
HSBC Endures $1.6 Billion Hit Amid BoCom Stake Reduction
HSBC Holdings Plc has disclosed an anticipated pre-tax loss of up to $1.6 billion following the dilution of its stake in China's Bank of Communications . This development arises from BoCom's private share placement, part of a broader initiative by Chinese state-owned banks to bolster their capital reserves.
The dilution reduces HSBC's holding in BoCom from 19.03% to approximately 16%, a consequence of the Chinese government's strategy to strengthen its banking sector. The $71.5 billion recapitalization effort aims to enhance the capacity of major state-owned banks, including BoCom, to support the national economy.
Despite the substantial charge, HSBC has indicated that the loss will not significantly impact its capital ratios or dividend distributions. The bank emphasized that the investment in BoCom is long-term, and the charge is a non-cash accounting adjustment due to the dilution.
This is not the first time HSBC has faced financial repercussions related to its BoCom investment. In the previous year, the bank reported a $3 billion impairment on its stake, citing challenges in China's financial sector, particularly the ongoing property market crisis.
The latest charge coincides with HSBC's announcement of a 25% decline in first-quarter pre-tax profits, amounting to $9.5 billion. This downturn is attributed to one-time losses from business disposals in Canada and Argentina. Nevertheless, the results surpassed analyst expectations, which had projected profits of $7.8 billion.
In response to the profit decline, HSBC has initiated a $3 billion share buyback and declared a first-quarter dividend of $0.10 per share. The bank's CEO, Georges Elhedery, who assumed the role in September, is spearheading a cost-cutting initiative targeting $1.5 billion in annual savings by 2026. This strategy includes restructuring business segments and divesting operations in Germany, South Africa, France, and Malta.
See also Aramco and BYD Join Forces on Energy Vehicle Innovation
HSBC has also raised its bad loan provisions by $202 million to $876 million in the first quarter, reflecting economic uncertainty and the impact of higher tariffs. Of this amount, $100 million is allocated for exposure to Hong Kong's commercial property sector. The bank anticipates lending demand to remain subdued throughout the year and projects a potential $500 million increase in loan loss provisions if global economic conditions deteriorate further.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
2 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Asian markets rally ahead of latest China-US trade talks
9 June 2025 08:45 Hong Kong (AFP)Stocks rallied on Monday on hopes that a fresh round of China-US trade talks later in the day will ease tensions between the economic superpowers, while investors were also cheered by forecast-topping US jobs gains extended a run-up across global markets in recent weeks as fears about Donald Trump's tariff blitz subside and countries make deals with eyes are on London, where top officials from China and the United States are due to meet for more negotiations aimed at preserving a fragile truce agreed last month that slashed eye-watering tit-for-tat talks come days after Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping held their first publicly announced telephone talks since the US president returned to the White were helped by news that Beijing had on Saturday approved some applications for rare-earth exports, while plane giant Boeing will start sending commercial jets to China for the first time since that the two sides will make a breakthrough boosted Asian markets, with Hong Kong up more than one percent, while Tokyo, Shanghai, Seoul, Singapore, Taipei and Manila also gains followed a strong lead from Wall Street, where all three main indexes closed more than one percent higher after figures showing the world's largest economy created a forecast-beating 139,000 jobs last the figures for the previous two months were revised down, the data indicated that the economy remained robust, and tempered worries sparked by Wednesday's report by payroll firm ADP showing a big miss on private will now turn to the Federal Reserve as it decides whether to lower interest rates, with many economists warning that Trump's tariffs could reignite inflation, hit supply chains and drag on consumer sentiment."The May minutes and recent comments by several (policy board) members... suggest the Fed is highly attentive to the risk that tariffs will lead to a persistent inflation shock," wrote analysts at Bank of America. "Those risks could come into focus for markets by the fall." Stock Markets Continue full coverage


Zawya
4 hours ago
- Zawya
Can HSBC shrink its investment bank to greatness?
