US Senate passes Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill', sending it to the House
Lawmakers passed the bill by a 51-to-50 vote in the Republican controlled-chamber on Tuesday, after Vice President JD Vance broke the tie.
The successful vote ended what was a marathon 27 hours of debate in the upper chamber. Three Republicans joined with Democrats to vote against the bill, which would enshrine many of Trump's signature policies, including his 2017 tax cuts, reductions for social safety net programmes, and increased spending on border enforcement and deportations.
Critics on both sides of the aisle have taken aim at the estimated $3.3 trillion the bill would add to the national debt.
Others have blasted reductions to programmes like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). They argue that the bill takes support away from low-income families to finance tax cuts that will primarily help the wealthy.
Trump, however, has pressed for the bill to be passed by July 4, the country's Independence Day. The legislation — informally known as the One Big Beautiful Bill — now heads back to the House of Representatives for a Wednesday vote on the updated version.
The president found out about the Senate's passage in the midst of a news conference in south Florida, where he was touting his crackdown on immigration.
Despite tight odds in the House of Representatives, Trump struck an optimistic tone about the upcoming vote.
' I think it's going to go very nicely in the House,' Trump said. 'Actually, I think it will be easier in the House than it was in the Senate.'
The president also downplayed one of the most controversial provisions in the bill: cuts to Medicaid, a government health insurance programme for low-income families. About 11.8 million people are anticipated to lose their health coverage in the coming years if the bill becomes law.
'I'm saying it's going to be a very much smaller number than that, and that number will be all waste, fraud and abuse,' Trump said.
Criticisms in the Senate
Trump was not the only Republican to be celebrating the passage of the omnibus bill. In the Senate, leading Republican John Thune touted the bill as a victory for American workers.
'It's been a long road to get to today,' Thune said from the Senate floor. 'Now we're here, permanently extending tax relief for hard-working Americans.'
But not all Republicans were as enthused about the bill. Three party members — Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine — all voted against its passage. And even a critical vote in favour, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, appeared to express regret in the aftermath.
'Do I like this bill? No,' she told a reporter for NBC News. 'I know, that in many parts of the country, there are Americans who are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don't like that.'
She later took to social media to criticise the haste of its passage. 'Let's not kid ourselves. This has been an awful process – a frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline that has tested every limit of this institution.'
Meanwhile, the top Democrat in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, said that Republicans had 'betrayed the American people and covered the Senate in utter shame'.
'In one fell swoop, Republicans passed the biggest tax break for billionaires ever seen, paid for by ripping away healthcare from millions of people,' said Schumer.
Still, Schumer announced one symbolic victory on Tuesday, writing on the social media platform X that Trump's name for the legislation — 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — had been struck from its official title.
Republicans currently hold a trifecta in US government, with control of the Senate, the House of Representatives and the White House, giving Democrats reduced power in legislating.
But the Republicans have narrow majorities in Congress, leading to uncertainty about the bill's fate. In the Senate, they hold 53 of the chamber's 100 seats. In the House, where the bill heads now, they have a majority of 220 representatives to the Democrats' 212.
'Not fiscal responsibility'
The bill is therefore likely to face a razor-thin margin in the House. An early version that passed on May 22 did so with just one Republican vote to spare.
The House Freedom Caucus, a group of hardline conservatives, has continued to baulk at the bill's high price tag and could push for deeper spending cuts in the coming days.
'The Senate's version adds $651 billion to the deficit — and that's before interest costs, which nearly double the total,' the caucus wrote in a statement on Monday.
'That's not fiscal responsibility. It's not what we agreed to.'
Billionaire Elon Musk, whose endorsement and funding helped propel Trump to victory in the 2024 presidential election, has also been a vocal opponent of the bill.
'What's the point of a debt ceiling if we keep raising it?' Musk asked on social media on Tuesday. 'All I'm asking is that we don't bankrupt America.'
