Syria's new Islamist government orders women to wear burkinis at the beach - but bikinis are allowed at 'four star or above' hotels and private beaches
Syria 's new Islamist-led government has decreed that women should wear burkinis or other swimwear that covers the body at public beaches and swimming pools, while permitting Western-style beachwear at private clubs and luxury hotels.
The tourism ministry's decision marks the first time the Damascus authorities have issued guidelines related to what women can wear since Bashar al-Assad was toppled in December.
But it offered an exception for hotels classed as four stars or above, and for private beaches, pools and clubs, saying 'normal Western swimwear' was generally permitted, 'with adherence to public morals and within the limits of public taste'.
The new requirements were set out in a wider decree dated June 9 and which included public safety guidelines for beaches and swimming pools ahead of the summer.
It said that beach-goers and visitors to public pools should wear 'appropriate swimwear that respects public decency and the feelings of different segments of society', requiring 'more modest swimsuits' and specifying 'the burkini or swimming clothes that cover the body more'.
Women should wear a cover or a loose robe over their swimwear when moving between the beach and other areas, it said.
Men should wear a shirt when not swimming, and are not allowed to appear bare-chested 'in the public areas outside the swimming areas - hotel lobbies or ... restaurants', it said.
The decree added that 'in public areas outside the beaches and swimming pools', it was preferable to wear loose clothing that covers the shoulders and knees and to avoid transparent or very tight clothing.
During the Assad family's iron-fist rule of Syria, which was shaped by a secular Arab nationalist ideology, the state imposed no such restrictions, though people often dressed modestly at public beaches, reflecting conservative norms.
Since Sunni Islamist-led rebels overthrew Assad, fliers have appeared urging women to cover up, but the government has issued no directives ordering them to observe conservative dress codes.
A temporary constitution passed earlier this year strengthened the language on the role of sharia in Syria.
Interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who led an al Qaeda group before cutting ties with the jihadist network, has sidestepped interviewers' questions on whether he thought Syria should apply sharia, saying this was for experts to decide.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Israel has inflicted unprecedented damage on Iran's elite - why now?
Not only has Israel's attack on Iran been more wide-ranging and intense than its two previous military operations last year, but it also appears to have adopted some of the strategy that was used in the Israeli offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon last is not only to hit Iran's missile bases - and thus its ability to respond with force - but also to launch strikes to take out key members of Iran's leadership. That strategy of decapitation of Hezbollah senior figures had devastating consequences for the group and its ability to mount a sustainable counter from Tehran has shown what seem to be specific buildings hit, similar to images from Israel's attacks on the southern suburbs of Beirut, which culminated in the killing of Hezbollah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah. No figure of that magnitude appears to have been killed in Iran. The Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has not been targeted. But to kill Iran's military chief of staff, Hossein Salami, the commander of the powerful Revolutionary Guards, and several of the country's top nuclear scientists in the first hours of an operation that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has suggested might go on for days is to have inflicted an unprecedented degree of damage on Iran's would seem to necessitate a fiercer response from Iran than we saw in its two attacks on Israel last year. But it may also make Tehran's ability to summon up such a response that much harder. That presumably is the calculation that Netanyahu made in ordering this escalation in the conflict. LIVE: Follow latest updates and analysis Why he decided to go ahead with the attack right now - one that he has for so long advocated - could be for the reasons he has given. In a statement released not long after the operation began, he said that it was a matter of Israel's survival. But Netanyahu has been making the argument that Israel faces existential threat if Iran gets a nuclear bomb for many years. To underline the renewed urgency, a senior Israeli military official has said that there was information that Iran had enough material to make fifteen nuclear bombs within there may also have been a very different factor at play. The talks between the US and Iran on a deal over Tehran's nuclear programme was about to enter its sixth round on Sunday. There have been conflicting signals over how much progress has been made in this. For Netanyahu, though, it may have seemed that this was a crucial moment to ensure that what he sees as an unacceptable deal would be stopped in its he and his advisors may have felt that not only Iran but its proxies in the region - Hezbollah in particular - have been weakened to such an extent that the threat they once posed is now no longer as potent. The coming hours and days will show whether that is proved to be correct or a dangerous miscalculation.
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
US stock futures fall after Israel attacks Iran
June 13 (Reuters) - U.S. stock index futures dropped on Friday after Israel's military strike on Iran escalated tensions in the oil-rich Middle East and battered risk sentiment across global markets. Israel's widescale strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities were aimed at preventing Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Iran has promised a harsh response and retaliated by launching 100 drones. The escalation of tensions in the Middle East - a major oil-producing region - sent oil prices surging more than 6% and U.S. energy stocks rose in tandem, with Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab and Exxon (XOM.N), opens new tab advancing nearly 3% in premarket trading. The strikes come just days ahead of a planned sixth round of nuclear talks between Iran and the United States. Tensions had been building as U.S. President Donald Trump's efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran appeared to be deadlocked. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the Israeli offensive a "unilateral action" and said Washington was not involved. At 04:32 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 505 points, or 1.17%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 70.5 points, or 1.17%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 309.25 points, or 1.41%. A 1.6% slump in Russell futures pointed to sharp declines for domestically focused stocks. Airline stocks dipped as the surge in crude prices raised concerns about higher fuel costs. Delta Air Lines (DAL.N), opens new tab was down 3.9%, United Airlines (UAL.O), opens new tab dropped 4.8%, Southwest Airlines (LUV.N), opens new tab lost 2.5% and American Airlines (AAL.O), opens new tab declined 3.9%. Defense stocks rose, with Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab up 4.7%, RTX Corporation (RTX.N), opens new tab up 5.5%, Northrop Grumman (NOC.N), opens new tab up 4.2% and L3harris Technologies (LHX.N), opens new tab up 4.3%. The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab still remains just 1.8% below its record high reached earlier this year, following stellar monthly gains in May driven by upbeat corporate earnings and a softening in Trump's trade stance. The tech-heavy Nasdaq (.IXIC), opens new tab is about 2.8% off its record closing high reached in December last year. Investors are now focused on the Federal Reserve's meeting scheduled next week where policymakers are expected to keep interest rates unchanged.
