&w=3840&q=100)
‘When Paris removed stray dogs': What happened in the French capital in the 1880s?
A local resident walks her dogs past War propoganda posters in the Montmarte district in Paris on March 25, 2020. File Photo/Reuters
The Supreme Court's recent ruling on the immediate removal of stray dogs from Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) has sparked a huge debate in the country. It has pitted public safety advocates against dog lovers who see the order as 'cruel'.
The directive has garnered reactions from various quarters, including politicians. While some have hailed the top court's directive, others found it 'inhumane'. Former Union minister and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi has described the order as 'impractical', 'financially unviable' and 'potentially harmful' to the region's ecological balance.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
She also brought up the example of Paris, which she said faced a rat problem after getting rid of the canines from its streets in the 1880s.
Let's take a closer look.
Supreme Court's stray dogs order
The Supreme Court on Monday (August 11) ordered the Delhi government, civic bodies and authorities of Noida, Gurgaon, and Ghaziabad to start picking up stray dogs and relocate them to shelters.
A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan said that dog shelters have to be set up to accommodate around 5,000 stray dogs, which should be sterilised and immunised.
The apex court gave authorities eight weeks to create the facilities and install CCTV monitoring to ensure no animals are released back onto the streets.
It also warned that any person or organisation that obstructs the move will face strict action. The bench also refused to consider petitions from dog lovers or any other party on the issue.
The order came amid a rise in dog bites and cases of rabies. However, it has divided the country, with many animal lovers criticising the ruling.
Both Gandhi families have spoken against the Supreme Court's directive to remove the stray dogs.
'The SC's directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy. These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased. Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination & community care can keep streets safe - without cruelty. Blanket removals are cruel, shortsighted, and strip us of compassion,' Congress MP Rahul Gandhi wrote in a post on X.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He added, 'We can ensure public safety and animal welfare go hand in hand.'
The SC's directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy.
These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased.
Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination & community care can keep streets safe - without cruelty.
Blanket… — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) August 12, 2025
Animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi warned that removing stray dogs from the streets will create new problems.
'Within 48 hours, three lakh dogs will come from Ghaziabad, Faridabad, because there's food here in Delhi. And once you remove the dogs, monkeys will come on the ground… I've seen this happen at my own house,' she reportedly said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Referring to 1880s Paris, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader stated, 'When they removed dogs and cats, the city was overrun with rats.' She said dogs were 'rodent control animals'.
What happened in the 1800s Paris?
In the 1800s, stray dogs were frowned upon in Paris, seen as transmitters of rabies, fleas, and dirt.
Paris had a large number of strays at the time, with the administration considering them a threat to cleanliness, health, and safety.
According to a research paper titled Stray Dogs and the Making of Modern Paris, shared by The University of Liverpool Repository, in 1883, pharmacist Emile Capron backed the removal of stray dogs from the streets of Paris, claiming that 'the infinite number of these awful mutts' spread rabies. She also blamed them for scaring horses and pedestrians, which resulted in traffic accidents.
'As Capron's remarks suggest, many commentators treated strays as dangerously mobile nuisances that hindered the movement, and threatened the health, of the city's productive human and nonhuman inhabitants. Strays contributed to the sense that Paris was a pathological city plagued by crime, filth, and insecurity, and elite commentators treated them as members of the city's criminal, dirty and uprooted 'dangerous classes,'" Chris Pearson wrote in the paper.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
To ensure 'public safety', many stray dogs were allegedly culled. As Paris moved towards becoming modern, 'Parisian public hygienists and authorities turned strays into a problem that they would solve to make the city safe, clean and modern,' Pearson wrote.
As per some accounts, the killing of strays led to a surge in the population of rats in the French city.
ALSO READ: With nearly 10 lakh stray dogs, how will Delhi implement the Supreme Court order?
When Parisians ate dogs, cats, rats
During the Siege of Paris (the Franco-Prussian War between 1870-1871), the allied German forces surrounded Paris and cut off most of the food shipments to the French capital.
Amid food shortages, Parisians resorted to eating rats, cats, dogs, and even horses.