Musk has threatened to fund primary challenges against Republicans who support the bill and even floated on Monday launching a new political party in the US.
Trump, however, has brushed aside Musk's criticism as a reaction to the elimination of tax credits for electric vehicles: The billionaire owns one of the most prominent manufacturers, Tesla.
The president also threatened to use the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — which Musk helped to found — to strip the billionaire's companies of their subsidies.
'DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon,' Trump said as he travelled to Florida.
Reporting from Washington, DC, Al Jazeera correspondent Alan Fisher said that public support has been slipping as a clearer picture of the bill has emerged.
'The longer this has been talked about and the more details that become public, the fewer Americans support him,' Fisher said.
Several recent polls have shown a majority of Americans oppose the bill. A survey last week from Quinnipiac University, for example, found just 29 percent of respondents were in favour of the legislation, while 55 percent were against it.
Increase to national debt
All told, the legislation in its current form would make permanent Trump's 2017 cuts to business and personal income taxes, which are set to expire by the end of the year.
It would also give new tax breaks for income earned through tips and overtime, a policy promise Trump made during his 2024 campaign.
At the same time, the bill would provide tens of billions of dollars for Trump's immigration crackdown, including funding to extend barriers and increase technology along the southern border. The bill would also pay for more immigration agents and build the government's capacity to quickly detain and deport people.
Beyond cuts to electric vehicle tax breaks, the bill also guts several of former President Joe Biden's incentives for wind and solar energy.
Faced with criticism about the knock-on effects for low-income families, Republicans have countered that the new restrictions to Medicaid and SNAP — formerly known as food stamps — would help put the programmes on a more sustainable path.
Many Republicans have also rejected the Congressional Budget Office's assessment that the legislation would add $3.3 trillion to the country's already $36.2 trillion debt.
Nonpartisan analysts, meanwhile, have said the increase in debt has the potential to slow economic growth, raise borrowing costs and crowd out other government spending in the years ahead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
27 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Restaurant workers say ‘no tax on tips' undermined by benefits cuts
United States President Donald Trump's big tax and spending bill has faced backlash from both Democrats and fiscal hawks in his own party. But one proposal that has received rare bipartisan support from the start — eliminating taxes on tips. The Senate bill passed on Tuesday, which mirrors the House bill passed last month, would deliver this campaign promise from Trump and had also been proposed by his Democratic opponent, former Vice President Kamala Harris. The House plan lets workers deduct all reported tips from their taxable income, while the Senate version sets limits — $18,500 for individuals or $25,000 for joint filers — and phases it out for higher earners. The tax break would expire at the end of 2028. If this bill passes, filers could deduct some or all of those tips starting in 2026. Economists forecast that cutting tax on tips could increase the federal deficits by $100bn over the next decade. Many restaurant workers continue to earn the federal tipped minimum wage, or subminimum wage, of just $2.13 per hour nationally. It is slightly higher in places like New York at $3.55 per hour. The law assumes that tips will bridge the gap to reach the $7.25 federal minimum wage. A survey cited by the White House and conducted by a fintech firm found that 83 percent of restaurant workers support a no-tax-on-tips policy. Trump's plan has been endorsed by the National Restaurant Association. 'The inclusion of the No Tax on Tips and No Tax on Overtime provisions recognises the value of our dedicated workforce. More than two million tipped servers and bartenders stand to benefit, while the overtime measure rewards the commitment of over 13 million hourly team members across the sector,' Michelle Korsmo, president and CEO of the National Restaurant Association, told Al Jazeera in a statement. The bill at the surface promises to put more money in the pockets of servers, bartenders, and other tipped workers. But it has been criticised by worker-centric advocacy groups and restaurant workers themselves, who caution against embracing it too quickly because it also comes with cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, which workers in the restaurant industry disproportionately rely on. 