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Iran vows revenge for Israeli strikes, saying it will write ‘end of this story'
Iran vowed to avenge the attack on its nuclear sites and the assassination in Tehran of its senior military leadership, saying it would respond forcefully and that the 'end of this story will be written by Iran's hand'. In the first signs of a counterstrike, Israel said Iran had launched 100 drones towards Israel and that its air defences were intercepting them outside Israeli territory. Iraq said more than 100 Iranian drones had crossed its airspace, and, soon after, neighbouring Jordan said its air force and defence systems had intercepted several missiles and drones that had entered its airspace, for fear they would fall in its territory. Responding to the most serious attack on Iran since the revolution in 1979, the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, threatened 'severe punishment' and claimed residential areas had been targeted. The Iranian leadership vowed both a military and diplomatic response, saying women and children had been killed in the strikes across Iran. It remains to be seen if Iran decides to attack US military sites in the Middle East, but its leaders are likely to believe that the Trump administration was not just aware of these strikes in advance, but covertly endorsed them. The US said it had not been involved in the attacks, but Tehran pointed both to Israeli officials stating the attack had been completely coordinated with the US, and that the Israeli air force is entirely dependent on US supplies. In a furious statement, the Iranian government accused Israel of terrorism and insisted the attack demonstrated it 'does not adhere to any international rules or laws and, like a drunkard, openly and brazenly engages in terror and ignites the flames of war before the eyes of the world, including westerners who claim to uphold human rights and international law'. 'Starting a war with Iran is playing with the lion's tail,' the statement added. In a telling warning that the Iranian regime, if it survives, may now indeed feel the need to try to assemble a nuclear bomb in the face of Israel's attacks, the statement further said: 'The world now better understands Iran's insistence on the right to enrichment, nuclear technology and missile power, and the enemy has made it possible to prove our injustice and righteousness, who is the aggressor and which regime is threatening the security of the region.' Among those killed by Israeli strikes were Gen Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of the Revolutionary Guards Gen Gholamali Rashid, a senior Revolutionary Guards commander, the nuclear scientist Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi and Fereydoun Abbasi, the former head of the Atomic Energy Organization. Residential buildings across Tehran were hit. Pictures showed that specific floors on high-rise apartments were struck, but the damage had spread to many different floors. Army barracks across the country appear to have been hit, with reports trickling in of deaths and damage. But Isfahan regional governors said there had been no leakage of uranium from the Natanz nuclear facility. No electricity or oil installations were struck, but Israel may well return to hit economic targets in the coming days, depending on any Iranian response. Iran, aware that the savage blow to its prestige may lead to some form of uprising, urged its citizens only to listen to official channels, and ignore rumours. The foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, had been in Oslo with other Arab ministers for a security conference and had been looking towards Oman-brokered talks on Sunday with the US special envoy Steve Witkoff. The planned sixth round of talks, the first in which both sides had put forward proposals in writing, were to focus on whether Iran would be allowed to continue domestic uranium enrichment with monitoring by the UN nuclear watchdog the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Iran insists it did not have a covert plan to build a nuclear bomb, but all signatories to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty including Iran have a sovereign right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes. It points out that the comprehensive report put to the IAEA board this week showed no evidence that Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon. The report did say it could not be certain that the nuclear programme was entirely civilian in purpose. Tehran has consistently argued that its increased stockpiles of highly-enriched uranium was a calculated and legitimate response to Donald Trump unilaterally withdrawing in 2018 from the nuclear deal agreed with Barack Obama three years earlier and imposing economic sanctions. The highly experienced Iranian negotiating team were aware that Israel was increasingly worried that Trump, facing an open war for his ear on Iran in Washington, might strike an unsatisfactory deal with Iran. But the consensus among Arab diplomats was that Trump was sincere in saying he did not want Israel to strike, and that he would allow the bilateral US-Iran talks to play out before permitting any Israeli action. The belief among Iranian negotiators that they had further time before Trump implicitly or explicitly sanctioned military action looks, in retrospect, to have been a severe error. But the right to enrich has been an Iranian red line for decades, and they will reject the accusation they overplayed a weak hand. Moreover, Iranian diplomats had been led to believe initially that the US would permit Iran to continue some form of uranium enrichment, but had been struggling to convert that belief into a specific American offer in the talks held in Oman and Rome. Iran will now have to reflect whether it was being played by the US negotiators, or whether Israel has the freedom of action to mount such an assault without a green light from Washington. To many Iranian eyes, despite the reports that Trump was distancing himself from Israel, there is little that Trump has done in practice since taking office to restrain Israel either in Gaza or across the region. Araghchi, for instance, said on 23 April: 'The attempts by the Israeli regime and certain special interest groups to derail diplomacy – using variety of tactics – is abundantly clear for all to see. Our security services are on high alert.' Iran's air defences have proved ineffective, partly due to the previous airstrikes launched on Iran by Israel in October that took out Russian-made air defence systems, including around its nuclear sites. One of the few cards Iran has to play is that in recent months, it has managed to improve its fractured relations with Arab states in the region, even though its policy of forward defence based on proxy groups in Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, Yemen and Iraq was largely dismantled by Israel. But the valued Gulf state sympathy for Iran is not likely to extend to joint military action against Israel.
