Watch: House committee considering a cap on school voucher spending, increases to public school funding
The potential changes were unveiled Monday when the committee released two rewritten versions of legislation. The committee was slated to discuss the two bills Tuesday, but hours after proposed new versions were released, the panel's meeting was rescheduled to Thursday.
If the changes are adopted and advanced, it could draw into focus key issues the House and Senate will have to resolve before sending priority school funding and school voucher proposals to the governor.
[School choice, vouchers and the future of Texas education]
The potential $1 billion spending cap on education savings accounts could be added to Senate Bill 2, the upper chamber's priority voucher legislation. The proposed cap comes after critics have raised concerns that lawmakers are downplaying what the state could spend on vouchers during the initial rollout. A budget analysis shows costs reaching nearly $5 billion by 2030. Lawmakers also proposed a change to the bill that would allow only U.S. citizens or people lawfully in the country to receive vouchers.
House Bill 2, the school funding measure, currently increases the money districts receive to educate each student by $220. The potential update would increase that amount, referred to as the basic allotment, by $395. The proposed update released Monday would also automatically increase the basic allotment every two years by tying it to property value growth, according to the committee's summary of the potential changes.
Current state budget proposals only set aside $1 billion for vouchers, which would allow parents to use taxpayer dollars to fund their children's private school tuition. But if legislation creating vouchers includes a $1 billion cap, the state could not spend more money on the program even if more is available.
If demand for vouchers exceeds the money available, the new proposal would also limit funding for students without disabilities or from wealthier households — a family of four making about $156,000 or greater — to only 20% of the program's total budget until after the 2026-27 school year. It would also prioritize students who exit public schools over those who are already enrolled in private schools.
Those possible changes, however, still would not require private schools to accept certain students, which has raised concerns among public education advocates. In other states, voucher programs like the one Texas is proposing primarily benefit wealthier families who had already enrolled their children in private schools.
[Texas officials' claim that school funding is at an all-time high ignores inflation and temporary federal money]
Meanwhile, HB 2's potential changes could increase the state's basic allotment to $6,555 for each student, with 40% directed to salaries for school staff. Higher salary increases would go to teachers with more than a decade of classroom experience. The base funding per student has been at $6,160 since 2019.
School districts say raising that amount offers them flexibility to address the unique needs of their campuses, as opposed to money they can only use for specific purposes. The bulk of it flows toward salaries for educators and support staff. Districts also use the money to pay for essential services and goods, like electricity, insurance and water. Leftover money may fund other necessities like school supplies and building maintenance.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Get the data and visuals that accompany this story →
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
10 minutes ago
- UPI
Texas files motion against O'Rourke in fight over redistricting maps
Texas on Tuesday filed a contempt motion against Beto O'Rourke, alleging he is violating a court order by continuing to fundraise for state legislators who fled the Lone Star State earlier this month. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI | License Photo Aug. 12 (UPI) -- Texas filed a motion for contempt Tuesday against Beto O'Rourke, accusing him of violating a temporary restraining order barring him from fundraising for Democratic lawmakers who fled the state earlier this month amid a deepening fight with Republicans over redistricting maps. In the motion, filed in the District Court for Tarrant County, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alleges that O'Rourke -- a former U.S. House legislator and potential Democratic presidential candidate -- violated a court order that was handed down Friday by continuing to solicit donations for Texas Democrats through the Democratic Party's ActBlue fundraising arm, specifically at rallies in Fort Worth and Abilene that were held over the weekend and online. "Beto is about to find out that running your mouth and ignoring the rule of law has consequences in Texas," Paxton said on X. "It's time to lock him up." Democrats have come out in force since their Texas colleagues fled the state earlier this month to deny Republicans a quorum to pass redistricting maps that would give the GOP five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Critics and Democrats argue that the maps draw lines that dilute the voting power of Latino and Black people, while serving as a power grab by President Donald Trump through rigging the GOP representation in the House ahead of next year's midterm elections. Usually, redistricting occurs once a decade with the publishing of U.S. Census Bureau data. O'Rourke has been at the forefront of the effort to support Texas Democrats and a target of Paxton, who, on Friday, secured a temporary restraining order barring his fellow Texan from soliciting donations for nonpolitical purposes, including to fund "out-of-state travel, hotel or dining accommodations or services to unexcused Texas legislators during any special legislative session called by the Texas governor." The motion filed Tuesday centers mainly on social media posts by O'Rourke that encourage people to donate "to have the backs of our Texas Democrats in this fight," and the two rallies held over the weekend, specifically the Saturday event in Fort Worth, where Paxton in the motion quotes the Democrat as having said, "There are no refs in this game. [expletive] the rules," seemingly to suggest he was openly flouting the court order. O'Rourke responded to the lawsuit by accusing Paxton of purposefully misusing his words in a social media post, that included a clip from the rally the attorney general quoted him from. The clip shows O'Rourke speaking about encouraging all Democratic-led states to redraw their maps as Texas has to "maximize Democratic Party advantage" because "there are no refs in this game." In the Tuesday response, O'Rourke said Paxton was "lying to try to silence us." "We alerted the court that the AG's office blatantly lied in its filing," he said in a post on X. "We're seeking maximum sanctions in response to his abuse of office." If the court finds O'Rourke in violation of the temporary restraining order, it could fine him up to $500 and jail him for up to six months. The next hearing in the case has been scheduled for Aug. 19. The filing comes the same day the Texas Senate approved the controversial redistricting map 19-2 along party lines, with nine of the 11 Democrats walking out before the vote in protest.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NC Democrats criticize GOP's Michael Whatley for rise of Mark Robinson
