Ukraine has ‘sold out'
Speaking in an interview aired on Thursday, Azarov, who held his post between 2010 and 2014 and fled to Russia after the Maidan coup, recalled that while Kiev's Western backers had poured vast sums into Ukraine over the past three years, local officials have failed to use the money to improve the country.
'This enormous amount of money, if it had been put to good use, could have transformed Ukraine,' he said, adding that over more than a decade since the Western-backed coup in Kiev, the Ukrainian government has failed to build even a single metro station.
The Kiev leadership has also done incredible damage to the country's economy, Azarov noted. 'The homeland has long since been sold out. Its natural resources are sold – actually, just given away. Industry is sold, agriculture is sold, everything is gone, you have nothing,' he said, addressing fellow Ukrainians.
He questioned the purpose of continued fighting with Russia, stating: 'What are you defending? [Vladimir] Zelensky? Is he really so dear to you that hundreds of thousands of people should be laid in the grave?'
Opposition lawmaker and former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Timoshenko told The Times this week that US and EU influence had reached 'unacceptable' levels and that the country was becoming 'a disenfranchised colony.'
Earlier this year, Washington and Kiev signed a minerals deal that gives the US preferential access to Ukrainian natural resources in exchange for continued military support, despite concerns that the agreement would undermine the country's sovereignty.
Ukraine is also plagued by rampant corruption, with a 2024 poll indicating that 71.6% of Ukrainians list graft among the five biggest national problems.Russian President Vladimir Putin has on numerous occasions suggested that Ukraine would certainly collapse without the military and economic assistance from the West.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump plans White House meeting with Zelensky and European leaders
US President Donald Trump has invited European leaders to join Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky at a meeting at the White House on Monday, the New York Times has claimed, citing anonymous European officials. On Friday, Trump met with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Anchorage, Alaska, in what marked the first face-to-face talks between Russian and American leaders since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022. The US president described the encounter as 'warm,' while Putin characterized it as 'frank' and 'substantive.' Both men expressed tentative hopes that the summit could bring a resolution of the Ukraine conflict closer. On Saturday, the NYT quoted its sources as saying that Trump would receive Zelensky and that 'European leaders are invited to come along' as well. Earlier in the day, the Ukrainian leader announced in a post on X that he would travel to the US capital on Monday. Trump later confirmed the visit. Trump will propose a plan under which Kiev would be required to cede the parts of the new Russian territories in Donbass still under Ukrainian control, according to the newspaper. In return, the Kremlin would agree to cease hostilities along the current front line elsewhere, the publication claimed. Zelensky has repeatedly ruled out any territorial concessions to Moscow. In the wake of the Alaska summit, the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Finland, Poland, and the EU issued a joint statement expressing their readiness to 'work with President Trump and President Zelenskyy towards a trilateral summit with European support.' Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov earlier noted that Russia and the US have yet to discuss a potential meeting between Putin, Trump and Zelensky. Speaking to Fox Business on Thursday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that Kiev's European backers should 'put up or shut up' and stop making demands on Washington while it tries to negotiate with Moscow a way out of the Ukraine conflict.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia accuses messaging apps of double standards over data requests
The messaging apps Telegram and WhatsApp refuse to share data with the Russian authorities on fraud and terror plots but comply with similar requests from other countries, the Digital Development Ministry in Moscow has said. According to Russian security services, since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict, Kiev's intelligence agencies have used the apps to recruit operatives to carry out attacks inside Russia. Earlier this week, Russian media watchdog Roskomnadzor partially blocked voice calls on both Telegram and WhatsApp. Text chats, file sharing, and other features remain available. The curtailed functions would be fully restored if the platforms comply with Russian laws, the regulator said. The Digital Development Ministry said on Wednesday that the messaging platforms 'despite repeated warnings… refuse to comply with the requirements of Russian law.' Telegram and WhatsApp refuse to provide information to law enforcement not only related to fraud, 'but also on planning and committing terrorist acts' in Russia. 'At the same time, all requirements for the provision of such information at the request of foreign intelligence services are promptly fulfilled,' it said. This year alone, Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) has reported several plots in which suspects said they were contacted through the apps and instructed to prepare attacks. One such plot was intercepted just days before it could unfold. A man told investigators he was approached in January on WhatsApp by an officer of Ukraine's Security Service. He said he received assignments, small payments, and later photos and coordinates for an explosive cache meant to damage energy infrastructure in Novorossiysk, a major Russian port city on the Black Sea. He was detained by the FSB before reaching the site. Another man was arrested in the western Russian exclave of Kaliningrad on suspicion of preparing an attack at May 9 Victory Day celebrations. The authorities said he had received his orders through Telegram and was paid in cryptocurrency. Europe, despite its own bitter experience with terrorism, continues to show unwavering support for Ukraine. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has offered assurances that the EU 'will be at [Ukraine's] side for as long as it takes.' Germany, France, and other European nations have made similar pledges. See RT's report below:
