was a couple of weeks back.
All the above-mentioned issues raised a serious question mark over Apple's ability to command a forward price-earnings ratio of around 30x, especially as the company's earnings growth is expected to be in single digits in 2025 as well as 2026.
I would argue that Apple has seen the bulk of the expected rerating now and the catch-up trade will soon fizzle away.
The next rally will likely come from an impressive moves that Apple makes in its AI strategy. While these are still early days, given the deft maneuvering Cook and Co. have done in rejigging the supply chain and getting back in Trump's good books, I would keep betting on Apple finally getting its AI act right.
On the date of publication, Mohit Oberoi had a position in: AAPL, GOOG, META. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump taps conservative economist EJ Antoni to serve as next labor statistics chief
President Trump on Monday announced he would nominate E.J. Antoni, a top economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, to serve as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after he pushed out the previous leader. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'I know E.J. Antoni will do an incredible job in this new role. Congratulations E.J.!' Antoni is the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation and previously contributed to Project 2025's policy rubric, which outlined potential moves for the next GOP administration during the 2024 campaign. Antoni has in the past expressed skepticism about data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. He recently appeared on conservative firebrand Steve Bannon's podcast to urge Trump to fire the previous commissioner, Erika McEntarfer. The position requires Senate confirmation, but Republicans hold a 53-47 GOP majority, giving Antoni a path to the job even if there are defections. Trump earlier this month ordered the firing of McEntarfer, a Biden White House appointee who was confirmed with a large bipartisan majority in the Senate in 2024. The move came after the jobs report released in early August showed lower-than-expected hiring in July and major downward revisions to the jobs reports from May and June. While Trump and his allies argued it was a move intended to improve transparency and accuracy, critics noted McEntarfer had little to do with what the numbers showed. Economists and lawmakers also expressed concern that it would erode credibility and confidence in government data, hurting businesses and consumers in the process.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Skipping Nvidia Left Amazon, Apple And Tesla Behind In AI
Everyone thinks they are a comic. And everyone in big cap high tech thinks they can design better and/or cheaper AI chip alternatives to the industry-leader, Nvidia. Turns out, it's simply not that easy. Apple and AWS have recently run aground in AI growth, and Tesla has just abandoned their own Dojo Supercomputer chip development, saying they are switching to Nvidia and AMD for training AI models. (Like many semiconductor developers, Nvidia is a client of Cambrian-AI Research). Oh, and today, The Information reported that 'Microsoft's AI Chip Effort Falls Behind'. There is definitely an important trend here. A few companies have eschewed getting locked in to Nvidia, paying the high prices state-of-the-art AI technology commands. This penny-smart but pound-foolish approach left the world's largest consumer electronics company (Apple) and the undisputed cloud leader (AWS) far behind, just when generative AI created massive end user opportunities they could not adequately address. Nvidia's CUDA platform is the de-facto standard for training and deploying large language models for generative AI. CUDA offers unmatched performance, developer tooling and ecosystem support. Companies that build on CUDA — like Microsoft (with OpenAI) and Meta (with LLaMA) — have been able to scale quickly and deliver cutting-edge AI products. By contrast, Amazon and Apple chose to go their own way, and Tesla took the Nvidia off-ramp in 2019. Let's take a look, as each took a different approach, and mostly failed. Apple Maintains Its ABN Strategy (Anybody But Nvidia) Apple's generative AI journey has been even more problematic. After unveiling 'Apple Intelligence' in 2024, the company's most anticipated upgrade — a fully LLM-powered Siri — has been delayed until 2026. Apple has some serious semiconductor bona fides, with its M-class Arm-based chips for desktops and the A-class for mobile. The company is justifiably proud of these efforts. But Apple tried its hand at AI acceleration early on using its own chips and then shifted to Google TPU-based AI development. Not a bad choice, mind you, but the TPU does not have the performance nor the AI development tool-set that Nvidia Blackwell enjoys. The result? Well, how's that AI-enhanced Siri and Apple Intelligence working out for you? Yeah, not at all. To be sure, Apple has significant technical challenges that come with having an installed base and a focus on privacy above all, but not using Nvidia from the start probably cost it more in extra work and time to market than the 'expensive' Nvidia infrastructure would have cost. Siri's architecture, built over a decade ago, wasn't designed for generative AI, and retrofitting it has proven more difficult and taking longer than Apple expected. To make matters worse, Apple's AI teams have faced internal fragmentation, with some pushing for in-house developed AI models and others advocating partnerships with with OpenAI, Perplexity or Google. The company also lost key talent to competitors. Ruoming Pang, who led Apple's foundation models team, left for Meta in 2023. Other researchers followed, citing slow progress and lack of clarity in Apple's AI strategy. Amazon AWS Does Offer Nvidia GPUs, but Prefers its Own Silicon AWS recently paid the price of its slow generative AI sales on Wall Street caused by Amazon's hubris and NIH (not invented here). The market share of new generative AI use cases landing on AWS is reportedly lower than its overall cloud share, with Microsoft taking over the lead. According to IOT-Analytics, Microsoft has about 16% share of new genAI case studies, as does AWS, well below AWS leadership share in 2023 of 37%. AWS is not losing its first-place share in the overall cloud market, at least not yet, but for genAI-specific apps and new enterprise AI workloads, Azure and Google are increasingly competitive, and in some cases are outpacing AWS in genAI-related tools and adoption. Reducing reliance on Nvidia and lowering costs sounded like a good strategy. So, Amazon's