
Hegseth Wins Praise But Asia Still Has Strong Doubts About Trump
After US military allies in Europe were torched by Vice President JD Vance in March over military spending, free speech and the war in Ukraine, America's partners in Asia warily awaited Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's arrival at a security conference in Singapore.
Turns out there was little reason to worry, apart from the perpetual anxiety over President Donald Trump's social media feed.
While Hegseth delivered Trump's demands for higher security spending on par with Europe, he couched it as necessary to prepare for a potentially 'imminent' Chinese invasion of Taiwan. The US wouldn't be pushed out the region, he said, nor let allies and partners 'be subordinated and intimidated' — a commitment lauded by many in attendance.
But in the hallways of the Shangri-La Hotel, Hegseth couldn't dispel concerns about the erratic policymaking of his boss. Many of the generals, defense ministers and intelligence officers from Asia and Europe — who are key to helping the US counter China — were still reeling from the shock of Trump's sectoral levies and 'reciprocal' tariffs.
Hegseth 'offered a needed level of reassurance to allies and partners that the United States will remain present in the Indo-Pacific and committed to countering China's coercive threats,' said Rory Medcalf, head of the National Security College at the Australian National University. 'But this message will remain discounted by the dysfunction we are seeing in Washington.'
On his second trip to Asia since March, the Pentagon chief displayed some diplomatic nuance that surprised some officials who expected more grandstanding from the former television personality. Hegseth was also able to capitalize on a huge absence at the annual gathering: China didn't send a defense minister for the first time since 2019, putting Beijing's lower-level officials on the back foot.
That void gave US officials space to set the tone and work the room, vowing greater cooperation with countries like Cambodia, Thailand and Indonesia. And it gave America's traditional partners even more room to criticize Beijing, despite their dependence on trade with China.
Yet even if Hegseth was more reassuring than Vance, it still wasn't enough to overcome the uncertainty created by Trump's trade policies. That's particularly the case in Southeast Asia, which was among the hardest hit by Trump's tariffs in April.
'Trade is not a soft power indulgence — it is part of our strategic architecture,' Malaysia Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said, referring to Southeast Asia. 'It must be protected, not from competition but from the onslaught of arbitrary imposition of trade restrictions.'
Trump's barrage of tariffs and general volatility — he announced a doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs over the weekend — was the subject of much of the chatter on the sidelines of the annual conference, according to several officials who asked not to be identified, citing private discussions.
The officials said they were unsure whether the US president would stand by their side in a moment of need and that any deal reached with him could unravel moments later in a social media post.
That uncertainty appeared to be pushing Indo-Pacific nations and Europe toward each other in a stronger sense of shared security and free-trade opportunities based on longstanding global rules. It also sparked pushback against what several nations saw as efforts to establish 'spheres of influence' where the US or China can dominate.
'Our shared responsibility is to ensure with others that our countries are not collateral victims of the imbalances linked to the choices made by the superpowers,' French President Emmanuel Macron said at the conference's opening on Friday.
Macron's words about 'strategic autonomy' and his call for Europe and Asia to join forces to 'de-risk' supply chains struck a chord with many attendees. Several countries in the region are already having similar debates in their own capitals, some of the officials said.
Many governments in the region rely on China economically and on the US for security, and are keen to not antagonize either. However, there's also a desire to be more autonomous and less dependent on either of the world's two-biggest economies, opening up new space for middle powers in Europe and Asia to join hands.
Kaja Kallas, the European Union's top diplomat, made that pitch to Asian nations throughout the weekend.
'If you reject unilateralism, bullying and aggression, and instead choose cooperation, shared prosperity and common security, the European Union will always be by your side,' she said.
Amid the US-China turbulence, smaller nations sought to build ties. Japan's defense minister, Gen Nakatani, touted efforts to build closer relations with India and the Philippines. Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene said on Sunday that her country was working with partners in the region to counter Russian and Chinese cyber threats, as well as Beijing's dominance of drone manufacturing and ship building.
