
2006 Mumbai train blasts: Bombay HC acquits all 12 accused, sets aside their death penalty and life terms
The special bench of Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam C Chandak questioned the trustworthiness of certain prosecution witnesses and the Test Identification Parade (TIP) of some of the accused. The bench ordered their release, if they are not required to be detained in any other case, and directed all of them to execute personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each.
Finding substance in the case of defence lawyers, the bench observed that the prosecution 'utterly failed to establish the offences beyond a reasonable doubt against the accused on each count.'
The bench led by Justice Kilor held, 'It is unsafe to reach the satisfaction that the appellant accused have committed the offence for which they have been convicted and sentenced. Therefore, the accused judgment and order of conviction and sentence are liable to be quashed and set aside'
There were 13 accused, of whom one was acquitted by the special court under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA). Of the 12, five were sentenced to death, one of whom died in prison during the pandemic, and seven were awarded a life term.
The special bench passed the judgement over five months after it concluded the hearing on January 31. The Bombay High Court had conducted hearings over the span of six months from July last year.
Mumbai train bombings and the case
A series of bombs exploded on seven western suburban coaches, killing 189 commuters and injuring 824 on July 11, 2006. After an over eight-year trial, the special court under the MCOCA awarded the death penalty to five of the convicts, and life terms to seven others in September 2015.
The death sentences were awarded on charges of spreading terror, organised crime, criminal conspiracy and murder under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), Explosives Substances Act, 1908, MC OCA, Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Railways Act, 1989.
The convicts are lodged at various prisons across the state, including Yerawada and Amravati central jails, for over 18 years. They filed the pleas after they were convicted by the special court, and the matter had been pending since then.
There were 250 witnesses, including 92 prosecution witnesses, and the evidence in the case spanned over 169 volumes, and the judgments of death sentences of nearly 2,000 pages.
Five convicts awarded the death penalty are Kamal Ahmed Mohd Vakil Ansari from Bihar, Mohammad Faisal Ataur Rahman Shaikh from Mumbai, Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique from Thane, Naveed Hussain Khan from Secunderabad, and Asif Khan Bashir Khan from Jalgaon in Maharashtra. All of them were found guilty of planting the bombs.
Tanveer Ahmed Mohammed Ibrahim Ansari, Mohammed Majid Mohammed Shafi, Shaikh Mohammed Ali Alam Shaikh, Mohammed Sajid Margub Ansari, Muzammil Ataur Rahman Shaikh, Suhail Mehmood Shaikh, and Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Shaikh were awarded life terms. One of the accused, Wahid Shaikh, was acquitted by the trial court after spending nine years in jail.
Maharashtra Govt vs defence
In 2015, the Maharashtra Government approached the Bombay High Court with pleas seeking confirmation of the death penalty granted to five convicts in the 2006 Mumbai train bombings. On the other hand, the convicts filed appeals challenging the special court order.
As the convicts sought speedy disposal of the matter, which had been pending since 2015, the HC in July 2024 constituted a special bench led by Justice Kilor, which conducted regular hearings through more than 75 sittings over the span of six months.
Senior lawyer S Muralidhar (former Delhi HC judge), Senior Advocates Nitya Ramakrishnan and S Nagamuthu, along with Advocates Yug Mohit Chaudhry and Payoshi Roy, represented the convicts, whereas Senior Advocate Raja Thakare, appointed as special public prosecutor (SPP), appeared for the Maharashtra Government.
The lawyers representing the convicts argued that their 'extra-judicial confessional statements' obtained by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) through 'torture' were inadmissible under the law.
They also argued the convicts were falsely implicated, innocent, and were languishing in jail for 18 years without substantial evidence, and their prime years were gone in incarceration. They said the trial court erred in convicting them, and, therefore, the said order set aside.
