Trump and Putin to meet to discuss Ukraine peace deal in Alaska, World News
Trump made the highly anticipated announcement on social media after he said that the parties, including Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, were close to a ceasefire deal that could resolve the three-and-a-half-year conflict, one that could require Ukraine to surrender significant territory.
Addressing reporters at the White House earlier on Friday, Trump suggested an agreement would involve some exchange of land.
"There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both," the Republican president said.
The Kremlin subsequently confirmed the summit in an online statement.
The two leaders will "focus on discussing options for achieving a long-term peaceful resolution to the Ukrainian crisis," Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said.
"This will evidently be a challenging process, but we will engage in it actively and energetically," Ushakov said.
In his evening address to the nation on Friday, Zelenskiy said it was possible to achieve a ceasefire as long as adequate pressure was applied to Russia. He said he had held more than a dozen conversations with leaders of different countries and his team was in constant contact with the United States.
Putin claims four Ukrainian regions - Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson - as well as the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, which he annexed in 2014. His forces do not fully control all the territory in the four regions.
Earlier, Bloomberg News reported that US and Russian officials were working towards an agreement that would lock in Moscow's occupation of territory seized during its military invasion.
A White House official said the Bloomberg story was speculation. A Kremlin spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
Reuters was unable to confirm aspects of the Bloomberg report.
Ukraine has previously signaled a willingness to be flexible in the search for an end to a war that has ravaged its towns and cities and killed large numbers of its soldiers and citizens.
But accepting the loss of around a fifth of Ukraine's territory would be painful and politically challenging for Zelenskiy and his government.
Tyson Barker, the US State Department's former deputy special representative for Ukraine's economic recovery, said the peace proposal as outlined in the Bloomberg report would be immediately rejected by the Ukrainians.
[[nid:721085]]
"The best the Ukrainians can do is remain firm in their objections and their conditions for a negotiated settlement, while demonstrating their gratitude for American support," said Barker, a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council.
Under the putative deal, according to Bloomberg, Russia would halt its offensive in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions along current battle lines.
The last time Alaska hosted a high-stakes diplomatic gathering was in March 2021, when senior officials from the administration of Democratic former President Joe Biden met with top Chinese officials in Anchorage.
The get-together involving Biden's top diplomat Antony Blinken and his Chinese counterpart Yang Jiechi quickly turned into a stunning public clash in front of the cameras, with both sides leveling sharp rebukes of the others' policies that reflected the high tension in bilateral ties.
Since his return to the White House in January, Trump has moved to mend relations with Russia and sought to end the war. In his public comments he has veered between admiration and sharp criticism of Putin.
In a sign of his growing frustration with Putin's refusal to halt Russia's military offensive, Trump had threatened to impose new sanctions and tariffs from Friday against Moscow and countries that buy its exports unless the Russian leader agreed to end the conflict, the deadliest in Europe since World War Two.
It was unclear by Friday evening whether those sanctions would take effect or be delayed or cancelled.
The administration took a step toward punishing Moscow's oil customers on Wednesday, imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods from India over its imports of Russian oil, marking the first financial penalty aimed at Russia in Trump's second term.
Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff held three hours of talks with Putin in Moscow on Wednesday that both sides described as constructive.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk of Poland, a close ally of Ukraine, said earlier on Friday that a pause in the conflict could be close. He was speaking after talks with Zelenskiy.
"There are certain signals, and we also have an intuition, that perhaps a freeze in the conflict - I don't want to say the end, but a freeze in the conflict - is closer than it is further away," Tusk told a news conference. "There are hopes for this."
