FENZ complaints system neither independent, nor fair: Union
The Professional Fire Fighters Union says Fire and Emergency's complaints system is neither independent, nor fair. FENZ has apologised unreservedly to a former volunteer firefighter for failing to properly investigate a series of complaints, which began nearly a decade ago. A scathing 111 page independent report by Simon Mount KC, issued yesterday, details a list of 33 failings by FENZ in handling her initial complaint and several after that. These include failure to comply with its own processes, conflicts of interest, and unreasonable delays, and a failure to learn from at least two previous, highly critical external reviews. FENZ Chief Executive & National Commander Kerry Gregory says significant changes to how complaints are managed have been made including introducing an independent service that specialises in conflict resolution and complaint management. He says the complaints service puts people at the heart of the investigation and is robust and transparent. But the Professional Firefighters Union, which represents more than two thousand paid firefighters, disagrees. Union Secretary Wattie Watson joins Susie.
To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following:
See terms of use.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
25 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Explainer: Samoa Citizenship Bill and the pension
Forum chairman Teleiai Edwin Puni. Photo: RNZ / Jesse Chiang Some elderly Samoans have finally regained New Zealand citizenship after waiting decades, following a bill revoking an old law passing through New Zealand's parliament. But for many, there's still no pension in sight. In October 2024, New Zealand passed the Citizenship (Western Samoa) Restoration Amendment Act , restoring a pathway to citizenship to Samoans born between 13 May 1924 and 1 January 1949. Many had theirs stripped under the Citizenship Act 1982. Pacific leadership forum chair Teleiai Edwin Puni said the long delay has already seen people miss out. "The restoration of the Samoan cohort of those entitled to be New Zealand citizens took 42 years, and many have passed away," he said. "That is the hardest part of this exercise - is that many have passed who were denied their right to be New Zealand citizens. "We have a small number of those who are still alive, and now another hurdle is ahead of them. Coming to New Zealand not knowing what to apply for, what they're entitled to is also another barrier for them to get what they are entitled to." Members of New Zealand's Samoan Community, including those now eligible for citizenship came to Parliament to watch the bill pass its third reading. Photo: VNP/Louis Collins He said the ASA Foundation has now stepped in to help. But gaining citizenship doesn't mean immediate access to New Zealand superannuation. "The current policy with the pension, you've got to be in New Zealand for 10 years," Teleiai said. "The Samoan people that have just been granted [citizenship] - they were denied 42 years, but now they have to wait for another 10 years. 50 years - I don't think anyone would still be alive so that itself is a real concern. "We are hoping that the government of the day will consider looking at that special case. Teleiai said some of those entitled tocitizenship are still in Samoa and no longer able to travel to New Zealand where they can be entitled to the benefit. "So it means those in Samoa granted New Zealand citizenship for what? For nothing." Green Party MP Teanau Tuiono speaks during the First Reading of his Member's Bill, the Restoring Citizenship Removed By Citizenship (Western Samoa) Act 1982 Bill, 10 April 2024. Photo: Johnny Blades Emma King, from the Ministry of Social Development, confirmed that citizenship in itself doesn't mean someone is eligible for superannuation. "Applicants also need to meet certain residency requirements." These include: King said if an NZ citizen doesn't meet the pension requirements, they may still be eligible for other support. However, a main benefit (such as jobseeker support, sole parent support and supported living payment) also has residency rules. "Clients are generally expected to be oridnarily resident when they first apply for a benefit and have been living in New Zealand continuously for two years or more since becoming a New Zealand citizen or permanent resident." Citizens or residents that have not been in NZ for two years may be eligible for an emergency benefit, where they must be ineligible for another benefit and in hardship, as well as ordinarily resident. She said people who are denied support can challenge decisions. "If they disagree with our decision, they can apply for a review." Even if they can't access superannuation, anyone aged 65 or older can apply for a supergold card, which offers transport concessions and discounts. The advocacy on this issue continues. Former New Zealand MP Anae Arthur Anae is campaigning on wider criteria . "I'm still battling on two things, and that is the recognition of the woman married to these people or the men as well," Anae said. "I still believe in my heart that New Zealand owes these people 50 percent of their pension if they stay in Samoa, where they want to stay, and have the freedom to travel backwards and forward as they want. "And these are two issues that I will continue to fight with them, because I believe in it and they're things that are right and should be done."