On its part, the Maharashtra Government opposed the appeals by the convicts, claiming the probe agency provided sufficient evidence to establish it was a 'rarest of the rare' case to sentence the accused to the death penalty.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
2008 Malegaon blast case: Who is Pragya Thakur? Firebrand sadhvi once 'tortured' in ATS custody, now stands acquitted
1 2 NEW DELHI: Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit on Thursday welcomed their acquittal by a special court in Mumbai in the 2008 Malegaon blast case , in which six people were killed and over 100 injured. Calling the verdict a victory for the saffron order, Thakur said: 'Aaj bhagwa ki vijay hui hai, nyay ki jeet hui hai (today Bhagwa has won, justice has won). Jisne bhi bhagwa ko badnaam kiya bhagwaan use saza dega (whoever insulted bhagwa, God will punish them).' 'This case was not just fought by me but by Bhagwa. Mera pura jeewan kalankit kar diya tha (my whole life had been disgraced),' she added. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai Thakur, who was arrested in October 2008 and spent over eight years in jail, said her life was 'ruined' because of the case. 'I was able to survive only because I am a sanyasi,' she told the court. She also said her acquittal was not just a personal win, 'but a win for every 'bhagwa' (saffron).' The 2008 blast and investigation On 29 September 2008, a low-intensity bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded near a mosque in Malegaon, a communally sensitive town about 200km from Mumbai, killing six people and injuring 101. Thakur was initially arrested by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), which claimed the motorbike used in the blast was registered in her name. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo The prosecution had also alleged she attended a meeting in Bhopal where revenge for the 2006 Malegaon blasts was discussed and that she offered manpower for the attack. Investigations pointed to a wider conspiracy involving members of the Abhinav Bharat organisation, which prosecutors said aimed to avenge attacks on Hindus and establish a 'Central Hindu Government (Aryawart)'. The case was transferred to the National Investigation Agency ( NIA ) in 2011. In 2015, special public prosecutor Rohini Salian alleged the NIA had asked her to 'go soft' on the accused. The NIA later filed a supplementary chargesheet in 2016, giving a clean chit to Thakur and accusing the ATS of planting RDX traces to frame Purohit. Despite this, in December 2017, the special court ruled that seven accused would stand trial under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) were dropped. A trial spanning over a decade The trial formally began on December 3, 2018 and included testimony from 323 prosecution witnesses — 37 of whom turned hostile. The case saw dramatic courtroom moments, including an instance in 2019 when Thakur, then a sitting MP, complained about the "dusty" courtroom and the "dirty and small" chair. Final statements of the accused were recorded in 2024, followed by the examination of eight defence witnesses. Political career and controversy Thakur, a self-described sanyasi (hermit), was released on bail by the Bombay high court in April 2017. In 2019, she contested and won the Bhopal Lok Sabha seat on a BJP ticket, defeating senior Congress leader Digvijaya Singh. However, she was not fielded in the 2024 elections. Thakur has maintained that her arrest was politically motivated and aimed at pushing the narrative of 'saffron terror' — ad term she attributes to former Union minister P Chidambaram. 'I was falsely implicated in the case to endorse the bogey of saffron terrorism,' she has said. After her candidature was announced in 2019, she said she was inexperienced in politics but determined to 'bring honour to saffron', which she claimed was maligned by opposition parties. Thakur also told reporters that she had taken sanyas (renunciation) two years before the 2008 blast.