Tusk also said Zelenskiy was "very cautious but optimistic" and that Ukraine was keen that Poland and other European countries play a role in planning for a ceasefire and an eventual peace settlement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Layoffs? Price increases? US companies make hard choices as Trump's tariffs set in
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Barry Barr, founder of KAVU True Outdoor Wear, has been speaking to members of Congress about the effect of Mr Donald Trump's trade policy on small businesses like his. Mr Barry Barr has taken a number of cost-saving measures in recent months to keep his outdoor apparel company afloat during US President Donald Trump's destabilising trade war. He froze his spending on marketing and even prohibited his employees from travelling to see customers. But while he waited for Mr Trump's tariffs to come into better focus, he resisted making more consequential decisions at his company, KAVU True Outdoor Wear. He didn't raise prices on its fall lineup. He continued manufacturing bags, woven shirts, polar fleeces and other items at factories in China, India and Vietnam, even though Mr Trump had signalled that those countries would face stiff duties. 'It's a sit and wait, honestly,' he said in July. 'We just don't know.' More recently, Mr Barr was trying to wrap his head around the punishing new tariffs that were set to click on shortly after midnight on Aug 7. It was hard for him to know whether the slate of duties on about 90 countries would ultimately hold, given the ever-evolving nature of Mr Trump's trade policy. On Aug 6, Mr Trump signed an executive order that would double tariffs on India, to 50 per cent, beginning in August in an effort to stop the country from buying Russian oil. He also threatened to impose a 100 per cent tariff on foreign semiconductors. The latest tariff orders confirmed for Mr Barr that he would have to raise prices and lay off employees in the months ahead. 'There will be some tough decisions to be made for sure,' he said. 'You have to put your big-kid pants on and do it.' Mr Barr's thinking is emblematic of the shift in strategy occurring at companies across the country. For manufacturers, retailers and other businesses that rely on imported goods, Mr Trump's tariff policy has become an exercise in forbearance. Since the spring, companies have had to contend with a series of delays, fresh threats and haphazard deals that have scrambled their ability to make long-term decisions. 'We kind of saw this summer as a holding period for a lot of firms,' said Ms Courtney Shupert, an economist at MacroPolicy Perspectives. 'Firms were saying, 'Let's wait and see if demand is going to be stronger or weaker'.' But now that many of Mr Trump's tariffs have officially set in and his trade policy seems to be solidifying, many companies are concluding that they can no longer afford to hold back. On recent earnings calls with investors, public companies including shopping conglomerate QVC Group, footwear brand Allbirds and eyewear vendor Warby Parker openly talked about their tactics to handle the escalating tariff costs, including increasing prices. 'I think we can, over the medium term, mitigate the impact of tariffs,' Mr Andrew Rees, CEO of the footwear brand Crocs, said on Aug 7. He outlined plans to raise prices, reduce business expenses and wring savings out of the company's supply chain, including by negotiating with factories. How quickly businesses act could have wide-ranging implications for the economy. Should more companies decide to pass on price increases to consumers, that could push up inflation and chill consumer spending. Many companies in recent months also hesitated to fire, or hire, workers amid the tariff unpredictability, reminiscent of the labor hoarding after the worst of the pandemic. If companies begin to have more confidence in the tariff rates, that moratorium could break. Indeed, the latest jobs report from the Labor Department, which was released Aug 1, suggested that businesses might be closer to that tipping point than previously thought. In several interviews by phone and text message in recent days, Mr Barr, who started KAVU in 1993, recounted how his business had contended with mounting pressure because of Mr Trump's tariff policy. Mr Barr has long paid some levies on products. But the extra tariffs that Mr Trump revealed in April, which included since-modified duties of 46 per cent on Vietnam and 26 per cent on India, were much more onerous. At first, Mr Barr chose to swallow Mr Trump's baseline 10 per cent tariff, as well as tariffs against China that had already kicked in. But as the trade war dragged on, he started to consider other solutions. 'There's absolutely no way I can make a profit this year absorbing all these tariffs,' Mr Barr said. 'It's bigger than any tax bill I've had to pay.' His foreign suppliers lowered their prices slightly to account for the cost of the tariffs, which helped somewhat. Mr Barr weighed manufacturing some items in a factory his company works with in Seattle but decided against it, in part because it would be too expensive and impractical to import the sewing machines he would need. He was also concerned that the tariffs would make buying fabric and other raw materials from abroad too costly. He is looking into whether he could move some production to factories in Central America but is not yet sure it will be possible. As the tariff landscape began to take firmer shape, however, Mr Barr started to enact deeper changes. He chose not to raise prices on items in KAVU's fall lineup, even though the items were subject to some tariffs when they arrived in the United States this summer. But the persistently high tariff rates compelled him to increase prices for 2026. KAVU products are sold in about 2,000 US retail