RNZ News
25 minutes ago
- RNZ News
ACT leader claims bots behind submissions on Regulatory Standards Bill
technology politics 30 minutes ago ACT Party Leader David Seymour has claimed that 99.5 percent of the submissions received on the Regulatory Standards Bill were "fake" and created using "bots". In-Depth Journalist Ella Stewart reports.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Analysis: New Zealand First gets bump in support after keeping mum on pay equity debate
The latest RNZ-Reid Research poll was conducted between 23 May - the day after the Budget - and Friday 30 May. Photo: RNZ Analysis : New Zealand First has achieved what its coalition partners couldn't in the latest RNZ-Reid Research poll - a bump in support following a Budget that was largely paid for by significant changes to the country's pay equity scheme. Our latest poll, conducted between 23 May - the day after the Budget - and Friday 30 May is a bad read for National with the party down in its polling, the coalition unable to govern if an election was held today, Christopher Luxon behind Labour's Chris Hipkins as preferred prime minister, and more people thinking the country is headed in the wrong direction than the right. It's not good news for coalition partner ACT either, its drop in polling released just days after leader David Seymour was sworn in as deputy prime minister, taking over the mantle from New Zealand First leader Winston Peters. The RNZ-Reid Research poll comes just a day after a 1News-Verian poll showing National, ACT and Labour had dropped in support while the Greens, New Zealand First and Te Pāti Māori were up. On those numbers the coalition would still be in a position to govern if an election was held today. With the exception of Labour, which is down in support in the 1News poll, the trends are fairly similar for the other parties and the numbers are within both polls' margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent. Both polls interviewed just over 1000 eligible voters and covered a similar polling period. The backdrop to both was a Budget that delivered very little for middle-income New Zealanders. While health and education investment was up, much of it would be needed to simply keep the lights on. The targeted investment was focussed on business owners, while meaningful increases in an ongoing cost of living crisis, like KiwiSaver government contributions, were cut in half and, in some cases, BestStart payments for children were canned altogether. There were small targeted increases for low-income families, yet pay equity claims that overwhelmingly benefit poorly paid women were set back potentially years. It was Seymour who declared ACT had saved the Budget by finding $12.8 billion in cuts with its changes to the pay equity regime, and it was National's Nicola Willis and Luxon who bore the brunt of the decision to rush the overhaul through under urgency and not consult with the public. On that score the poll reveals just a quarter of respondents - 25.5 percent - support the government's pay equity changes , while 68 percent of respondents think the government should have consulted New Zealanders first. New Zealand First barely featured in the pay equity debate in recent weeks and successfully avoided saying anything much on the issue, other than it was a collective Cabinet decision that it supported, the onus being on the word collective - a Cabinet manual requirement. As for the Budget, it was Willis who led the charge and, given many of ACT and New Zealand First's coalition committments have already been ticked off in the past 18 months, any disgruntlement with the piecemeal approach to it lie at the feet of National. But Luxon says he isn't focussed on the polls, going as far as to tell RNZ he "doesn't recognise the numbers". He says the response he's heard to the Budget has been nothing but positive, and given his time again on pay equity he wouldn't change anything. Peters noted the world is in "unprecedented times" and he believes his party is doing a good job remembering the fundamentals New Zealanders care about - that is, increasing wages and decreasing taxes. He wouldn't comment on whether his party had deliberately stayed out of the pay equity fray, instead saying he was concentrating on talking direct to voters and being a politician who actually listens. As for Seymour, he told RNZ different things motivate different voters and while it's possible pay equity fed into some people's minds when it came to polls he was of the view that "doing what's right is politically popular in the long term, and even if I'm wrong good policy is worth it". A bigger issue for all three parties in this poll is the issue of whether voters think the country, under the coalition, is headed in the wrong or right direction. In March, the RNZ-Reid Research poll showed more respondents believing the country was headed in the right direction (43.5 percent) than the wrong direction (40.6 percent). The post-Budget numbers - 37.8 percent right direction versus 46.5 percent wrong direction - won't sit well with the coalition. Luxon told RNZ voters understand it has been a difficult time and he senses they know the corner is being turned and "there's a sense of optimism". The poll, however, doesn't back that sentiment up. Explore the full results with RNZ's interactive charts . This poll of 1008 people was conducted by Reid Research, using quota sampling and weighting to ensure representative cross section by age, gender and geography. The poll was conducted through online interviews between 23-30 May 2025 and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent at a 95 percent confidence level. The report is availabe here . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.