
Refugee resettlement groups challenge Trump's program freeze
Refugee resettlement groups challenge Trump's program freeze
Show Caption
Hide Caption
President Trump cancels travel for refugees approved to enter US
President Donald Trump canceled travel plans for refugees approved to travel in the United States with an executive order on Monday, Jan. 20, 2025.
Fox - Seattle
Several U.S. refugee resettlement organizations asked a federal judge on Monday to restore the U.S. refugee program, arguing President Donald Trump's indefinite suspension is unlawful and is causing irreparable harm.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington State, challenges Trump's pause of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program. The president said the break was necessary to determine if it 'aligns with the interests of the United States,' with a report due every 90 days on whether the program should be resumed.
Trump's move closed the door on many already-vetted and approved refugees, including former Afghan allies who once aided the U.S. and refugee family members waiting to be reunified.
The Trump Administration also stopped federal funding for faith-based U.S. resettlement organizations, crippling their ability to provide services, the lawsuit said. That can include help with housing, job placement and language courses.
'Shutting down this proven and Congressionally-mandated program irrevocably harms tens of thousands of vulnerable refugee families we have pledged to support,' Rick Santos, the head of Church World Service, one of the plaintiff agencies, said in a statement.
The new litigation, which asks the court to declare Trump's suspension illegal, enjoin its implementation and restore refugee-related funding, was filed by Church World Service, HIAS, Lutheran Community Services Northwest and nine impacted individuals.
That includes a refugee from the Democratic Republic of the Congo whose family sold all of their belongings only to find their flight had been canceled days before they were set to leave, according to the groups.
The State Department did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment.
The lawsuit echoes the legal battle that unfolded in 2017, when federal courts intervened amid a Trump ban targeting refugees from Muslim-majority countries and those seeking family reunification.
Still, during Trump's first term, he slashed annual refugee admittance caps, set by presidents, to a historic low of about 15,000. That in turn led to funding cuts that hobbled or closed some U.S. resettlement organizations.
Former President Joe Biden restored the program that resettled more than 100,000 refugees in fiscal year 2024, reaching a 30-year high.
Mark Hetfield, HIAS President, said that when the executive order was issued last month, nearly 44,000 of the 125,000 admissions ceiling set by Biden had been met for the current fiscal year that began Oct. 1.
Although the refugee program has historically enjoyed bipartisan support and has resettled more than 3 million refugees fleeing persecution since 1980, Trump has long portrayed it as a security vulnerability and a strain on communities.
But advocates say refugees admitted under the program constitute some of the country's most vetted immigrants, spending years going through security checks, medical exams and interviews before they're resettled with the help of local agencies.
And they noted that a federal study found that over a 15-year period, refugees contributed $123 billion more than they cost the government.
The lawsuit also aims to resume federal funding of refugee resettlement organizations, arguing that Trump's changes have already left them 'struggling to keep their lights on and their staff employed, let alone continue to serve the vulnerable refugees at the core of their missions.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, trashing N.J. as ‘blue horror show,' again urges support for ex-assemblyman for governor
GOP gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli and President Trump at Trump's Bedminster country club on March 21. (Courtesy of the Ciattarelli campaign) President Donald Trump urged his New Jersey supporters during a virtual rally Monday night to vote for Republican Jack Ciattarelli for governor in the June 10 GOP primary, calling Ciattarelli a 'true champion' for the Garden State. 'It's being watched actually all over the world because New Jersey's ready to pop out of that blue horror show and really get in there and vote for somebody that's going to make things happen,' Trump said. Trump's push for Ciattarelli came on the eve of the early in-person voting period for the primary, which begins Tuesday at 10 a.m. and runs through Sunday. Ciattarelli is one of five men seeking the Republican nod for governor next week. His opponents include longtime New Jersey 101.5 radio host Bill Spadea, who also competed for Trump's endorsement, and state Sen. Jon Bramnick, a Trump critic. Whoever wins the nomination on June 10 will compete against one of six Democrats in November to succeed term-limited Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat. The president said Monday that Ciattarelli has his 'complete and total endorsement.' 'Other people are going around saying I endorsed them. It's not true,' Trump said. Trump's support for Ciattarelli came even after Ciattarelli in 2015 called Trump a 'charlatan.' Appearing on Spadea's show last year, Trump said Ciattarelli 'made some very big mistakes' when Ciattarelli sought unsuccessfully to unseat Murphy in 2021. Spadea has said he was disappointed in Trump's endorsement of Ciattarelli, and has even referenced the endorsement in a recent campaign ad, telling Republican voters that 'it's OK for you to disagree with' Trump. Several polls have shown Ciattarelli with a substantial lead in the GOP primary. A May 15 Emerson College/Pix 11/The Hill poll shows Ciattarelli with 44% support compared to Spadea's 18%, with roughly a quarter of voters undecided. That poll also shows Trump has a split job approval rating in the state, with 47% approving and 47% disapproving. Trump on Monday blasted New Jersey as a sanctuary state with 'crippling regulations and rampant corruption.' Just 10 days ago, the Trump administration sued four New Jersey cities and their mayors — including two Democratic candidates for governor, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop — over their sanctuary city policies. Trump also touched on his usual rally talking points, like easing illegal immigration at the southern border, transgender issues, crime, congestion pricing, and ending the 'radical left war on suburbs.' 