'Perfect' dress that 'doesn't crease' and 'packs well for holidays'
Cue the ABBA soundtrack because our fashion experts have found the perfect summer dress that's seemingly strolled straight off the set of Mamma Mia. For anyone still on the hunt for a light and airy addition to their summer wardrobe - be it for a holiday or at home - this one hailed 'perfect for hot summer days' could be just the ticket.
FatFace's Noelle dress is the epitome of boho, summer styling - think soft, sea-inspired hues and billowy fabrics. It offers a laid-back, sun-soaked vibe reminiscent of the Greek island wardrobes of Donna and Sophie - aka Meryl Streep and Amanda Seyfried - in the much-loved musical.
The dress boasts a stunning blue and white print inspired by the ocean, making it the perfect choice for beach holidays. With a flattering V-neckline, subtle ruching at the bust, and an empire waist, it's designed to be comfortable and airy while still offering shape.
To style it, team it with leather sandals and a raffia tote for day trips or add chunky gold jewellery and espadrilles for evening meals. For a relaxed festival-ready look, throw on an oversized denim jacket and white trainers, reports the Manchester Evening News.
Of course, there are plenty more Mamma Mia-inspired outfits out there. Roman offers this blue and white shirt dress that reviewers have described as 'smart' and 'fun', making it an ideal choice for spring festivities or weddings.
Alternatively, Boden has this gorgeous version with a Royal blue and white floral print. It's a pricier option at £126, but shoppers can save 15% with the code JM7D.
If you're taken with the Noelle dress, rest assured you're in good company amongst FatFace shoppers. One customer said: "Perfect dress for these hot summer days; the light fabric allows for the body to stay cool while it floats over the body and arm. Love this dress."
Another shared: "This dress is lovely; it fits well and is perfect for the summer. The crinkly fabric means it doesn't crease and will pack well for holidays."
However, not everyone was enamoured by the garment. One buyer wrote: "Lovely dress but needs to go back too long for me."
Similarly, price was a sticking point for another reviewer, who said: "Lovely dress, but honestly a little on the pricey side. It's lightweight for summer, the side slit and pockets are good, fit flattering, and the pattern dimension changes make it eye-catching, but not worth the £75+ price tag."
On a more positive note, another shopper eventually warmed up to the piece: "I wasn't sure about this dress at first, but it's grown on me. I love the long gathered sleeves, and the smaller pattern size on the bodice is a clever design touch."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'I visited popular London park and couldn't believe how much deck chair hire cost'
A tourist in London filmed herself looking at the prices for deck chair hire in a popular park in the capital, as even using one for an hour can incur a hefty cost A London visitor has been left gobsmacked by the unexpected expense of hiring a deck chair in Hyde Park, taking to social media to vent her frustration over the additional cost of living sting. Nadia Scott shared her disbelief on TikTok, showing a sign in Westminster's iconic Grade I-listed park that listed the rental prices. "So we're in London and they're charging £4 an hour to sit down," she exclaimed. "You can sit down for two hours for £5.50, £6.50 for three hours and £14 to sit on your a**e all day." She went on to highlight the sea of unoccupied chairs, suggesting most people were too savvy to fork out when they could simply sit on the grass at no cost. And when asked for her thoughts, Nadia's friend, Molly, bluntly remarked: "You've got be having a f*****g laugh." The park's signage also mentions a reduced rate for concessions (students, seniors over 65, and disabled persons), and even season tickets for frequent visitors, costing £180 for standard and £80 for concessions. Reacting to the clip, one TikTok user noted: "The bedrock of capitalism is supply and demand... the only reason this exists is because people are willing to pay for it." Another criticised: "Fair enough to charge for the chairs but those particular prices are extortionate!". And a third disgruntled individual remarked: "I wouldn't mind if it was some luxury chair, leather, Bluetooth, or massage, but they're chairs from the Victorian era." WARNING – explicit language in video below, viewer discretion advised. However, not everyone is critical of the deck chair rental scheme. One person defended the concept, explaining: "You're not paying to sit. You're paying to use the chair. It's a business and a service and optional." Whilst a second quizzed: "So what's the problem? If its too expensive for you then you're not the target audience. Not everything has to be good value to everyone." Promoting their offering on the web, Parkdeck Chairs Ltd, the enterprise behind the deck chair hire initiative, proclaims: "We believe London's parks are sanctuaries where people relax, connect, and enjoy nature. Our mission is to enhance these beautiful spaces by providing high-quality, comfortable, and sustainable deckchair services." The company further commits to environmental stewardship, stating: "We are committed to preserving these treasured green spaces through eco-conscious practices, responsibly sourced materials, and a service that supports both people and the planet." The service extends to several Royal parks including The Regent's Park, Kensington Gardens, St. James's Park, and The Green Park. These deck chairs are up for grabs from March to October, available during daylight hours, provided the weather plays along.
