
MLK assassination files released: What to know
James Earl Ray, who died in prison in 1998, admitted to the murder after he was captured in London, but conspiracy theories have swirled about the motivation behind the attack and who may have been involved beyond Ray, including the federal government.
Why now?
Trump signed an executive order in January to release of the documents related to MLK's assassination.
While campaigning for a second non-consecutive term last year, the president had promised to release FBI records related to the deaths of high-profile figures in the 1960s, including President John F. Kennedy Jr. (JFK) and former Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK).
The documents related to the Kennedy brothers have also been released, prompting increased speculation about the high-profile assassinations.
The president also signaled he would release the files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but the administration said earlier this month that it had no additional information to provide and has sought a court release of grand jury testimony.
What are the documents?
The previously classified records related to MLK's assassination while he was standing on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis include details about the FBI's probe into the civil rights leader before his death five decades ago.
King was in Tennessee to support sanitation workers who were on strike over low pay, and he had delivered his 'I've been to the mountaintop' speech there the night before.
Then-FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover deemed King a radical and targeted him for investigation with the agency's Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO).
Records have shown that the FBI had wiretaps on King's phone lines, surveilled his hotel rooms and used informants to build information against him while he led the 1960s Civil Rights effort against discrimination.
What do they reveal?
More than 230,000 pages of documents related to King's assassination were published in Monday's release. According to the National Archives, more files will be released as information is reviewed.
The documents unveiled, so far, focus primarily on the FBI's investigation into King's death, such as agency memos and interviews with people who knew Ray, but they also provide insight into the FBI's investigation into King's anti-poverty and anti-war campaign before his death.
Historians who have studied King told The New York Times that the documents provide little new information, though.
How does the King family feel about this?
His family has long questioned the conventional narrative that Ray, who pleaded guilty to the assassination and died in 1998 a Nashville, Tenn., prison at age 70, acted alone in the shooting death of King.
A jury in a 1999 civil trial found that a man, who claimed to have known about a plot to kill King, and unnamed others — including government agencies — had participated in a conspiracy to carry out the killing.
However, the Justice Department reopened the case in the 1990s and said it 'found nothing to disturb the 1969 judicial determination that James Earl Ray murdered Dr. King.'
King's two living children, Martin Luther King III and Bernice A. King, released a joint statement on Monday saying that they disagreed with the Trump administration's release of the documents on their father without appropriate context.
'We recognize that the release of documents concerning the assassination of our father, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., has long been a subject of interest, captivating public curiosity for decades,' the duo wrote. 'We ask those who engage with the release of these files to do so with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family's continuing grief.'
They urged people to view the files 'within their full historical context.'
'During our father's lifetime, he was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign orchestrated by J. Edgar Hoover through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),' the Kings continued. 'The intent of the government's COINTELPRO campaign was not only to monitor, but to discredit, dismantle, and destroy Dr. King's reputation and the broader American Civil Rights Movement.'
'These actions were not only invasions of privacy, but intentional assaults on the truth – undermining the dignity and freedoms of private citizens who fought for justice, designed to neutralize those who dared to challenge the status quo,' they added.
The King family won a wrongful death lawsuit against Shelby County, Tenn., in 1999.
'The jury unanimously concluded that our father was the victim of a conspiracy … including government agencies as a part of a wider scheme,' the King children said in their statement. 'As we review these newly released files, we will assess whether they offer additional insights beyond the findings our family has already accepted.'
The two also noted their support for 'transparency and historical accountability,' but warned against efforts to smear their father's legacy that may come from the release.
'Those who promote the fruit of the FBI's surveillance will unknowingly align themselves with an ongoing campaign to degrade our father and the Civil Rights Movement,' they wrote. 'Let us move forward together, inspired by our father's enduring vision of the Beloved Community – a world made possible when we choose to center love in all that we do.'