'New Jersey's economy will wither and die, and you'll be living in a nightmare of chaos and crime, and you sort of have that to a certain extent now. But it's going to be changed, and it's going to be changed fast with Jack,' Trump said. Ciattarelli told the president that his first executive order as governor would be ending the Immigrant Trust Directive — that's the state policy that bars law enforcement from assisting federal agents with civil immigration enforcement — and pledged that his attorney general won't sue the White House. The state's current attorney general, Matt Platkin, a Democrat, has led and joined numerous legal complaints against the Trump administration. 'I'm honored, and I will not let you down, nor will the Republicans across New Jersey,' Ciattarelli said. 'They're going to turn out in record numbers this year because we see what's going on across the state.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Countries given Wednesday deadline for their ‘best offers' to avoid tariffs: report
The Trump administration has reportedly asked other countries to present their best offer for a new trade deal by Wednesday as it races to meet its own self-imposed negotiating deadline. When Donald Trump unveiled his steep "Liberation Day" tariffs in early April, it set off deep alarm throughout the world and roiled the markets. One week later the White House was forced into a U-turn, pausing the heaviest tariffs for 90 days while it worked to secure more favorable trade deals. But now, with only five weeks to go until the deadline — and Trump himself furious over Wall Street's wisecracks about him "always chickening out" — it seems that U.S. negotiators are eager to get to yes. According to Reuters, a draft letter from the United States Trade Representative asks negotiating partners to list their best proposals in various key areas by Wednesday June 4. Specifically, it reportedly asks for any proposals about tariffs, plans to remedy non-tariff trade barriers, commitments on digital trade, and quotas to buy U.S. goods. Officials will evaluate these proposals within days, the letter says, and then offer a "possible landing zone" for a deal. It further warns negotiating partners against holding out for a court to strike down Trump's tariffs, declaring that he "intends to continue this tariff program" by whatever legal means available. A spokesperson for the Trade Representative told Reuters: "Productive negotiations with many key trading partners continue at a rapid pace. It is in all parties' interest to take stock of progress and assess any next steps." The Independent has asked the Office of the Trade Representative for comment. Trump's original slate of tariffs was both radical and seemingly arbitrary, in some cases slapping stiff taxes on tiny islands that are uninhabited by human beings and export no goods. The rationale for these duties was also murky, with Trump aides sometimes claiming they were a permanent measure to reshape the global economy and sometimes insisting they were simply a negotiating tactic. Since then, officials have made conflicting claims about how those negotiations are proceeding. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said last month that he'd been briefed on 24 deals that were "close to being resolved", while Trump himself told TIME that he'd "made 200 deals" — even though there are only about 195 countries in the entire world. All of which puts Trump in a difficult spot. If he reimposes the same tariffs, markets could be once again plunged into chaos — including bond markets, which influence how much it costs the U.S. government itself to borrow money. Yet if he extends the deadline once again, it could vindicate a Wall Street slogan that has sorely infuriated Trump: "TACO", which stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out".


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Education Department pausing plan to garnish Social Security checks over defaulted loans
The Department of Education has not gone through with a plan to garnish Social Security checks over defaulted loans, a department spokesperson told The Hill. 'The Department has not offset any social security benefits since restarting collections on May 5, and has put a pause on any future social security offsets,' Ellen Keast, the spokesperson, said. The department announced in April that student loan borrowers in default, or people who have not paid their loans for more than 270 days, had the chance of seeing financial consequences including stopped federal payments like Social Security and garnished wages. The changes could have impacted the lives of over 5 million borrowers. 'The Trump Administration is committed to protecting social security recipients who oftentimes rely on a fixed income,' Keast said. 'In the coming weeks, the Department will begin proactive outreach to recipients about affordable loan repayment options and help them back into good standing.' In March, President Trump said that he was 'immediately' moving the handling of federal student loans from the Department of Education to the Small Business Administration (SBA). 'I've decided that the SBA, the Small Business Administration, headed by Kelly Loeffler … will handle all of the student loan portfolio,' Trump said to reporters in the Oval Office at the time, saying it was a 'pretty complicated deal, and that's coming out of the Department of Education immediately.' 'And also, Bobby Kennedy, with the Health and Human Services Department, will be handling special needs and all the nutrition programs and everything else,' he continued. 'I think that will work out very well. Those two elements will be taken out of the Department of Education.'