
Additional Phoenix PD reforms will follow new use-of-force policy
State of play: The department expects to have policies ready for public comment in April on the use of police dogs, youth interactions, permitting, and data collection on stops, searches and arrests.
In May, draft policies will be ready for review on unattended, seized or impounded property.
And in September, draft policies on accountability are expected.
Why it matters: The policies will address issues raised in the U.S. Department of Justice's civil rights investigation, which found numerous Phoenix PD patterns and practices that violated constitutional rights.
The intrigue: Phoenix PD says it's committed to moving forward with reforms regardless of what happens with federal civil rights investigations under the Trump administration, which is expected to take a much more hands-off approach than the Biden administration.
Zoom in: The department also expects to craft new policies over the next few months on "First Amendment facilitation and management" to guide how officers respond to large-scale gatherings, vehicle and pedestrian stops, and cultural competency training, among other areas.
What's next: After a policy goes up for public comment, it still could take a while before it goes into effect.
Once that process is finished, the department needs to create a required training for each new policy.
As an example, implementation of the new use-of-force policy took two years.
Yes, but: PPD spokesperson Ryan Cody told Axios that most new policies probably won't take as long to implement as the use-of-force guidelines, which received more than 800 public comments.
Catch up quick: The DOJ last June released the findings of a three-year civil rights investigation into Phoenix police in which the agency found patterns of:
Excessive use of force, including unnecessary deadly force.
Arresting people experiencing homelessness without reasonable suspicion of crimes and improperly seizing or destroying their property.
Engaging in discriminatory enforcement against Black, Latino and Native American people.
Violating the rights of protesters engaging in constitutionally protected speech.
Discriminatory enforcement against people with behavioral health problems.
Driving the news: PPD last week released its new policy stating that officers should use only force that's "necessary and proportional to effectively and safely resolve an incident," in addition to the previous standard that force be "reasonable."
The new policy also requires that all incidents in which force is used be reported.
In a statement announcing the new policy, interim police chief Michael Sullivan said the department made sure its criteria for using force were more clearly defined than in the previous policy.
The policy is the result of two years' worth of effort that began shortly after Sullivan's hiring in 2022, about a year into the DOJ investigation.
What they're saying: The Phoenix Law Enforcement Association (PLEA), the union representing PPD officers, described the new use-of-force policy as confusing.
PLEA president Darrell Kriplean told KTAR the new proportionality requirement is too subjective, expressing concerns that officers could be hurt if they're too slow to react to a threat because of the policy.
Cody told Axios the addition of the "necessary and proportional" requirement was intended to more clearly define the "reasonable" standard, which was somewhat vague and subjective.
What we're watching: Phoenix is looking for a new, permanent police chief.
The city expects to have a list of finalists next month and to announce a new chief in April.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP senator: US stake in Intel would be ‘step toward socialism'
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a libertarian-minded Republican, criticized the Trump administration's push to acquire a stake in U.S. chipmaker Intel, suggesting the move would be a 'step toward socialism.' 'If socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldn't the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism?' Paul said on Wednesday in a post on the social platform X. 'Terrible idea,' he added, linking to a news story about the latest effort. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10 percent stake in the company, which would make the U.S. government one of Intel's largest shareholders. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that the money for the stake would come from previously allocated Biden-era funding. Media reports have suggested that the stake would be in exchange for converting grants pledged to Intel under the CHIPS and Science Act. 'The president figures out that we should get, America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'I mean, that is exactly Donald Trump's perspective, which is, why are we giving a company worth $100 billion this kind of money?' he continued. 'What is in it for the American taxpayer? And the answer Donald Trump has is we should get an equity stake for our money.' Paul has long pushed for the federal government to play a smaller role in the daily lives of Americans and the U.S. economy. He voted against Trump's legacy-defining policy bill, citing concerns about increased spending and the national debt.