Even one of America's closest partners in the region, Australia, signaled some independence from its ally.
Hegseth's outreach to the region 'is deeply welcome,' Australia's Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said. But he quickly added that 'liberal trade has been the lifeblood of the Asian region, and the shock and disruption to trade from high tariffs has been costly and destabilizing.'
During his remarks, Hegseth was pressed on the trade concerns and whether there was a contradiction in the Trump administration's message. He sidestepped the question with a smile, saying he was 'in the business of tanks, not trade.'
Last year, China's delegation surprised observers by repeatedly calling unscheduled press briefings. This year they surprised delegates by barely appearing at all. When they did engage, China's representatives pushed back at Hegseth's accusation that Beijing was destabilizing Asia and sparred with other speakers more broadly.
The Pentagon chief aimed to 'provoke, divide, instigate confrontations, stir up the region,' said Rear Admiral Hu Gangfeng, vice president of China's National Defense University. Another official, Senior Colonel Lu Yin, decried the atmosphere at the forum, saying that 'labeling China, blaming China, verbally attacking China are politically right here.'
In one of the sharpest exchanges of the weekend, Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro had a testy exchange with two senior colonels in the People's Liberation Army, receiving applause after he thanked them for 'propaganda spiels disguised as questions.' Referring to China, Teodoro said he couldn't trust a country that 'represses its own people.'
Yet although China's presence was diminished, most countries still wanted to balance ties between Beijing and Washington.
'If we have to choose sides, may we choose the side of principles,' Singapore Defense Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Sunday at the final panel of the weekend. 'Principles that uphold a global order, where we do not descend into the law of the jungle, where the mighty do what they wish and the weak suffer what they must.'
With assistance from Alastair Gale, Courtney McBride and Alfred Cang.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Harvard seeks to unfreeze $2.5 billion funding in court filing, says national security, public health research in peril
Harvard University, which is at the loggerheads with the US President Donald Trump's administration, has asked a federal judge to issue a summary judgement to unfreeze the $2.5 billion funding blocked by the federal government which the varsity said was an illegal decision. The filing by Harvard University in the US District Court in Boston stated that since the university rejected a list of demands by the White House, the Trump administration had issued 957 orders since April 14 to freeze funding for research pertaining to national security threats, cancer and infectious diseases, Reuters reported. President Trump has previously said that he is trying to force change at Harvard and other US colleges, specially the Ivy league, as he views that these educational institutes have been captured by leftist 'woke' thought and become bastions of antisemitism. On the plea by Harvard University for summary judgements, US District Judge Allison Burroughs set arguments for July 21. The university had sued the Trump administration in April after a funding freeze was announced, as the school alleged the funding freeze violated its right to free speech and was arbitrary in nature. In the filing, Harvard's lawyers wrote 'The directive to freeze and terminate every dollar of Harvard's research funds came directly from the White House, which dictated the form that such terminations would take and set arbitrary deadlines for particular terminations.' Harvard University, in the recent filing, detailed that the funds terminated by federal government includes $88 million for pediatric HIV research, $12 million for increasing Defense Department awareness of emerging biological threats and $8 million to better understand dark energy. The university added that a funding cut would destroy the ongoing research in infectious disease, Parkinson's and cancer treatment. Last month, in another setback to Harvard, the Trump administration revoked the university's ability to enroll international students which was blocked by a US judge after the varsity sued the government in a separate lawsuit.


