Villagers in Koppa put up tents on vacant govt. land in protest over delay in granting sites for houses
K.L. Ashok, an activist with Karnataka Janashakti, told The Hindu that the people who put up the tents were natives of villages in Koppa, and they were all Dalits. 'They have submitted applications seeking sites for houses in the prescribed format. As their demand has not been fulfilled, with no way out, they have put up the tents on the vacant land,' he said.
After their repeated appeals to the gram panchayat and other offices seeking sites went unanswered, they identified a vacant revenue land about 6 km from Jayapura and put up the tents. A majority of them are plantation workers who worked in estates. As long as they worked for the estate owners, they were provided with houses on the estates. However, as they retired, they had to make their own arrangements to stay.
Mr. Ashok said that the estate owners send the workers out of the houses once they retire. 'The minimum rent for a house in the taluk is about ₹5,000 a month. How can the retired workers pay so much rent? The government should grant sites to the needy. More than 50 lakh applications are pending before the government across the State,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Duty-free access to U.K. under FTA to drive foreign investment into India
The India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) has the potential to increase foreign direct investment into India, according to officials, industry participants, and investment analysts. A major driver of this is the local sourcing norm in the agreement that mandates that only goods made in India would be eligible for the tariff reductions. Also read: India-U.K. trade deal: Agri exports to grow 20% in 3 years, other key sectors to benefit The CETA, signed by the two countries on Thursday (July 24, 2025), includes a separate chapter on 'Rules of Origin', which stipulates what kinds of goods are eligible for the reduced tariffs the deal provides. 'To qualify for reduced tariffs, the rules of origin specify that a product must either be wholly obtained or significantly transformed through processing in either the UK or India,' the documents accompanying the CETA said. This, it added, was to ensure that only genuinely British or Indian goods could access the preferential tariffs under the agreement. 'This is an important aspect of the deal, since it means that goods imported from abroad, repackaged, and then exported to the U.K. will not be eligible for the zero duties,' a senior government official explained. 'This means companies looking to export to the U.K. will have to invest in proper manufacturing here, instead of importing from countries like China.' He added that, while the U.K. has opened up 99% of its tariff lines, India does not export all of these tariff lines to the U.K.. 'However, what the deal does is provide potential,' the official explained. 'If a foreign company sees an opportunity to export a particular good to the U.K., it will now view India favourably since they can export from here at zero duty. Importers in the U.K. would prefer imports from India rather than from a country for which they have to pay a duty. Sarvadnya Kulkarni, CEO of the General Instruments Consortium, an engineering components manufacturer, agreed with this assessment, and said this was especially true for the precision engineering sector. 'The UK-India FTA is expected to significantly enhance foreign direct investment in India's precision engineering and industrial instrumentation sector,' Mr. Kulkarni told The Hindu. 'With reduced tariffs and greater regulatory alignment, UK-based engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) companies and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and process industry investors are likely to find India more attractive for sourcing, joint ventures, and technology transfers.' He added that the agreement creates a more predictable and transparent trade environment, which is crucial for capital-intensive sectors such as oil & gas instrumentation and process automation. 'This could accelerate investment in manufacturing infrastructure, R&D, and supply chain integration across both countries,' Mr. Kulakarni said. Krishan Arora, Partner, Leader of the India Investment Roadmap at Grant Thornton Bharat too feels that the CETA marks a new chapter by opening both markets for greater investment and collaboration. 'By liberalising key sectors and lowering entry barriers, the agreement is set to drive high-impact FDI and foster seamless value chain integration,' he said. 'Enhanced access to skilled talent across both nations will empower industries from IT to manufacturing, encouraging joint ventures and innovation.' He added that this trade deal will offer greater predictability for investors, and position both countries as reciprocal hubs of opportunity in the global economy. Tufan Erginbilgiç, CEO of Rolls-Royce, too, is optimistic about the company's operations in India. 'The Free Trade Agreement is a landmark in bilateral cooperation,' he said, following the signing of the deal. 'Rolls-Royce is growing its aerospace capabilities in India, and we look forward to working with Indian partners to co-develop power and propulsion technologies for India and the world, building on 60 years of successful technology transfer. This will unlock benefits of job creation, technology development and manufacturing growth.'
