World Bank Data On India And Pakistan Shows Massive Contrast Over Poverty
Latest data released by the World Bank shows the tale of two countries - India and Pakistan - and their journey to battle poverty - a colonial inheritance. The comparison, especially over the last 15 years, shows a stark difference in priorities between the two south Asian neighbours.
While the data for India, released on Saturday, gives a comparative analysis of poverty between 2011-12 and 2022-23, for Pakistan, it highlights the same between 2017-18 and 2020-21. This also comes at a time when India's economy has been in the news last week for surpassing that of Japan's to become the fourth-largest in the world, and Pakistan's was in the news last month for yet another bailout package from the IMF as it struggles to stay afloat.
While India's growth story has been a result of its governance model - of development and poverty alleviation, Pakistan's plight has been a result of its misappropriation of funds and its policy on terror.
WHAT THE DATA REVEALS
Keeping inflation as one of its primary indicators, the World Bank has revised its global income threshold from $2.15 per person, per day to $3 per person, per day to ascertain what percentage of the population lives above the 'extreme poverty' line.
According to World Bank's Poverty and Shared Prosperity report, despite the upward revision of per-person income, between 2012 and 2022, extreme poverty in India declined from 27.1 per cent to 5.3 per cent of the total population.
The report states that in India, 75.24 million people were living in extreme poverty in India during 2022-23, a massive drop from 344.47 million in 2011-12. This means 269 million individuals - more than the entire population of Pakistan - were lifted out of extreme poverty in India in just 11 years.
Sadly, for Pakistan the story is quite the opposite. Extreme poverty figures have risen from 4.9 per cent to 16.5 per cent in less than 5 years between 2017 and 2021. Analysts suggest that the situation could be far worse because of Pakistan's outdated Household Income and Expenditure Survey. To add to this, the overall poverty headcount in Pakistan - at $4.2 per person, per day - has risen from 39.8 per cent of the total population in 2017 to more than 44.7 per cent in 2021.
Meanwhile, Pakistan's economy has been completely dependent on loans from global institutions and friendly countries. It has taken 25 bailout packages from the IMF with a cumulative amount of $44.57 billion, and another $38.8 billion in loans from the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Islamic Development Bank. Besides this, loans from China stand at more than $25 billion and $7.8 billion from lenders like Eurobonds and Sukuks. Saudi Arabia, UAE, and the Paris Club have also extended several billion in loans to cash-strapped Islamabad.
'FUNDING AND SUPPORTING TERROR'
However, Pakistan has been far from transparent in its allocation of funds. It has been pulled up several times by international financial institutions over Islamabad's lack of accountability. Islamabad and Rawalpindi's obsession with India and its age-old habit to compare with New Delhi has seen Pakistan spending most of its funds allocated to the country's infamous army, which in turn, has a policy of "bleeding India with a thousand cuts" with its asymmetric warfare against India by funding, setting up terror infrastructure, and supporting terrorists and terror outfits who carry out "cross-border terror".
Speaking to NDTV, former High Commissioner of India to Pakistan, Ajay Bisaria, said, "The world cannot fix the Pakistan problem unless the structural problem of Pakistan army's overwhelming presence in politics and economy is fixed. Pakistan's army controls the allocation of resources. So, all the funds that are sent either via bilateral donors or multilateral donors ends up being misused by the army and in building the terror machinery. All donors will do well to get a wake-up call from the data which shows that only the Pakistani army is getting enriched by its bailouts."
"The world will do well to put strong FATF-like conditions to monitor the aid money that goes to Pakistan to ensure funds are used for development and the benefit of the people of Pakistan," he added.
Another diplomat, former Ambassador Ashok Sajjanhar, told NDTV that "The Pakistani government's priorities focus mainly on defence purchases on one end, and building a terror apparatus on the other end. Growth and development are phrases that are unheard of in Pakistani politics, as all governments have an unhealthy obsession with bringing India down, economically, politically and socially, rather than focusing on its own pressing domestic issues."
"But dismantling terror factories are not on Pakistan's agenda since most continue to indulge in falsehoods. When Congressman Brad Sherman told Pakistan to end terror, he also spoke on behalf of millions of Pakistanis who see their development funds being funneled away towards terror and towards fulfilling the inflated egos of Pakistani generals," he added.
An economist, Piyush Doshi, co-founder of the Foundation for Economic Development said, "Pakistan spending money in defence, particularly when it comes at the cost of very important development expenditure, is illogical. The world will be doing the people of Pakistan a favour by blacklisting the country, which will then force them to make rational choices and using funds to benefit its citizens."