India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Amid Tariff Turbulence, US Prez Trump Likely To Hold Talks With Chinese Counterpart Xi, Says White House
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to hold talks this week, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Speaking to reporters, Leavitt confirmed that a readout of the call would be provided if the two leaders proceed with the discussion. This development comes after White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett expressed expectations for a conversation between Trump and Xi earlier on Sunday. According to the ANI report, during an appearance on ABC News' "This Week," Hassett mentioned the anticipation of talks between the two leaders, although without specifying a date. Leavitt further clarified, "I can confirm that the two leaders will likely talk this week. And as always, when foreign leaders call, we will provide a readout of those calls." Hassett made the remarks during an appearance on ABC News' "This Week" on Sunday. However, he did not mention the specific date when the two leaders would hold talks. The development comes after Trump accused China of breaching a deal negotiated between officials of the two nations in Geneva last month to roll back high tariffs for 90 days. However, China rejected Trump's allegations on Monday and accused the US of provoking "new economic and trade frictions." On May 30, Trump accused China of violating a recent trade agreement with the US. However, he did not mention China's action that violated its agreement with China. In a post shared on Truth Social, he stated, "Two weeks ago, China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace, which is, by far, the number one in the World. We went, in effect, COLD TURKEY with China, and it was devastating for them. Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, 'civil unrest.' I saw what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us." "I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn't want to see that happen. Because of this deal, everything quickly stabilized and China got back to business as usual. Everybody was happy! That is the good news!!! The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY," he added. Earlier in May, the US announced a trade deal with China in Geneva. US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said that there was substantial progress between the parties. "I'm happy to report that we made substantial progress between the United States and China in the very important trade talks. First, I want to thank our Swiss host. The Swiss government has been very kind in providing us this wonderful venue, and I think that led to a great deal of productivity we've seen. We will be giving details tomorrow, but I can tell you that the talks were productive," the White House quoted Bessent as saying. "We had the vice premier, two vice ministers, who were integrally involved, Ambassador Jamieson, and myself. And I spoke to President Trump, as did Ambassador Jamieson, last night, and he is fully informed of what is going on. So, there will be a complete briefing tomorrow morning," he added. US Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer said that the parties came to a conclusion very quickly. "This was, as the Secretary pointed out, a very constructive two days. It's important to understand how quickly we were able to come to an agreement, which reflects that perhaps the differences were not so large as maybe thought," he said. Greer hoped that the deal would help the US deal with a trade deficit of USD 1.2 trillion. "That being said, there was a lot of groundwork that went into these two days. Just remember why we're here in the first place -- the United States has a massive USD1.2 trillion trade deficit, so the President declared a national emergency and imposed tariffs, and we're confident that the deal we struck with our Chinese partners will help us to work toward resolving that national emergency," the statement read.


Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Gold Extends Robust Gains as Trade Worries Spur Flight to Safety
(Bloomberg) -- Gold edged higher following its biggest daily jump in four weeks on a weaker dollar and stronger demand for havens due to trade and geopolitical risks. Bullion was near $3,390 an ounce after surging 2.8% on Monday as relations between Washington and Beijing deteriorated and the Russia-Ukraine war intensified. China accused the US of violating their recent trade deal and vowed to take measures to defend its interests, even as the White House later confirmed that the nation's leaders are likely to speak this week. Meanwhile, the European Union issued a fresh warning of countermeasures if President Donald Trump follows through on his tariff threats. With few signs of negotiation breakthroughs on the horizon, the latest developments have scuppered optimism that the US was progressing toward making a deal with the two biggest American trading partners. The greenback fell to its lowest since 2023, reflecting growing concerns over Trump's policies and their impacts on the economy. All of that is underscoring gold's haven appeal, which has ebbed since it hit a record high above $3,500 an ounce in April. The precious metal is still up more than a quarter so far this year though, with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. saying last week it would remain a hedge against inflation in long-term portfolios, along with oil. Spot gold rose 0.2% to $3,389.61 an ounce as of 7:23 a.m. in Singapore. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index steadied, following a 0.6% loss on Monday. Silver was flat, after hitting the highest since October. Platinum edged up, and palladium was little changed. Looking ahead, there are a slew of US labor-market indicators due this week — including the May employment report — which will help to steer the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. Lower rates are typically positive for non-interest-bearing bullion. More stories like this are available on