'That is like one of like the biggest fears I have right now. I rely on SNAP myself. I rely on Medicaid. At one point, I didn't have insurance because of the whole sub-minimum wage, ' Jessica Ordenana, a server at a Chili's Restaurant in Queens, New York told Al Jazeera. According to One Fair Wage, about 66 percent of tipped workers in the US don't earn enough to pay federal income tax, so eliminating tax on tips wouldn't help the majority of restaurant workers. To put this in perspective, a worker earning $2.13 per hour, working 40 hours a week for 52 weeks, would earn just $4,430.40 annually. Employers are legally required to make up the difference if tips don't bring workers to $7.25/hour, totalling $15,078 per year. Federal income taxes must be paid by those who make more than $14,600 annually. Many workers still fall short due to inconsistent schedules and unreliable tipping. Work requirements complications Restaurant tipped workers overwhelmingly rely on services like SNAP and Medicaid, and will now face new work requirements to get them. For instance, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' includes a Medicaid work requirement that obligates able-bodied adults aged 19 to 64 to work at least 80 hours per month to remain eligible. For many restaurant workers, this is simply not feasible. Not because of unwillingness, but because their hours depend on consumer demand. According to Harvard Kennedy School's The Shift Project, which studies workplace trends, one in five service sector workers reported having not as many hours as they would like and saw a 34 percent fluctuation in the number of hours week to week. 'I'm actually having a hard time at Chili's because they went from giving me my full like four or five days a week, to now just one day a week. It really varies week to week,' Ordenana said. 'When I ask for another day on the schedule [the manager] tells me, yeah, yeah sure. And then they don't even put me on the schedule. So last week, I didn't work at all,' Ordenana said. Demand for eating out has started to slump as Americans tighten purse strings in the face of a slowing economy and uncertainty over the impact of Trump's tariffs. Consumer Price Index data showed that spending on eating out was flat for three months from February to April and has started to decline heading into the middle of the year. Consumer spending is projected to drop by 7 percent over the middle of the year, according to KPMG's Consumer Pulse report. As a result, One Fair Wage estimates that 45 percent of restaurant workers currently enrolled in Medicaid could lose their health insurance because of the possible downturn in hours because of slumping demand. 'More tipped restaurant workers would lose their Medicaid than would gain small tax benefits. This is not the right solution,' Saru Jayaraman, founder of the advocacy group One Fair Wage told Al Jazeera. 'Why are these workers on Medicaid to begin with? Because they earn a sub-minimum wage and can't afford to take care of themselves.' SNAP benefits face a similar threat. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think tank, forecasts that the tax bill could lead to as many as 11 million people, including restaurant workers, losing access to critical benefits. The House bill would cut $300bn from SNAP over the next 10 years and the Senate bill would cut $211bn. 'Those cuts have to come out of benefits or eligibility. There is just no way that cuts to administrative costs, to streamline waste, fraud, and abuse, or whatever the talking points are about thinking. Those are benefits to eligible people. To achieve that kind of savings, you have to cut benefits to people. There's no way around it. And that's devastating,' Ed Bolen, director of SNAP State Strategies at Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told Al Jazeera. Nationwide, 18 percent of restaurant workers rely on SNAP benefits, including Ordenana. 'How am I going to eat? How am I gonna survive? How am I going to pay rent? And then on top of that, I might lose benefits? How is this happening in America?' Ordenana asked rhetorically.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Del Monte seeks bankruptcy protection as consumers turn away