Daily Mirror
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Is this colour the secret to a proposal? Princess Diana's niece adds fuel to the theory
As Princess Diana's lookalike niece, Lady Eliza Spencer, gets engaged, we look at why her outfit-of-choice may have prompted the proposal Princess Diana's niece, Lady Eliza Spencer, has officially said 'yes'– and her proposal look is turning into a talked-about style moment. At age 33, Eliza accepted longtime partner Channing Millerd's proposal during a romantic Santorini getaway, announcing the happy news via Instagram with the caption 'Forever and Ever'. In the romantic snaps, Eliza, who bears a striking resemblance to her aunt Diana, stands in a deep red satin midaxi dress, simple sandals and delicate gold jewellery. The bold red hue immediately brings to mind the so-called 'red nail theory', or more broadly, the 'romantic red effect'. TikTok users and colour psychologists suggest wearing red can increase perceived attractiveness or even spur proposals, partly because red is linked to confidence, passion and subliminal cues. This theory has now widely circulated on social media, and can be traced all the way back to 2021 when US influencer Bridget Bahl got engaged to her now-husband with bright red nails. She went on to say that she believed the red colour played a big part in the proposal happening that weekend, since she'd worn neutral nails for months around that weekend in the hope of a proposal. Despite mixed (alright, very little) scientific backing, it's clear that red still feels loaded with symbolic power. Lady Eliza's choice feels deliberate, and at the very least, incredibly chic. It's no secret that red evokes romance and boldness, and an already devoted partner might just feel inspired. Whether or not it triggered the proposal, a red dress in that Greek sunset light made the whole moment feel almost cinematic. Lady Eliza follows in the glam footsteps of her aunt, the late Princess Diana, who also favoured a red nail and a red dress combination. Most famously, her look for the ballet in March 1992 (just a few months before Eliza was born) showed how the colour can be worn to look regal and romantic, rather than harsh. So, whether she was mimicking her aunt's style, subtly prompting a proposal, or just dressing for the romantic scenery, we think Lady Eliza's dress choice was the perfect one for the occasion. So if you have a special (or hopefully a special) date coming up that you want to look your best for, here's how to shop her look. Shop Lady Eliza's red engagement dress Her exact dress looks to be Reformation's Casette Silk Dress in the deep red shade, £348, however, the red shade has sold out. You can pick up the midaxi piece in six other shades, though, should you like that exact silhouette. For an almost identical alternative to the red dress she wears in the engagement photos, Reiss' Alula Back Detail Midi Dress in Red, £240, is an excellent pick. If you're looking for a cheaper lookalike, Pretty Little Thing's Red Satin High Neck Ruched Detail Dress, £32, will give you Lady Eliza's look for less. And of course, for nails, you can beat Essie's iconic Not Red-y For Bed, £8.99.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'If Prince Harry had whacked his Uncle Andrew, we'd all think better of him for it'
Prince Harry says he never punched his Uncle Andrew. Fleet Street Fox thinks it's an opportunity missed Picture the scene: a gilded corridor, the back seat of an armoured Rolls Royce, or perhaps while perusing the breakfast kippers at a highly-shined table groaning with silverware. In the red-haired corner, Prince Harry, Duke of Taking Offence. Opposite him stands Prince Andrew, the Duke of Being As Offensive As Possible. And at stake in this clash of purposeless privilege, a chance to claim the crown as The Spare The World Could Most Easily Spare. Words were exchanged, or maybe not. Punches were thrown, claims a Royal author, although that seems unlikely between two soft-handed manbabies more inclined to call lawyers. And Andrew was left with "a bloody nose" after "Harry got the better" of him, which sounds about as realistic as suggesting one pebble outwitted a different pebble. Never mind the daftness of it all. Prince Harry's reps have let it be known no such confrontation ever took place. In one self-defeating PR masterclass, the Spare Who Cares