UN video shows shots fired at Palestinians waiting for aid
The shots are fired into the ground in front of a crowd of people, who begin rushing towards the UN vehicles as they draw near.
' Israeli forces were firing warning shots just inches away from a crowd waiting for a UN convoy with food supplies,' the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha) said.
It said the shooting took place on Wednesday near the Karam Abu Salem border crossing from Israel into southern Gaza.
In the video, a male voice says: "No, no, don't do this, don't do this" as people swarm towards the vehicles, despite the shots fired seconds earlier. "Check your door's locked, check your door's locked, safety lock as well," another male voice says.
Ocha spokesperson Olga Cherevko said the UN team faced "several constraints" when they went to pick up food supplies from the border crossing.
"One of the constraints that we faced was waiting about 2.5 hours at an Israeli forces checkpoint, which by the time we were allowed to pass, we were met on the road by tens of thousands of hungry and desperate people who directly offloaded everything from the backs of our lorries."
Israel also did not give the UN enough time to secure the aid on the lorries, Ms Cherevko said, making it easier for the packages to fall off.
The UN footage was released amid growing international anger over Israel's restrictions on the delivery of aid as it presses a military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, despite extreme levels of hunger in the Palestinian enclave and the rising number of deaths among people trying to receive food.
The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said on Friday that at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed while seeking food.
It said 859 deaths occurred near aid sites run by the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), and 514 along the routes of food convoys. "Most of these killings were committed by the Israeli military," it added.
Twelve more people died while trying to collect aid on Saturday morning, the Palestinian news agency Wafa reported, as well as 10 others killed in Israeli attacks across the enclave.
Gaza health authorities have also been reporting more and more people dying from hunger-related causes. The total stands at 147, among them 88 children, most of whom died in the past few weeks.
Israel said it is taking steps to increase aid access and last Sunday announced humanitarian pauses in its war against Hamas to allow the delivery of relief supplies. However, aid agencies say they are not receiving enough permissions from the Israeli military for the entry of aid.
US President Donald Trump 's special envoy Steve Witkoff and Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Gaza on Friday in what the White House said was a preparation to draw up a new plan to deliver aid to the territory.
Mr Trump has repeatedly expressed concern over the levels of starvation in Gaza.
"We want to help people. We want to help them live. We want to get people fed. It is something that should have happened long time ago," he told the Axios news website on Friday.
Ms Cherevko said access to aid had to be expanded so that more food was entering on a regular basis and "communities have the confidence that supplies are coming and that they will be receiving them and that they will be distributed properly".
Israel has denied pursuing a policy of starvation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Over 500 ready to risk arrest to protest Palestine Action ban on Saturday
Over 500 people are set to participate in a protest against the UK government's ban on the direct action group Palestine Action, putting to the test a pledge by the Metropolitan Police to arrest anyone showing support for the proscribed organisation. Campaign group Defend Our Juries (DOJ) is organising the protest on Saturday in Parliament Square to demand the reversal of the group's proscription, saying that the protest would only go ahead if at least 500 people committed to joining. As of Monday evening, the group said that as many as 1,000 people had signed up, confirming on Tuesday that it would go ahead. The protest will involve participants holding cardboard signs reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' DOJ has called similar protests over the last month since the government moved to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation on 4 July, making it a criminal offence to be a member of or show support for the group. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Falling foul of the law proscribing the group is punishable by a sentence of up to 14 years in prison. The proscription followed an incident in which members broke into RAF Brize Norton and spray-painted two planes they said were 'used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East". Since then, over 200 people have been arrested - including priests, vicars and former magistrates - after they were deemed by police officers to have expressed support for the group. On Thursday, three people who participated in a protest calling for Palestine Action's ban to be lifted in Westminster on 5 July were charged with showing support for a terrorist organisation. Leading global academics denounce UK's Palestine Action ban Read More » DOJ said the protests have 'changed the meaning' of an arrest under the Terrorism Act and that it is considered a 'badge of honour' within the movement. But the numbers expected at Saturday's protest are unprecedented, with DOJ warning that Met police chief Mark Rowley faces a 'dilemma' after pledging to arrest all participants. DOJ highlighted that the mass arrests could place strain on a prison system already 'on the brink of collapse' and remains at 97.5 percent capacity, according to an independent review this week. 