Del Monte Foods, the 139-year-old company best known for its canned fruits and vegetables, is filing for bankruptcy protection as consumers in the United States increasingly bypass its products for healthier or cheaper options. Del Monte announced the bankruptcy filing late Tuesday. Del Monte, which also owns the Contadina tomato brand, College Inn and Kitchen Basics broth brands and the Joyba bubble tea brand, has secured $912.5m in debtor-in-possession financing that will allow it to operate normally as the sale progresses. The Walnut Creek, California-based brand has assets and liabilities ranging from $1bn to $10bn, according to a filing in a New Jersey bankruptcy court. 'After a thorough evaluation of all available options, we determined a court-supervised sale process is the most effective way to accelerate our turnaround and create a stronger and enduring Del Monte Foods,' CEO Greg Longstreet said in a statement. The company has seen sales growth of Joyba and broth in the 2024 fiscal year, but not enough to offset weaker sales of Del Monte's signature canned products. 'Consumer preferences have shifted away from preservative-laden canned food in favour of healthier alternatives,' Sarah Foss, global head of legal and restructuring at Debtwire, a financial consultancy, told the news agency The Associated Press. Grocery inflation also caused consumers to seek out cheaper store brands. Last month, the consumer price index report showed a 0.3 percent increase in the price of food and 2.2 percent compared with this time last year. Another blow is expected from US President Donald Trump's 50 percent tariff on imported steel. This went into effect in June and will also push up the price that Del Monte and others pay for cans. Del Monte Foods, which is owned by Singapore's Del Monte Pacific, was also hit with a lawsuit last year by a group of lenders that objected to the company's debt restructuring plan. The case was settled in May with a loan that increased Del Monte's interest expenses by $4m annually, according to a company statement. Del Monte's stock is about even from the market open, and it is up 4.62 percent over the last five days.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Tesla global sales fall amid Musk backlash and pressure on EV market
Tesla has reported another hefty drop in auto sales extending a difficult period amid intensifying electric vehicle competition and backlash over CEO Elon Musk's political activities. On Wednesday, the electric vehicle (EV) maker reported 384,122 deliveries in the second quarter, representing a 13.5 percent decline from this time a year ago. Its earnings report will be released after the market close. Sales were roughly in line with analyst expectations. The global sales figures reflect the more contested nature of the EV market, which Tesla once dominated, but which now also features BYD and other low-cost Chinese companies, as well as legacy Western carmakers like General Motors, Toyota and Volkswagen. However, demand for EVs has slumped amid tariff fears and the looming end of the EV tax credit in the United States. On Wednesday, Volvo also announced that fully electric sales fell by 26 percent in June. Rivian sales also tumbled. The electric carmaker said there was a 22.7 percent drop in sales compared with to this time last year. Musk weighing on sales and the stock Musk's political activism on behalf of right-wing figures has also made the company a target of boycotts and demonstrations, weighing on sales. Musk donated more than $270m to US President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, barnstorming key battleground states for the Republican. But in the last few weeks, he has had a falling out with Trump, driven by the president's wide-ranging tax and spending bill. Musk's objections to the 'Big Beautiful Bill' has escalated tensions between the two. In a social media post, Musk accused bill supporters of backing 'debt slavery'. In response, the president called for the Department of Government Efficiency to look at subsidies for Musk's companies, sending the stock tumbling and it closed down 5.3 percent on Tuesday. A brighter future? But analysts believe that increased production of the Model Y and 3 could show a positive road ahead for the EV-maker, which produced 396,835 cars of the two models in the second quarter — up from 345,454 in the first quarter. 'We believe Tesla is on a path to an accelerated growth path over the coming years with deliveries expected to ramp in the back-half of 2025 following the Model Y refresh cycle,' Dan Ives, analyst at Wedbush Securities, said in a note to Al Jazeera. Musk has acknowledged that his work as head of the Department of Government Efficiency and his embrace of European far-right candidates have hurt the company. But he attributed much of the sales plunge to customers holding off while they waited for new versions of Tesla's best-selling Model Y, and recently predicted a major turnaround in sales. The company is focusing more on robots, self-driving technology and robotaxis ferrying passengers around without anyone behind the wheel its test run of robotaxis in Austin, Texas, seems to have gone smoothly for the most part. But it also has drawn the scrutiny of federal car safety regulators because of a few mishaps, including one case in which a Tesla cab was shown on a widely shared video heading down an opposing lane. On Wednesday, Tesla stock was trending upwards at 11am in New York (15:00 GMT) and was up 4.73 percent for the day, however, it is down 3.02 percent over the last five days.