HSBC's exit from ECM and M&A in Western markets wasn't a surprise. The bank said its activities in those markets cost it around US$300m a year and were not materially profitable. So a straightforward decision, right? Not necessarily. Investment banks, more than any part of a bank, are people businesses in which the assets have legs and can walk out the door. Employees also often have inflated egos and are usually convinced that business comes to the bank because of them – not the other way around. In recent weeks, three senior global heads have departed to competitors – Kamal Jabre (head of M&A), Ed Sankey (head of ECM) and Dan Bailey (head of TMT investment banking). More are likely to go, and players like HSBC in the middle of a restructuring often find themselves having to pay a premium to keep their best talent. When HSBC announced the shrinking of its ECM and M&A businesses it didn't mention research and many at the bank suggested it remained committed to global coverage. That seemed very strange as research is typically a heavily loss-making business subsidised by investment banking. Moreover, in Europe and the US, HSBC has a weak franchise in research. Unsurprisingly, then, HSBC has since confirmed it is concentrating its research in line with the geographical refocus of its ECM and M&A footprint. As well as focusing its equity research efforts on Asia-Pacific and Middle East stocks, there are suggestions that remaining London-based analysts will cover global multinationals heavily exposed to these regions. Shrink to fit? Shrinking an investment bank is difficult. In most cases the really hard bit is exiting balance sheet-heavy businesses with the challenge of unwinding legacy positions such as long-dated derivatives. We saw with Credit Suisse how, when done badly, it can exacerbate a death spiral. But Credit Suisse also gives us a case study in dis-synergies from exiting business lines. When the bank lost US$5bn in the Archegos Capital Management debacle, the bank's reaction was to exit the prime brokerage space. This put even more pressure on the economics of Credit Suisse's equities business, accelerating its market share losses in equity trading with the key hedge fund client base. When shareholder Ping An Asset Management had suggested several years earlier that HSBC split itself up, the bank highlighted that the core of the Asian business was a global network. Former CEO Noel Quinn said when announcing second-half 2022 results that the bank had 'a 20% wallet share of wholesale banking client business from Europe, the Middle East and the Americas into Asia' and that '45% of our wholesale client business is booked cross-border and a large proportion of the revenues booked domestically for wholesale clients comes to us because of the business we do for those clients overseas, and we will continue to grow that number'. In other words, we're in Europe and the US in large part because of the money we can make serving clients in those regions doing business in Asia and the Middle East. Will it work? So will that work with the new strategic refocus? The centre of HSBC's wholesale business is cross-border payments, lending and FX, not ECM and M&A, but the departure of senior global rainmakers makes you wonder about potential dis-synergies, such as losing the ability to compete in large cross-border transactions such as a Middle East or Asia business looking for Western private equity or corporate buyers or helping a Middle East or Asia business looking to IPO in London or New York. Will the new model have the C-suite and boardroom connectivity for the former or the distribution to European and US institutional investors for the latter? If HSBC is no longer seen as being able to compete in cross-border ECM and M&A, will it be stuck competing to be the local investment bank in deal mandates against Indian, Chinese and Middle Eastern banks? This is a pretty crowded space. HSBC is not a top 10 player in ECM or M&A in Asia-Pacific or in major markets like China and India, although it is certainly a market leader in the Middle East. Skewered? HSBC has committed to a global footprint in DCM that ties into its global corporate transaction banking and lending footprint. DCM also tends to focus on CFOs and corporate treasurers while ECM and M&A relationships are more focused on boardrooms and CEOs. But the geographical skew of HSBC's DCM franchise is at odds with the bank's overall geographic strengths. According to LSEG fee statistics, HSBC's global DCM ranking has been steady between nine and 11 over the last six years, depending on the mix of issuers. And yet the majority of its DCM revenues come from Europe and the US with a top five or six position in Europe and even higher in the UK. Non-US banks typically have strong DCM franchises in their home markets where they offer a full service investment bank. The bulk of HSBC's wholesale banking franchise is insulated from shrinking its investment bank. But a major talent drain leading to a negative feedback loop in its remaining ECM and M&A footprint or its global DCM business could still be costly. Moreover, a firm that loses advisory business, primary and secondary share sales and bond mandates will see a knock-on effect to trading franchises in cash equities, equity derivatives, credit and interest rate swaps. In trying to shrink to greatness, HSBC must be careful not to shrink into irrelevance. Rupak Ghose is a former financials research analyst


Dubai Eye
6 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
US and China set for trade talks in London
Three of US President Donald Trump's top aides will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for talks aimed at resolving a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will represent the United States in the talks, Trump announced in a post on his Truth Social platform without providing further details. China's foreign ministry said on Saturday that vice premier He Lifeng will be in the United Kingdom between June 8 and June 13, adding that the first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism would be held during this visit. "The meeting should go very well," Trump wrote. Trump spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday in a rare leader-to-leader call amid weeks of brewing trade tensions and a dispute over critical minerals. Trump and Xi agreed to visit one another and asked their staffs to hold talks in the meantime. Both countries are under pressure to relieve tensions, with the global economy under pressure over Chinese control over the rare earth mineral exports of which it is the dominant producer and investors more broadly anxious about Trump's wider effort to impose tariffs on goods from most US trading partners. China, meanwhile, has seen its own supply of key US imports like chip-design software and nuclear plant parts curtailed. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 in Geneva to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump returned to the presidency in January. That preliminary deal sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and US indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives. China sees mineral exports as a source of leverage. Halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican US president if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products. In recent years, US officials have identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the United States economically and militarily.