logo
Why Hyundai's boss says it is doing a ‘terrible job'

Why Hyundai's boss says it is doing a ‘terrible job'

News.com.au2 days ago
Hyundai's new Australian boss says the brand has 'ground to make up' after doing a 'terrible job' selling electric cars in Australia.
Don Romano took over as Hyundai's Australian chief executive in March after a stint in Canada, where the brand has a strong share of electric vehicle sales.
But in Australia, Hyundai's EV performance is less impressive.
The critically acclaimed Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Ioniq 6 duo attracted just over 500 combined sales in the first six months of the year, placing them well behind rivals such as the Tesla Model Y (10,431) and Model 3 (3715), BYD Sealion 7 (3756) and Seal (1609), Kia EV5 (2765), MG4 (2268), Geely EX5 (1845) and Polestar 4 (676).
'We have ground to make up,' Romano says.
'We do a terrible job with our EVs … we are not doing the job we should be.
'Our market share of electric vehicles is extremely low relative to our market share of total vehicles and the only explanation for that is that we haven't put enough focus on it because I can see other electric car companies that are … doing a much better job with their EVs than they do with their ICE [internal combustion engine vehicles].
'We're the opposite.'
Romano believes Hyundai's previous managers made mistakes, including a decision to bypass the brand's dealer network to sell cars such as the Ioniq 5 directly to customers.
'We went around our dealers,' Romano says.
'So, we have a job to do to get our dealers back in the game and to let them know that no, we are going through our dealer body and that you are an important part of the distribution process.'
Romano's experience in North America differs from Australia. In the US and Canada, General Motors has the largest EV share behind Tesla.
But here, Chinese brands such as BYD have an enormous role to play in the market, making competition tough for Hyundai.
Hyundai's cheapest Inster EV starts from about $43,000 drive-away, roughly $10,000 more than the BYD Dolphin. The Ioniq 5 SUV is about $15,000 more than BYD's Sealion 7, and the Ioniq 6 sedan starts $27,000 upstream from the equivalent BYD Seal.
'The real issue when you talk about competitiveness is probably when you look at Chinese EVs, and the question I'd have is 'how long can they sustain that low price' when we're all using the same materials and the same equipment?',' he says.
'Eventually, when you look at the same systems that are used to build these cars and the same equipment and the same material, eventually, it comes to an equilibrium where we're all having on the same cost factor that we're going to have to all live with.
'And then the pricing really just comes down to what it takes to distribute the cars and market the cars. So I don't think any change in our competitive pricing is something that is a long-term issue. I think we're going to ultimately all be in the same bandwidth on a car-by-car basis.
'I don't know how they do it other than, you know, I read the same things you do about government intervention and support …
'It's one big world that we all live in and we're all going to be living in the same economic environment, so whatever advantage one country has over another, and I've seen this happen in my 40 years, where it used to be cheaper to build in one country than another, and then suddenly it's just as expensive, I think that's ultimately going to happen.
'Whether that's in my lifetime or not, that I can't answer. But for right now it appears they have it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woodside slammed by regulator for safety incidents at multiple WA decommissioning sites
Woodside slammed by regulator for safety incidents at multiple WA decommissioning sites

ABC News

time6 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Woodside slammed by regulator for safety incidents at multiple WA decommissioning sites

A key union says it is aware of "significant failures" in Woodside's safety management at one of its offshore projects, days after the national regulator ordered it to suspend its decommissioning work over similar issues. The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) last Thursday revoked the oil and gas giant's decommissioning obligations at Griffin and Stybarrow gas fields until it completed "essential planning and preparatory activities". The orders come after what NOPSEMA called "preventable health and safety incidents" at both sites. NOPSEMA asked BHP to decommission both gas fields in 2021, a year before its petroleum arm was bought by Woodside. Decommissioning refers to the process of safely closing a mine or oil and gas site, with the expectation that the impacted environment will be rehabilitated afterwards. In May, 16,000 litres of oil spilled into the ocean during removal operations at Woodside's Griffin oil and gas field, which NOPSEMA said had the potential to expose workers to hydrogen sulphide. Meanwhile, the regulator said there had been unsuccessful recovery attempts and the presence of hydrates in some infrastructure at Stybarrow. A Woodside spokesperson said the company had made substantial progress towards decommissioning the Stybarrow, Griffin and Minerva fields, concluding a multi-year decommissioning program. "Across the campaign, more than 25,000 tonnes of infrastructure, including over 140 kilometres of pipe and 100 subsea structures, have been brought to shore to enable recycling and reuse," it said. A Woodside spokesperson said NOPSEMA's revised general directions provided additional time and clarity for essential planning and preparatory activities. The regulator's directions were welcomed by Maritime Union of Australia organiser Doug Heath, who has sent the regulator a deluge of reports about "near misses" at Woodside's decommissioning projects. He told the ABC that "a fundamental breach" had occurred at one of Woodside's offshore projects just this week. "We've had a series of incidents where workers have suffered, in one case a punctured lung," Mr Heath said. "In other cases, there have been a series of near misses." In March, NOPSEMA confirmed it was investigating lifting and crane operations at McDermott's DLV 2000 vessel, which has been decommissioning the Stybarrow gas field. Two years ago, Woodside contractor Michael Jurman died while working at the North Rankin offshore facility, an incident that NOPSEMA is still investigating. Since then, Woodside's health and safety data showed the number of high-potential incidents and total recordable injuries had increased. Mr Heath said the company had not learned its lesson. "If they need the regulator to tell them that they're not doing a good enough job, they've got some significant failures within their HSC management," he said. "[Woodside is] doing more decommissioning work than probably any other oil and gas company in WA, but their standards have slipped over the course of time. A Woodside spokesperson said safety always had been and would continue to be its priority, and it was continuously taking action to strengthen its safety culture.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store