New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Texas House passes redistricting bill stalled by AWOL Democrats
The Texas House on Wednesday passed a highly contentious, mid-decade redistricting bill – just days after dozens of Democratic lawmakers returned to Austin, ending a two-week-long effort to block the legislation backed by President Trump. In a 88-52 party-line vote, Republican state lawmakers approved the newly drawn congressional map, which could net the GOP up to five additional seats in Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm election. In the partisan showdown over House Bill 4, Democrats fumed over the timing of the redistricting push and also claimed the legislation undermined minority representation, violated voting rights protections and lacked public input. Advertisement 3 More than 50 Democrats stalled House Bill 4 for about two weeks after they fled the state capital earlier this month. REUTERS State Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins (D), one of several Democrats who fled to Chicago prevent the House from establishing a quorum, accused Republicans of drawing up the new map 'in the cloak of darkness' and not giving the Texas Legislative Black Caucus – which she said, 'potentially will lose two seats' – a 'role in this process.' State Rep. Todd Hunter (R), the author of the bill, shot back: 'You absolutely did … but you left 17 to 18 days.' Advertisement 'Now you're getting on the microphone saying, why didn't I involve you? Well, I wasn't going across state lines to find you. I was here,' Hunter continued. 'Don't come into this body and say we didn't include you – You left us for 18 days, and that's wrong,' he later added. In defense of the legality of the effort, Hunter argued that 'redistricting can be done at any point in time.' 'The underlying goal of this plan is straightforward: improve Republican political performance,' he added, noting that he believes Supreme Court precedent is on his side. Advertisement Countering claims that minority Texas residents are being harmed by redistricting, Hunter noted that 'four of the five new seats are hispanic majority … that's a pretty strong message, and it's good.' 3 The Texas Capitol filled with protesters ahead of debate on the redistricting bill. AP 3 Democratic Texas Rep. Mihaela Plesa on Tuesday tore up the Department of Public Safety escort form that Democrats returning to the state capital were forced to sign in order to leave the chamber. Getty Images Of the more than 50 state Democratic lawmakers that fled the state capital earlier this month in opposition to House Bill 4, 20 were listed as absent for Wednesday's session, however several appeared to show up before the final vote. Advertisement The Rotunda at the Texas Capitol filled up with protesters opposed to redistricting on the morning of the final vote. The gallery also had to be warned on several occasion to not applaud Democrats debating against the measure. The Republican-controlled House shot down all 12 Democrat-proposed amendments ahead of the vote, including a bid to block the implementation of the new map until the federal government releases files related to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats, in an attempt to stretch out the debate, also sought to add amendments delaying the new map from taking effect until 2028 and linking implementation to the establishment of an independent redistricting commission and a federal court ruling that the map does not suppress minority voters. The majority of the missing Dems returned Monday – amid threats of arrest, removal from office and after paychecks began being withheld – and were only allowed to leave the chamber after they agreed to be released into the custody of a Department of Public Safety officer, who would ensure they return for the redistricting vote. Texas state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) refused to sign the permission slip imposed by Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows and slept in the chamber for the two nights leading up to the vote. The runaway lawmakers decided to make their return after an initial special session was adjourned Friday and after California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced plans to redraw district lines in the Golden State in a bid to cancel out the Texas GOP's new map.. The Texas House Democratic Caucus said in a statement that they would 'launch the next phase in their fight against the racist gerrymander that provoked a weeks-long standoff with Governor [Greg] Abbott and President Trump.' 'Don't delete your emails, don't delete your text messages,' state Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer (D) – one of several Democrats promising a legal challenge to the new map – warned Republican lawmakers just before the vote.

16 minutes ago
Trump calls on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to resign
President Donald Trump on Wednesday called on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to resign, citing an allegation of potential mortgage fraud. "Cook must resign, now!!!" Trump wrote on his social media platform. Earlier Wednesday, Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, posted on the social media platform X part of an Aug. 15 letter sent to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi accusing Cook of falsifying bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, "potentially committing mortgage fraud," the letter stated. Trump's post included a link to a Bloomberg report about Pulte's request for an investigation. In a statement provided to ABC, Cook said she learned from the media about Pulte's letter seeking a criminal referral over the mortgage application, which predated her time with the Federal Reserve. "I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet," Cook said in the statement. "I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts." Trump's call for Cook to step down comes as he has repeatedly denounced Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell, whom he has dubbed "too late Powell" for not cutting interest rates as well as a "stubborn mule" and "numbskull." Cook was nominated to serve on the board of governors in 2022 by former President Joe Biden. Her term runs until January 2038. Cook is the first Black woman in history to serve on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Trump appears to be rallying for another open seat on the board, which would allow him to appoint someone more aligned with his views. The president was able to nominate a Federal Reserve governor almost six months ahead of schedule when Adriana Kugler announced earlier this month she was stepping down. The president picked Stephen Miran to temporarily serve on the Fed board. If Miran is confirmed by the Senate in time, he could be on the board for its September meeting.