'Is Mark Rowley really going to spend his political capital and credibility as well as significant public resources on arresting more grandparents and NHS workers under the Terrorism Act in front of the world's press?' a DOJ spokesperson said. Police resources will be further strained by simultaneous protests by far-right groups targeting hotels housing asylum seekers in London. However, a source with knowledge of the police's planning for Saturday's protest told The Guardian: 'If they think that by turning up with significant numbers that we can't arrest them for breaking terrorism laws, they need to think again. 'They will be arrested. However, we have to do it, they will be arrested for breaking terrorism laws.' At previous protests that led to mass arrests, the Met has arrested people on the spot and immediately released them on bail after confirming their identities and home addresses. A 'slippery authoritarian slope' On Thursday, an open Zoom call organised by DOJ for members of the public wanting to participate in Saturday's protest was shut down minutes before it was due to start, following a police order. DOJ reported that an email from the Zoom Trust and Safety Team explained: "Zoom has received a request from the Metropolitan Police Service, Counter Terrorism Internet Referral Unit, London UK seeking to restrict access to users to a meeting scheduled by your account." The group said they managed to reschedule a meeting within half an hour, which hundreds attended. "These attacks on the right to protest just show how [Home Secretary] Yvette Cooper's conflation of direct action with terrorism would put us on a dangerously slippery authoritarian slope, if it is allowed to stand," a DOJ spokesperson said. UK ban on Palestine Action at odds with international law, says UN rights chief Read More » "Trying to shut down our campaign has had precisely the opposite effect, confirming the power of collective action and our cardboard signs. There's never been a more important time for people wanting to protect our freedoms to take a stand". Saturday's protest comes amid mounting pressure on the UK government to lift the controversial ban amid concerns that it could be used to stifle criticism of Israel and the right to protest. Last month, UN human rights chief Volker Turk said that the ban was 'disproportionate and unnecessary' and called for the designation to be rescinded. He said: "UK domestic counter-terrorism legislation defines terrorist acts broadly to include 'serious damage to property'. "But, according to international standards, terrorist acts should be confined to criminal acts intended to cause death or serious injury or to the taking of hostages, for purpose of intimidating a population or to compel a government to take a certain action or not. 'It misuses the gravity and impact of terrorism to expand it beyond those clear boundaries, to encompass further conduct that is already criminal under the law.' Meanwhile, on Thursday, Amnesty International warned that the mass arrests could break international law, with Amnesty UK Chief Executive Sacha Deshmukh saying: 'Arresting people on terrorism offences for peacefully holding a placard flies in the face of international human rights law. "At a time when people are quite rightly outraged by the genocide they see being perpetrated in Gaza, it is more crucial than ever that there is space to peacefully express that outrage.' Also on Thursday, scores of leading global academics, including Judith Butler, Tariq Ali, Angela Davis, Naomi Klein, Rashid Khalidi, Avi Shlaim and Ilan Pappe, signed an open letter denouncing Palestine Action's proscription as an "attack on fundamental freedoms". On 30 July, a High Court judge ruled in favour of Palestine Action and granted the direct action group a judicial review to oppose the ban on the group. Ahead of the planned protest on Saturday, DOJ wrote to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, urging her to surrender herself 'to your nearest police station for violating the Genocide Act 1969'. In a letter to Rowley, the group wrote: 'Your disproportionate and embarrassing actions do not serve the British public. They are gross violations of our democratic rights and freedoms. We will refer them to the High Court.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump to host Azerbaijan-Armenia peace summit and sign economic agreements
US President Donald Trump will meet the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan in Washington on Friday for a peace summit aimed at ending decades of conflict and reopening key transport routes in the region. The two countries in the South Caucasus region will sign an agreement that will create a major transit corridor, to be named the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity, the White House said. That route will connect mainland Azerbaijan and its autonomous Nakhchivan region – a demand from Baku that had held up peace talks between the two nations. 'The road map they are agreeing to will build a co-operative future that benefits both countries, their region of the South Caucasus and beyond,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said. The transit corridor will 'allow unimpeded connectivity between the two countries while respecting Armenia's sovereignty and territorial integrity and its people'. Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan are separated by a 32km patch of Armenian territory. In addition, both Armenia and Azerbaijan will sign deals with the US meant to bolster co-operation in energy, technology and the economy, the White House said. 'These two Nations have been at War for many years, resulting in the deaths of thousands of people,' Mr Trump said on his Truth Social platform on Thursday. 