They added, 'By embracing compassion, mutual respect, and justice, we can transform his dream into our shared reality.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump, Zelensky see progress with Putin
The news comes after Trump on Truth Social touted a 'highly productive' meeting between Putin and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff. Later in the day, Zelensky said Russia appeared to be more open to a ceasefire agreement. 'Russia now seems to be more inclined toward a ceasefire — the pressure is working. But the key is to ensure they don't deceive anyone in the details — neither us, nor the United States,' Zelensky said during an address. Trump raised the idea of meeting with the two leaders during a call with European allies on Wednesday, a source confirmed to The Hill. It was not immediately clear when or where the meeting might happen, or if it had been agreed to by all parties. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Russia had expressed an interest in meeting with Trump. 'As President Trump said earlier today on TRUTH Social, great progress was made during Special Envoy Witkoff's meeting with President Putin,' Leavitt said in a statement. 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky. President Trump wants this brutal war to end.' The New York Times first reported that Trump was aiming to meet with Putin and Zelensky as soon as next week. Zelensky posted on X earlier Wednesday that he'd spoken with Trump following Witkoff's meetings in Russia. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Wednesday afternoon that Russia and Ukraine still need to move closer on their demands for a peace deal before the meeting with Trump can go ahead. 'If we can get what the Ukrainians will accept and what the Russians will accept close enough, then I think there's the opportunity for the president to have a meeting that includes both Putin and Zelensky to try to close this thing out,' he added. 'So, we've got to get closer in that regard.' The Trump administration is set to impose additional sanctions on Russia later this week, and the White House on Wednesday announced it would double tariffs on India over its continued purchase of Russian oil, which it said was fueling Moscow's war machine


NBC News
5 minutes ago
- NBC News
Congress doesn't want to talk to Alex Acosta, Epstein's 'sweetheart deal' maker
The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Tuesday listed former attorneys general, a former FBI director, former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as people all subject to subpoenas for matters tied to Jeffrey Epstein. However, not named in the news release was Alex Acosta — who was the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida whose secret non-prosecution agreement with Epstein created a spark that has turned into an inferno of controversy nearly 20 years later. Acosta also was President Donald Trump's labor secretary during his first term. Acosta left the role in 2019 after he faced scrutiny over the Epstein plea agreement. Victims of Epstein's sexual abuse are unhappy that Acosta was not among those subpoenaed. 'How can any genuine investigation into the federal government's sweetheart deal with Epstein (including the extraordinary grant of blanket immunity to all his named and unnamed co-conspirators) omit Alex Acosta?' Epstein victim attorney Jack Scarola asked in a statement to NBC News. Brittany Henderson, another Epstein victim attorney, said, 'Anyone familiar with the history of litigation related to Jeffrey Epstein knows from our decade long fight to enforce the Crimes Victims Rights Act that Alex Acosta is an important person to subpoena in any quest for the truth.' Relatives of Virginia Giuffre, one of the survivors of Epstein's abuse, who died by suicide this year, reiterated Wednesday that the victims should be consulted and heard first. Asked by NBC News why Acosta was not subpoenaed, a committee spokesperson said by text message that 'in a voice vote, both Republicans and Democrats on the Federal Law Enforcement Subcommittee in July approved a motion offered by Rep. Scott Perry by unanimous consent directing the Chairman to issue targeted subpoenas to Bill and Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Robert Mueller, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, and Alberto Gonzales. Chairman Comer has now issued the subpoenas.' Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., is the committee's chairman. Public records show that Gonzalez was Acosta's boss at the time the agreement was reached. Records also show it was Acosta who first made the decision to pursue what many legal analysts have called a 'sweetheart deal' to agree not to prosecute Epstein. A Justice Department Office of Professional Responsibility investigation into the Epstein non-prosecution agreement, which led to a 348-page report in November 2020, says it was Acosta who 'made the pivotal decision to resolve the federal investigation of Epstein through a state-based plea and either developed or approved the terms of the initial offer to the defense that set the beginning point for the subsequent negotiations that led to the NPA,' or non-prosecution agreement, according to the report's summary. The report says Acosta's top lieutenants went around the federal prosecutor investigating the case, the FBI and the victims by making an offer for Epstein to plea to state charges. The prosecutor at the time, Marie Villafana, was denied a meeting with Acosta by her immediate supervisors to explain her position and the strength of the case. She expressed her concerns and frustrations in an email to her supervisor at the time, Matt Menschel, about why an indictment was brought and why decisions were being made about a plea deal even after, she says, the U.S. attorney's office reassured her it would not cave in to Epstein's attorneys, the report says.


CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
NYT obtains previously undisclosed images of Epstein's home
The New York Times has obtained previously undisclosed images and descriptions of the interior of Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse.