Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to hear challenges to the state's congressional district boundaries
MADISON, Wis. — The liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to hear challenges brought by Democrats seeking to throw out the battleground state's current congressional district boundaries before the 2026 midterms.
The decisions, made without explanation from the court, is a setback for Democrats who had hoped for new, friendlier district boundary lines in Wisconsin as they attempt to win back control of the House next year.
Democrats asked the court to redraw the maps, which would have put two of the state's six congressional seats currently held by Republicans into play. It was the second time in as many years that the court had refused to hear the challenges.
Democrats hoped the court would revisit the congressional lines after it ordered state legislative boundaries redrawn. Democrats then picked up seats in the November election.
'It's good that Wisconsin has fair maps at the state level, but we deserve them at the federal level as well,' Democratic U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan said. 'Unfortunately, gerrymandered maps for members of Congress will remain in Wisconsin.'
Attorneys who brought the lawsuits did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.
Republicans hold six of the state's eight U.S. House seats, but only two of those districts are considered competitive.
Two requests to reconsider the congressional boundaries were filed with the court, which is controlled 4-3 by liberal justices. One came from the Elias Law Group, which represents Democratic groups and candidates, and the other came on behalf of voters by Campaign Legal Center.
Democrats argued that the court's decision to redraw maps for state legislative districts a couple years ago opened the door to revisiting maps for U.S. House districts. They also argued that the current map violates the state constitution's requirement that all Wisconsin residents be treated equally.
In 2010, the year before Republicans redrew the congressional maps, Democrats held five seats compared with three for Republicans.
The current congressional maps, drawn by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, were approved by the state Supreme Court when it was controlled by conservative judges. The U.S. Supreme Court in March 2022 declined to block them from taking effect. And last year the state Supreme Court rejected a request to reconsider the maps without giving a reason as to why.
One of the seats that Democrats hope to flip is in western Wisconsin. Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden won an open seat in 2022 after longtime Democratic Rep. Ron Kind retired. Von Orden won reelection in the 3rd District in 2024.
The other seat they are eyeing is southeastern Wisconsin's 1st District. Republican Rep. Bryan Steil has held it since 2019. The latest maps made that district more competitive but still favor Republicans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., was ebullient Tuesday afternoon. The South Dakota Republican just concluded a lengthy lunch meeting with fellow GOPers and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about the Big, Beautiful Bill. "Good afternoon. Everybody having fun yet?" Thune asked the Congressional press corps as he approached the microphone in the Ohio Clock Corridor of the Capitol for his weekly exchange with reporters. "Ask us around 3:45 Sunday morning," suggested yours truly. Reporter's Notebook: Marathon Weekend Awaits Senate As Johnson Prepares House For 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Battle If you are an insomniac… Read On The Fox News App Or don't want to see the National Symphony Orchestra Pops perform Dolly Parton's musical canon at the Kennedy Center… Or you don't have tickets to see the Savannah Bananas play at Nats Park this weekend… The U.S. Senate may be the place for you. Action on the Big, Beautiful Bill could happen at any time of the day or night this weekend. The Senate is attempting to pass the Big, Beautiful Bill sometime on Saturday or Sunday. Maybe even early Monday. Presuming Senate Republicans can pass the bill. "If the bill is going to pass, do you expect that you at least have two or three members on your side who would vote no?" I asked Thune. "Could be," replied Thune. "Why?" I countered. "Well, we've got a lot of very independent thinking senators who have reasons and things that they'd like to have in this bill that would, in their view, make it stronger," answered Thune. "Hopefully when push comes to shove and everybody has to say yes or no, we'll get the number of votes that we need." House Conservatives Go To War With Senate Over Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' There's more political pushing and shoving in the U.S. Senate than there is in a line of fourth graders waiting for the water fountain after recess. And senators may advance beyond pushing and shoving to actual fighting as Republicans grouse about the bill's contents. It's about the math. Senate Republicans can still lose three votes and pass the bill with a tie-breaking vote by Vice President Vance. Fox was told that the bill was in trouble if there are ten potential noes now. But if the universe of prospective nays is only five, they can probably whittle that down enough to pass the bill. Here are the GOP senators worth keeping an eye on because of possible problems they could have with particular provisions in the legislation: Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., Rick Scott, R-Fla., Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Mike Lee, R-Utah, John Kennedy, R-La., Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Susan Collins, R-Maine, John Curtis, R-Utah and Jim Justice, R-W.V. That's 11. And many of those on the list could vote yes. They may hold out until the end to either score a provision in the bill they want. Or, they want to understand the final product. "We don't know what's in the bill. The parliamentarian has thrown out some provisions," said Kennedy. "Look, I'm labor. I'm not management. But I got one vote, the same as management does. And I'm willing to work nights. I'm willing to work weekends. But what I'm not willing to do is have someone pat me on the head and say 'shut up and just vote for it.'" Kennedy said he unearthed "a few things in this bill that we weren't told about. And I'm not happy." With hat tips to boxing analysts Al Bernstein and Larry Merchant, Thune reverted to discussing the physicality of senators. "When push comes to shove, you're looking at whether or not you're going to allow the perfect to become the enemy," said Thune. "You have to recognize that this is a process whereby everybody doesn't get everything they want." Senate Gop Aims To Approve Major Legislation Next Week As Trump Touts Party Unity One of the most outstanding issues remains SALT, the deduction for state and local taxes in high-tax states. "We'll have a solution on that in 24 to 48 hours," said Bessent after his huddle with GOP senators. "I know that there are a lot of conservatives who don't like it," said White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Fox Business. "A lot of very important people in the House, who want it as big as it can be. And, Secretary Bessent is in there working with people to find exactly the right number that'll land the bill." So when does the Senate finish? "The question of when will the Senate get it done, that's a great question," said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo. "They've had it for over six weeks. I'm waiting." The Senate will likely take a procedural vote to formally get on the bill on Friday. If the Senate votes to get on the bill, 20 hours of clock time starts to run under special Senate budget rules. The procedural vote only needs a simple majority. The 20 hours of time is split. Democrats will probably burn all 10 of their hours. Republicans will use a few of their hours. So, the Senate probably begins its "vote-a-rama" on the bill late in the wee hours of Saturday morning. A "vote-a-rama" is where the Senate takes hours and hours of consecutive roll call votes on amendments to the package. It would culminate with passage of the Big, Beautiful Bill in the Senate late Saturday or early Sunday. Senate Republicans Look To Sweeten Medicaid Pot To Silence Dissent On Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Note that it is impossible to game out when this could happen. But frankly, a final vote could come at any time of the day or night all weekend long – if not early Monday. Also, this scenario presumes everything goes swimmingly. The most recent vote-a-rama ran just under ten hours earlier this year. A 2021 vote-a-rama consumed 14 hours and 48 minutes, with the Senate considering a total of 40 amendments. We believe this vote-a-rama might be on the longer end. Here's the other wild card: How fast can the House pivot to pass the bill and align with the Senate? House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., signaled the House may aim to vote on Tuesday. Also, the "72-hour rule" to allow the House to read the bill before voting does not apply. The Senate is sending back to the House an "amendment" to the original House plan. Thus, the "72-hour rule" is not in play under these circumstances. However, the question is if Johnson faces pressure to let the bill marinate for a few days. Trump Pressures Congress To Pass 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Insisting 'No One Goes On Vacation Until It's Done' But some House conservatives aren't happy with the Senate measure. "We're not going to get jammed on this. We're just not," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, believes the Senate should just accept the House measure – since the House could barely pass its version in May. "We did the hard work of threading a very tight needle with this legislation. So it does not need to come back looking too much different from what we ended up passing out of the House," said Pfluger. So the question is whether the Senate can pass its bill. And if the House can accept whatever the Senate passes. So, as I said, if you don't have a lot to do this weekend, Capitol Hill may be the spot to be. Especially at 3:45 Sunday article source: A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Mamdani says his platform would be successful with candidates outside of NYC
New York State Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, who appears to have secured a win in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, said Wednesday that his platform would be successful with candidates outside of his city. 'Do you think that is a platform that would work for other candidates running in other parts of the country?' MSNBC's Jen Psaki asked Mamdani in an interview on 'The Briefing.' 'Absolutely. I think ultimately, this is a campaign about inequality, and you don't have to live in the most expensive city in the country to have experienced that inequality, because it's a national issue,' Mamdani responded. 'And what Americans coast to coast are looking for are people who will fight for them, not just believe in the things that resonate with their lives, but actually fight and deliver on those very things,' he added. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, shocked American political observers Tuesday as he seemed to be on the path to winning the Democratic nomination for the Big Apple's mayoral race over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. He immigrated to the U.S. from Uganda as a child and has spent most of his life in the nation's biggest city. If Mamdani clinches New York City's top job, he would be its first Muslim and Asian mayor. The results will be final by July 1. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a recent interview that former Vice President Harris would be president if she had used the same campaign playbook as Mamdani. 'Look, he ran a brilliant campaign. And it wasn't just him. What he understood and understands — campaign's not over — is that to run a brilliant campaign, you have to run a grassroots campaign,' Sanders told Politico Magazine in a piece published Wednesday.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Top Andrew Cuomo Donor Didn't Even Rank Him First In NYC Primary
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A top donor to former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's super PAC on Wednesday said he did not rank the candidate as his first choice in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. The donor, investor Mark Gorton, also told The New York Times he will likely throw his support behind Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old state assemblyman who on Tuesday toppled Cuomo in a stunning political upset, all but clinching the Democratic nomination. Newsweek reached out to a spokesperson for Cuomo for comment via email on Wednesday. Why It Matters Mamdani's insurgent campaign sent shock waves through the political sphere, overcoming tens of millions of super PAC dollars poured into Cuomo's campaign and endorsements from Democratic heavy hitters including former President Bill Clinton and ex-New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg. Mamdani's campaign, conversely, was fueled by grassroots support and endorsements from progressive giants like New York U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and independent Vermont U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, campaigned on rent freezes in the city, eliminating bus fares and increasing taxes on wealthy New Yorkers. Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks at his primary election party on June 25 in New York City. Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks at his primary election party on June 25 in New York City. Heather Khalifa/AP What To Know Gorton gave $250,000 to Cuomo's "Fix the City" super PAC but told the Times he ranked New York City Comptroller Brad Lander as his first choice for mayor. He added that he will likely support Mamdani because Lander and the state assemblyman cross-endorsed each other in the mayoral race. "I feel like people misunderstood my $250,000 for Cuomo for real enthusiasm," Gorton told the Times. "It was basically, 'Oh, looks like Cuomo is coming back. We don't want to be shut out. Let's try and get on his good side.'" Cuomo, who resigned from office in 2021 amid a cloud of sexual harassment allegations, largely represented the old guard of the Democratic Party. After launching his mayoral campaign in March, Cuomo was sharply criticized by his primary opponents for skipping candidate forums, making few public appearances and coasting on name recognition (his father, Mario, served as New York governor from 1983 to 1994). Cuomo conceded to Mamdani less than two hours after polls closed on Tuesday, when it became clear his campaign would not overcome the 7-point lead held by Mamdani. As of 10:18 p.m. ET Wednesday, 93 percent of the votes had been counted and the Associated Press (AP) had not called the race. But Mamdani, who stood at 43.5 percent support, will almost certainly be the Democratic mayoral nominee, though it will be several days until a final outcome is announced, due to New York City's ranked choice voting system. AP projected that no one candidate will get more than 50 percent of first-choice votes in the first round, meaning the candidate who's ranked first by the fewest number of voters will have their votes redistributed to voters' second-choice candidate. Voting will continue until there are two candidates left, at which point whoever has the most votes will be declared the victor. What People Are Saying Mamdani declared victory on Tuesday night, telling supporters at an election night party in Long Island City: "I will be the mayor for every New Yorker, whether you voted for me, for Governor Cuomo or felt too disillusioned by a long-broken political system to vote at all. I will fight for a city that works for you, that is affordable for you, that is safe for you, I will work to be a mayor you will be proud to call your own." Cuomo called Mamdani to concede and later congratulated him at his own election night party, telling supporters: "Tonight was not our night. Tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani's night." Cuomo went on to say his opponent "inspired [voters] and moved them and got them to come out and vote. He really ran a highly impactful campaign." Lander said at his election night party: "This much is clear: Together, we are sending Andrew Cuomo back to the suburbs. With our help, Zohran Mamdani will be the Democratic nominee." Ocasio-Cortez applauded Mamdani, writing on X: "Congratulations, @ZohranKMamdani! Your dedication to an affordable, welcoming, and safe New York City where working families can have a shot has inspired people across the city. Billionaires and lobbyists poured millions against you and our public finance system. And you won." What Happens Next Cuomo bowed out of the Democratic primary on Tuesday but has still secured an independent line on the mayoral ballot. He told CBS News that he's considering staying in the race: "The Democratic primary is always an interesting situation, right? There are about 5 million voters in New York City, there are about 8 million people in New York City, and about 1 million people vote in the Democratic primary. So it's not necessarily representative of the city at large." He added: "That's why I qualified for an independent line in November, I did that several months ago, because in the general election, more people come out to vote. It's a broader pool, if you will, of New Yorkers, more representative pool of New Yorkers."