The latest World Bank data tells a story - a tale of two neighbours - one surging ahead and the other collapsing. Both are setting an example for the Global South - of how to be and how not to be. The message is clear: Poverty is not destiny, it is policy, leadership and will.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Good politician, bad statesman — what Muhammad Yunus' one year in power reveals
Not only has Yunus deftly navigated the choppy waters of Bangladeshi politics, he has even turned foes into friends. Plunged into chaos after Hasina's hasty exit on 5 August 2024, Bangladesh, though, is in desperate need of a statesman. In the one year since Yunus took over as the caretaker to the interim government of Bangladesh on 8 August 2024, the accidental politician has proved himself a consummate one. Detractors who had claimed he won't last three months are now worried if he will even vacate his chair. If Sheikh Hasina had her way, Muhammad Yunus would have been dunked into the Padma River by now. Not once but twice. But it has been a year since the ousted Bangladeshi prime minister hasn't had her way. In that time, not only has Yunus avoided a plunge into the Padma, but also dashed Hasina's dreams of returning to Bangladesh, all while sitting pretty in the chair she was forced to vacate. Turning the tables There has been no love lost between Sheikh Hasina and Muhammad Yunus, much before the latter replaced the former as Bangladesh's premier last year. On 18 May 2022, Hasina had allegedly said, 'He (Yunus) stopped funding for a project like the Padma Bridge because of one managing director post. He should be given two dunks in the Padma River, but lifted up so he doesn't die. Then maybe he will learn a lesson.' Hasina had said this while blaming Nobel Peace Prize winner, economist Dr Muhammad Yunus, for blocking the World Bank's funding of the Padma bridge project. That's not all. As recently as 1 January 2024, a court in Bangladesh had sentenced the Nobel laureate to six months in jail for violating Bangladesh's labour laws. Yunus' supporters said the case was politically motivated. The acclaimed economist and three colleagues from Grameen Telecom—one of the firms Yunus founded—were found guilty of failing to create a welfare fund for their workers. 'I call for the Bangladeshi people to speak in one voice against injustice and in favour of democracy and human rights for each and every one of our citizens,' Yunus had said. Within the next seven months, the people of Bangladesh came out on the streets in large numbers, spoke in one voice, and ousted Hasina. Yunus became the new leader of Bangladesh. And it was Hasina's turn to face the law. On 15 September 2024, a case was filed against Hasina, accusing her of issuing death threats to both Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) chairperson Begum Khaleda Zia and Yunus. According to the case statement, the plaintiff referred to remarks made by Sheikh Hasina during an event on 18 May 2022, where she spoke about dunking Yunus in the Padma River. That, along with over 200 cases, a six-month sentence in a contempt case, and three arrest warrants, including one for alleged crimes against humanity during last year's student-led protests, shows how the tables have turned. But let us pretend that all this is just comeuppance for authoritarian Hasina and that the legal system is completely free and fair under Yunus. And turn to his politics. He was expected to bring democracy back to Bangladesh after the rule of 'fascist Hasina', where the ruling political class did not differentiate between citizens, stabilised law and order in the country after the violent July-August uprising against Hasina and did not turn against political opponents like Hasina did. The interim government under Yunus has had a dismal record on all these counts, even as the man himself has solidified his position in Bangladesh politics. One of the main reasons for the discontent against Hasina was the stolen elections that had brought her back to power. I had covered the last national elections in Bangladesh, held on 7 January 2024, and saw how Awami League fought Awami League and won. The country's largest opposition political party at that time, BNP, and the largest Islamist party, the Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh, were both kept out of the electoral fray. Yunus had one job. As the chief of an unelected government, he was tasked with holding a free and fair national election at the earliest. Instead, Yunus has been postponing election dates by insisting on reforms. This has frustrated most political parties in Bangladesh, including BNP, with its acting chairperson, Tarique Rahman, accusing the interim government of deliberately stalling the electoral process. Yunus has now announced February 2026 as the probable date for the next national election. But many are not convinced. London-based Bangladeshi investigative journalist Sushanta Dasgupta told me he would believe in the news of the next elections in Bangladesh when they actually happen. 