India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Woman caught with 400 kg hydroponic ganja worth Rs 40 crore at Hyderabad airport
The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) has seized 400 kilograms of hydroponic ganja from the luggage of a woman passenger at the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport in Hyderabad. The contraband is estimated to be worth Rs 40 crore, according to an official release issued by the NCB on on specific intelligence inputs, NCB officials intercepted the woman at the airport and discovered the substance concealed in her two check-in bags. Initial investigation revealed that the woman had procured the hydroponic ganja in Bangkok and returned to India via Dubai in an apparent attempt to avoid NCB noted that there have been several previous instances where hydroponic ganja was recovered from passengers arriving directly from Bangkok at various Indian airports. By choosing a route through Dubai, the woman may have hoped to evade detection. Further investigation is underway to trace the woman's connections both in Thailand and in India, the NCB IS HYDROPONIC GANJA OR HYDRO GANJA?Hydroponic ganja refers to cannabis plants grown without soil. This method gives growers precise control over the plant's environment, which can result in quicker growth and higher yields. Hydroponics is a method of cultivation without soil, where plants are grown in a nutrient-rich water solution, often supported by an inert medium such as coco coir, perlite, clay pellets, or rockwool.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Hyderabad


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
2008 Malegaon blast case: Court says no reliable proof to warrant conviction; here's why all 7 accused were let off
NEW DELHI: A special NIA court on Thursday acquitted former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, lieutenant colonel Prasad Purohit, and five others in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case. The court cited lack of evidence and procedural lapses in invoking the UAPA, the Arms Act, and other charges in the 17-year-old blast case, which had claimed six lives. 'I have been saying this since the beginning. I was summoned, and I went to the ATS because I respect the law. I was detained illegally for 13 days and tortured. I was living my life as a sanyaasi and was labelled a terrorist. My life was destroyed by the allegations. The case has been going on for 17 years, and I have struggled. Ye bhagwa ki Vijay hui hai. Hindutva ki Vijay hui hai. (This is the victory of saffron. This is the victory of Hindutva)' . Pragya Singh Thakur said after the verdict Why were the accused acquitted? The court stated that it cannot convict anyone merely on perception and moral evidence; there must be cogent evidence. "Mere suspicion cannot take the place of real proof. No religion teaches violence…Terrorrism has no religion, but the court cannot convict on mere perception and moral, there has to be cogent evidence," the court said. The court ruled that the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) could not be applied as the sanction for prosecution was not obtained as per legal requirements. 'The UAPA will not be invoked in this case as the sanction was not taken as per rules. Both the sanction orders under the UAPA are defective,' the court observed. The court said the investigating agency failed to prove that the motorcycle used in the blast belonged to Pragya Thakur. It also observed that Thakur had renounced material possessions and become a sanyaasi two years before the blast. While delivering the verdict, the court noted that although the prosecution established that a blast occurred in Malegaon, it could not prove that the bomb was planted in the motorcycle recovered from the scene. The crime scene was not properly barricaded, leading to contamination, the court added. It also noted discrepancies in the number of victims, and said that 'the injured were not 101 but 95, and there was manipulation in some medical certificates.' On the alleged role of Abhinav Bharat, the court said there was no material evidence to support the prosecution's claims. 'Abhinav Bharat was used as a common reference by the prosecution. There is no evidence that its funds were used for terror activities,' the court said. The court ordered the government to compensate each of the families of the six people killed with Rs 2 lakh, and Rs 50,000 each to the injured. What we know about the 17-year-old case On September 29, 2008, six people were killed and several others injured when a bomb allegedly strapped to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon city, Nashik, during Ramzan and on the eve of Navratri. The ATS alleged that the motorcycle belonged to Thakur, and that Purohit brought RDX from Jammu and Kashmir and stored it in his home. The investigation, led initially by the Maharashtra ATS under the late Hemant Karkare, led to the arrest of Thakur and Purohit in late 2008. The ATS, for the first time, alleged the involvement of "saffron extremists" and linked the accused to a larger conspiracy, also naming them in connection with other blast cases. Investigations into the Abhinav Bharat organisation suggested a network of meetings and alleged plans to avenge perceived atrocities against Hindus and create a "Central Hindu Government" (Aryavart). The case was transferred to the NIA in 2011. In 2015, special public prosecutor Rohini Salian claimed she was instructed by the NIA to 'go soft' on the accused, resulting in a change in the prosecution team. In May 2016, the NIA filed a supplementary chargesheet alleging that the ATS had planted RDX traces to frame Purohit. The agency also gave a clean chit to Thakur and others, citing lack of evidence. Despite the NIA's findings, the special court proceeded with charges against seven accused under UAPA, though it dropped charges under MCOCA.