locations. The company also exports its goods to 26 countries. Working off the assumption that tariffs for Vietnam and India would settle around 10 per cent, and China around 37.5 per cent, Barr increased retail prices for his company's summer 2026 line by about 15 per cent to 30 per cent – the most he believed customers would pay. Under the new pricing, the retail cost of a pullover made in China would rise to US$120 (S$154) from US$90. A button-down shirt produced in India that used to retail for US$80 would be US$105. But with the tariff rates settling higher, Mr Barr is now worried he will have to raise prices even more. The US' trade deal with Vietnam, for instance, stipulates a 20 per cent tariff on goods from the country, and India is facing 50 per cent tariffs. At the same time, KAVU's preseason sales for next summer came in 15 per cent lower compared with sales for this summer season. With his profit margin shrinking and business expenses already shaved to the bone, Mr Barr said he would probably have to lay off some of his 28 employees in the next three to four months. 'You've got to save money somewhere so the company can move ahead,' he said. Frustrated, Mr Barr has been speaking to members of Congress about the effect of Mr Trump's trade policy on small businesses like his. 'What we need to thrive is stability and not chaos,' Mr Barr said during a virtual news conference with Democrat Senator Patty Murray of Washington. And while he still fears that the tariffs will severely hurt KAVU, he hopes his company can pull through with the right adjustments. 'We can fight hard to survive,' Mr Barr said. 'That's all we can do.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump attack on Intel's CEO Tan Lip-Bu could compound factory struggles
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Mr Tan Lip-Bu, who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a saviour of the struggling American chipmaker. At the end of July, Governor Mike DeWine of Ohio said Intel's chief executive was 'very, very optimistic' about the company's plans to build multibillion-dollar semiconductor factories in his state. Last week, President Donald Trump attacked the tech executive, and a Republican senator called for an investigation into delays surrounding Intel's massive construction project outside Columbus. Mr Trump demanded on Aug 7 that Mr Tan Lip-Bu, Intel's new CEO, resign over his past ties to Chinese companies, adding to the woes of a company that Mr DeWine and other senior figures in Ohio's Republican Party had said would help create a manufacturing boom and turn the state into a 'Silicon Heartland'. To help build its Ohio factories, Intel received commitments worth roughly US$1.5 billion (S$1.9 billion) in federal funding in recent years, as well as a US$2 billion incentive package from the state. The project has been badly delayed, and the chipmaker said this year that the factories would not be operational until at least 2030. The company's challenges in Ohio highlight the risks that federal and state officials took when they financially backed Intel, a once-powerful force in chip manufacturing, an industry now dominated by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Intel's situation is also indicative of the struggles the Trump administration will face as it tries – through the pressure of tariffs and threats from the White House – to shift the bulk of semiconductor production to the United States from Asia. When the Biden administration offered financial incentives through the CHIPS Act, Intel was one of the few American companies that it made sense to back. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Singapore 4 men arrested after police search operation in forested area near Rail Corridor World Thousands protest in Tel Aviv against Israeli govt move to expand Gaza war Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties Asia Manila struggles to keep a lasting hawker culture, casts eyes on how Asian nations lifted street food But whether by stick or carrot, forcing this transition could prove extraordinarily difficult, as the delays around the Ohio project demonstrate. 'It's pretty obvious that Intel has failed to meet the commitments it made to the people of Ohio,' Republican Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio, wrote on social media on Aug 7. 'Now we find out its new CEO is deeply conflicted with ties to the CCP,' he said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. 'The CEO must immediately resign, the project completed, and a fraud investigation should be initiated by Ohio,' Mr Moreno added. Semiconductor factories are extremely expensive and complicated to build. Intel has struggled to find enough customers to stay afloat as it poured money into construction. After posting an US$18.8 billion loss in 2024 in its foundry division, the company ousted its CEO in December, cut 15,000 jobs and appeared to be exploring other strategies, including the possible sale of its manufacturing business to TSMC. Asked for comment, a spokesperson for Intel referred to its most recent earnings report from July, in which the company said it was committed to completing the project in Ohio but had slowed construction to match customer demand. Mr Dan Tierney, press secretary for Mr DeWine, said on Aug 8 that the governor remained optimistic about the project. 