'Yunus wants to stick to power. He may very well invent a new crisis to stall the elections. With the Awami League kept out of the electoral fray, this anyway, would be a sham election,' Dasgupta said. However, one of Yunus' harshest critics within Bangladesh, Army chief Waker-uz-Zaman, who had asked for elections by December 2025, seems to have come around. His army is now guarding leaders of Yunus' favoured political party, the National Citizen Party, from political violence. The other big charge against Hasina, which now applies to Yunus as well, was going after political opponents and dissenters. In the run-up to the 7 January 2024 elections, the Hasina administration was blamed for attacking, killing, and jailing political opponents. Yunus' administration is on the same path. It is one thing to go after Hasina for her 'crimes', quite another to ban the students' wing of her party, Bangladesh Chhatra League, and then ban her party, Awami League, from all political activities under the Anti-Terrorism Act. In a previous column for ThePrint, I had written how the Yunus administration is imitating Hasina by going after political dissenters by, rather chillingly, calling it 'Operation Devil Hunt'. Home affairs adviser Lieutenant General Jahangir Alam Chowdhury (Retd) has even said that the said operation will focus on detaining individuals who threaten the nation's stability and will continue 'until all the devils are brought to justice'. Yunus' record in stabilising the law-and-order situation in Bangladesh and protecting minorities has also been dismal. In a report titled, 'Gotham but No Batman', Al Jazeera reported how muggings, assaults, and rapes have spiked in the Bangladesh capital under the interim government. It has left the youth who risked their lives for change to ask: 'What was it all for? As far as Yunus' role in protecting the rights of minorities is concerned, even the global press has been writing about the attacks on Hindus and other religious minorities. Political vendetta, worsening law and order situation, attacks on minorities and political dissenters, and delayed poll date. What gives? Also read: Bangladesh army chief seems to be cosying upto Yunus. Did 5 people have to die for it? Good politician, bad statesman That Yunus has aced the game, that is, Bangladesh politics, can be understood by his free pass to Islamists. While the West sees him as a liberal voice, Yunus has freed Islamic fundamentalists of all shades ever since he came to power. Any good politician can read their constituency, and Yunus has understood that beneath the thin crust of a tolerant, pluralistic, mostly urban liberal elite circle, Bangladesh has, over the year,s turned Islamic. And what better way to address that large mass of people than to cater to the fundamentalists and release them from jail? The other thing that Yunus has read right is the anti-India sentiment in Bangladesh. Soon after Hasina came back to power in Bangladesh, the 'India Out' campaign began with a call for a ban on all Indian goods from the Bangladesh market. Yunus has catered to that sentiment in Bangladesh society by even challenging the territorial integrity of India by talking about the 'Chicken's neck' corridor, the link between India's mainland and its seven northeastern states, and inviting China to take part in a river conservation project. Cosying up to China while fanning India hate in Bangladesh—it takes a good politician to kill proverbial two birds with one stone. Even as the world complained against the attacks on minorities, Yunus fended off those charges by claiming they were 'exaggerated propaganda'. He insisted the attacks were political in nature and not communal. Geostrategist Brahma Chellaney writes that the situation has gotten so bad that even the pro-regime BNP, the Awami League's arch-rival for long, has decried the erosion of basic freedoms. The party has called out the 'madness that erupted in the name of religion,' and the 'terrifying violence' on the streets. 'A collapsing economy will only exacerbate these problems. GDP growth has tumbled, foreign debt has ballooned, and inflation has soared to a 12-year high. With investor confidence plummeting, the stock market has fallen to its lowest level in almost five years. Job losses and declining living standards create fertile ground for continued radicalisation and social unrest,' Chellaney writes. He said that Bangladesh once embodied the promise of secular democracy in a Muslim-majority country, but now it risks slipping into the kind of military-sanctioned dysfunction that has long plagued Pakistan. It would take a statesman to bring Bangladesh back from this abyss. In his one year in power, Yunus has proved he isn't one. Deep Halder is an author and journalist. He tweets @deepscribble. Views are personal. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
Economic Times
8 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump's 50% tariffs: India should step on the accelerator with its own reforms
Synopsis The article critiques Western hypocrisy regarding India's relationship with Russia, contrasting it with historical European dependence on Russian resources. It highlights perceived double standards in dealing with Pakistan and suggests India is being unfairly penalized for the failure of US-Russia relations. The piece advocates for India to focus on its own reforms and maintain self-belief amidst geopolitical challenges. Three years of Indian oil imports from Russia are supposed to have funded Russia's war effort, but not the 60 years of European imports prior to that. India is supposed to be the reason why Putin is not climbing down. Even Indians are not aware of the sway they hold over the world's mightiest powers. It is the same West which, while being intolerant of Russia, wants India to be magnanimous and understanding of Pakistan. There are limits to hypocrisy and limits to credibility. This is not the India of 1947 when our eyes were half shut. The real story of the Ukraine war is in fact the awakening of the Global South to western double standards. If the US and its western allies expect India to join them in sanctioning Russia, India has the right to ask them to do the same with China when it threatens India. The US-led West makes matters worse when it awards Pakistan with an IMF tranche exactly on the day when India is engaged in defending itself against Pakistan's terror assault. At the very least, the Indian prime minister was not hosting President Putin for lunch at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg, when his army walked into Ukraine. The imposition of a 50% tariff on India, with perhaps more to follow, half being on the grounds of helping Russia, is a case study of making enemies out of friends. Since no one is eternal, and no crisis is permanent, this too shall