The 1-Year Anniversary Of The Attempted Trump Assassination
citizens.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Legal Analyst: Ghislaine Maxwell likely sees ‘quid pro quo' with Trump's DOJ
The Department of Justice says it's reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's ex-girlfriend who is now in prison. Legal analyst Temidayo Aganga-Williams says Maxwell likely sees a "quid pro quo" situation.
CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
Stockton's Republic Services customers demand credit for weeks of missed pickups
The Republic Services strike officially ended on Friday and while some trash may be gone, another issue is piling up. "I got an email, 'Oh, we took $144 out of your account,'" Republic Services Customer Glen Pitts said. "I go, 'Wait a minute, three weeks, and no service, and you billed me anyway?'" Pitts is just one of the hundreds of Republic Services customers in the city of Stockton. He was shocked to see he still got charged for service that never came. "It was piling up. I had no more room for more trash. It was going to start going in bags piled in the street like everybody else," he explained. He went to Facebook, posted about his recent bill, and the comments started flooding in. "I called the company, and I said, 'What's with this? This is insult to injury,'" Pitts continued. "They said, 'Well, that's all. The billing is all set up before the strike went on.' I say, 'You can't turn it off?'" He's not alone in his concerns and frustration. "We pay for our house and this house," Republic Services Customer Renee Grafius shared. "That's about what it is and they charge us full price. It's already been paid." Grafius was also charged nearly $200 for the utility. As of Tuesday afternoon, her trash was still sitting on the sidewalk. "Garbage is just piling up," she continued. "It's going to become a health hazard pretty soon. It is what it is, but it needs to be picked up." Now, neighbors like them are demanding for a credit or some sort of compensation. The city and mayor of Stockton are also pushing for answers. During the strike, Mayor Christina Fugazi sent a strong statement to the company, saying, "Guess what Republic Services? You need to give your customers a credit and if this doesn't get settled, you won't have a contract with the city of Stockton anymore." CBS Sacramento reached out to Republic Services multiple times to find out if a credit is being considered. The company eventually sent a statement saying, "Right now, we are focused on resuming regular service and will address non-service-related concerns once that work is complete." In the meantime, customers are hoping for a solution and soon. "You've upset the people," Pitts said. "You've upset Stockton." The city of Stockton said they have been clear with Republic Services on giving customers a credit, but mentioned they have not received any promises of the company doing so.
Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
EPA drafts rule to strike down landmark climate finding
The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to rescind a landmark 2009 legal opinion that greenhouse gas emissions put human health at risk, which underpins many of the government's actions to combat climate change, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the decision was not yet public. The 'endangerment finding,' which determined that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare, provides the legal justification for regulating them under the Clean Air Act. In March, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said the agency would reconsider the finding, among dozens of potential environmental rollbacks announced on what he called 'the most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' Zeldin has previously said he aims to strike a balance between economic concerns and protecting the environment. 'After 16 years, EPA will formally reconsider the Endangerment Finding,' Zeldin said in a statement at the time. 'The Trump Administration will not sacrifice national prosperity, energy security, and the freedom of our people for an agenda that throttles our industries, our mobility, and our consumer choice while benefiting adversaries overseas.' A decision to completely rescind the endangerment finding is still a draft proposal and could be subject to change, according to the two individuals. The draft would also eliminate all resulting limits on motor vehicle greenhouse gas emissions, according to one of them, with the second person describing this outcome as likely. A government website lists the title of a document under review with the Office of Management and Budget called 'Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding and Motor Vehicle Reconsideration Rule,' but it gives no details on the proposal, which still must be released for public comment before it is finalized. David Doniger, a senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group, said the proposed repeal of the endangerment finding is not justified under the law. 'They're trying to completely defang the Clean Air Act by saying, 'Well, this stuff's just not dangerous,'' Doniger said. 'That claim is just mind-bogglingly contrary to the evidence.' Thomas Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, a conservative think tank, said he fully supports the administration's efforts to review the endangerment finding, saying that Congress never mandated the EPA to take action on the issue and that the agency instead relied on a single ambiguous Supreme Court case. 'It's long since past the time for an administration to review this,' Pyle said. 'Ultimately Congress should have a say when it's all said and done.' The draft rule largely avoids making scientific arguments about climate change and instead focuses on making legal arguments saying that the agency does not have the basis to act on climate change under a certain section of the Clean Air Act, the two people familiar with the matter said. Zeldin's EPA has said that the Biden administration did not properly consider all the policy implications. The finding has allowed for seven regulations on vehicle emissions with a cost of more than $1 trillion, according to the EPA. Richard Revesz, a law professor at New York University and former Biden administration official, said that repealing the endangerment finding is unlikely to hold up in court but that the move will still affect U.S. climate policy until a final judicial decision is made. 'If the endangerment finding fell, it would call into question essentially all or almost all of EPA's regulation of greenhouse gases,' Revesz said. The endangerment finding was written in response to a 2007 Supreme Court decision saying that greenhouse gases are an air pollutant, essentially requiring the EPA to regulate them, according to legal experts. The endangerment finding had been updated and expanded since 2009, effectively serving as the government's understanding of the latest climate science, said Joseph Goffman, who headed the EPA's air office under President Joe Biden. 'Withdrawing the endangerment finding is in effect a repudiation of scientific reality,' Goffman said. Doniger and other people familiar with the matter said that the Trump administration official Jeffrey Clark, acting administrator in the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, is the primary architect of the proposed repeal of the endangerment finding. 'Since 2009, I've consistently argued that the endangerment finding required a consideration of downstream costs imposed on both mobile sources like cars and stationary sources like factories,' Clark said in the March statement released by the EPA. 'Under the enlightened leadership of President Trump and Administrator Zeldin, the time for fresh thought has finally arrived.' As a career attorney in the Justice Department during the George W. Bush administration, Clark worked on the case that eventually resulted in the 2007 Supreme Court decision that prompted the EPA to write the endangerment finding. 'He's trying to get revenge,' Doniger said.
