Lagos Startup Week turns 10: Celebrating a decade of Africa-led innovation
Born in 2015 under the vision of Prime Startups, Lagos Startup Week was launched to spark a movement: one that would not just showcase startups, but shape the very future of innovation across Africa. That vision has now become a reality.
In 2025, as LSW celebrates its 10th edition, Lagos has earned its place on the global tech map. According to Dealroom.co and Partech reports, Lagos is now one of the most active startup ecosystems on the continent, with Nigerian startups attracting over $3.5 billion in venture capital funding, launching globally relevant startups , and fostering a new wave of digital pioneers redefining what's possible ahead of Istanbul, Turkey and Pune, India. having created five unicorns and grown its ecosystem valuation 11.6x since 2017 despite having a smaller economy,' the report stated. According to the report, Lagos is home to five unicorns, comprising Interswitch, Flutterwave, Jumia, OPay, and Moniepoint, which makes the state stand out and the major acquisition of Paystack by Stripe for over $200 million.
The event organisers have curated a range of activities for over 5,000 attendees. Participants will have the opportunity to learn from tech experts and business leaders, gain valuable advice on scaling or starting a business, and network with high-profile entrepreneurs,regulators and investors. Lagos Startup Week is undeniably the destination for anyone seeking to forge connections within the global tech industry.
'This is more than an event. This is where Africa's future gets prototyped,' says Olumide Olayinka, Partner, Prime Startups and Convener of Lagos Startup Week. What began as a grassroots gathering has evolved into one of the continent's most consequential platforms for innovation, venture, and ecosystem development.
The 10th edition of Lagos Startup Week marks more than a milestone; it signals a new era. Under the bold theme 'DND – Disrupting the Next Decade,' LSW 2025 will examine what it takes to build in complex markets, elevate African-led innovation on the global stage, and define the next 10 years of entrepreneurial impact.
From resilience to radical thinking, this year's event will spotlight founders who are not just building products but rewriting narratives.
LSW is proudly powered by Prime Startups, an ecosystem builder supporting African founders beyond the event stage. Through year-round founder support, cross-border ecosystem partnerships, and policy engagement, Prime Startups is helping to lay the foundation for Africa's next wave of high-growth ventures.
According to Olumide Olayinka, Co-organiser and Partner at Prime Startups. ' Lagos Startup Week was never just an event; it was always a declaration. Olumide said that 'the city needed a platform where founders could breathe, build, and belong. Ten years later, we are still doing that at scale, and with global attention.'
THE LSW EXPERIENCE– 2025 AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS
📅 Dates: July 7–12, 2025
📍 Venue: Civic Centre, Lagos, Nigeria
🌍 Theme: DND – Disrupting the Next Decade
To accommodate the expanding scope of this landmark edition, the event will span seven floors of the iconic Civic Centre for three unforgettable days. This year's edition promises to be even more spectacular, featuring 4 stages and Demo Days, all designed to showcase the visionary technology that will shape our collective future.
Expect:
Previous editions have welcomed visionaries such as:
WHY THIS MATTERS
In an era of global realignment and digital acceleration, Lagos Startup Week is more than a timestamp. It's a bellwether for how emerging markets will define the future of commerce, connectivity, and capital. It's where Africa builds and the world watches.
Join us in Lagos this July. The future isn't coming. It's being built here.