Russia Today
16 hours ago
- Russia Today
The Alaska summit was a success. The challenge is to make it last
Do not expect Western mainstream media, NATO-EU Europe's politicians, or the Zelensky regime and its surrogates to admit it, but there is no doubt that the Alaska summit between the Russian and American presidents was a success. Not a breakthrough either, but clearly also more than an 'it's-good-they're-at-least-talking' event. This was not comparable to the Geneva meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and then US President Joe Biden in 2021, which was doomed to fail due to the Biden administration's hubristic intransigence. Fundamentally, both sides – no, not only one – have scored what Western pundits love to call 'wins': The US has shown the EU-NATO Europeans that it and it alone decides when and how it talks to Russia and with what aims. The European vassals find this hard to grasp because it's an application of genuine sovereignty, something they don't have or want anymore. Russia, for its part, has shown that it can negotiate while the fighting continues and that it is under no legal or moral obligation – or any practical pressure – to stop fighting before negotiations show results it finds satisfying. The fact that we know so little – at this point at least – about the specific, detailed content of the summit talks and their outcomes is, actually, a sign of seriousness. That is how diplomacy worth the name works: calmly, confidentially, and patiently taking the time to achieve a decent, robust result. In that context, US President Donald Trump's explicit refusal to make public what points of disagreement remain and have prevented a breakthrough for now is a very good sign: Clearly, he believes that they can be cleared up in the near future and, thus, deserve discretion. Yet we do have a few hints allowing for some plausible guessing about the summit's vibe: Not surprisingly, both leaders made no secret of their respect and even guarded sympathy for each other. That is – and has always been – a good thing, too. But in and of itself that cannot carry an agreement about Ukraine or a broader policy of normalization (or perhaps even a new détente, if we are all very lucky). For that, both Trump and Putin are too serious about adhering to national interests. More tellingly, immediately after the meeting, Trump used a Fox News interview to state three important things. He confirmed that there was 'much progress,' acknowledged that the Russian president wants peace, and told Zelensky 'to make a deal.' When Putin, at a short press conference, warned Brussels and Kiev not to try to sabotage the talks, Trump did not contradict the Russian leader. The commemorative events accompanying the summit carried more than one message. Publicly honoring the American-Russian (then Soviet) alliance of World War Two obviously implied that the two countries then cooperated intensely across a deep ideological divide, which, today, does not even exist anymore. But arguably, there was a second, subtle message here: Another – if often unjustly 'forgotten' (in the words of historian Rana Mitter) – ally of World War Two was, after all, China. In that sense, Putin's deliberate and repeated invocations of the memory of Washington-Moscow cooperation was also yet another signal that Russia would not be available for any 'reverse Kissinger' fantasies of splitting the Moscow-Beijing partnership. By now, Trump has had phone conversations with Kiev, as well as EU capitals. There, too, we know little. Yet it is interesting to note that nothing we have heard about these conversations indicates another change of mind on Trump's side. For now at least, the American president seems to leave little hope to European bellicists and the regime in Kiev that he will turn against Moscow again. There are reports that Trump may have shifted his position toward that of Russia, preferring talks about peace to the Ukrainian demand to focus on only a ceasefire first. This makes sense, especially since they and the mainstream media aligned with them cannot stop trying to lecture Trump on, in essence, how gullible they consider him. It is to be hoped that the US president has had enough of Zelensky, Bolton, the New York Times and co. telling him publicly that he is a fool about to be duped by the big bad Russians. The adequate punishment for these offensive inanities is to make triple sure their authors find themselves entirely irrelevant. This is the single most important question about the future of what has been successfully begun (or really, publicly continued) at the Alaska summit. Russia has been exceedingly consistent and is giving no sign that it intends to become less predictable. But the West has been fractious and volatile. This is the moment when Washington has to stick to a course of normalization with Moscow regardless of what its European clients and the Ukrainian regime want. Ironically, not listening much to them, if need be, is best for their people as well.