pass, but the signalling and damage done might outlast both. The causes behind the guillotine have less to do with hard facts and geopolitical logic and more to do with personal egos. The only silver lining in such a situation is that such outbursts tend to be reversible and amenable to correction. No one in India advocates a return to the frosty Indo-US relationship of the Cold War era, and this too is a guarantee for weathering this storm. India was buying Russian oil even in February 2025. This was the month when President Trump sent his personal billionaire confidant Steve Witkoff to meet President Putin in Moscow, Vice President Vance admonished European allies at the Munich Security Conference who were already on the edge over fears that the US is set to a deal directly with Russia bypassing them, personal emissaries of Presidents Trump and Putin met face to face for the first time in Riyadh, and President Zelenskyy was given a public dressing down in the Oval Office. In that month, Trump repeatedly blamed the Biden administration for allowing the Ukraine war to take place. One set of Trump's Cabinet officials spoke of the unimaginable economic opportunities that could open up for American companies in Russia if relations return to normal. Another set explained the Trump strategy as being the reverse Nixonian moment, a move to give Russia space to rebalance its relations between China and the West. India made it known that it had a huge stake in the success of these efforts. Today, India has been made the collateral damage for the failure of these efforts. Given the opacity surrounding these efforts, no one really knows the true story, but a breakthrough can by no means be ruled out. In either eventuality, the world will look a different place. India can take satisfaction from the fact that it is in distinguished company of other US friends and allies in helping make America great again. Meanwhile, as many Indian economists have noted, we should step on the accelerator with our own reforms and addressing our challenges. A bit of spine and self-belief in the great task ahead we are embarked upon will do no harm. We are accused of punching above our weight in any case. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's 50% tariffs: India should step on the accelerator with its own reforms
Three years of Indian oil imports from Russia are supposed to have funded Russia's war effort, but not the 60 years of European imports prior to that. India is supposed to be the reason why Putin is not climbing down. Even Indians are not aware of the sway they hold over the world's mightiest powers. It is the same West which, while being intolerant of Russia, wants India to be magnanimous and understanding of Pakistan. There are limits to hypocrisy and limits to credibility. This is not the India of 1947 when our eyes were half shut. The real story of the Ukraine war is in fact the awakening of the Global South to western double standards. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program If the US and its western allies expect India to join them in sanctioning Russia, India has the right to ask them to do the same with China when it threatens India. The US-led West makes matters worse when it awards Pakistan with an IMF tranche exactly on the day when India is engaged in defending itself against Pakistan's terror assault. At the very least, the Indian prime minister was not hosting President Putin for lunch at 7, Lok Kalyan Marg, when his army walked into Ukraine. The imposition of a 50% tariff on India, with perhaps more to follow, half being on the grounds of helping Russia, is a case study of making enemies out of friends. Since no one is eternal, and no crisis is permanent, this too shall pass, but the signalling and damage done might outlast both. The causes behind the guillotine have less to do with hard facts and geopolitical logic and more to do with personal egos. The only silver lining in such a situation is that such outbursts tend to be reversible and amenable to correction. No one in India advocates a return to the frosty Indo-US relationship of the Cold War era, and this too is a guarantee for weathering this storm. Live Events India was buying Russian oil even in February 2025. This was the month when President Trump sent his personal billionaire confidant Steve Witkoff to meet President Putin in Moscow, Vice President Vance admonished European allies at the Munich Security Conference who were already on the edge over fears that the US is set to a deal directly with Russia bypassing them, personal emissaries of Presidents Trump and Putin met face to face for the first time in Riyadh, and President Zelenskyy was given a public dressing down in the Oval Office. In that month, Trump repeatedly blamed the Biden administration for allowing the Ukraine war to take place. One set of Trump's Cabinet officials spoke of the unimaginable economic opportunities that could open up for American companies in Russia if relations return to normal. Another set explained the Trump strategy as being the reverse Nixonian moment, a move to give Russia space to rebalance its relations between China and the West. India made it known that it had a huge stake in the success of these efforts. Today, India has been made the collateral damage for the failure of these efforts. Given the opacity surrounding these efforts, no one really knows the true story, but a breakthrough can by no means be ruled out. In either eventuality, the world will look a different place. India can take satisfaction from the fact that it is in distinguished company of other US friends and allies in helping make America great again. Meanwhile, as many Indian economists have noted, we should step on the accelerator with our own reforms and addressing our challenges. A bit of spine and self-belief in the great task ahead we are embarked upon will do no harm. We are accused of punching above our weight in any case.