Watch 2024 recap:
Whether you're an aspiring entrepreneur, a seasoned industry leader, or an enthusiast looking to stay ahead of the curve, Lagos Startup Week is the ultimate destination to witness the cutting edge of innovation. See you there!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Wall Street is concerned about the reliability of government inflation data on eve of CPI
This week's inflation data will be huge for markets, and not just for the numbers. Beneath the Bureau of Labor Statistics' reports on consumer and producer prices will be simmering questions over the data's validity. Those concerns have accelerated as budget cutbacks have forced the agency to change the way it collects data. On top of that, President Donald Trump's decision to fire the BLS commissioner after the July nonfarm payrolls release raised worries that the bureau could be politicized. Doubt over the accuracy and integrity of the data is a serious issue considering how much BLS work is used to formulate policy, calculate Social Security payments and inform any number of other political and economic decisions. "I feel like this data that is coming out is getting much less reliable, and this has been building for a long time," DoubleLine CEO Jeffery Gundlach said last week on CNBC. Staffing and funding is one issue. Trump's decision earlier this month to fire Erika McEntarfer as the BLS chief is another. The move "has raised questions about whether and by how much the quality of official data produced by official U.S. government agencies could be compromised," Morgan Stanley economist Michael Gapen said in a note. "Official U.S. data has never been perfect, but has been of high quality, compiled impartially, and useful in the setting of policy." Questions on multiple fronts Gapen's sentiments mirror those around Wall Street, where written commentary has broken down the various issues the BLS has already faced in terms of budget cuts that have pushed it to alter the way it is collecting some data. Also, notable revisions the BLS has applied to its critical monthly payrolls count have raised concerns, including accusations from Trump that the McEntarfer-led BLS was manipulating the data for political purposes. BLS officials weren't immediately available to respond to CNBC requests for comment. Outside of political circles, there are few on Wall Street who place credence in the notion that the BLS is doing anything nefarious with the data. However, the bureau's often primitive way of collecting jobs data — largely through phone calls and written surveys — has fed into caution about the reliability of pre-revisions data releases. Survey response rates have been steadily sliding, forcing the BLS into bigger revisions. "Significant downward revisions to job growth and increased imputation for CPI have raised questions about the reliability of the official statistics," Bank of America senior U.S. economist Aditya Bhave wrote. "We argue the data remain reliable, though we would recommend being careful with the initial jobs data." Looking for inflation clues On the market's plate this week, though, are the two key inflation readings, first with the consumer price index on Tuesday, then the producer price measure, considered a gauge of costs at the wholesale level, on Thursday. At issue for the BLS is its move to stop collecting CPI data from several cities due to staffing limitations, as well as the growing use of imputed data, or estimating price movements in areas where it can't get exact information. In those cases, the BLS will try to use data from another source, preferably somewhere near to the locale it is surveying, but sometimes it has to use prices from other urban areas as assumptions. When the imputed data comes from a local source it has a higher degree of reliability. But Gapen and other economists worry that if the BLS has to rely on "different cell" imputation, the chances for higher variance increase. Estimates are that some 35% of BLS data for its price reports is affected in some way by imputing. Bank of America estimates that a combination of different-cell imputation and the varied impact of tariffs likely will alter the headline CPI reading by only a basis point or two — 0.01 or 0.02 percentage point. It's still a consideration, though. "In more normal times, that may be too small to matter, but in today's environment every basis point counts," Bhave said. "Still we do not think the BLS' decision to reduce the CPI sample is enough to warrant alarm over the signal from the inflation data." Impact on Fed moves Indeed, precision will matter as the Federal Reserve closely monitors inflation data and charts its monetary policy course. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones expect the all-items CPI to show a 0.2% increase for July, putting the 12-month inflation rate at 2.8%, up 0.1 percentage point from June. Excluding food and energy, the respective forecasts for core inflation are 0.3% for the month and 3.1% for the year, the latter up 0.2 percentage point from a month ago. The Fed targets inflation at 2%. Beyond those numbers, Wall Street will be poring through the data for readings on tariff-sensitive items. Should those goods and services not point significantly higher, it would encourage the Fed to cut rates in September. However, higher readings could keep policymakers in the wait-and-see posture that has dominated the year so far. "Sequential firming in inflation is one key factor behind our view that the Fed will remain on hold at the September meeting despite recent employment data that point to a sharp slowdown in labor demand," Morgan Stanley's Gapen wrote. Traders widely expect the central bank to cut the fed funds in September, then at least once more before the end of the year, but Wall Street economists are in multiple camps. For instance, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America both see no cuts this year, while JPMorgan Chase anticipates three — equal to one at each of the remaining meetings. Those forecasts could change, though, depending on what the data says — and how the BLS data is viewed. "Taken at face value, the new procedures implemented by the BLS should not introduce systematic bias into its estimates of CPI inflation, but it will increase volatility in future CPI prints," Gapen wrote. "That said, the devil is in the details."