'We expect chips to be made in that facility,' Mr Tierney said. He added that the company had already invested US$7 billion in the construction project in Ohio, more than three times the amount of the state's incentive package, which involves some tax credits that have yet to be paid out. The incentive package is tied to job creation by the end of 2028, so the earliest that the state would attempt to claw back any money is 2029, Tierney said. The stakes are high for Intel and Ohio. Semiconductor chips, which are used in everything from cellphones to fighter jets, have recently become a particular focus for Mr Trump, as they were for former President Joe Biden. Both presidents viewed domestic production as critical to national security, especially as more than 90 per cent of the world's most advanced chips were produced in Taiwan, an island claimed by China. In 2022, under Mr Biden, Congress passed a Bill with bipartisan support that aimed to remedy that vulnerability by pouring billions of dollars into subsidies for semiconductor companies to build facilities in the United States. Intel, the only American-owned maker of advanced logic chips, was awarded up to US$7.9 billion to build factories in the United States. Only about US$2 billion of that has been disbursed. Mr Trump has criticised the subsidy approach, arguing that tariffs are a more effective tool to bring manufacturing back to the United States. He threatened last week to impose a 100 per cent duty on many imported chips. Mr Tan, who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a saviour of the struggling American chipmaker. He is a longtime Silicon Valley investor who focused on semiconductor startups, even during eras when venture capital money seemed to be pouring into software and apps. On July 28, a company that Mr Tan once ran pleaded guilty to transferring technology that was under US export controls to Chinese entities. Though the plea agreement with the Justice Department did not name Mr Tan, Republican Senator Tom Cotton wrote to the chair of Intel's board of directors on Aug 5, raising questions about what Mr Tan may have known about the illicit activity. In a statement on Aug 7, Mr Tan, an American citizen who was born in Malaysia, said that 'misinformation' was circulating about his past roles and that he fully shared 'the president's commitment to advancing US national and economic security'. 'I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards,' he said. He added that he was engaging with the administration 'to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts.' The questions surrounding Mr Tan could create yet another hurdle in the attempt to bring the manufacturing of advanced semiconductors to Ohio. State Senator Bill DeMora, a Democrat representing Columbus, said Ohio Republicans were using Mr Trump's attack on Mr Tan to distract from the fact that they sank public money into a project that has stalled. Mr DeMora, who has long called the project a boondoggle, said in an interview on Aug 8 that Ohio Republicans 'did all this hoopla and pageantry' to hype the Intel project. 'Now they want the Intel president to step down because he has ties to China,' he said. 'That's their excuse.' He said construction had continued with a fraction of the workers the company had promised to hire. He predicted that the site would never become a semiconductor factory. 'Intel is never going to make a chip there,' he said. NYTIMES
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Newsom calls Trump's $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, says California won't bow
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks at a press conference, accompanied by members of the Texas Democratic legislators, at the governor's mansion in Sacramento, California, U.S., August 8, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria WASHINGTON - California Governor Gavin Newsom said on Saturday that a $1 billion settlement offer by President Donald Trump's administration for UCLA amounted to political extortion to which the state will not bow. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT The University of California says it is reviewing a $1 billion settlement offer by the Trump administration for UCLA after the government froze hundreds of millions of dollars in funding over pro-Palestinian protests. UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze $584 million in funding. Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. KEY QUOTES "Donald Trump has weaponized the DOJ (Department of Justice) to kneecap America's #1 public university system — freezing medical & science funding until @UCLA pays his $1 billion ransom," the office of Newsom, a Democrat, said in a post. "California won't bow to Trump's disgusting political extortion," it added. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Singapore 4 men arrested after police search operation in forested area near Rail Corridor World Thousands protest in Tel Aviv against Israeli govt move to expand Gaza war Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties Singapore E-bike rider arrested for rash act causing hurt after accident with pedestrian in Toa Payoh Asia Manila struggles to keep a lasting hawker culture, casts eyes on how Asian nations lifted street food "This isn't about protecting Jewish students - it's a billion-dollar political shakedown from the pay-to-play president." CONTEXT The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests and in doing so violated Jewish and Israeli students' civil rights. The White House had no immediate comment beyond the offer. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's war in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Experts have raised free speech and academic freedom concerns over the Republican president's threats. The University of California says paying such a large settlement would "completely devastate" the institution. UCLA PROTESTS AND ENVIRONMENT Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. Rights advocates have noted a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. RECENT SETTLEMENTS The government has settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both accepted certain government demands. Settlement talks with Harvard University are ongoing. REUTERS