AWS division, like Google and Microsoft, invested heavily in custom silicon for training and inference, named, of course, Trainium and Inferentia. The latest release, Trainium2, was launched in 2024 and appears to offer impressive specs: up to 83.2 petaflops of FP8 compute and 6 TB of HBM3 memory bandwidth. Amazon even created a 40,000-chip Trainium UltraCluster to support generative AI workloads. But accelerator performance alone doesn't create AI. You need software, great chip-to-chip networking and a thriving developer ecosystem. AWS developers found Trainium software harder to work with than CUDA, and they reportedly pushed back to management against Trainium's limitations. Management essentially said shut up and get to work. So, Trainium adoption lagged. Amazon realized it needed to invest even more to create the developers ecosystem, and it launched the Build on Trainium initiative — a $110 million investment in university research. While appealing, this effort came years after Nvidia had firmly cemented its dominance in AI research and development. That is $110 million that could have been better spent on Nvidia hardware and better AI. And that $110 million is on top of the money that AWS spent developing the Trainium and Inferentia chips, probably well over $1 billion. So, Amazon decided to invest another $4 billion in Anthropic, the company behind Claude. Anthropic agreed to use Trainium chips for training its models in return. But behind the scenes, tensions emerged. Engineers at Anthropic reportedly also pushed back against Trainium. Many preferred Nvidia's stack for its maturity and tooling. Anthropic teams had to rework their CUDA-based pipelines to work on Trainium, leading to delays and performance issues. While Amazon touted the partnership as a breakthrough, it was a compromise — Anthropic needed funding, and Amazon needed a flagship AI partner. Amazon appears of late to be changing course, deepening its partnership with Anthropic and expanding support for Nvidia GPUs. AWS is building a massive Nvidia cloud infrastructure, Project Ceiba, with over 20,000 Nvidia GPUs. But it is only available to Nvidia engineers for use in developing AI and chips, not for public cloud access. Now Tesla has Seen the Light In 2019, Tesla shifted from using Nvidia to its custom FSD Chip for vehicle Autopilot hardware and neural network inference, replacing Nvidia's Drive PX2 system. And it began a major effort to build its own AI Supercomputer, DOJO, with its in-house chips. Since 2019, Tesla has reportedly spent over $1 billion developing DOJO along with another $500 million developing a DOJO supercomputer in Buffalo, New York. Last week, Elon Musk announced on X that he was ending this program and would instead deploy on Nvidia and AMD GPUs. I suspect Tesla will mostly deploy Nvidia this year and see how AMD's MI400 looks in 2026. Should Cloud Service Providers Even Build Their Own AI Chips? Well, first, let's look at a company that did not. OpenAI has recently reached $12 billion in annualized revenue and broke the $700 million ChatGPT weekly active user barrier. And guess what it uses? Yep, Nvidia. Sam Altman does have the gleam of OpenAI chips in his eye, to be sure, but he also realizes that speed, ease of use and development time matters more to OpenAI than the savings that proprietary chips could provide. At least for now. Meta has its own MTIA chip, but it is used for internal workloads, like recommendation engines for its Facebook and other properties. Microsoft has its own Maia chips starting with the Maia 100, announced in 2023, Used primarily for internal testing and select workloads. The planned successor, Maia 200, is now expected in 2026 due to delays. Maia 200 is designed for data center AI acceleration and inference workloads. We will see if Microsoft learns from Tesla and Apple's mistakes. I suspect Google is perhaps alone in realizing a decent return on its TPU investments, but it has generally failed to attract large outside customers, aside from Apple. But it gets a lot of bang for the buck for internal workloads and training. My advice to CSPs is this: if you can get Nvidia GPUs, use them. If you have a workload for which you believe they are not ideal and can model a decent ROI, then go for it. Otherwise, save your capital. The Consequences of Skipping Nvidia Can be Dire A year in the world of generative AI can mean the difference between heaven and hell, or at least multi-billion-dollar successes or failure. The hubris of some high tech companies have cost them billions of dollars, spent needlessly. Amazon ceded early leadership in cloud AI to Microsoft Azure, which now hosts many of the world's top models. Apple missed the 'AI supercycle' for iPhone upgrades, as consumers saw little reason to buy new devices without meaningful Siri improvements. Tesla has seen the light and is moving fast. All three of these companies now face pressure to catch up — not just in model performance, but in developer mindshare and ecosystem momentum. Yeah, you can build your own AI chip. But you might regret it.
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Venture Global, Inc. Announces Updated Timing for Release of Second Quarter 2025 Earnings
ARLINGTON, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Venture Global, Inc. ('Venture Global') (NYSE: VG) announced that it plans to release its second quarter 2025 financial results before market open on Tuesday, August 12, 2025. As previously announced, Venture Global will host a conference call for investors and analysts beginning at 9:00 am Eastern Time (ET) on Wednesday, August 13, 2025, to discuss second quarter results. A listen-only webcast of the conference call and accompanying slide presentation will be available at Venture Global's Investor Relations website HERE. After the conclusion of the conference call, a replay will be made available on the Venture Global website. About Venture Global Venture Global is an American producer and exporter of low-cost U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) with over 100 MTPA of capacity in production, construction, or development. Venture Global began producing LNG from its first facility in 2022 and is now one of the largest LNG exporters in the United States. The company's vertically integrated business includes assets across the LNG supply chain including LNG production, natural gas transport, shipping and regasification. The company's first three projects, Calcasieu Pass, Plaquemines LNG, and CP2 LNG, are located in Louisiana along the Gulf of America. Venture Global is developing Carbon Capture and Sequestration projects at each of its LNG facilities.