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
The CCP Is Crushing China's Industrial Output
China's economy is suffering from hidden debt, industrial overcapacity, and a renewed expansion of the same central planning policies that created these problems in the first place. Decades of state-driven growth have left the country dangerously overleveraged, with mounting liabilities and shrinking returns on innovation. Behind the impressive record of rapid industrialization lies a system distorted by state subsidies, overregulation, and artificial incentives. The Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) refusal to relinquish control to market forces has triggered a decline in industrial output, stifled innovation, and pushed the nation toward a severe debt crisis. China's real debt burden is far higher than official figures suggest, with total debt exceeding 300 percent of GDP, and the once hidden liabilities—such as local government financing vehicles (LGFVs), shadow banking, and real estate loans —are included. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates $8.4 trillion (58 trillion yuan) in off-balance-sheet LGFV debt, nearly 400 percent higher than China's officially reported $2 trillion. And the debts continue to mount, as many LGFVs are unable to service existing obligations without taking on new loans. Taken together, these liabilities reveal a dangerously overleveraged economy, where CCP-led fiscal controls and overcapacity have pushed China toward mounting financial instability. This mounting debt crisis coincides with growing signs of industrial decline. China's manufacturing sector—once the engine of its economic rise—is now buckling under the combined weight of overcapacity, falling demand, and eroding profitability. Production declined in July for only the second time since October 2023, driven by weakening new orders and shrinking export demand, which fell for the fourth consecutive month. China's official manufacturing employment index rose slightly to 48.0 in July 2025 from 47.9 in June. Still, it remains below 50, the level that separates growth from contraction, indicating continued job losses in the sector. The private Caixin Manufacturing PMI confirmed the trend, reporting that factories are cutting staff in response to weak demand and rising cost pressures. Sub-indexes for new orders and raw materials inventory both declined in July, with the new orders index falling to 49.4 from 50.2 in June. This drop is a key leading indicator, reflecting a weaker pipeline of future production. At the same time, manufacturers are drawing down raw material inventories, signaling lowered expectations for third-quarter output. With fewer orders and shrinking stockpiles, factories are likely to scale back production further in the coming months. Industrial profits reflect this downturn, falling to 4.3 percent year on year in June after a 9.1 percent decline in May. For the first half of 2025, profits decreased by 1.8 percent, highlighting deepening weakness across the manufacturing sector. In an effort to stay afloat, manufacturers in key sectors, such as electric vehicles (EVs), lithium batteries, solar panels, and e-commerce, are locked in intense competition, often sacrificing quality and slashing research and development. This has led to market saturation with substandard goods and stifled innovation. The automotive sector exemplifies the broader collapse. Fueled by state subsidies and local government investment, China ramped up EV production to achieve global dominance, but the result was massive overcapacity. A price war, triggered by Tesla's 2023 cuts, has since devastated industry profits and strained the supply chain. Despite selling 15.65 million vehicles in the first half of 2025, automakers saw profits decrease by 12 percent, with even state-backed firms reporting major losses. Nearly identical EV models now compete almost exclusively on price. This has forced manufacturers to cut corners, downgrade product quality, and slash innovation budgets, which Chinese analysts have dubbed 'involution.' Suppliers face delayed payments and steep discount demands, while 73 percent of dealerships failed to meet sales targets in the first half of the year, according to the China Automobile Dealers Association. The crisis in the auto industry reflects deeper structural flaws that threaten China's entire economic model. As with any market crisis, the CCP's response is more control and regulation, failing to recognize that it was Beijing's interference in what should be free and open markets that caused the crisis in the first place. Central authorities are now enforcing faster supplier payments, a heavy-handed measure that treats a symptom while ignoring the underlying disease. They are also introducing a revised ' unfair competition ' law, a move steeped in irony, given that state subsidies and incentives are what created the overcapacity and triggered the price wars. Additionally, the CCP is pushing for the consolidation of weaker brands, a strategy that will ultimately reduce competition and stifle innovation even further. As with any centrally planned economy, serious questions arise: How will the CCP define a 'weaker brand,' and will companies be forced to merge or shut down even if they refuse? In a true free market, weaker brands can survive for decades with smaller market shares, as long as their owners choose to keep operating. The CCP's push to eliminate struggling companies is yet another attempt to control the economy—an intervention that mirrors the very policies that created China's current crises of debt, overproduction, declining profits, and stalled innovation.
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Why some OpenAI investors are buying shares at a much higher price
OpenAI is raising money at a $300 billion valuation, in a SoftBank-led round that the company announced months ago but which isn't slated to close until year-end. It's also working on a secondary share sale at a $500 billion valuation, as recently reported by Bloomberg and confirmed by Axios. The big question: Why would investors buy shares at the much higher price? The big answer: Allocation issues. By the numbers: The primary round was for a total of $40 billion, of which $30 billion was to come from SoftBank and $10 billion was to come from other investors. A $10 billion first close occurred in June, including $7.5 billion from SoftBank and $2.5 billion from the syndicate. That left the syndicate with $7.5 billion of allocation, which late last month got upsized to $8.3 billion (thus increasing the overall round size to nearly $41 billion). Zoom in: Syndicate investors wanted more than the $8.3 billion they got, according to multiple sources. But the rest has been allocated to SoftBank. That's what's driving demand at the $500 billion mark. Yes, it's at a 40% premium. But if you believe OpenAI is eventually going to join the Mag 7 (or whatever that cohort gets renamed), then it's a bargain. On the sell-side, OpenAI is continuing to offer employee tenders — as it's done fairly consistently. The intrigue: SoftBank can get out of its remaining commitment if OpenAI doesn't complete certain corporate restructuring moves. It's a very unlikely scenario, but there's at least a possibility that there could be new shares available at the $300 billion mark.