On November 12, 1870, a stall on the Rue Rochechouart street sold several animals. 'On the right side of the stall was several large dogs, neatly dressed … next to these are several large cats, also very neatly dressed … On the left of the stall there is a dozen or more of rats stretched upon a tray, and a young woman, half veiled, is timidly approaching them with a little girl at her side. She wishes to inquire the price of the rats, and, if she has money enough, to purchase one,' Robert Lowry Sibbet, an American doctor who was trapped in Paris during the siege, wrote in the book The Siege of Paris by an American Eye-Witness, published in 1892.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
LDF and UDF ratchet up their demand for Suresh Gopi to clarify voter list fraud accusations
As accusations of voter list fraud in the Thrissur Lok Sabha constituency in the 2024 general elections appeared to turn from a trickle into a torrent, the ruling front and the opposition in Kerala ratcheted up their demand for a public accounting from Union Minister of State for Tourism, Suresh Gopi, MP. Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] general secretary, M.A. Baby, dismissed the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) former State president K. Surendran's averment that Mr. Gopi owed no explanation and the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) and opposition United Democratic Front (UDF) were grousing belatedly about Election Commission of India (ECI) officials in Thrissur stacking the odds in favour of the Union Minister. Speaking to reporters in New Delhi, Mr. Baby said: 'Belated reporting of a theft did not absolve the perpetrator of the crime. The BJP's voter fraud in Thrissur is a microcosm of what the BJP-engineered in other States. The modus operandi, including identity theft, reflects a pattern. The Election Commission of India (ECI) should retrieve its lost credibility by conducting a thorough investigation', he said. Meanwhile, Mr. Gopi, who arrived after a long hiatus in Thrissur early Wednesday, appeared to maintain a sphinx-like silence. When mobbed by reporters, Mr. Gopi quipped: 'Thank you for the favours done'. Congress speak Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan said Mr. Gopi's reticence was a deliberate attempt to cock a snook at the Thrissur electorate and civil society. 'Mr. Gopi has the right of reply, given the gravity of the accusations of voter fraud swirling around him and the BJP in Kerala. His speechlessness lends credibility to Congress's accusations of massive voter list fraud in Thrissur each passing hour,' Mr. Satheesan said. Senior Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala adduced evidence of what he claimed was massive voter list fraud by CPI(M) and BJP since 2021. He said the BJP appeared to have taken a page from the CPI(M) 's playbook on rigging elections. 'It included persons appearing in multiple voters' lists across districts and fictitious voters using phoney addresses and identity proof', he added.


NDTV
14 minutes ago
- NDTV
Top Court Orders EVM Recount, Overturns Sarpanch Elections In Haryana
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has overturned the election of the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Buana Lakhu in Haryana's Panipat district after a court-monitored recount found the appellant securing the highest number of votes. A bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and N.K. Singh ordered the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Election Officer, Panipat, to issue a notification within two days declaring the appellant, Mohit Kumar, elected, and allowing him to assume office immediately. The election for the Sarpanch's post was held on November 2, 2022, in which the respondent, Kuldeep Singh, was declared elected. Mohit Kumar challenged the result before the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)- cum-Election Tribunal, which, on April 22, 2025, found grounds for recounting the votes at a booth. However, the Punjab and Haryana High Court overturned that decision on July 1, prompting Mohit Kumar to appeal to the apex court. In an order passed on July 31, the Justice Kant-led Bench directed the District Election Officer to produce all the EVMs before the Registrar of the Supreme Court. "The nominated Registrar shall recount the votes, not only of the disputed booth but of all the booths. The recounting shall be duly video-graphed. The recount result shall be duly signed by the learned Registrar, the petitioner and the respondent no.1 or their authorised representative as well as the learned assisting counsel," it ordered. Pursuant to the top court's directive, the OSD (Registrar) recounted the votes from all booths, with the final tally showing Mohit Kumar securing 1,051 votes against Kuldeep Singh's 1,000. Accepting the recount, the Justice Surya Kant-Bench observed: "There being prima facie no reason to doubt the Report submitted by the OSD (Registrar) of this Court, especially when the entire recounting has been duly videographed and its result is signed by the representatives of the parties, we are satisfied that the appellant deserves to be declared as the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Buana Lakhu Village, District Panipat, Haryana." However, in the interest of justice, the apex court allowed the parties to agitate the issues, if any, left to be adjudicated by the Election Tribunal, saying that "the Election Tribunal... shall accept the Report of the OSD (Registrar) of this Court as the final and conclusive report so far as the result of recounting of votes is concerned." It clarified that the direction to declare the appellant as the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Buana Lakhu in Panipat would remain subject to the final judgment of the Election Tribunal. Disposing of the appeal along with all pending applications, the Supreme Court set aside the impugned Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment, as the recounting of votes had been completed following its order.


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Begin by creating shelters for 5,000 dogs': SC's Aug 11 full order now out
The Supreme Court has, in its August 11 order to capture and put in shelters all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR, called it 'a progressive exercise' — acknowledging that shelters could take time to be built and increased — and told the authorities to 'begin by creating dog shelter(s) for say 5,000 dogs in the next six-eight weeks'. Under no circumstances should the dogs be released back onto the streets, says SC's August 11 order.(PTI) The matter has since been referred to a larger bench of three judges for a hearing on August 14. Animals rights activists and several other sections questioned the August 11 order, arguing that it wasn't rooted in science even though the stray-dog issue needed to be addressed. Under no circumstances should the dogs be released back onto the streets after being 'captured, sterilized, dewormed and immunized as required by Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023', as per the detailed order uploaded on the SC website on Wednesday. Ordering immediate start of both exercises — that of rounding up the dogs, and the creation of infrastructure such as shelters and medical facilities — the order says these 'shall be undertaken simultaneously'. 'We do not want to hear about even a semblance of lethargy from the concerned authorities on the pre-text of awaiting the creation of shelters / pounds,' the order, however, adds. It warns authorities of strict action otherwise. 'The dog shelters/pounds should have sufficient personnel to sterilize, deworm and immunize stray dogs and also for looking after the stray dogs who would be detained,' it adds. The two-judge bench took suo motu notice of the stray dog issue — citing a rise in cases of dog bites — and passed orders covering "all localities of Delhi, Ghaziabad, Noida, Faridabad, Gurugram as well as areas on the outskirts".