Opinion: Could the PQ'S byelection win spell the end for Legault?
Despite polls and projections suggesting he was neck and neck with Parti Québécois candidate Alex Boisonneault, the Quebec Conservative leader lost the byelection in the riding of Arthabaska by a bruising 10-point margin Monday evening.
It's quite a setback for Duhaime, who was hoping for a victory that could have given his party crucial momentum, just a year ahead of the next provincial general election. The media exposure his daily presence in Parliament would have brought him — along with the legitimacy of being an elected official — would have certainly helped getting his party's message across to a wider audience. The kind of turning point that can transform a somehow marginal political movement into a genuine alternative in the eyes of many voters.
For a man who has spent years touring the province as the self-proclaimed voice of Quebec's political outsiders, the loss is more than just disappointing — it's a squandered opportunity.
Still, Duhaime seems to remain optimistic about his party's future. In his concession speech, he made it clear that he intends to lead the provincial Conservatives into the next general election. But will members of his party still want of a captain who can't steer the ship into port, even in a riding like Arthabaska where the vast majority of voters support the Conservatives at the federal level?
Sometimes, very local byelections can have a national impact. Think of Geneviève Guilbault's victory when the CAQ caused an upset in Louis-Hébert, wrestling away this traditionally Liberal stronghold following Sam Hamad's departure, just a year before the 2018 election. All of a sudden, it cemented François Legault's image as a serious contender for premier in the minds of many Quebec voters, paving the way for his majority government 12 months later.
The PQ, which has consistently been leading in voting intentions across the province for the past several months, is now perfectly positioned to write its own version of that story. By winning in Arthabaska for the first time in nearly three decades — its third byelection win in a row, and its third victory out of the four by-elections held in the province since 2022 — it is confirming once more its current position as the leading political force in Quebec.
But in politics, a lot can happen in a single year and Paul St-Pierre-Plamondon's fortunes could change at any moment.
Meanwhile, the CAQ suffered a crushing defeat Monday night, finishing fourth. Its candidate, Keven Brasseur, took only seven per cent of the vote, two points behind the Quebec Liberal Party. For a party that has won every single election in this riding since its creation in 2012 — and always with massive majorities — it's a humiliating slap in the face.
The result underscores just how harshly Quebecers are judging François Legault's increasingly weary government. It could as well trigger a general panic within the CAQ ranks as serious questions about the Premier's leadership will — and should — be raised.
Legault still hopes he can turn things around with a major cabinet shuffle, which could take place as soon as within the next few days. But let's face it: it'll take far more than just a little game of musical chairs among ministers to stop the bleeding.
About a year ago on the federal stage, Justin Trudeau's Liberal Party lost two consecutive byelections in two of its most impenetrable strongholds. Six months later, Trudeau was no longer prime minister.
Could Monday's collapse signal the beginning of the end for François Legault? One thing is clear: make sure the popcorn is ready, because this fall promises to be pretty captivating in provincial politics.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
More than 14,000 people voted early in Alberta byelection
OTTAWA – More than 14,000 people cast their ballots early in the Battle River–Crowfoot byelection, Elections Canada says. Elections Canada says an estimated 14,452 voters made their way to the advance polls. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is running in Battle River—Crowfoot after losing his Ottawa-area seat in the April to Liberal Bruce Fanjoy. Damien Kurek resigned his seat in the riding after winning more than 82 per cent support in the April 28 election. Poilievre's former riding of Carleton saw the highest voter turnout during advance polls in the federal election, said preliminary data from Elections Canada, with more than 43,000 people showing up to cast their ballot early. Elections Canada data said that 14,434 people showed up to advance polls in Battle River—Crowfoot during the April election. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025.


CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Are Quebecers done with François Legault and the CAQ?
After the CAQ's byelection loss in Arthabaska, Quebec Premier François Legault is looking for a way to reboot his party. He recognized that Quebecers are disappointed with his government and its handling of several files, including Northvolt and the SAAQclic fiasco.


Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
LILLEY: Conservatives call for end to two-tier immigration justice
Lower court judges are giving out light sentences based on immigration status that the Supreme Court never intended for in 2013 decision. Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox The Superior Court of Justice in Windsor is shown on March 31, 2025. Photo by Dan Janisse / Windsor Star The Conservative Party is proposing a policy that every Canadian should be able to rally around. Stop giving lighter sentences to immigrants who aren't citizens just so they won't be deported or denied citizenship. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account No one has a right to come to Canada and become a citizen; you are granted that privilege and certain things are expected of you, like not breaking our laws. Lately though, we've seen cases were judges have handed out lower sentences to people who had broken serious laws. The entire reason for that was to protect the possibility that convicts could still stay in Canada and be granted citizenship. It's a ridiculous practice that abuses a Supreme Court decision from 2013 and needs to come to an end. Conservative Immigration Critic Michelle Rempel-Garner says her party will seek to do just that when Parliament returns in September. 'Conservatives will introduce legislation to amend the Criminal Code and restore the value of Canadian citizenship by ending the practice of judges considering a non citizen's immigration status in sentencing,' Rempel-Garner said during a Wednesday news conference on Parliament Hill. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. She noted cases that have raised concerns of late, cases that should concern anyone. Recommended video 'A permanent resident received a conditional sentence after being convicted of trying to purchase sexual services from a 15 year old as a stronger penalty would have hindered him and his wife from obtaining Canadian citizenship,' she said. 'Another non-citizen in Canada on a visitor's permit, was convicted twice of groping an 18-year-old woman's genitals at a bar, yet received a discharge to avoid a permanent criminal record and to allow for an appeal of their deportation.' These cases, well documented in the media, are outrageous, she pointed out. 'Anyone seeking residence or citizenship in Canada has responsibilities as well as rights. When it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a form of two-tier justice where judges can and have given lighter sentences to individuals who are non citizens,' she said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The entire practice stems from a 2013 Supreme Court ruling where a man named Hoang Anh Pham was given a two-year sentence in an Alberta court for trafficking in marijuana. Had he been given a sentence of two-years less a day his immigration status would not have been in jeopardy. The Supreme Court ruled that the trial and appeals judge erred by not considering this and noted that two-years less a day for such charges was not outside of the norm. They said factors such as this, what they called collateral consequences, should be considered — but not abused — in sentencing. 'These consequences must not be allowed to dominate the exercise or skew the process either in favour of or against deportation. Moreover, it must not lead to a separate sentencing scheme with a de facto if not a de jure special range of sentencing options where deportation is a risk,' the court ruled at the time. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It seems lower court judges saw that immigration status should be considered in sentencing but glossed over paragraph 16 of the ruling. Read More We can't have two-tiered sentencing in this country based on your citizenship status, that cuts both ways. I'm lucky, I was born here but my parents weren't nor were many family members. Would I be upset if they were facing deportation after being sentenced for a serious crime and not being citizens. Absolutely. However, I'd also understand that we have laws and standards and those must be upheld. The Supreme Court decision in 2013 was rather narrow in scope and quite reasonable. It's now being abused by defence lawyers who want to game the system and accepted by judges who haven't bothered to read the original decision or who don't understand it. If the courts won't fix this, legislation like what Rempel-Garner and the Conservatives are proposing will be needed. We can't have two-tiered justice in this country. Toronto Maple Leafs Editorial Cartoons World Columnists Celebrity