has put more of a dent in his own reputation, and we've all been denied the fun of picturing blood spurting from the nose of Not My Handsy Andy. Because if Harry had socked it to the man who has done more to wreck the Royal Family's reputation than Meghan's Oprah interview, Fergie's toe-sucking, Prince Phillip's gaffes, and Princess Diana being in the orbit of Mohammed al Fayed all rolled into one, there's no-one would think any the less of him for it. In fact, he'd probably earn new fans, some of them Royal. The nation's patience with Prince Andrew has been running on empty for decades, with questionable property deals, friendships, and Wikileaks reports about a trade envoy who seems to have done more to damage Britain's reputation than enhance it. Throw in a disputed trip to Pizza Express in Woking and images of him behaving "if anything, too honourably" by flying to New York to tell a convicted paedophile they couldn't be friends any more, and Prince Andrew is arguably the one spare we could have done without. It's not like Edward doesn't need the work. And while of COURSE bopping each other on the nose is no way to behave and violence must never be condoned, it's hard not to think that the occasional clip round the ear might not make princes more impressive people. The government is, after all, telling us today to be "more resilient". For us that may mean stockpiling batteries and spam, because we already know what a hard knock feels like. For these two princes, though, resilience seems to be as much of a second thought as how to empty a vacuum cleaner, or wondering who combs the gravel. Henry I was a spare as well, educated in Latin and never meant to be king. When his older brother William Rufus died in a freak hunting accident, the younger brother left his corpse on the forest floor and hightailed it to seize the Royal Treasury. His ruthlessness cannot be unrelated to the fact the Royal Family was only one generation away from illegitimacy, and the crown was by no means safe. The Wars of the Roses saw cousins grabbing and losing the crown, murdering and massacring thousands. The eventual winner, one Henry Tudor, is the most likely culprit for the murder of his own two young nephews and rivals, the Princes in the Tower. If a minor Welsh landowner wants to be Royal, he'll fight anyone for it. And the most famous spare of all went on, after his brother's early death, to marry the widow, enrich himself by smashing the monasteries, murder two wives, ruin the lives of three more, and only let Anne of Cleves have some peace and quiet because he thought her too fugly to bother with. Henry VIII was a monster, and Anne Boleyn was his Meghan Markle. It's not uncommon for Henrys to be a bit fighty. Nor is it unheard of for them to be spares who grab what power they can. It's highly likely, though, that if Henrys I to VIII knew their latest iteration had moved to California and decided to become a mental health advocate, they would raise a Royal eyebrow. So if our current version of the prodigal son had given his rotten uncle a taste of Windsor knuckle, it would be both unsurprising and sort-of fulfilling - it is what younger brothers are for, especially in this family. Battered by criticism and searching for relevance, if Harry had been able to show that he could see as clearly as we do what Prince Andrew is and deserves, he'd be resonating with the public in the same way as Henry V at Agincourt. The problem with modern princes is they grew up without risk. If they fell out of a tree, someone would chop it down. If they hurt themselves, three servants would fix it. They click their fingers, and the gravel combs itself. In the stables at Sandringham is a battery-powered replica of James Bond's Aston Martin DB5, gifted to Andrew by the car company after Dr No came out. It has hand-tooled leather seats and a rotating number plate. How can any boy with a childhood like that grow up NOT to be begging for some sort of comeuppance? Harry himself might be less of a whiner if someone had told him bluntly that in The Firm it takes an act of God to get promoted, so he'd better start praying or get a proper job. Sometimes the right thing to do is the one thing nobody dares to do, and in this case a punch might have done more than land a well-deserved wallop. It might have restored a bit of faith that the Windsors actually know which way is up.