'Many Leaders have tried to end the War, with no success, until now, thanks to 'TRUMP.'' He added that the economic agreements with the US will 'fully unlock the potential of the South Caucasus Region'. Mr Trump will meet the leaders separately, and then all three will participate in a signing ceremony. The war between Azerbaijan and Armenia was over Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory disputed since the Soviet era. The two nations battled for control of the region through violent clashes that left tens of thousands dead over nearly four decades, while international mediation efforts failed. It ended in 2023 after Baku reclaimed the territory, long recognised as belonging to Azerbaijan but which was held by Armenia for decades. The two countries have since been working to normalise relations. Armenia and Azerbaijan held peace talks in Abu Dhabi in July, during which both sides agreed to continue bilateral negotiations and 'confidence-building measures'. President Sheikh Mohamed said the decision to hold the talks in the UAE emphasised that the country is trusted as a supporter of peace and diplomatic solutions, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. Mr Trump has positioned himself as a peacemaker and has claimed to have ended five conflicts so far. He has expressed his desire several times to win a Nobel Peace Prize. The Armenia-Azerbaijan deal comes as a political blow to Russia, as the two countries fall within its sphere of influence and Moscow had attempted for decades to bring the conflict to a close. It also comes as the US attempts to broker a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. Bloomberg reported on Friday that Washington and Moscow were aiming to reach a deal to halt the war that would lock in Russia's occupation of territory seized during its military invasion.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
UK hosts top Polisario official after backing Morocco's Western Sahara plan
A Sahrawi delegation led by the Polisario Front's top diplomat met British Middle East and North Africa Minister Hamish Falconer in London this week amid increasing international efforts to address the Western Sahara conflict. Falconer invited Mohamed Yeslem Beisat following a joint communique issued by the UK and Morocco on 1 June, which threw Britain's support behind the Moroccan autonomy plan for the territory as the basis for resolving the conflict. Beisat is the foreign minister of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), a Polisario-dominated administration that rules five refugee camps in Algeria and 20 percent of Western Sahara. The SADR is recognised by more than 40 states - though not by Britain - and is a member of the African Union. Beisat is the most senior Polisario official to have been invited for official meetings by the British government. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Western Sahara is designated by the United Nations as a non-self-governing territory. Eighty percent of the desert region is controlled by Morocco, which views it as sovereign territory. The rest is held by the Polisario Front, an Algerian-backed armed Sahrawi liberation movement that has fought for Western Sahara's independence since it was ruled by colonial Spain, which exited in 1975. Since a 1991 ceasefire, the conflict between Morocco and Polisario has remained largely frozen, as plans to hold a referendum on independence were never realised. In the meantime, Morocco has cemented its presence in the region, lobbied states to recognise its sovereignty there and presented a new plan in 2007 to settle the conflict by offering Western Sahara a degree of autonomy. Morocco's claim of sovereignty has not been accepted by the UN, though it was recognised by Washington in 2020 in a deal that saw the kingdom establish open ties with Israel. French President Emmanuel Macron followed suit last year, saying the autonomy plan was the 'only basis' for a fair and lasting settlement. Since then, Spain, Britain and Portugal have also backed the autonomy plan, though they described it as the most 'serious' or 'credible' solution and refrained from recognising Moroccan sovereignty there. Beisat told Middle East Eye that the UK's joint communique with Morocco was contradictory. 'It is very important for us that they reflected the principle of self-determination in the communique. The disappointment was that they praised the Moroccan autonomy plan, which is contrary to the principle of self-determination,' he said. 'The Moroccan proposal is 17 years old. I don't know how someone can take from the fridge a rotten product and try to sell it as a very fresh, healthy product.' Beisat said he told Falconer on Tuesday that the Polisario Front is very open to working with the UK to find a settlement 'based on international legality' and that the British minister affirmed that 'self-determination is a very important principle for the United Kingdom'. The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office declined to comment on the meeting on the record. Riccardo Fabiani of the International Crisis Group, a conflict-resolution organisation, told MEE there is 'strong momentum' behind the autonomy plan following France's change of position and Donald Trump's re-election. 'Morocco is capitalising on this by pushing all the partners it can to adopt more favourable language on the plan,' he said. 'Direction of travel matters more than the words themselves, as long as foreign governments adopt increasingly supportive language on the plan.' Fabiani described the UK's involvement as an 'interesting case', noting that the British position 'started from a relatively low base [neutrality] and could afford the luxury of adopting favourable language without going too far - for example, recognising Moroccan sovereignty'. This has left Britain as the most 'balanced or equidistant' permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, supporting Morocco while continuing to talk about self-determination and the UN. 'So, the conditions are there for the UK to play a constructive role,' Fabiani said. 'Not many other countries still have access to all parties - surely not France - and the UK can also be a go-between and a facilitator to lay the groundwork for the UN envoy to try and resume negotiations.'