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Rahul Gandhi Dismisses PM Modi As "All Show, No Substance" In Sharp Political Attack
Congress leader and Lok Sabha Opposition Leader Rahul Gandhi launched a scathing critique of Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a public address at Talkatora Stadium in Delhi on Friday, characterizing the Prime Minister as merely theatrical without any genuine substance. Gandhi asserted that Modi represents nothing more than an elaborate performance that has been accorded excessive significance by various stakeholders. Drawing from his personal interactions with the Prime Minister, Gandhi revealed that after meeting Modi on multiple occasions and sharing the same room during official discussions, he had concluded that the Prime Minister was never truly a significant challenge or threat. Gandhi emphatically stated that Modi lacks real authority or influence, using the Hindi phrase "Dum nahin hai" to emphasize his point about the Prime Minister's limited actual power. The Congress leader argued that media coverage has artificially inflated Modi's public image far beyond what reality warrants, suggesting that the Prime Minister's perceived importance stems more from promotional efforts than genuine leadership capabilities. Gandhi's remarks represent one of his most direct personal assessments of the Prime Minister's character and effectiveness in recent political discourse. Beyond his critique of Modi personally, Gandhi expanded his attack to address broader systemic issues within India's governmental structure. He specifically targeted what he described as the systematic underrepresentation of marginalized and economically disadvantaged communities within the country's bureaucratic establishment, arguing that this exclusion represents a fundamental injustice. Gandhi presented demographic statistics to support his argument, claiming that Dalits, backward classes, tribal communities, and minorities collectively constitute approximately ninety percent of India's total population. Despite this overwhelming majority, he argued that these communities remain largely absent from positions of power and decision-making authority within the government apparatus. To illustrate this disparity, Gandhi used the metaphor of halwa distribution following budget preparation ceremonies, noting that no representatives from these marginalized communities were present during such symbolic moments of governmental celebration. He emphasized that while these communities form the productive backbone of the nation's economy, they remain excluded from the benefits and recognition that their contributions deserve. Gandhi's criticism extended to corporate representation, referencing data obtained by the Congress government in Telangana to demonstrate that members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes communities are notably absent from high-paying positions in corporate entities and management roles. This exclusion from lucrative employment opportunities perpetuates existing economic inequalities and limits social mobility for these populations. Conversely, Gandhi highlighted that when examining employment rolls for programs like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act or gig economy workers, these lists consist almost entirely of individuals from SC, ST, and OBC communities. This pattern reveals a troubling dynamic where marginalized communities perform essential labor but remain excluded from positions of authority and higher compensation. During his address at the Congress party's Bhagidari Byay Sammelan, Gandhi offered a personal reflection on his political journey, acknowledging shortcomings in his advocacy for OBC communities since entering politics in 2004 during the UPA-1 government. He expressed genuine regret for not providing adequate protection and support for these communities throughout his political career. Gandhi admitted that had he possessed greater understanding of OBC history and the challenges facing these communities earlier in his political involvement, he would have implemented a comprehensive Caste Census during that period. He characterized this oversight as a personal failing rather than a party-wide mistake, taking individual responsibility for the missed opportunity to address these systemic inequities. The Congress leader pledged to rectify these past oversights, suggesting that addressing the underrepresentation of marginalized communities would become a priority in his future political activities. This commitment represents an acknowledgment of the need for more inclusive governance structures that better reflect India's demographic diversity. Earlier in the day, Gandhi had criticized Prime Minister Modi for what he characterized as deliberate marginalization of SC, ST, and OBC communities through the maintenance of large numbers of unfilled reserved positions in central universities. This accusation suggests a pattern of systematic exclusion that extends beyond bureaucratic representation to educational opportunities and institutional access. Gandhi's comprehensive critique encompasses both personal assessments of Modi's leadership capabilities and broader structural criticisms of governmental policies and practices. His remarks reflect ongoing political tensions between the Congress party and the ruling BJP, while also highlighting persistent issues of social justice and representation that continue to influence Indian political discourse.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Rahul looks back at where he faltered: Didn't protect OBCs because I couldn't understand their issues at the time
A day after he said that the Congress 'fell short' of understanding issues faced by the OBCs and that 'opened up the space' for the BJP, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Friday said that he didn't protect the OBC community's interests earlier in his political career as the issues faced by them are complex and not easily visible. Addressing a Bhagidari Nyay Sammelan of OBCs at the Talkatora Stadium in Delhi, Gandhi said that while he should score well on issues related to Tribals, Dalits, minorities and women, he couldn't understand the problems of OBCs and admitted that he didn't do enough for the community. He also said that he will be working 'double' on this front from now on. 'Since 2004, I have been in politics. Twenty-one years have passed. When I look back, and in a way, analyse myself – where I did the right thing and where I lacked – I see a couple of big issues. I worked on the Land Acquisition Bill, MGNREGA, Right to Food, Tribal Bill… These things I did well. I feel I should get good marks on issues of Tribals, Dalits, minorities, women… When I look back, I see one thing clearly. I lacked on one thing, made a mistake – what was it? The Congress and I made a mistake. I should have protected the OBC section; I didn't. The reason for this was that I didn't understand your issues at the time,' he said. Gandhi said that around a decade ago, he 'could see the problems faced by Dalits' – 'it was clear and I understood it'. 'Untouchability is their history,' he said. Talking of Tribals, Gandhi said, 'It is easy to understand issues of Tribals – jungle (forest), jal (water), zameen (land) are right there for you to see.' 'But the OBC issues are hidden, and not easy to see. My regret is that if I knew your history and issues, I would have got the caste census done then. And it is my mistake and not the Congress's. The good thing is that if I had got the caste census done then, it wouldn't have been as good as it will be now,' he said. Gandhi said that the Telangana caste survey is like a 'tsunami' and that its 'aftershock' will be felt soon. 'The way the tsunami came… The earthquake that led to the tsunami wasn't seen. It was under the sea… When the tsunami came, its impact was felt 2-3 hours later. The same has happened in Telangana,' he said.