North Carolina Democrats are tying Republican Senate candidate Michael Whatley to Mark Robinson, who lost his bid for governor after years of inflammatory social media posts and anti-LGBTQ+ remarks, and after a bombshell report linked Robinson to a series of disturbing online comments. Republicans have coalesced around Whatley, head of the Republican National Committee and former head N.C. Republican Party, after he was hand picked to run for Senate by President Donald Trump. Democrats are painting Whatley's previous support of Robinson — the state's lieutenant governor and eventually the GOP's nominee for governor — as evidence of bad judgment. Whatley led the NCGOP from June 2019 to May 2024, according to his LinkedIn. Robinson served as lieutenant governor from 2020 to 2024. Before Trump picked Whatley and when Robinson was a potential candidate, U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, the retiring Republican incumbent, warned Republicans against making Robinson their nominee, with a reference to the scandal, Robinson's online handle 'minisoldr.' Tillis posted that for Republicans to be successful in 2026: 'Word to the wise, let's avoid minisoldr.' Why Democrats are using this strategy now While there is still a primary in 2026, given both parties' immediate support of the two leading candidates, it is highly likely the general election will be a faceoff between Whatley and Democrat Roy Cooper, a former two-term governor and four-term attorney general. Rev. James Gailliard, a Rocky Mount pastor and former House member who's now running for state Senate, said Democrats are talking about this so far ahead of the 2026 election because it 'speaks to the severity of the moment.' 'I think it speaks to the severity of our need to be able to get on the runway quick so we can get out in front of voters and really express what the real issues are,' Gailliard said. 'You know, I'm a pastor, and, I don't like to see politicians three months before Election Day, and coming knocking at my church. I want to see them a year ahead of time, 15 months ahead of time.' Whatley officially entered the race July 31 with an event in his hometown of Gastonia. Rep. Phil Rubin, a Wake County Democrat, criticized Whatley's 'elevation of dangerous extremists like Mark Robinson' while Whatley led the NCGOP, 'even as Robinson said vile things' about a variety of people, including women and victims of violence. 'One of the things you need as a United States senator is strong judgment in both this sort of tactical sense, but also a moral sense. ... He was the head of the North Carolina Republican Party. He was the person who was probably more than anyone else, responsible for Mark Robinson's rise,' Rubin told reporters at a news conference on Tuesday in Raleigh. Gailliard said North Carolina 'doesn't need someone representing us in the U.S. Senate who wants to be rewarded for having given us Mark Robinson.' NCGOP response to Whatley criticism NCGOP spokesperson Matt Mercer pointed to Whatley's comments to Bloomberg in the wake of the CNN report connecting Robinson to racist and sexually explicit comments, including Robinson calling himself a 'black Nazi.' Whatley told Bloomberg in September 2024, when the Robinson scandal broke, 'those comments are absolutely antithetical to Republican values' and that Robinson would have to demonstrate to voters those words, actions and values were not his in order to win the election. Robinson continued to deny the allegations even after he lost most of both his official and campaign staff, through the election, which he lost to Democrat Josh Stein. Mercer said that while Whatley called for accountability, Cooper backed former President Joe Biden after 'Biden's cognitive decline was laid bare in the June 27 debate last year .... Instead of taking the car keys away from grandpa because he wasn't up to the job, Cooper said he was going to go on and win the Daytona 500.' Cooper spoke at a Biden rally in Raleigh the day after the debate. Within a month, Biden had left the presidential race.


Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Scoop ... Inside Jeffries' donor retreat
Many Democrats left House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries' annual California fundraising event last week convinced Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear is running for president, according to four attendees. 🍷 Jeffries' event at the luxury Lodge at Torrey Pines is the successor to Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi's wine-soaked summer donor party in Napa, California. Why it matters: Democrats lapped up the message from the two-term governor, who told big dollar donors and vulnerable House Dems that the key to winning over Trump voters is staying true to your values. Beshear's biggest applause line came when he explained why he vetoed a bill in 2023, when he was up for reelection, that restricted some medical care and bathroom use for transgender people. Beshear called it"the nastiest anti-trans bills in the nation — and I vetoed it," according to attendees. "There are some things worth losing over," Beshear, who went on to win by five percentage points, said. Zoom out: Democrats are eager to find candidates — and messages — that they think will appeal to voters in red and blue states. Both Beshear and Jeffries spoke of the importance of authenticity and using words that voters actually use. Don't be afraid to say "addiction," Beshear said, when discussing the opioid crisis. Zoom in: In both public and private conversations, the looming mid-cycle redistricting battle was frequently discussed. Democrats promised their donors that they would respond to GOP gerrymander efforts. "We are working on an aggressive plan to make sure we fight fire with fire on redistricting," according to a member of Congress in attendance. In addition to Jeffries, House Minority Whip Katherine Clark and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar attended, along with roughly a dozen "Frontline" lawmakers and some California members as well. After Beshear's Friday night fireside chat with Jeffries, donors got a political update from DCCC Chair Suzan DelBene and Mike Smith, the president of the House Majority PAC, which can accept unlimited donations. Jared Bernstein, Biden's former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and Wally Adeyemo, Biden's deputy treasury secretary, provided an economic overview. Jake Sullivan, Biden's national security adviser, and Susan Rice, one of his domestic policy advisers, discussed foreign affairs and immigration.